Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.156

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Agricultural Science Digest, volume 21 issue 3 (september 2001) : 208"' 2()9

INFLUENCE OF PLANT DENSITY AND NPK LEVELS ON mE GROWTH AND YIELD OF SESAME (SESAMUM INDICUML.) GENOTYPES

K. Subrahmaniyan, "N. Aruhtfozni aria P. Kalaiselven
1Regional Research Station Tamil Nadu Agricultural UntQersity, Vridhachaia,? - 606 001, India
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Subrahmaniyan K., Kalaiselven P. aria Aruhtfozni "N. (2024). INFLUENCE OF PLANT DENSITY AND NPK LEVELS ON mE GROWTH AND YIELD OF SESAME (SESAMUM INDICUML.) GENOTYPES. Agricultural Science Digest. 21(3): 208"' 2()9. doi: .
A field experiment was conducted during rabi seasons of 1997–98 and 1998–99 to study the response of sesame genotypes viz., YMV 3, TMV 4, TMV 6, VRI 1 and VS 9104 to two plant densities (1,11,000 and 1,66,000 plants/ha) and two NPK levels (100 and 150 per cent of the recommendetl dose). The pooled results revealed that among the five genotypes, the pre release culture VS 9104 recorded higher number of branches, crop dymatter production and number of capsules/plant and seed yield (777 kg/ha). However it wason par with the variety TMV 6 (772 kg/ha). Under a plant density of 1,11,000 plants/ha (30x30 cm), yield parameters were significantly higher. However a plant population of 1,66,000 plants/ha (30x20cm) significantly recorded a higher seed yield of 768 kg/ha. Increasing NPK levels upto 150 per cent resulted markedly higher yield attributes and a seed yield of 734 kg/ha.
    1. Ghosh, D.C. and Patra, AK (1994). IndianJ. Agron., 39: 71-75.
    2. Gnanar(loorthy, P. etal. (1992) Indian'J.Agron. 37: 858-859.
    3. Majumdar, OK an~ Roy, SK (1992). Indian J. Agron., 37: 758-762.
    4. Ramanathan, S.P.and Chandrasekaran, B. (1998). Indian J. Agron. 43: 329-332.
    5. Subrahmaniyan, K and Arulmozhi, N. (1999). Indian J. Agron. 44:272-274.
    6. Tiwari, KP. and Namdeo, KN. (1997). IndianJ. Agron., 42: 365-369

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)