<div>In this paper, we show the importance of Vedic mathematics to derive the optimal solution in agriculture e.g. for soil management and crop production, sowing of seeds etc. Since the primary requirement of any being is food i.e. anna, a man started to think about its production, because without production-consumption is impossible. Agriculture is the base of Indian agronomy or rural economy and the proper management of land is most essential for the same. We also study a systematic investigation on the Vedic agricultural system to prove is as the base of modern agronomy. Vedic Mathematics is an ancient system of calculation which was discovered from the Vedas between 1911 and 1918 by Sri Bharati Krishna Tirthaji Maharaj (1884-1960). Vedic Mathematics is a collection of techniques and formulas to solve mathematical arithmetic in easy and faster way; it offers a new and entirely different approach to the study of Vedic Mathematics based on pattern recognition. Mathematics is practical science as it helps us with the daily life. Arithmetic computations cannot be obtained faster by any other known method rather than Vedic mathematics, so this is the best way of understanding mathematics to agriculture students.</div>

An Approach to Implement Vedic Mathematics to Agricultural System: A Review

<div>Background: Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is the third most important pulse crop grown all over the world. Chickpea is infested by an average of about 60 insect-pests, of which gram pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) is known to be the key pest. The migratory nature, polyphagous, short life cycle, multivoltine and resistance to insecticides makes H. armigera&nbsp;very difficult to control. In order to develop the resistance chickpea genotypes against H. armigera it is very important to understand the interrelation between the chickpea biochemical constituents and their effect on insect growth and development. 
 
Methods: The biological performance of H. armigera on different chickpea genotypes was studied using detached leaf method and the test genotypes were also evaluated for field level resistance to H. armigera under natural conditions. Different biochemical constituents viz., reducing sugar, protein, total phenol and tannins content in chickpea genotypes were estimated at 30 days after sowing. The relationship between biological attributes of H. armigera reared on different chickpea genotypes and biochemical constituents of chickpea genotypes was computed using simple correlation co-efficient. 
 
Result: Among the test genotypes, the lowest larval weight, prolonged larval duration and pupal duration were observed in GL-13042. The lowest pupal weight and percent of adult emergence was observed in NBeG-786 while the lowest fecundity was observed in GL-13001. The percent pod damage, pest susceptibility/ resistance per cent and PRSR on different chickpea genotypes in the field condition varied from 25.9 to 47.84%, 12.91 to 45.86 and from 4 to 5. In the biochemical constituents, the highest total phenol and tannin content were observed in NBeG-786 whereas the lowest protein and reducing sugar content were observed in GL-13042. Relationship between biological attributes of H. armigera and biochemical constituents in different chickpea genotypes revealed that reducing sugars, protein, total phenols and tannins content showed negative association with biological attributes of H. armigera reared on chickpea genotypes.</div>

<div>Effect of Different Chickpea Genotypes and Its Biochemical Constituents on Biological Attributes of Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner)</div>

<div>Background: Data on measurements of the proximal femur, acetabulum with special reference to CHD in GSD is relatively limited. The present study recorded the complete canine femoral geometry of healthy as well as dysplastic hip joint in young dogs of GSD breed. 
 
Methods: All the dogs were subjected to radiographic evaluation to measure hip joint morphometric parameters using the CARESTREAM vita flex CR system with added IMAGE SUITE software version 4.0. 
 
Result: In dogs below 6 months of age and with CHD, measurements like AW, HD were higher in CHD where as ND, FIA values were lower. AA, EAA values were higher and AHI was lower in CHD. Indices like DI and SI were higher whereas PC and NA were lower in CHD. In healthy hip, HNI and PC values were higher in male dogs where as FNALa, ND values were higher in female dogs. In CHD, FSC, HD, TW, FSD, FIA were higher in female dogs where as HAL value was higher in male dogs. In dogs between 6 to 12 months age and with CHD, FNALa, FNALb values were higher, where as AW, ND, FSD, FIA values were lower in CHD. AA, EAA values were higher, where as AHI, PC were lower in CHD. Indices like DI and SI were higher, whereas PC and NA were lower in CHD. In dogs with healthy hip, FNALa, FNALb, TW, AHI values were higher in male dogs where as AW, AHI values were higher in female dogs. In CHD, AW, TW were higher in female dogs where as HAL, FSC, ND, FSD values were higher in male dogs.</div>

An Approach to Implement Vedic Mathematics to Agricultural System: A Review

Effect of Different Chickpea Genotypes and Its Biochemical Constituents on Biological Attributes of Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner)

Morphometry of Hip Joint in German Shepherd Dogs with Hip Dysplasia vis-a-vis Normal Hip