Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 28 issue 4 (december 2008) : 274 - 276

PHYSIOLOGICAL AND AGRONOMIC EFFICIENCY OF NITROGEN IN RICE AS INFLUENCED BY SOURCES OF NITROGEN AND CROP ESTABLISHMENT TECHNIQUES

H
H.M. Jayadeva
T
T.K. Prabhakara Setty
R
R.C. Gowda
M
M.T. Sanjay
1Agricultural Research Station, Kathalagere, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore - 560 065, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Jayadeva H.M., Setty Prabhakara T.K., Gowda R.C., Sanjay M.T. (2025). PHYSIOLOGICAL AND AGRONOMIC EFFICIENCY OF NITROGEN IN RICE AS INFLUENCED BY SOURCES OF NITROGEN AND CROP ESTABLISHMENT TECHNIQUES. Agricultural Science Digest. 28(4): 274 - 276. doi: .

ABSTRACT

The field experiments were carried out during kharif, 2005 and summer, 2006 to know the physiological and agronomic efficiency of nitrogen in rice as influenced by sources of nitrogen and crop establishment techniques. The SRI establishment technique recorded significantly higher physiological efficiency (53.36, 54.18 and 53.77 kg grain kg−1 N uptake) and agronomic efficiency (67.07, 55.47 and 61.27 kg grain kg−1 N) of nitrogen in kharif, summer and pooled analysis, respectively. Among the sources of nitrogen, application of large sized urea granules recorded higher physiological efficiency (52.83, 53.25 and 52.99 kg grain kg−1 N uptake) and agronomic efficiency (60.53, 48.27 and 54.40 kg grain kg−1 N) of nitrogen in kharif, summer and pooled analysis, respectively

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Deebakaran, G. and Ramasamy. (1999). Madras Agril. J., 86(7-9): 429-431.
    2. De Datta, S.K. (1995). Fertilizer Res., 42:193-203.
    3. Novoa, R. and Loomis, R.S. (1981). Plant and Soil, 58: 177-204.
    4. Sundararaj, N. et al. (1972). Design and Analysis of Field Experiments. (Ed.). UAS, Pubn., Bangalore, India.
    5. Velu, V. and Ramanathan, K.M. (1994). Madras Agricl. J., 81(11): 605-609.
    6. Yoshida, A. S. (1981). Fundamental of Rice Crop Science. International Rice Research Institute, Los Banos, Philippines, p. 269
    Published In
    Agricultural Science Digest
    Article Metrics
    Metrics Icon
    0
    Views
    0
    Citations
    Reviewed By
    Share Article
    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      volume 28 issue 4 (december 2008) : 274 - 276

      PHYSIOLOGICAL AND AGRONOMIC EFFICIENCY OF NITROGEN IN RICE AS INFLUENCED BY SOURCES OF NITROGEN AND CROP ESTABLISHMENT TECHNIQUES

      H
      H.M. Jayadeva
      T
      T.K. Prabhakara Setty
      R
      R.C. Gowda
      M
      M.T. Sanjay
      1Agricultural Research Station, Kathalagere, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore - 560 065, India

      • Submitted|

      • First Online |

      • doi

      Cite article:- Jayadeva H.M., Setty Prabhakara T.K., Gowda R.C., Sanjay M.T. (2025). PHYSIOLOGICAL AND AGRONOMIC EFFICIENCY OF NITROGEN IN RICE AS INFLUENCED BY SOURCES OF NITROGEN AND CROP ESTABLISHMENT TECHNIQUES. Agricultural Science Digest. 28(4): 274 - 276. doi: .

      ABSTRACT

      The field experiments were carried out during kharif, 2005 and summer, 2006 to know the physiological and agronomic efficiency of nitrogen in rice as influenced by sources of nitrogen and crop establishment techniques. The SRI establishment technique recorded significantly higher physiological efficiency (53.36, 54.18 and 53.77 kg grain kg−1 N uptake) and agronomic efficiency (67.07, 55.47 and 61.27 kg grain kg−1 N) of nitrogen in kharif, summer and pooled analysis, respectively. Among the sources of nitrogen, application of large sized urea granules recorded higher physiological efficiency (52.83, 53.25 and 52.99 kg grain kg−1 N uptake) and agronomic efficiency (60.53, 48.27 and 54.40 kg grain kg−1 N) of nitrogen in kharif, summer and pooled analysis, respectively

      KEYWORDS

        REFERENCES

        1. Deebakaran, G. and Ramasamy. (1999). Madras Agril. J., 86(7-9): 429-431.
        2. De Datta, S.K. (1995). Fertilizer Res., 42:193-203.
        3. Novoa, R. and Loomis, R.S. (1981). Plant and Soil, 58: 177-204.
        4. Sundararaj, N. et al. (1972). Design and Analysis of Field Experiments. (Ed.). UAS, Pubn., Bangalore, India.
        5. Velu, V. and Ramanathan, K.M. (1994). Madras Agricl. J., 81(11): 605-609.
        6. Yoshida, A. S. (1981). Fundamental of Rice Crop Science. International Rice Research Institute, Los Banos, Philippines, p. 269
        In this Article
          Contact us
          Follow us
          Published In
          Agricultural Science Digest

          Editorial Board

          View all (0)