Banner

Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.176, CiteScore: 0.357

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Agricultural Science Digest, volume 20 issue 2 (june 2000) : 129-130

SCREENING OF SOME BRINJAL CULTIVARs AGAINST BACTERIAL WILT AND FRUITBORER

D.R. Chaudhary, S.D. Sharma
1Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Bajaura-175 125, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Chaudhary D.R., Sharma S.D. (2025). SCREENING OF SOME BRINJAL CULTIVARs AGAINST BACTERIAL WILT AND FRUITBORER. Agricultural Science Digest. 20(2): 129-130. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Nine genotypes of brlnjal (Solanum melongena L.) viz., Arka Kesav, Arka Neelkanth,
Hisar Shyamal, Pusa Purple Cluster, Pusa Purple Long, SM 6-6, SM 6-7, Arka Nldhl and
Punjab Barsatl were evaluated from 1996·98 for the incidence of bacterial wilt and attack of
fruit and shoot borer In mid hills of Himachal Pradesh. The genotypes Arka Kesav, Arka
Neelkanth, Arka Nldhl and SM 6·6 were observed to be resistant to bacterial wilt whereas
fruit borer incidence In these varieties varied from 2.88 (Arka Kesav) to 5.64 (SM 6·6) per
cent. Apart from this, these cultlvars also possessed good agronomic traits.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Dhankhar, B.S., et a1. (1977) Haryana J. Hart. Sci., 6: 50-58.
    2. Mukherjee, R. and Mukhopadhayay, S. (1982). Veg. Sci. 9: 122-125.
    3. Peshwani. K.M. and Lal, R. (!964) Indian J. Ent. 26 : 112-113.
    4. Sood, A.K. and Singh, B.M. (1992) In : International Bacterial Wilt Symposium held at Tiwan, Ort. 28-31 pp38.
    Reviewed By

    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)