volume 25 issue 3 (september 2005) : 182 - 185

STUDIES ON GROWTH, YIELD AND MINERAL COMPOSITION OF WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUML.) AS AFFECTED BY SOURCES OF NITROGEN

D
Dharmendra Singh
V
Vinay Kumari
1Department of Agricultural Botany, Janta Mahavidyalaya Ajitmal, Auraiya - 206 121 (UP), India
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Singh Dharmendra, Kumari Vinay (2025). STUDIES ON GROWTH, YIELD AND MINERAL COMPOSITION OF WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUML.) AS AFFECTED BY SOURCES OF NITROGEN. Agricultural Science Digest. 25(3): 182 - 185. doi: .
Increased supply of nitrogen increased the growth and yield up to 200 kg nitrogen per hectare. These parameters were higher under nitrate nutrition plants as compared to ammonium nutrition plants. However, these attributes were found to be the maximum under ammonium nitrate in which both sources of nitrogen were present. Content of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium increased in leaves and stem of wheat plant at all the nitrogen levels with sources of nitrogen. Phosphorus showed a decreasing trend under calcium nitrate compared to ammonium sulphate.
    1. Abelel Rehman, KA et aI. (1984). Isotope Radiation Res., 12: 135-14l.
    2. Berttramson, B.R. (1942). PI. Physiol. Lancaster, 17: 447-54.
    3. Blair, G.J. et aI. (1970). Agron. J., 62: 530-32.
    4. Harada, T. et al. (1968). Soil Sci. Pl. Nutr., 14: 47-55.
    5. Humphries, E.C. (1956). In: Modern Methods of Plant Analysis. (Peach, K. and Tracey, M.V. Eds.), SpringerVerlag,
    6. Berlin, Gottingen, Heidelberg, pp.468-502.
    7. Jackson, M.L. (1967). SoU Chemical Analysis. Edn. 1, Eastern Economy, Prentice-Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi,
    8. pp. 135-82. .
    9. Jacob, A. (1958). Magnesium, the Fifth Major Plant Nutrition. Edn. 1. Staples Press Ltd., London, pp. 47-49.
    10. Kirkby, EA (1968). Soil Sci., 105: 133-4l.
    11. Leonce, F.S. and Miller, M.H. (1966). Agron. J., 58: 245-49.
    12. Naftel, JA (1931). J. Am. Soc. AgTon., 23: 142-58.
    13. Stahl. A.L. and Shive, J.w. (1933). Soil Sci., 35: 469-83.
    14. Takahashi, T. and Yoshida, D. (1956). Soil Sci. PI. Fd., 2: 102-105.
    15. Townsend, L.R. (1967). Can. J. Pl. Sci., 47: 555-62.
    16. Woolhouse, H.W. and Hardwick, K. (1966). New Phytol., 65: 518-25.
    volume 25 issue 3 (september 2005) : 182 - 185

    STUDIES ON GROWTH, YIELD AND MINERAL COMPOSITION OF WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUML.) AS AFFECTED BY SOURCES OF NITROGEN

    D
    Dharmendra Singh
    V
    Vinay Kumari
    1Department of Agricultural Botany, Janta Mahavidyalaya Ajitmal, Auraiya - 206 121 (UP), India
    • Submitted|

    • First Online |

    • doi

    Cite article:- Singh Dharmendra, Kumari Vinay (2025). STUDIES ON GROWTH, YIELD AND MINERAL COMPOSITION OF WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUML.) AS AFFECTED BY SOURCES OF NITROGEN. Agricultural Science Digest. 25(3): 182 - 185. doi: .
    Increased supply of nitrogen increased the growth and yield up to 200 kg nitrogen per hectare. These parameters were higher under nitrate nutrition plants as compared to ammonium nutrition plants. However, these attributes were found to be the maximum under ammonium nitrate in which both sources of nitrogen were present. Content of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium increased in leaves and stem of wheat plant at all the nitrogen levels with sources of nitrogen. Phosphorus showed a decreasing trend under calcium nitrate compared to ammonium sulphate.
      1. Abelel Rehman, KA et aI. (1984). Isotope Radiation Res., 12: 135-14l.
      2. Berttramson, B.R. (1942). PI. Physiol. Lancaster, 17: 447-54.
      3. Blair, G.J. et aI. (1970). Agron. J., 62: 530-32.
      4. Harada, T. et al. (1968). Soil Sci. Pl. Nutr., 14: 47-55.
      5. Humphries, E.C. (1956). In: Modern Methods of Plant Analysis. (Peach, K. and Tracey, M.V. Eds.), SpringerVerlag,
      6. Berlin, Gottingen, Heidelberg, pp.468-502.
      7. Jackson, M.L. (1967). SoU Chemical Analysis. Edn. 1, Eastern Economy, Prentice-Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi,
      8. pp. 135-82. .
      9. Jacob, A. (1958). Magnesium, the Fifth Major Plant Nutrition. Edn. 1. Staples Press Ltd., London, pp. 47-49.
      10. Kirkby, EA (1968). Soil Sci., 105: 133-4l.
      11. Leonce, F.S. and Miller, M.H. (1966). Agron. J., 58: 245-49.
      12. Naftel, JA (1931). J. Am. Soc. AgTon., 23: 142-58.
      13. Stahl. A.L. and Shive, J.w. (1933). Soil Sci., 35: 469-83.
      14. Takahashi, T. and Yoshida, D. (1956). Soil Sci. PI. Fd., 2: 102-105.
      15. Townsend, L.R. (1967). Can. J. Pl. Sci., 47: 555-62.
      16. Woolhouse, H.W. and Hardwick, K. (1966). New Phytol., 65: 518-25.
      In this Article
      Published In
      Agricultural Science Digest

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)