Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorM. R. Saseendranath

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.40

  • SJR 0.233, CiteScore: 0.606

  • Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Structural and Functional Evaluation of Achilles Tendons in Rabbits: A Biomechanical Perspective

Imdat Orhan1,*, Aydın Alan1, Emel Alan2, Ayhan Düzler1
  • 0009-0000-4450-0371, 0000-0003-0428-578X, 0000-0003-4990-3991, 0000-0001-9515-574X
1Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Erciyes University, Türkiye.
2Department of Histology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Erciyes University, Türkiye.

Background: The Achilles tendon (tendo calcaneus communis) is a critical structure for movement, transmitting force from muscle contraction to the skeletal system. Understanding its biomechanical and histological properties is essential for veterinary medicine, biomechanics and tendon injury research. While previous studies have examined Achilles tendon adaptation in various species, limited research has compared the structural and functional differences between right and left tendons. This study aims to analyze and compare the biomechanical properties of right and left Achilles tendons in rabbits, focusing on tensile strength, elongation and stiffness.

Methods: Six adult, healthy male New Zealand rabbits were used in this study. A total of 12 Achilles tendons (both right and left) were dissected and analyzed. Biomechanical testing was performed using a SHIMADZU AG-X 50 kN Autograph device, measuring failure force, elongation and stiffness. Additionally, histological analysis was conducted using Crossman’s triple staining technique to examine structural differences between the tendons.

Result: The results indicated that right Achilles tendon exhibited significantly higher tensile strength than left tendon. The mean failure force for right tendons was 408.53 N, while left tendon had a lower mean failure force of 337.45 N. Similarly, right tendon showed greater elongation and stiffness, suggesting higher mechanical resilience. These findings align with previous research on tendon adaptation to mechanical stress and provide insights into functional differences between tendon structures. This study highlights the biomechanical asymmetry of Achilles tendons in rabbits, which may be relevant for tendon rehabilitation strategies and experimental tendon models.

In domestic mammals, the Achilles tendon is formed by the muscles m. gastrocnemius, m. soleus, m. biceps femoris, m. semitendinosus and m. flexor digitorum superficialis, along with their extensions (Dursun, 2008; NAV, 2012). However, in rabbits, the Achilles tendon formation differs as the M. semimembranosus replaces the M. semitendinosus in this structure (Nisbet, 1960; Bensley, 1910).

Tendons are fibrous connective tissue that transmit the force of muscle contractions to bones, enabling effective limb movement (Buchanan and Marsh, 2002; Ker et al., 2000; Merrilees and Flint, 1980; Curwin, 1997). These structures consist of a complex composition, primarily made up of 70-80% type I collagen for tensile strength  and 10-40% elastin for elasticity (Merrilees and Flint, 1980; Curwin, 1997).

The evaluation of the structural and mechanical properties of tendons provides important insights into soft tissue health in both clinical  and experimental studies. In particular, studies utilizing advanced imaging techniques such as elastography have made it possible to characterize tendon lesions  and monitor mechanical changes (Jani et al., 2020).

The Achilles tendon is notable for its biomechanical properties, which vary with age. Nakagawa et al., (1996) conducted a study on the Achilles tendon in rabbits  and demonstrated that young rabbit tendons exhibit high tensile strength  and elasticity as they age. These findings indicate that while the Achilles tendon develops structural strength during growth, its durability remains stable throughout aging. It has been reported that age and a history of physical activity play an important role in the prevention of tendon injuries (Nakagawa et al., 1996).

Detailed anatomical analyses of the musculoskeletal structures, such as those performed on the ostrich foot locomotor system, provide valuable insights into the mechanical roles of tendons and ligaments in weight-bearing and movement (Zhang et al., 2016). Similar biomechanical underst anding is essential when evaluating the structural and functional properties of the Achilles tendon in rabbits.

Collagen-based structural evaluations, such as those conducted on chicken shank tendons, have highlighted the relationship between age  and fiber density, underscoring the importance of morphological integrity in biomedical applications (Rana et al., 2024). Similar principles apply to the study of structural  and functional properties of the Achilles tendon in rabbits.

Numerous studies have explored the properties of the Achilles tendon, including stiffness, resilience, elongation, maximum load and breaking load, across various animal species (Matsumoto et al., 2003; Almeida-Silveria et al., 2000; Diehl et al., 2006; Doral et al., 2010; Buchanan and Marsh, 2002; Han et al., 2000; Jielile et al., 2010; Nagasawa et al., 2008; Szaro et al., 2011; Nakagawa et al., 1996; Legerlotz et al., 2007; Buchanan and Marsh, 2001; Vidik, 1969; Maganaris and Narici, 2005; Wang, 2006; Nisbet, 1960).

This study introduces a rabbit Achilles tendon model using a full transection method to examine two major challenges in tendon healing: re-rupture  and adhesion formation (Meier Bürgisser et al.,  2016). Evaluating the biomechanical properties of the Achilles tendon highlights the importance of appropriate immobilization techniques to prevent adhesion to surrounding tissues. Studies have shown that adhesion formation can be controlled by varying immobilization angles (Meier Bürgisser et al.,  2016).

Achilles tendon injuries or ruptures are among the most common cases of tendon damage in clinical practice (Matsumoto et al., 2003; Doral et al., 2010; Jielile et al., 2010; Nagasawa et al., 2008; Nakagawa et al., 1996; Legerlotz et al., 2007).

Additionally, studies comparing the biomechanical properties of tendons in different animal species have aimed to identify the most suitable model for simulating human tendons. Rabbit, horse, dog,  and pig tendons have been examined for their mechanical resistance, elastic modulus,  and ultimate tensile strength (Burgio et al., 2022). These findings contribute to underst anding tendon load-bearing capabilities  and provide valuable insights for biomechanical testing of human tendons.

The Achilles tendon plays a vital role in transmitting muscle contraction force to bones, ensuring effective movement (Merrilees and Flint, 1980; Curwin, 1997). Its biomechanical properties, primarily determined by its type I collagen composition, allow it to withst and high tensile loads  and resist injuries. Additionally, studies on rabbits have demonstrated that specific loading frequencies positively impact tendon strength (Wang et al., 2013). Found that low-frequency loading at 6% strain for 8 hours daily significantly increased collagen production  and enhanced tendon strength.

This study aims to investigate the mechanical  and histological properties of the common calcaneal tendon (tendo calcaneus communis) in rabbits.
This study was conducted between 2013 and 2015 at Erciyes University Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Erciyes University Research Center. In the study, six healthy, adult male New Zeal and rabbits weighing between 2.8  and 3.2 kg were used. A total of 12 Achilles tendons, both right  and left, were obtained from rabbits sacrificed under anesthesia. From these fresh specimens, three were sectioned from the midline for histological examination. These sections were fixed in a 10% formaldehyde-ethanol solution for 12 hours, followed by processing through graded alcohols, methyl benzoate and benzene and then embedded in paraplast blocks. Thin sections of 5 µm were prepared from these blocks and three histological slides were generated. The slides were stained using Crossman’s triple staining technique to examine the general structure.

For mechanical testing, the tendons were prepared by immersing them in 10% formalin for 10 days. Testing was conducted using the SHIMADZU AG-X 50 kN Autograph device.

The distal end of each tendon was clamped at the calcaneus attachment, while the proximal end was secured at the muscle-tendon junction (Fig 1). A tensile force of 5 N/s was applied to all specimens and the pulling process continued until tendon rupture. The obtained data were visualized using graphs.

Fig 1: Mechanical testing of tendons.

Structures of tendons that consist of much collagen  and few elastin fibers were determined in histological investigation. As shown in the Fig 2-3, in longitudinal  and cross-section, fibroblast nuclei were observed to be squeezed between collagenous fiber bundles (Fig 2,3).

Fig 2: Cross section of tendon. A: fibroblast nucleus.



Fig 3: Longitudinal section of tendon. A: fibroblast nuclei, B: Collagenous fiber bundles.



The thickness of the tendons used in the study was measured as an average of 5 mm at the midpoint. The cross-sectional area was described as oval in shape. The tendon length from the muscle-tendon junction to the calcaneus was measured as an average of 27.8 mm.

According to the tensile test values shown in the Table 1, the average breaking force of all analyzed right  and left Achilles tendons was 361.147 N, the average elongation percentage was 62%,  and the average elongation length was 9.524 mm. The average breaking force for the left tendons was measured as 337.455 N, while the right tendons had a higher average breaking force of 408.530 N. All the obtained values were visualized using Table 1  and Graph 1.

Table 1: This table presents a comparative overview of the biomechanical properties of right and left Achilles tendons, including their maximum, minimum and mean values for failure force, elongation and stiffness.



Graph 1: All tendons are showed graphically with force-elongation rate.



The results indicated that the right tendons were more resistant than the left tendons. Additionally, the failure force  and elongation rate for the right tendons were found to be higher than the average. Considering all the tendons used in the study, they were observed to withst and an average force of 361.14 N and exhibit an average elongation of 62.37%. These findings indicate that tendons can stretch beyond half of their original length under normal conditions.

Merrilees and Flint (1980) reported that the presence of 70-80% type I collagen in tendon composition contributes significantly to its strength. Similarly, Curwin (1997) emphasized that immobilization negatively impacts the biomechanical properties of tendons, a finding consistent with the importance of mechanical stress for optimal tendon resilience, as observed in our study.

The higher tensile strength observed in the right tendons compared to the left tendons is comparable to the findings of Viidik et al., (1965), who demonstrated that tendons subjected to greater loads exhibit increased tensile capacity. This observation suggests that the right tendons in our study may have been exposed to higher stress, leading to greater resilience.

The results also align with Nakagawa et al., (1996), who studied age-related changes in the biomechanical properties of rabbit Achilles tendons. They found that young adult tendons had the highest tensile strength, which was attributed to increased collagen fibril dimensions during growth. In our study, no age distinction was made and adult rabbits were used. Therefore, no conclusions can be drawn regarding the relationship between aging and tendon injury. 

The mechanical properties of the rabbit Achilles tendons in our study are also consistent with Burgio et al., (2022), who compared tendons from different animal species. Rabbit tendons demonstrated biomechanical properties, such as elastic modulus  and tensile strength, that closely resemble those of human tendons, making them a suitable model for biomechanical studies. Our findings support the notion that variables like applied stress rates contribute to variations in mechanical properties.

Our results also parallel the findings of Meier Bürgisser et al. (2016), who showed that the biomechanical properties of Achilles tendons improved over time in a full transection healing model, although they did not fully recover to pre-injury levels. Their study highlighted the significance of immobilization techniques in reducing adhesion formation and optimizing tendon healing strategies.

Furthermore, studies by Bürgisser and Buschmann (2014) suggest that elongation during tendon healing may lead to decreased force transmission and functional impairment, findings consistent with our observations on tendon properties.

Compared to our study, Matsumoto et al., (2003) reported higher stiffness (125.1) and tensile strength (549.2 N) in a study of 20 adult female rabbits. Similarly, Nakagawa et al., (1996) observed a higher tensile strength (average: 919.6 N) but lower elongation rate (16.3%) in adult Japanese white rabbits, though the sex of the animals was unspecified. Viidik (1969) examined Achilles tendons in 30 male rabbits  and found similar results (mean tensile strength: 377.4 N) in the control group, consistent with the average tensile strength in our study (361.14 N).
Since the aim of previous studies was not to determine the fundamental properties of Achilles tendons in rabbits, some characteristic could not be compared. We used control group values from earlier studies for comparisons. Variations may arise due to differences in sex, fixation  and storage methods, or the breeds of rabbits used. No prior study has compared left and right Achilles tendons within the same animal. Despite the limited sample size, determined that the right Achilles tendon is more resistant than the left in this study.
 
The views and conclusions expressed in this article are solely those of the authors  and do not necessarily represent the views of their affiliated institutions. The authors are responsible for the accuracy and completeness of the information provided, but do not accept any liability for any direct or indirect losses resulting from the use of this content.
All animal procedures for experiments were approved by the Committee of Experimental Animal care  and h andling techniques were approved by the University of Animal Care Committee.
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article. No funding or sponsorship influenced the design of the study, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

  1. Almeida-Silveria, M.I., Pérot, D.L.C. and Goubel, F. (2000). Changes in stiffness induced by hindlimb suspension in rat Achilles tendon. European Journal of Applied Physiology. 81(1-2): 252-257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004210050047. 

  2. Bensley, B.A. (1910). Practical anatomy of the rabbit. The University Press.

  3. Buchanan, C.I. and Marsh, R.L. (2001). Effects of long-term exercise on the biomechanical properties of the Achilles tendon of guinea fowl. Journal of Applied Physiology. 90(1): 164- 171. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.2001. 90.1. 164. 

  4. Buchanan, C.I. and Marsh, R.L. (2002). Effects of exercise on the biomechanical, biochemical and structural properties of tendons. Comparative Biochemistry  and Physiology Part A. 133(4): 1101-1107. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1095- 6433(02)00238-3. 

  5. Burgio, V., Civera, M., Rodriguez Reinoso, M., Pizzolante, E., Prezioso, S., Bertuglia, A. and Surace, C. (2022). Mechanical properties of animal tendons: A review  and comparative study for the identification of the most suitable human tendon surrogates. Processes. 10(3): 485. https://doi.org/10. 3390/pr10030485.

  6. Bürgisser, G.M. and Buschmann, J. (2014). Biomechanics of Soft Tissue in Cardiovascular Systems. Springer. https:// doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-1616-2. 

  7. Curwin, S. (1997). Biomechanics of tendon and the effects of immobilization. Foot  and Ankle Clinics. 2(3): 371-389.

  8. Diehl, P., Steinhauser, E., Gollwitzer, H., Heister, C., Schauwecker, J., Milz, S., Mittelmeier, W.,  and Schmitt, M. (2006). Biomechanical  and immunohistochemical analysis of high hydrostatic pressure- treated Achilles tendons. Journal of Orthopaedic Science. 11(4): 380-385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776- 006-1012-3. 

  9. Doral, M.N., Alam, M., Bozkurt, M., Turhan, E., Atay, Ö.A., Dönmez, G. and Maffulli, N. (2010). Functional anatomy of the Achilles tendon. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 18(5): 638-643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1083-7. 

  10. Dursun, N. (2008). Veteriner Anatomi I. Medisan Yayýnevi.Han, S., Gemmell, S.J., Helmer, K.G., Grigg, P., Wellen, J.W., Hoffman, A.H. and Sotak, C.H. (2000). Changes in ADC caused by tensile loading of rabbit Achilles tendon: Evidence for water transport. Journal of Magnetic Resonance. 144(2): 217-227. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmre.2000.2065. 

  11. International Committee on Veterinary Gross Anatomical Nomenclature. (2012). Nomina Anatomica Veterinaria (5th ed.).

  12. Jani, S.M.Y., Mahajan, S.K. and Mohindroo, J. (2020). Diagnostic approaches to tendon, ligament  and joint affections in equine with special reference to tendon elastography. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 54(10): 1272-1278. https://doi.org/ 10.18805/ijar.B-3566. 

  13. Jielile, J., Bai, J.P., Sabirhazi, G., Redat, D., Yilihamu, T., Xinlin, B., Hu, G., Tang, B., Liang, B. and Sun, Q. (2010). Factors influencing the tensile strength of repaired Achilles tendon: A biomechanical experiment study. Clinical Biomechanics. 25(8): 789-795.

  14. Legerlotz, K., Schjerling, P., Langberg, H., Brüggemann, G.P.  and Niehoff, A. (2007). The effect of running, strength and vibration on the mechanical, morphological and biochemical properties of the Achilles tendon in rats. Journal of Applied Physiology. 102(2): 564-572. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01259. 2006. 

  15. Maganaris, C.N. and Narici, M.V. (2005). Mechanical Properties of Tendons. In: Tendon Injuries.  [Narici, M.V. (Ed.)], Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3841-3_2. (pp. 14-21)

  16. Matsumoto, F., Trudel, G., Uhthoff, H.K. and Backman, D.S. (2003). Mechanical effects of immobilization on the Achilles tendon. Archives of Physical Medicine  and Rehabilitation. 84(5): 662-667. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(02)04941-3. 

  17. Meier Bürgisser, G., Calcagni, M., Bachmann, E., Fessel, G., Snedeker, J.G., Giovanoli, P. and Buschmann, J. (2016). Rabbit Achilles tendon full transection model-wound healing, adhesion formation and biomechanics at 3, 6 and 12 weeks post- surgery. Biology Open. 5(9): 1324-1333. https://doi.org/ 10.1242/bio.020644. 

  18. Merrilees, M.J. and Flint, M.H. (1980). Ultrastructural study of tension  and pressure zones in a rabbit flexor tendon. American Journal of Anatomy. 157(1): 87-106. https://doi.org/10. 1002/aja.1001570109.  

  19. Nagasawa, K., Noguchi, M., Ikoma, K. and Kubo, T. (2008). Static  and dynamic biomechanical properties of the regenerating rabbit Achilles tendon. Clinical Biomechanics. 23(7): 832- 838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.02.002. 

  20. Nakagawa, Y., Hayashi, K., Yamamoto, N. and Nagashima, K. (1996). Age-related changes in biomechanical properties of the Achilles tendon in rabbits. European Journal of Applied Physiology. 73(1): 7-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0026 2803. 

  21. Nisbet, N.W. (1960). Anatomy of the calcaneal tendon of the rabbit. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 42B(2): 360-366.

  22. Rana, J., Keshri, O., Rahman, C.K.F., Kumar, V., Patel, S.K. and Das, B.C. (2024). Extraction and evaluation of collagen as biomaterial from chicken shank. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.18805/IJAR.B-5502. 

  23. Viidik, A., S andqvist, L. and Mägi, M. (1965). Influence of postmortal storage on tensile strength characteristics  and histology of rabbit ligaments. Acta Orthopaedica Sc andinavica. 36(suppl 79): 3-38. https://doi.org/10.3109/ort.1965. 36.suppl-79.01. 

  24. Viidik, A. (1969). Tensile strength properties of Achilles tendon systems in trained and untrained rabbits. Acta Orthopaedica Sc andinavica. 40(3): 261-272.

  25. Wang, H.C.J. (2006). Mechanobiology of tendon. Journal of Biomechanics. 39(9): 1563-1582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005. 05.007. 

  26. Wang, T., Lin, Z., Day, R.E., Gardiner, B., L andao-Bassonga, E., Rubenson, J., Kirk, T.B., Smith, D.W., Lloyd, D.G., Hardisty, G., Wang, A., Zheng, Q. and Zheng, M.H. (2013). Programmable mechanical stimulation influences tendon homeostasis in a bioreactor system. Biotechnology  and Bioengineering. 110(5): 1495-1507. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.24809. 

  27. Zhang, R., Wang, H., Zeng, G., Zhou, C., Pan, R., Wang, Q.,  and Li, J. (2016). Anatomical study of the ostrich (Struthio camelus) foot locomotor system. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 50(4): 476-483. doi: 10.18805/ijar.9300.

Editorial Board

View all (0)