volume 29 issue 3 (september 2009) : 209-211
FIELD EVALUATION OF FUNGICIDES AND BOTANICALS AGAINST POWDERY MILDEW OF MUNGBEAN
1Department of Plant Pathology,
College of Agriculture, Latur-413 512, India.
Published In
Agricultural Science Digest
Article Metrics
0
Views
0
Citations
Reviewed By
In this Article
APC
APC cover the cost of turning a manuscript into a published manuscript through peer-review process, editorial work as well as the cost of hosting, distributing, indexing and promoting the manuscript.
Publish With US
Submit your manuscript through user friendly platform and acquire the maximum impact for your research by publishing with ARCC Journals.
Become a Reviewer/Member
Join our esteemed reviewers panel and become an editorial board member with international experts in the domain of numerous specializations.
Open Access
Filling the gap between research and communication ARCC provide Open Access of all journals which empower research community in all the ways which is accessible to all.
Products and Services
We provide prime quality of services to assist you select right product of your requirement.
Support and Policies
Finest policies are designed to ensure world class support to our authors, members and readers. Our efficient team provides best possible support for you.
volume 29 issue 3 (september 2009) : 209-211
FIELD EVALUATION OF FUNGICIDES AND BOTANICALS AGAINST POWDERY MILDEW OF MUNGBEAN
1Department of Plant Pathology,
College of Agriculture, Latur-413 512, India.
ABSTRACT
All the treatments significantly reduced powdery mildew intensity and increased the test
weight and seed yield of mungbean over unsprayed control. Karathane 48 EC (@ 0.1%) was
most effective, recording least mean powdery mildew intensity (15.14%) and highest grain yield
(1425 kg/ha) and test weight (58.00 g). The second and third best effective fungicides were
Contaf (@ 0.1%) and Calixin (@ 0.1%), which recorded mean disease intensity of 18.43 and
18.99 per cent, respectively and were at par. Botanical NSKE and plain water also recorded
comparatively minimum disease intensity of 33.47 and 32.51 per cent, respectively over unsprayed
control (54.65%). Cost benefit ratio showed that all the treatments were economical although
Sulfex was most economical with C : B ratio of 1:21.11 followed by botanical NSKE (1:12.76),
Contaf (1:7.83), plain water (1:7.61) and Calixin (1:7.28).
weight and seed yield of mungbean over unsprayed control. Karathane 48 EC (@ 0.1%) was
most effective, recording least mean powdery mildew intensity (15.14%) and highest grain yield
(1425 kg/ha) and test weight (58.00 g). The second and third best effective fungicides were
Contaf (@ 0.1%) and Calixin (@ 0.1%), which recorded mean disease intensity of 18.43 and
18.99 per cent, respectively and were at par. Botanical NSKE and plain water also recorded
comparatively minimum disease intensity of 33.47 and 32.51 per cent, respectively over unsprayed
control (54.65%). Cost benefit ratio showed that all the treatments were economical although
Sulfex was most economical with C : B ratio of 1:21.11 followed by botanical NSKE (1:12.76),
Contaf (1:7.83), plain water (1:7.61) and Calixin (1:7.28).
REFERENCES
- Banyal, D.K. and Rana, S.K. (2003). J. Mycol. Pl. Pathol. 33(2):302-304.
- Das, S.R. and Narain, A. (1990). Indian Phytopath. 43(1):100-101.
- Gupta, S.K. and Sharma, H.R. (2004). Pl. Dis. Res. 19(2):190-191.
- Kappor, A.S. and Thakur, B.R. (1997). Indian Phytopath. 50(1):115-118.
- Kunti, J.P. et al. (2002). J. Mycol. Pl. Pathol. 32(1):103-105.
- Mayee, C.D. and Datar, V.V. (1986). Bull. I. MAU, Parbhani PP:74.
- McKineey (1923). J. agric. Res. 26:195-218.
- Sharma, I.M. (1991). Indian Phytopath. 44:133-134.
- Shetty, T.A.S. et. al. (1996). Curr. Res. 25(1):14-15.
- Shrivastava, L.S. (1996). J. Hill. Res. 9(2):296-298.
- Singh, A. et. al. (2002). J. Mycol. Pl. Pathol. 32(2):286.
- Singh, A. and Sirohi, A. (2003). Pl. Dis. Res. 18(1):63-64.
- Singh, V.P. and Prithiviraj,B. (1997). Physiol. and mol. Pl. Pathol. 51(3):181-194.
- Sone, S.K. et. al. (1999). Indian Phytopath. 52(2):138-141.
- Vijaya, M. (2004). J. Mycol. Pl. Pathol. 34(2):604-605.
Disclaimer :
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Copyright :
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
In this Article
APC
APC cover the cost of turning a manuscript into a published manuscript through peer-review process, editorial work as well as the cost of hosting, distributing, indexing and promoting the manuscript.
Publish With US
Submit your manuscript through user friendly platform and acquire the maximum impact for your research by publishing with ARCC Journals.
Become a Reviewer/Member
Join our esteemed reviewers panel and become an editorial board member with international experts in the domain of numerous specializations.
Open Access
Filling the gap between research and communication ARCC provide Open Access of all journals which empower research community in all the ways which is accessible to all.
Products and Services
We provide prime quality of services to assist you select right product of your requirement.
Support and Policies
Finest policies are designed to ensure world class support to our authors, members and readers. Our efficient team provides best possible support for you.
Published In
Agricultural Science Digest