Today, livestock production has become a significant source of antimicrobial resistance. In the past few decades, ESBL-carrying pathogens have increased significantly in both humans and animals
(Mills et al., 2020). ESBL are rapidly spreading worldwide and are frequently isolated from animals and humans Enterobacteriaceae isolates. In the present study 104 rectal swabs were collected from diarrheic calves in and around Jabalpur for characterization of ESBL producing
Escherichia coli. A total 81 (77.88%) samples yielded
E. coli which include 51 (98.07%) from organized buffalo farm diarrheic calf and 30 (57.69 %) from gaushalas diarrheic cattle calves (Table 2). In this study, simplex PCR was performed for targeting the highly conserved gene 16S rRNA for confirmation and rapid diagnosis of
E. coli. All the 81 (100 %) isolates produced 1476 bp of amplicon and were confirmed as
E. coli.
The present study shows much higher isolation rate than
Masud et al. (2012) (30.71%) and
Gebregiorgis and Tessema (2016) (36.8 %). The reason why the result of the current study varies from the other reports might be due to variations in farm management conditions, the season in which sample were collected. The present study findings corroborate with the result of
Pereira et al. (2014);
Awosile et al. (2018) and
Putra et al. (2020), they isolated and identified
E. coli from calf and confirmed
E. coli in 96%, 88.1% and 100%, respectively.
E. coli. Prevalence of
E. coli was lower in diarrheic calves (77.88%) compared to other studies. The differences in the prevalence rates of
E. coli among diarrheic calves may be attributed to the geographical locations of the farm, management practice and hygienic measures (
El-Seedy et al., 2016).
Of the 81 isolates, 07 (8.64%)
E. coli isolates (06 from buffalo calves and 01 from cattle calf) showed reduced susceptibility to one or more antimicrobials of initial screening (Fig 1). Total 05 (10.20%) isolates (04 from buffalo calves and 01 from cattle calf) were phenotypically confirmed as ESBL-producers by using ESBL identification kit and double disc diffusion test (Table 3, Fig 2). Out of the 05 phenotypically positive isolates (DDDT) screened for the presence of
bla genes by PCR, 03 (60%) isolate were found to be positive for
bla TEM gene (02 from buffalo calves and 01 from cattle calf) and 01 (20%) isolates for
bla CTX-M gene (buffalo calves). None were positive for
bla AmpC gene. Coexpression of
bla TEM and
bla CTXM was recorded in 01 (20%) isolate (Table 4) from diarrheic buffalo calf. Phenotypic methods may miss low-level ESBL producers so all the
E.coli were tested for ESBL genes. Some ESBL producers may not express sufficient activity to be detected phenotypically. Mutations or co-expression of AmpC may mask the ESBL phenotype.
Findings of present study are supported by observations of
Liu et al. (2018) from China using double disc diffusion test reported 9.60%
E. coli isolates from pigs as ESBL producer. In France,
Haennia et al. (2014) reported prevalence of ESBL
E. coli to be 29.40% in calves fecal flora.
Hiroi et al. (2011) screened 16
E. coli isolates, out of which two isolates (12.50%) were phenotypically confirmed as ESBL producers. Similar findings of lower prevalence of ESBL producer
E. coli were observed in the present study it might be due to differences in the detection methods. As documented in the
Schmid et al. (2013) using enrichment and selective media (MacConkey agar containing cefotaxime) for isolation of ESBL producing
E. coli.
Olowe et al. (2015) performed PCR in
E. coli isolates obtained from animal fecal samples in Nigeria and detected
bla TEM and
bla CTX gene in 48 (42.10%) and 51 (44.70%) isolates, respectively.
Liu et al. (2018) from China reported 9.60%
E. coli isolates from pigs as ESBL producer harbored at least one type of beta lactamase, with
bla CTX-M,
bla TEM, being detected in 90.90% and 68.18 %, respectively. The present study revealed
bla TEM shows higher prevalence which is similar to the finding of
Montso et al. (2019) from South Africa screened 53.1%
E. coli isolates as ESBL producers. The
bla TEM and
bla CTX-M genes were detected in 85.5% and 58.00%, respectively.
Tekiner and Ozpinar (2016) from Turkey detected
bla TEM and
bla CTX-M 96.40% and 53.70%, respectively in foods of animal origin. In present study occurs of ESBL resistance was higher in dairy buffalo calves in comparison to gaushala cattle calves. In dairy farms for treatment and prophylactic purpose antibiotic are use, while in gaushalas abandoned cattle from rural area are kept hence less chance of resistance.
The plasmid profile of 05, ESBL producing
E. coli isolates from diarrheic calves. Plasmid profiling of ESBL producing
E. coli isolates from diarrheic calves were observed by agarose gel electrophoresis which showed plasmid bands in different combinations. The average plasmid number among the isolates was 3.4 and ranging from 3-4 plasmids per isolate. Two isolates (40%) were harboring 03 plasmids whereas three isolates with 04 plasmids which were highest number of plasmid. The plasmid size was found in different combinations which ranged from 900bp to >10 kbp in all isolates. pQE-30 Xa vector was used as positive control in our study.
In
E. coli, the antimicrobial resistance genes reside in plasmids which are responsible for resistance to numerous antimicrobial agents. We recorded smaller plasmids of <20 kb in size. Existence of common plasmid among the isolates implies the spread of resistant plasmid in the community.
Gupta et al. (2014) reported smaller size plasmid ranging from 3 kbp to 8 kbp and their number also varied from one to four. Whereas
Gohar et al. (2015) reported plasmid size from 100 bp to 12 kbp. Furthermore, the similarity in plasmids among different isolates suggested plasmid movement between bacteria.