Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.156

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Agricultural Science Digest, volume 33 issue 3 (september 2013) : 193-197

EFFECT OF EARLY ETHREL APPLICATION IN ENHANCING COTTON PRODUCTION IN VERTISOLS OF ANDHRA PRADESH, INDIA

S. Ratna Kumari, Mridula George
1Regional Agricultural Research Station, Lam, Guntur- 522 403, India
Cite article:- Kumari Ratna S., George Mridula (2024). EFFECT OF EARLY ETHREL APPLICATION IN ENHANCING COTTON PRODUCTION IN VERTISOLS OF ANDHRA PRADESH, INDIA. Agricultural Science Digest. 33(3): 193-197. doi: 10.5958/j.0976-0547.33.3.006.
A field study was taken up for two years to know the effect of early application of ethrel on growth, yield and quality of cotton during kharif 2008 and 2009 in vertisols revealed that the application of ethrel@ 30ppm at 35-45 days after sowing (at the time of square initiation) gave maximum seed cotton yield in all the test entries studied. The physiological manipulation of morphoframes through different means not only changed the morphology of the cotton plant, but also the growth pattern, accumulation of dry matter production, harvest index and ultimately the seed cotton yield of the plant. It is very much interesting to note that there was no significant influence on quality characteristics of cotton fibre through this application.
  1. Atta-Aly, M.A.; Riad G.S; Z.El-S; Lacheene A.S and El- Beltagy.(1998). Early ethrel applications extends tomato fruit cell division and increases fruit size and yield with ripening delay.World Conference on Horticultural Research, 17-20 June 1998,Italy.
  2. Ashraf Bhat M.;M.R Mir1;N.A Khan; N.A Lone; K.A Bhat; S.M Razvi; H.Ashraf; Wani, Rashid, S. Hayat ,W.A. Payne, Sabina, and S.A. Wani. (2010).The role of ethrel on plant growth and development under different environmental conditionsIntern. J. Curr. Res. 4: 004-013.
  3. David Albers W. andC.eTimSchnakenberg.(1994). Plant growth regulators for cotton, University of Missouri Extension, New March 94,G4258.
  4. Elina Conevaad John. (2006). Ethrel Delays Blossoming, Reduces Fruit Set, and Increases Fruit Size of ‘Baby Gold 5’ Peaches. Dept. of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Vineland Cam and Cline Campus. Poster presentation (2006), Fruit and Vegetable growers Association, Ontario.
  5. Mahmoud M.M., Bondok M.A and Abdel-Halim M.A. (2006). The control of flowering in cotton plants in relation to induced growth correlations. Annals Agric. Sci. (Cairo).EG8801552, 170-198.
  6. Shuichi Iwahori; James M., Smith Lyonsand. (1970). Sex expression in cucumber plants affected by 2-chloroethyl phosphonic acid, ethylene and growth regulators. Plant Physiol. 46: 412- 415.
  7. Shweta and Nagar P.K. (2008). Post-harvest alterations in polyamines and ethylene in two diverse rose species. ActaPhysiologiae Plantarum 30: February 01, 2008, 243-248.
  8. Spangenberg German( 2007). Manipulation of plant senescence. International Patent Application PCT/AU 01/01092.
  9. Stewart, S.D; Layton M.B; Willams M.R; Ingram D andMaily. (2001).Response of cotton to prebloom square loss. J. Econ. Ento. 94:388-396.

Editorial Board

View all (0)