Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First Articles
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First Articles
Indian Journal of
Animal Research
Print ISSN: 0367-6722
Online ISSN: 0976-0555
NASS Rating
6.40
SJR
0.233
CiteScore
0.606

Chief Editor:
M. R. Saseendranath
Kerala Veterinary and Animal Science University, Mannuthy, Thrissur, INDIA
Frequency:Monthly
Indexing:
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, ...

Research Article

Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 52 issue 6 (june 2018) : 893-897

Preparation and pharmacokinetics of cefquinome sulfate liposomes in goats

Haigang Wu, Jinni Liu, Gugangke Xu, Zhaowei Ye, Jicheng Liu, Benchi Yi
1Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Xinyang Agriculture and Forestry University, Xinyang 464 000, PR China.
Cite article:- Wu Haigang, Liu Jinni, Xu Gugangke, Ye Zhaowei, Liu Jicheng, Yi Benchi (2018). Preparation and pharmacokinetics of cefquinome sulfate liposomes in goats. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 52(6): 893-897. doi: 10.18805/ijar.B-778.

ABSTRACT

We evaluated the pharmacokinetics of cefquinome sulfate (CEF) liposomes in eight healthy goats following intramuscular administration at 4 mg/kg. The average particle diameter of CEF liposomes prepared by the ethanol injection method was 335nm with a CEF entrapment efficiency of 69.56%. The elimination half-life (t1/2b) of CEF liposomes was 33.04h compared with 16.21 h for CEF injected without carrier (p<0.05). The area under the concentration curve (AUC) for CEF liposomes was approximately three-times greater than for CEF alone (P<0.05). The time-point of maximum plasma concentration of the drug (Tp) and the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) were 4.38 h and 1.99 ìg/mL for CEF liposomes, compared with 1.86 h and 3.55 ìg/mL for CEF without carrier, respectively. 

REFERENCES

  1. Aarestrup F M, Skov R L.(2010).Evaluation of ceftiofur and cefquinome for phenotypic detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus using disk diffusion testing and MIC-determination,Veterinary Microbiology, doi:org/10.1016/    j.vetmic.2009.07.005 
  2. Cagnardi P, Gallo M, Zonca A, Locatelli C, Moroni P, Carli S.(2009) Pharmacokinetics of cefquinome in lactating cows after intramammary administration in healthy and infected animals. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 32:145-146.
  3. Cao J Y. Veterinary Pharmacokinetics [M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press. 2005, 03.
  4. Chen XL,Jiang CM,Zhu LX.(2012). Pharmacokinetic of cefquinome in Cattle after single-dose intramuscular injection,Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 5:69-71,doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1302.
  5. Chin N X, Gu JW, Fang W, Neu HC.(1992). In vitro activity of cefquinome, a new cephalosporin, compared with other cephalosporin antibiotics.Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. May-Jun;15: 331-337.
  6. Dinakaran V, Dumka VK, Ranjan B, Balaje R, Sidhu PK.(2013).Pharmacokinetics following intravenous administration and pharmacodynamics of cefquinome in buffalo calves. Tropical Animal Health and Production,45:1509-1512. doi: 10.1007/s11250-013-0390-7 PMID: 23456794
  7. Ehinger AM ,Schmidt H,Kietzmann M.(2005).Tissue distribution of cefquinome after intramammary and “systemic” administration in the isolated perfused bovine udder. Veterinary Journal, doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2005.02.029.
  8. Fan M H, Xu S Y, Xia S Q.(2008).Preparation of salidroside nano liposomes by ethanol injection method and in vitro release study,Eur Food Res Technol, doi:10.1007/s00217.007.0706.9
  9. Heinritzi K, Hagn. J. (1999). Studies on the efficacy and safety of the new cephalosporin cefquinome in sows with puerperal septicaemia and toxaemia syndrome.Tierarztliche -Praxis-Ausgabe- Grosstiere/Nutztiere,27:114-121.
  10. Liu M R,Zhao D S,Liu B S,.(2013). Developments in Cefqinome, Chinese Animal husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 40(4):216-    220
  11. Lu GF,Yang HF,Li YJ,Jiang CM.ÿ2007    ÿ.Pharmacokiietics of cefquiiome sulfate suspension in pigs,Joumal of Yangzhou University (Agricultural and Life Science Edition),28(4):18-21
  12. Mengxiao Gu, Nan Zhang, Longfei Zhang.(2015).Response of a clinical Escherichia coli strain to repeated cefquinome exposure in a piglet tissue-cage model,BMC Veterinary Research , 11:169
  13. Michael Limbert.(1991).Antibacterial Activities In Vitro and vivo and pharmacokinetics Of Cefquinome(HR lllv), a New Broad Spectrum Cephalosporin. Antimicrobial Agents andChemotherapy, 35:14-19.
  14. Murphy SP, Erwin ME, Jones RN. (1994). Cefquinome(HR 111v). In vitro evaluation of a broad-spectrum cephalosporin indicated for infections in animals.Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. Sep; 20:49—55. 
  15. Sheng Z J, Xu W P, Xu T P, etal.ÿ2015    ÿ.New Developments in Liposomal Drug Delivery Systems. China Pharmaceuticals ,24(23):6-8
  16. Thomas G,Martin B,Voss A,Boettner P,Porramier W,Loehlein.(2002). A comparative field study of the efficacy of cefqinome and amoxycllin against acute meningitis of weaned piglets. The Pig Journal, 3: 50.
  17. Wang J, Shan Q, Ding H, Liang C, Zeng Z.(2014).Pharmacodynamics of cefquinome in a neutropenic mouse thigh model of Staphylococcus aureus infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother,58: 3008-3012. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01666-13 PMID:24614373
  18. Xu D W,Liu T X.(2015).Preparation and quality evaluation of naringenin liposomes by ethanol injection method,Central South Pharmacy, 13(12):1266-1269 
  19. Yang D. (2009).New Developments in Liposomal. Herald of Medicine. 28(3): 336-338.
  20. Yang P B, Zhang H.(2013). New Progress of The Research of Liposome, ZhejiangUniversity TraditionalChinese Medicine DOI:10.16466/    J.issn1005-5509.
  21. Zhao DH, Zhou YF, Yu Y, Shi W, Yang X, Xiao X.(2014). Integration of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic indices of valnemulin in broiler chickens after a single intravenous and intramuscular administration, Vet J 201:109-115. doi: 10.1016/    j.tvj1.2014.05.010 PMID: 24906499
  22. Zheng Z Z(2009).Quality control and Antibacterial activities of Cefquinome sulfate suspension in vitro.Chinese Journal of Veterinary Drug, 43(9):11-15
  23. Zhou YF, Zhao DH, Yu Y, Yang X, Shi W, Peng YB.(2015). Pharmacokinetics, bioavailability and PK/PD relationship of cefquinome for Escherichia coli in Beagle dogs. J Vet Pharmacol Ther,38: 543-548. doi: 10.1111/jvp.12225 PMID: 25776615 
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)