Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.176, CiteScore: 0.357

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Agricultural Science Digest, volume 23 issue 2 (june 2003) : 137 -139

GENETIC VARIABILITY AND CORRELATION STUDIES OF YIELD AND ITS ATTRIBUTING CHARACTERS IN MAIZE (ZE4 MAYS L.)*

M.K. Kabdal, 5.5. Verma, N. Ahmad, U.B.S. Panwar
1Department of Genetic5 and Plant Breeding. G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology. Pantnagar· 263 145, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Kabdal M.K., Verma 5.5., Ahmad N., Panwar U.B.S. (2025). GENETIC VARIABILITY AND CORRELATION STUDIES OF YIELD AND ITS ATTRIBUTING CHARACTERS IN MAIZE (ZE4 MAYS L.)*. Agricultural Science Digest. 23(2): 137 -139. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Streptomycin resistant pathogenic isolates of Pseudomonas mori were recovered from bactelial leaf spot lessions on mulberry leaves sprayed with the antibiotic for disease control. Efforts to detect such straints indicated their presence in 8 of 15 mulberry gardens in intensive sericultural areas of Kamataka. Satisfactory disease control was not possible with streptomycin due to the presence of resistant straints. The isolates were sensitive to tetracycline indicating the reason for successful control of the disease by commercially available agricuItura1 antibiotic Streptocyciine (streptomycin + tetracycline). The study reports for the first time the occurrence of streptomycin resistant strains of P mori in mulberry gardens.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Al-jibouri, H.A. et a/. (1958). Agron. J. 50:633-636.
    2. Allard, RW. (1960). Principles of Plant Breeding. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.
    3. Annapurna, D. eta/. (1998). Crop Res. Hisar 16:205-209.
    4. Debnath, S.C. and SarkaI'. K.R. (1987). Thai. J. Agric. Sci. 20:263-276.
    5. Krishnan, V. and Natrajan. N (1995). MadrasAgric. J. 82: 391-393.
    6. Kumar, A and Kumar, D. (1997). Ann. BioI. Ludhiana. 13(2): 271-273,
    7. Mani, v.P. and Bisht, G.S. (1996). J. HillRes. 9:131-134.
    8. Nawar, A.A. et al. (1998). J. Genet. Plant Breeding, 52: 119-127.
    9. Preciado, E. et a/. (1997). Agronomica Mesoamericana 8(1): 35~43.
    10. Satyanarayanan, E. and Sai Kumar, R. (1996). Curr. Res. Univ. Agric. Sci., Bangalore 25: 10-11.
    11. Searle, S.R. (1961). Biometrics 17:474-480.
    12. Singh, A.i'. eta/. (1998). J. Appl. Bioi., 8(1): 42-45.
    13. Tyagi, A.P. eta/. (1988). Maydica, 33: 109-119.
    14. Verma, R.K. and Singh. T.P. (1979). MysoreJ. Agric. Sci. 13(1): 15-18.
    Reviewed By

    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)