Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First Articles
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First Articles
Indian Journal of
Animal Research
Print ISSN: 0367-6722
Online ISSN: 0976-0555
NASS Rating
6.40
SJR
0.233
CiteScore
0.606

Chief Editor:
M. R. Saseendranath
Kerala Veterinary and Animal Science University, Mannuthy, Thrissur, INDIA
Frequency:Monthly
Indexing:
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, ...

Research Article

Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 53 issue 4 (april 2019) : 510-514

Length-weight relationship and condition factor as an indicator of growth and feeding intensity of Sea bream (Sparus aurata L, 1758) given feed with different protein contents

Aysun Kop Ali Yýldýrým Korkut, Sule Gurkan
1Ege University, Faculty of Fisheries, Department of Aquaculture, Turkey Bornovo-35100, Izmir.
Cite article:- Korkut Yýldýrým Ali Kop Aysun, Gurkan Sule (2018). Length-weight relationship and condition factor as an indicator of growth and feeding intensity of Sea bream (Sparus aurata L, 1758) given feed with different protein contents. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 53(4): 510-514. doi: 10.18805/ijar.B-998.

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between the length-weight and the condition factor of gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata L.,1758) fed with three types of feed with different levels of crude protein (A: 38% Crude Protein (CP) and 18% Crude Lipid (CL); B: 42% CP and 18% CL; and C: 45% CP and 18% CL). The length-weight relationship of the fish in groups A, B and C was determined as W=0.051*TL2.63, W=0.046*TL2.67 and W=0.046*TL 2.68 respectively and there was no statistically significant difference between the groups (p>0.05). There was negative allometric growth in all experimental groups. The lowest mean value in the groups according to Fulton’s condition factor (CF) was found in group B (1.66±0.17), and the highest mean value was found in group C (1.71±0.18). It was determined that there was no statistically significant difference between the groups (p>0.05). 

REFERENCES

  1. Akyol, O. and Gamsiz K., (2011). Age and growth of adult gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata L.) in the Aegean Sea. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK., 91: 1255-1259.
  2. Barnabe, G. (1990). Rearing bass and gilthead bream. In: Aquaculture, [G. Barnabe (Ed.)] Ellis Horwood Limited, England: 647-683.
  3. Benzer S.(2012) Age and growth of chub [Squalius Cephalus (L., 1758)] population in kirmir Stream Of Sakarya river, Turkey. Indian J. Anim. Res., 47 (6) : 538-542, 2013
  4. Brown, M. L. and Murphy B. R., (1991a). Relationship of relative weight (Wr) to proximate composition of juvenile striped bass and hybrid striped bass. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 120:509– 518.
  5. Can MF, Baºusta N, Çekiç M. (2002). Weight-length relationships for selected fish species of the small-scale fisheries off the South coast of Iskenderun Bay. Turk Journal of Veterinary and Animal Science, 26:11811183. 
  6. Cicek, E., Avsar, D., Yeldan, H., Ozutok, M. (2006): Length-weight relationships for 31 teleost fishes caught by bottom trawl net in the Babadil limani Bight (northeastern Mediterranean. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 22: 290-292
  7. Ceyhan, T., Akyol, O. and M Erdem, (2009). Length-weight relationships of fishes from Gökova Bay, Turkey (Aegean Sea). Turk. J. Zool. 33: 69-72
  8. Company, R., Calduch-Giner, J.A., Kaushik, S. and PerezSanchez J., (1999). Growth performance and adiposity in gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata): risks and benefits of high energy diets. Aquaculture, 171: 279292
  9. De Silva, S.S. and Anderson T.A., (1995). Fish Nutrition in Aquaculture. Chapman & Hall Tokyo: 41-1001 pps.
  10. Dirican S., Musul .and Cilek S.(2012). Condition factors of some Cyprinid fishes of Kilickaya Reservoir, Sivas, Turkey. Indian J. Anim. Res., 46 (2):172 - 175, 
  11. Dobson, S.H and Holmes R.M., (1984). Compensatory growth in the rainbow trout, Salmo gairdneri, Journal of Fish Biology, 25;649-656.
  12. Faggio, C., Piccione, G., Marafioti, S., Arfuso, F., Fortino, G., and Fazio F., (2014). Metabolic response to monthly Variations of Sparus aurata Reared in Mediterranean On-Shore Tanks. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 14: 567-574.
  13. FAO (2005). Cultured Aquatic Species Information Programme. Sparus aurata. Cultured Aquatic Species Information Programme. Text by Colloca, F.; Cerasi, S. In: FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department [online]. Rome. Updated 8 February 2005. [Cited 18 January 2017]. http://www.fao.org/fishery/culturedspecies/Sparus_aurata/en
  14. FAO (2015). GLOBEFISH - Analysis and information on world fish trade. Market Reports; European Seabass and Gilthead seabream - March 2015. http://www.fao.org/in-action/globefish/market-reports/resource-detail/en/c/338048/
  15. Ibarz, A., Padròs, F., Gallardo, M.A., Fernàndez-Borràs, J., Blasco, J., and L. Tort, (2010). Low-temperature challenge to gilthead sea bream culture: review of cold-induced alteration and “Winter Syndrome”. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 20: 539-    556. doi: 10.1007/s11160-010-9159-
  16. Ighwela, K. A., Ahmed A.B., and Abol-Munafi A.B. (2011). Condition factor as an indicator of growth and feeding intensity of Nile Tilapia fingerlings (Oreochromis niloticus) Feed on different levels of Maltose. American-Eurasian J. Agric. & Environ. Sci., 11 (4): 559-563, 
  17. Korkut A. Y., and D. Balký (2004). Effects of different feeding rations on growth of gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata L., 1758) in net cages .E.U. Journal of Fisheries & Aquatic Sciences 21, (3-4): 235–238
  18. Oliva-Teles A. (2000).Recent advances in European sea bass and gilthead sea bream nutrition. Aquaculture International 8: 477–492, 
  19. Pauly, D., (1983). Some simple methods for the assessment of tropical fish stocks. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper, (234), FAO, Rome, Italy.
  20. Pešýæ, A., Durovýæ, M., Joksýmovýæ, A., Markovýæ, O. and Ikýca Z., (2015). Condition of fish, Gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata) and sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) from fýsh Farm in Bokakotorska Bay (South-East Adrýatýc). VII International Conference “Water & Fish” - Zbornik Predavanja 419-423p.
  21. Qadri, S., Shah T.H.,. Balkhi, M. H., Bhat, B. A., F. Bhat A., Najar A. M.,. Asmi O. A, Farooq I. and Syed Alia (2017). Morphometrics and length-weight relationship of Schizothorax curvifrons Heckel 1838 in River Jhelum, Kashmir, India. Indian J. Anim. Res., 51 (3): 453-458
  22. Ricker, W.E. (1979). Gsrowth rates and Models. In: [Hoar W.S., Randall D.J. and Brett J.R. (eds)], Fish Physiology of. VIII. Bioenergetic and Growth. Academic press New York:677-743
  23. Riedel, R., Caskey, L.M., and Hurlbert S.H, (2007). Length-weight relations and growth rates of dominant fishes of the Salton Sea: implications for predation by fish-eating birds. Lake and Reservoir Management. 23:528-535
  24. Sanchez-Muros, M.J., Corchete, V., Suarez, M.D., Cardenete, G., Gomez-Milan, E. and de la Higuera M., (2003). Effect of feeding method and protein source on Sparus aurata feeding patterns. Aquaculture, 224: 89-103.
  25. Sangun, L., Akamca, E., and Akar M., (2007). Weight-length relationships for 39 fish species from the North-Eastern Mediterranean coast of Turkey. Turk J Fish Aquat Sci, 7: 37-40
  26. Sutton, S.G., Bult, T.P., and Haedrich R. L., (2000). Relationships among fat weight, body weight, water weight, and condition factors in wild Atlantic Salmon Parr. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 129: 527–538
  27. TUIK (2017). Aquaculture Statistics, Turkish Statistical Institute, Ankara. www.tuik.gov.tr/ (electronic publication).
  28. Wootton R.J. (1992). Fish Ecology: Tertiary level biology. Blackie, London
  29. Yýldýz, M., Þener, E., Timur, M. (2006). Effect of seasonal change and different commercial feeds on proximate composition of Gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata), Turkish Journal of fisheries and aquatic science, 6 (2), 99-104. 
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)