Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.176, CiteScore: 0.357

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Agricultural Science Digest, volume 20 issue 2 (june 2000) : 78-80

EFFECT OF SHADE BY WINDBREAK AND DIRECTION OF FRUITS ON TREE ON FRUIT QUALITY IN NAGPUR MANDARIN (CITRUS-RETICULATA BlANCO)

S.M. Ghawade. S.M. Dadmal. B.W. Taral, S.R. Katole
1AICRP (CitM), Dr. P.D.K.V., Akola - 444 104. India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Taral B.W. Dadmal. S.M. Ghawade. S.M., Katole S.R. (2025). EFFECT OF SHADE BY WINDBREAK AND DIRECTION OF FRUITS ON TREE ON FRUIT QUALITY IN NAGPUR MANDARIN (CITRUS-RETICULATA BlANCO). Agricultural Science Digest. 20(2): 78-80. doi: .

ABSTRACT

The effect of shade and direction of the fruits on the trees on the fruit quality
parameters were studied. Significantly more fruit breadth was recorded in partial shaded
trees than complete shaded trees. Fruits taken from the central direction on the trees showed
significantly more size and weight than those observed in the fruits taken from the other
directions. The trees situated in the complete shade showed the maximum juice content on
juice percentage, T.S.S, Vitamin 'C'. Thus shading by wind breaks does not adversely affect
the fruit quality of Nagpur mandarin trees.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Anonymous (1997-98) District Agricultural Statistical Information of Maharashtra part II.
    2. A.O.A.C (1975) Official Methods of Analysis (12th Ed.) Erl W. Hotwitz A.O.A.c. Washington D.C PP ~":l)
    3. Hilrrling, PL. (1967) Proc. Int. Symp. Sub-Trop 'Inri Trop. Hort., Bangalore PP: 87-89.
    4. ,Iilw,mdil, ,I.S et al (1973) Punjab Hort. ,J. 13 : 21-24.
    5. ,Josiln. ,1.S., et al. (1983) Indian Hort. ,1. 39 : 40-42.
    6. Monga. P.K., et al. (1992) Indian Hort . .J. 49: 321-325.
    Reviewed By

    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)