volume 20 issue 4 (december 2000) : 271-272

HYBRIDIZATION METHOD IN CHICKPEA

P
P.P. Arora
A
A.S. Jeena
1Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding G.B. Pant University of Agricultural and Technology,Pantnagar-263 145, India
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Arora P.P., Jeena A.S. (2025). HYBRIDIZATION METHOD IN CHICKPEA. Agricultural Science Digest. 20(4): 271-272. doi: .
Two lines with white flower (PG-82-1, L-550) and two lines with pink flower (Pant G114,
C235) were planted for crossing In chickpea, using pink flowered lines as male parents. Three
hundred selected buds in each cross were poUinated with 'and without emasculation, respectively.
In the FI' plants with pink flowers ranged from 6.00% to 10.33% and from 17.66% to 24.66%
with an average of 8.08% and 21.66% in method I and method II respectively. It indicates that
method II (without emasculation) of hybridization can be efficiently used in presence of marker
gene.
    1. Arora, P.P. and Singh, I.S. (1990). Int. chickpea Newsl. 23 : 11-12.
    2. Arora, P.P. and Singh, I.S. (1985).lndianJ. Genet, PI. BreedingSyrn. Proc. Vol. II: 984-986,
    3. Dahiya, B.S. (1974). Indian J. Genet. 34 : 206-207.
    4. Pundir, R.P.S. and Reddy, K.N. (1984). Int. Chickpea NewsJ. 11 : 9-11.
    5. Reting, G. (1971). Israel. J. Agric. Res. 21 : 113.
    6. Singh, N. (1986). Pulse Crop NewsJ. 6: 17.
    volume 20 issue 4 (december 2000) : 271-272

    HYBRIDIZATION METHOD IN CHICKPEA

    P
    P.P. Arora
    A
    A.S. Jeena
    1Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding G.B. Pant University of Agricultural and Technology,Pantnagar-263 145, India
    • Submitted|

    • First Online |

    • doi

    Cite article:- Arora P.P., Jeena A.S. (2025). HYBRIDIZATION METHOD IN CHICKPEA. Agricultural Science Digest. 20(4): 271-272. doi: .
    Two lines with white flower (PG-82-1, L-550) and two lines with pink flower (Pant G114,
    C235) were planted for crossing In chickpea, using pink flowered lines as male parents. Three
    hundred selected buds in each cross were poUinated with 'and without emasculation, respectively.
    In the FI' plants with pink flowers ranged from 6.00% to 10.33% and from 17.66% to 24.66%
    with an average of 8.08% and 21.66% in method I and method II respectively. It indicates that
    method II (without emasculation) of hybridization can be efficiently used in presence of marker
    gene.
      1. Arora, P.P. and Singh, I.S. (1990). Int. chickpea Newsl. 23 : 11-12.
      2. Arora, P.P. and Singh, I.S. (1985).lndianJ. Genet, PI. BreedingSyrn. Proc. Vol. II: 984-986,
      3. Dahiya, B.S. (1974). Indian J. Genet. 34 : 206-207.
      4. Pundir, R.P.S. and Reddy, K.N. (1984). Int. Chickpea NewsJ. 11 : 9-11.
      5. Reting, G. (1971). Israel. J. Agric. Res. 21 : 113.
      6. Singh, N. (1986). Pulse Crop NewsJ. 6: 17.
      In this Article
      Published In
      Agricultural Science Digest

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)