volume 21 issue 2 (june 2001) : 121 - 123

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT LEVELS OF NITROGEN ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF ONION (ALUUMCEPA L)

D
Dharmendra Kumar
S
Sanjay Kumar
A
Ajay Kumar·
1Department of Horticulture, Institute of Advanced Studies C.C.S. University, Meerut - 250001, India.
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Kumar Dharmendra, Kumar Sanjay, Kumar· Ajay (2025). EFFECT OF DIFFERENT LEVELS OF NITROGEN ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF ONION (ALUUMCEPA L). Agricultural Science Digest. 21(2): 121 - 123. doi: .
130 kg. N2/ha was found better for maximum survival percentage of seedlings, height of the plant, number of green leaves, diameter of pseudostem, minimum no. of days to bulb maturity, maximum number of roots, length of longest root, diameter of bulb, fresh weight of bulb and yield of bulbs in comparison of lower doses i.e. 65 kg. N1/ha and control.
    1. Botcher, H. and Kolbe., G. (1975). Archiv Fur Gert. 23: 143-149.
    2. Dhian Singh and~. R.P. (1991). IndianJ. Agron. 36: 125-126.
    3. EI-Tabbakh, A.E.•at, (1979). Res. Bull. Ain Shams University Faculty ofAgriculture No.991 , 17p.
    4. Hassan, M.S. (1977):'t!iudan Gezira Acta Horticulture No.53: 59-63.
    5. Hassan, M.S. and Ayub, A.T. (1978). Exp. Agric. 14: 29-32.
    6. Herison, C. etal. (1993). Hort. Sci. 28 23-25.
    7. Islam, M.T. and Haque (1977). Bangaladesh Hort. 5: 0-8.
    8. Jitendra and Dhankar, B.S. (1989). Veg. Sci. 16: 136-144.
    9. Kumar, H. et aI. (1998). Indian J. Agric. Res. 32: 134-38.
    10. MlIdan, S.P.S. and Sandhu, J.S. (1983). HaryanaJ. Hort. Sci. 12: 221-223.
    11. Pandey, U.C. and Ekpo, U. (1991). Nigeria Res. AndDeVelop. Reporter 8: 5·Q
    12. Patil, P.Y. et aI. (1986). PKVJ. Res. 8: 67-68.
    13. Saimbhi, M.S. et aI. (1987). PAUJ. Res. 24:407-410.
    14. Singh, K. And Kumar, S. (1969). J. Hort. Res. PAD, 6: 764-768.
    15. Verma, J.P. etal. (1972). Prog. Hart. 4: 57-58.
    16. Vishnu Shukla et aI. (1989). Prog. Hart. 21: 244-245
    volume 21 issue 2 (june 2001) : 121 - 123

    EFFECT OF DIFFERENT LEVELS OF NITROGEN ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF ONION (ALUUMCEPA L)

    D
    Dharmendra Kumar
    S
    Sanjay Kumar
    A
    Ajay Kumar·
    1Department of Horticulture, Institute of Advanced Studies C.C.S. University, Meerut - 250001, India.
    • Submitted|

    • First Online |

    • doi

    Cite article:- Kumar Dharmendra, Kumar Sanjay, Kumar· Ajay (2025). EFFECT OF DIFFERENT LEVELS OF NITROGEN ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF ONION (ALUUMCEPA L). Agricultural Science Digest. 21(2): 121 - 123. doi: .
    130 kg. N2/ha was found better for maximum survival percentage of seedlings, height of the plant, number of green leaves, diameter of pseudostem, minimum no. of days to bulb maturity, maximum number of roots, length of longest root, diameter of bulb, fresh weight of bulb and yield of bulbs in comparison of lower doses i.e. 65 kg. N1/ha and control.
      1. Botcher, H. and Kolbe., G. (1975). Archiv Fur Gert. 23: 143-149.
      2. Dhian Singh and~. R.P. (1991). IndianJ. Agron. 36: 125-126.
      3. EI-Tabbakh, A.E.•at, (1979). Res. Bull. Ain Shams University Faculty ofAgriculture No.991 , 17p.
      4. Hassan, M.S. (1977):'t!iudan Gezira Acta Horticulture No.53: 59-63.
      5. Hassan, M.S. and Ayub, A.T. (1978). Exp. Agric. 14: 29-32.
      6. Herison, C. etal. (1993). Hort. Sci. 28 23-25.
      7. Islam, M.T. and Haque (1977). Bangaladesh Hort. 5: 0-8.
      8. Jitendra and Dhankar, B.S. (1989). Veg. Sci. 16: 136-144.
      9. Kumar, H. et aI. (1998). Indian J. Agric. Res. 32: 134-38.
      10. MlIdan, S.P.S. and Sandhu, J.S. (1983). HaryanaJ. Hort. Sci. 12: 221-223.
      11. Pandey, U.C. and Ekpo, U. (1991). Nigeria Res. AndDeVelop. Reporter 8: 5·Q
      12. Patil, P.Y. et aI. (1986). PKVJ. Res. 8: 67-68.
      13. Saimbhi, M.S. et aI. (1987). PAUJ. Res. 24:407-410.
      14. Singh, K. And Kumar, S. (1969). J. Hort. Res. PAD, 6: 764-768.
      15. Verma, J.P. etal. (1972). Prog. Hart. 4: 57-58.
      16. Vishnu Shukla et aI. (1989). Prog. Hart. 21: 244-245
      In this Article
      Published In
      Agricultural Science Digest

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)