Crystal yield
After storage at 4
oC for two days, the crude extract was washed with cold water and dried, yielding 1.7142 g of green, clustered powder. The yield of crude crystals was influenced by three key factors: Alkaline treatment, liquid-liquid extraction and acidification.
C.
maxima peels contain significant pectin, which interferes with naringin crystallization. Pectin was removed by adjusting the pH to 11-11.5 using 0.1 M Ca(OH)
2, inducing pectin precipitation as calcium pectate. Ca(OH)
2 also isomerizes flavonoids and solubilizes chalcones, which are later reversed by acidification
(Lo Curto et al., 1992). Due to the high viscosity of calcium pectate, repeated filtration (2-3 times) was necessary for complete removal. Incubation for 10-15 minutes after Ca(OH)
2 addition was crucial to ensure complete reaction and prevent post-filtration precipitation.
Non-polar compounds were removed using n-hexane. The progression of extraction was monitored by the fading color of the hexane layer, with a colorless, transparent layer indicating completion. While no specific hexane-to-extract ratio was defined, a gradual fading of the yellow color with each 50 mL hexane addition was observed. To reverse the flavonoid isomerization and chalcone solubilization from the alkaline treatment, 0.1 M HCl was used to adjust the pH to 4-4.5, which is optimal for naringin crystallization
(Chakraborty et al., 2024). From 100 g of
C.
maxima peels, 1.7142 g of crude naringin crystals were obtained. The pale green color and clustered powder form of the crude crystals were attributed to residual chlorophyll from the flavedo, as whole peels were used in the extraction.
Column chromatography and naringin crystal yield
Eleven fractions (Fig 2) obtained from column chromatography were analyzed using thin-layer chromatography (TLC). A single compound exhibiting an Rf value near 1 was observed in fraction one, indicative of a highly non-polar substance. Two distinct spots, with Rf values of 0.44 and 0.63, were shown in fraction two. A single spot, with an Rf of 0.44, was displayed in fractions three through eleven, with intensity observed to decrease progressively from fraction three to eleven.
The presence of chlorophyll (Rf = 0.97) was suggested by the green color and an Rf value of approximately 1 in the first fraction. A low concentration of naringin (Rf = 0.44) and an unidentified compound (Rf = 0.63) were indicated in fraction two. Naringin was identified in fractions three to eleven, with a decreasing concentration gradient observed from fraction three. The presence of minor contaminants, which could not be completely removed, was suggested by a faint band at the solvent front. It is likely that these contaminants form a coating or core within the naringin crystals. Following column chromatography, the final nine fractions were combined and dried in a desiccator for 24 hours, resulting in the recrystallization of naringin. Large, needle-shaped crystals were collected, yielding 0.5789 g.
Analysis of melting point
The melting points of naringin standard (Sigma, Switzerland) and the extracted crystal were 165.8
oC and 166.5
oC, respectively. The melting point of naringin was reported to be 166
oC. This value was then re-evaluated by measuring the melting point of standard naringin (at 166.5
oC). As for the naringin collected from the extraction, this data was recorded at 165.8
oC. It can be observed that the differences were insignificant, indicating the high purity of the crystals.
This significantly high purity level was reconfirmed by HPLC chromatogram as presented in Fig 3, peak 5 exhibited an absorbance of 2094.116 mAU, indicating a naringin of 99.50% from
C.
maxima peel. This evidence supports the conclusion that the naringin obtained is highly pure, containing a mere 0.5% impurities, thus validating the suitability of this extraction and purification process for industrial-scale naringin production.
The remaining part contained eight contaminants in small amounts. By running MS, the molecular weight of naringin was recorded at 580.1763 g/mol as Fig 4, which was close to the value of standard naringin and theoretical naringin, at 580.2385g/mol and 580g/mol respectively
(Shilpa et al., 2023). The differences were due to the contaminants present in the crystals.
Optimum conditions for extraction using the PSE system
Naringin standard curve
A series of naringin standards was prepared at the following concentrations: 5 mg/mL, 2.5 mg/mL, 1.25 mg/mL, 0.625 mg/mL, 0.3125 mg/mL, 0.15625 mg/mL and 0.078125 mg/mL. A standard curve was constructed by plotting absorbance at 420 nm against concentration. The standard curve’s equation was determined to be y = 1.7571 x (R² = 0.9999). All values are presented as means ± standard deviation.
Naringin content was investigated using a colorimetric assay, based on the development of a yellow color upon alkaline treatment
(Alam et al., 2014). An increase in yellow color intensity was observed with increasing naringin concentration. The high accuracy and reliability of the standard curve were demonstrated by its strong correlation, as evidenced by an R² value of 0.9999.
The temperature for maximum yield
To determine the optimal extraction temperature for naringin
(Ly et al., 2021), experiments were conducted using a fixed solvent concentration of 80% ethanol and three extraction cycles while varying the temperature across a range of 40
oC, 50
oC, 60
oC, 70
oC and 80
oC. The results demonstrated that naringin content was significantly influenced by temperature. Specifically, the highest naringin concentration (4.91±0.013 mg/mL) was achieved at 60
oC. While 70
oC yielded a slightly higher mean value (4.97±0.025 mg/mL), the difference was not statistically significant. Lower naringin concentrations were observed at 50
oC (4.84±0.0091 mg/mL), 80
oC (4.82±0.014 mg/mL) and 40
oC (4.78±0.0071 mg/mL). These findings suggest that 60
oC represents the optimal temperature for naringin extraction under the given conditions. The observed decrease in yield at higher temperatures (70
oC and 80
oC) may be attributed to the potential thermal degradation of naringin. The relationship between extraction temperature and naringin concentration is visually represented in Fig 5.
Several studies have indicated that temperature is one of the most important parameters that could affect the extraction efficiency of flavonoids from plant materials
(Vuong et al., 2011), (Wissam et al., 2012). The naringin yield increased with the increase in temperature; however, from 70
oC to 80
oC, the naringin yield started decreasing. A previous study by
Krishnaiah et al., (2012) reported that bioactive compounds, including flavonoids, could be volatized and depleted at high temperatures. Since increasing temperature provides kinetic energy for the reaction, the extraction can be developed by increasing temperature. However, with high temperatures, the energy also causes the motion of molecules to become unstable and hence, hampers the extraction process.
The results showed that temperature had a significant impact on the naringin concentration. At 60
oC, the highest naringin content was yielded and therefore, this temperature was chosen for the naringin extraction process.
The solvent concentration for maximum yield
Fig 6 shows the extraction yields of naringin by using different solvent concentrations from 60% to absolute ethanol when the temperature was kept constant at 70
oC and the number of extracting cycles was three. The highest naringin content was yielded (4.91±0.013 mg/mL) by ethanol 80%, followed by ethanol 90% (4.82±0.0044 mg/mL), ethanol 70% (4.80±0.016 mg/mL), absolute ethanol (4.77±0.017 mg/mL) and ethanol 60% (4.75±0.0088 mg/mL).
@figure6
Naringin, like other flavonoids, exhibits solubility characteristics determined by its chemical structure and the polarity of the extraction solvent
(Dong et al., 2023). Ethanol, a safe, economical and effective solvent for pomelo peel extraction, is particularly well-suited for naringin due to its capacity to dissolve both polar and non-polar components of the molecule
(Andrade et al., 2022). This property, shared with water, makes polar solvents ideal for extracting naringin. Naringin yield increased with ethanol concentration from 60% to 80%, reaching a maximum of 4.91±0.0013 mg/mL. This suggests increased polarity efficiency with higher ethanol concentrations. However, a decrease in yield was observed at 99% ethanol, possibly due to a polarity mismatch with naringin in
C.
maxima peels. The 80% ethanol extraction yielded significantly higher naringin concentrations (r<0.05) compared to other concentrations. These findings align with
Ioannou et al., (2018), which also reported optimal flavonoid yields at 80% ethanol, although their study utilized orange peel and supercritical CO2 extraction
(Ioannou et al., 2018).
The time for maximum yield
Fig 7 shows the extraction yield of naringin in three-time intervals from 9 to 27 minutes when other extraction conditions were as follows: 80% ethanol and a temperature of 70
oC. As each extraction cycle done by the Speed Extractor machine included three steps - heat up, hold and discharge, which were set for 2, 5 and 2 minutes, respectively, each cycle lasted 9 minutes and the machine could only run up to three cycles maximum. 27 minutes of extraction was the optimum extracting time (4.91±0.013 mg/mL), followed by 18 minutes (4.80±0.0090 mg/mL) and 9 minutes (4.71±0.014 mg/mL).
@figure7
It was hypothesized that varying contact times between
C.
maxima peels and solvent would impact naringin yield. Sufficient extraction time is necessary for solvent saturation before replacement. Using a Büchi Speed Extractor, each extraction cycle comprised 2 minutes heating, 5 minutes holding and 2 minutes discharging, totaling 9 minutes per cycle, with a maximum of three cycles. An extraction time of 27 minutes (three cycles) yielded the highest naringin concentration (4.91±0.013 mg/mL). Due to the machine’s limitations, this was determined as the optimal extraction time for this PSE method. Therefore, 27 minutes was concluded to be the optimal extraction time for maximizing flavonoid yield within the constraints of the PSE method.