Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 29 issue 2 (june 2009) :

INFLUENCE OF ZINC UNDER DIFFERENT MOISTURE REGIMES ON YIELD AND NUTRIENT UPTAKE OF RICE IN INCEPTISOL

S
Sanjay Swami
K
Kapila Shekhawat*
1Division of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences & Technology-J, Main Campus Chatha-180 009 Jammu, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Swami Sanjay, Shekhawat* Kapila (2025). INFLUENCE OF ZINC UNDER DIFFERENT MOISTURE REGIMES ON YIELD AND NUTRIENT UPTAKE OF RICE IN INCEPTISOL. Agricultural Science Digest. 29(2): . doi: .

ABSTRACT

Field experiment was conducted in rice consisting of three moisture regimes (25, 50 and 75
mm irrigation) and four levels of zinc sulphate (0, 15, 30 and 45 kg ha-1) replicated thrice under
factorial randomized block design. The grain, straw yield and the uptake of N, P and K by rice
increased significantly with increasing levels of zinc up to 30 kg ZnSO4 ha-1. The relative uptake
of zinc was higher at the first level of 15 kg ZnSO4 ha-1 rather than respective higher doses. A
slight increase in the grain and straw yield of rice was observed with higher moisture regimes.
The productivity and uptake of various nutrients by rice were highest at 30 kg ZnSO4 ha-1 and 75
mm of irrigation.

REFERENCES

  1. Anonymous (2000). Nutritional Disorders and Nutrient Management in Rice. Inter. Rice Res. Ins. (IRRI), Manila, Philippines.
  2. Bansal, K.N. and Patel, K.C. (2008). J. Agron. Crop Sci., 157(1): 24-30.
  3. Jackson, M.L. (1978). Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi. pp. 183.
  4. Khan, A.A. and Zende, G.K. (1977). Pl. Soil, 46: 259-262.
  5. Khurana, M.P.S. et al. (2002). Ann. Agric. Res., 23(2):206-10.
  6. Lindsay, N.L. and Norvell, W.A. (1978). Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. America., 42:421-28.
  7. Paramasivam, K.S. et al. (1992). Oryza, 29(2):111-13.
  8. Rahman, M.A. et al. (2007). J. Agric. Rural Develop., 5(1&2): 43-47.
  9. Zhu, X. et al. (2008). Proc. 2nd International Confer. Digital Object Identifier: 4475- 4479.
Published In
Agricultural Science Digest
Article Metrics
Metrics Icon
0
Views
0
Citations
Reviewed By
Share Article
Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    volume 29 issue 2 (june 2009) :

    INFLUENCE OF ZINC UNDER DIFFERENT MOISTURE REGIMES ON YIELD AND NUTRIENT UPTAKE OF RICE IN INCEPTISOL

    S
    Sanjay Swami
    K
    Kapila Shekhawat*
    1Division of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences & Technology-J, Main Campus Chatha-180 009 Jammu, India

    • Submitted|

    • First Online |

    • doi

    Cite article:- Swami Sanjay, Shekhawat* Kapila (2025). INFLUENCE OF ZINC UNDER DIFFERENT MOISTURE REGIMES ON YIELD AND NUTRIENT UPTAKE OF RICE IN INCEPTISOL. Agricultural Science Digest. 29(2): . doi: .

    ABSTRACT

    Field experiment was conducted in rice consisting of three moisture regimes (25, 50 and 75
    mm irrigation) and four levels of zinc sulphate (0, 15, 30 and 45 kg ha-1) replicated thrice under
    factorial randomized block design. The grain, straw yield and the uptake of N, P and K by rice
    increased significantly with increasing levels of zinc up to 30 kg ZnSO4 ha-1. The relative uptake
    of zinc was higher at the first level of 15 kg ZnSO4 ha-1 rather than respective higher doses. A
    slight increase in the grain and straw yield of rice was observed with higher moisture regimes.
    The productivity and uptake of various nutrients by rice were highest at 30 kg ZnSO4 ha-1 and 75
    mm of irrigation.

    REFERENCES

    1. Anonymous (2000). Nutritional Disorders and Nutrient Management in Rice. Inter. Rice Res. Ins. (IRRI), Manila, Philippines.
    2. Bansal, K.N. and Patel, K.C. (2008). J. Agron. Crop Sci., 157(1): 24-30.
    3. Jackson, M.L. (1978). Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi. pp. 183.
    4. Khan, A.A. and Zende, G.K. (1977). Pl. Soil, 46: 259-262.
    5. Khurana, M.P.S. et al. (2002). Ann. Agric. Res., 23(2):206-10.
    6. Lindsay, N.L. and Norvell, W.A. (1978). Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. America., 42:421-28.
    7. Paramasivam, K.S. et al. (1992). Oryza, 29(2):111-13.
    8. Rahman, M.A. et al. (2007). J. Agric. Rural Develop., 5(1&2): 43-47.
    9. Zhu, X. et al. (2008). Proc. 2nd International Confer. Digital Object Identifier: 4475- 4479.
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us
      Published In
      Agricultural Science Digest

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)