Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 26 issue 3 (september 2006) : 191 - 193

RESPONSE OF PEARLMILLET TO WIND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES IN HOT ARID WATERSHED AREAS AFFECTED BY WIND EROSION

T
T.C. Poonia
G
G.D. Singh*
1National Agricultural Technology Project on Watershed Management, Agricultural Research Station, Fatehpur-Shekhawati, Rajasthan - 332 301, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Poonia T.C., Singh* G.D. (2025). RESPONSE OF PEARLMILLET TO WIND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES IN HOT ARID WATERSHED AREAS AFFECTED BY WIND EROSION. Agricultural Science Digest. 26(3): 191 - 193. doi: .

ABSTRACT

A field experiment was conducted during 2001–2002 at farmer's fields in Garinda village (Sikar, Rajasthan) to study the effect of wind erosion control measures on soil and water conservation and production potential of pearlmillet in hot arid watershed areas. The results revealed that vegetative barriers of tree sticks favourably affected the soil and water conservation, growth and yield parameters of pearlmillet. Application of vegetative barriers of tree sticks recorded +7.5 cm soil deposition while control plot recorded soil erosion to the extent of removal of -5.7 cm soil surface. The vegetative barriers of tree sticks recorded 27.6% higher grain yield over control (without barrier) plot.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Bielders, C.L. et al. (1998). In: Proc. of the Expert Group Meeting, 22-25 April 1997, ICARDA, Aleppo.
    2. Bielders. C.L. et al. (2000). Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 64: 1776-85.
    3. Bielders, C.L. et al. (2001). Ann. Arid Zone, 40: 369-394.
    4. Buerkert, A. and Lamers, J.P.A. (1999). PI. Soil, 215: 239-253.
    5. Gupta, J.P. and Agarwal, R.K. (1980). Arid Zone Research and Development. (Mann, H.S. ed.). Scientific Publishers, Jodhpur, Rajasthan.
    6. Leinher, D.E. et al. (1993). Agron. J., 85: 400-405.
    7. Sterk, G. and Stein, A. (1997). Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 61: 232-239.
    Published In
    Agricultural Science Digest
    Article Metrics
    Metrics Icon
    0
    Views
    0
    Citations
    Reviewed By
    Share Article
    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      volume 26 issue 3 (september 2006) : 191 - 193

      RESPONSE OF PEARLMILLET TO WIND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES IN HOT ARID WATERSHED AREAS AFFECTED BY WIND EROSION

      T
      T.C. Poonia
      G
      G.D. Singh*
      1National Agricultural Technology Project on Watershed Management, Agricultural Research Station, Fatehpur-Shekhawati, Rajasthan - 332 301, India

      • Submitted|

      • First Online |

      • doi

      Cite article:- Poonia T.C., Singh* G.D. (2025). RESPONSE OF PEARLMILLET TO WIND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES IN HOT ARID WATERSHED AREAS AFFECTED BY WIND EROSION. Agricultural Science Digest. 26(3): 191 - 193. doi: .

      ABSTRACT

      A field experiment was conducted during 2001–2002 at farmer's fields in Garinda village (Sikar, Rajasthan) to study the effect of wind erosion control measures on soil and water conservation and production potential of pearlmillet in hot arid watershed areas. The results revealed that vegetative barriers of tree sticks favourably affected the soil and water conservation, growth and yield parameters of pearlmillet. Application of vegetative barriers of tree sticks recorded +7.5 cm soil deposition while control plot recorded soil erosion to the extent of removal of -5.7 cm soil surface. The vegetative barriers of tree sticks recorded 27.6% higher grain yield over control (without barrier) plot.

      KEYWORDS

        REFERENCES

        1. Bielders, C.L. et al. (1998). In: Proc. of the Expert Group Meeting, 22-25 April 1997, ICARDA, Aleppo.
        2. Bielders. C.L. et al. (2000). Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 64: 1776-85.
        3. Bielders, C.L. et al. (2001). Ann. Arid Zone, 40: 369-394.
        4. Buerkert, A. and Lamers, J.P.A. (1999). PI. Soil, 215: 239-253.
        5. Gupta, J.P. and Agarwal, R.K. (1980). Arid Zone Research and Development. (Mann, H.S. ed.). Scientific Publishers, Jodhpur, Rajasthan.
        6. Leinher, D.E. et al. (1993). Agron. J., 85: 400-405.
        7. Sterk, G. and Stein, A. (1997). Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 61: 232-239.
        In this Article
          Contact us
          Follow us
          Published In
          Agricultural Science Digest

          Editorial Board

          View all (0)