PCR amplification and identification of SNPs
The genomic DNA from 100 Murrah buffaloes was isolated and primer were set on thermocycler for implication of target region of 517 bp (consisting part of intron 14, exon 15, intron 15, exon 16, intron 16, exon 17 and intron 17) and 514 bp (comprising partial intron 2, exon 3 and intron 3) of
DGAT1 and
ESR1 genes respectively; (Fig 2-3). The chromatograms were viewed using Chromas software suite and then aligned using Clustal Omega online tool to conduct comparative sequence analysis with
Bos taurus and reference Buffalo sequence of both the genes having accession number NC_059171.1
(DGAT1) and NC_059166.1
(ESR1). The aligned sequences showed transition at three positions
i.e. 290A>G, 306G>A and 317C>T in
DGAT1 gene as shown in Table (2) and Fig (4-6). On comparing the corresponding region of
DGAT1 gene with
Bos taurus, 15 inter-species nucleotide variations were identified in which 10 genetic variants were of transition type whereas 5 genetic variants were of transversion type. The targeted region of
ESR1 gene appeared to be monomorphic in the studied buffalo population; Therefore, no association studies was performed to determine the effect of genotypes on performance traits of Murrah buffaloes. However, 3 nucleotide variations were observed upon comparison between
Bubalus bubalis and
Bos taurus reference sequence, in which, transition was found at A87G and C430T and transversion at T436G position.
Estimation of gene and genotypic frequencies
At locus 290A>G, the gene frequency of alleles A and G were estimated to be 0.698 and 0.301 with genotype frequencies for AA, AG and GG were found as 0.44, 0.52 and 0.04, respectively (Table 3). The observed genotypes for SNP 306G>A were AA, AG and GG with their gene frequency for A and G alleles as 0.45 and 0.55 respectively and genotypic frequencies as 0.25, 0.40 and 0.35, respectively. The observed genotypes for SNP 317C>T were CC and CT with their gene frequencies for C and T allele as 0.98 and 0.02 respectively and genotypic frequencies as 0.95 and 0.05 respectively in the Murrah buffaloes; whereas, genotype TT was not observed in the screened population.
Association of SNPs with performance traits
The General Linear Model was used in SAS software to estimate the effect of non-genetic factors and genetic factors on production traits like milk fat% and milk production traits of 88 Murrah buffaloes up to their fourth lactation records. The overall least squares mean for milk production traits
viz average fat%, 305 Days Milk Yield (305DMY), Lactation Yield (LY), Peak Yield (PY), Lactation Length (LL) were found as 7.697±0.055%, 2158.4±56.022 kg, 2198.32±59.284 kg, 13.302±0.248 kg and 276.497±5.277 days, respectively as represented in the Table (5).
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) of NGF on performance traits
The ANOVA for non-genetic factors on various lactation traits (Table 4) revealed that only period of first calving had significant effect on all lactation traits (p≤0.01) under study
viz. average fat%, 305DMY, LY, PY and LL. The average fat% was found to be higher in the period between 2022 and 2023 as 8.002±0.211% and lower estimate was in the duration from 2019 to 2021 as 7.542±0.186%; however, the fat percentage in both periods were not significantly different from the first period
i.e. 2016-2018 (7.557±0.155). It might be due to progression in the nutritional inventions during the recent period in addition to the advanced managemental practices. In the current study, period of first calving significantly affected other lactation traits
viz 305DMY, LY, PY and LL in which higher estimate was found during the period 2016-2018 and lower during 2022-2023 (p≤0.01); however some traits showed non-significant effects with other periods. The lactation number had significant effect on PY and LL (p≤0.05) and the maximum PY was obtained during fourth parity and minimum during first parity; whereas, LL was found highest during second parity and lowest during first parity with no significant differences among the classes for both the traits (Table 5).
ANOVA of SNPs on performance traits
The effect of SNP G306A was found to be significantly associated with average fat percentage (p≤0.01) in Murrah buffaloes. The average fat percentage was found to be higher in GG genotype as 7.974±0.164% and lower in GA genotype as 7.493±0.181%; and both of them were not significantly different from the AA genotype (Table 5). Other lactation traits were found to be non-significantly associated with any of the genotype at the same locus. Also, there was non-significant effect of genetic variant A290G on the lactation traits observed in the studied population. The SNP C317T was not considered for association analysis due to very low gene frequency of T allele as presented in Table (3).
In the present study, results revealed clear existence of 3 SNPs in
DGAT1 gene at A290G, G306A and T317C and it was also found that G306A was significantly associated with average fat%. Similar to our findings,
Isık et al. (2022) conducted polymorphism study in
DGAT1 in 150 Anatolian water buffaloes in which mutations were detected as G155C and C275T in the 422 bp amplified sequence containing partial regions of 7,8 and 9 exons. Also,
Naserkheil et al. (2019) performed gene polymorphism studies of
DGAT1 gene on 200 Iranian buffaloes by DNA sequencing and identified nine nucleotide variants at various positions. In line with our studies,
de Freitas et al. (2016) detected three SNPs at 11644C>T, 11783G>T and 11785T>C positions in a study conducted on 196 Murrah buffaloes and it was also found that SNP at 11785T>C, located at exon 17, was significantly affecting milk fat and milk protein. The genotype TC had maximum fat% as 7.13% and genotype TT had minimum fat% as 6.72%; while, protein% was reported for TT genotype as 4.45% and CC genotype as 4.24% in buffaloes at 5% level of significance. Contrary to the present findings,
Silva et al., (2016) found no significant impact of
DGAT1 gene on milk production traits in Murrah buffaloes; however, four nucleotide variants were observed at different positions.
Yuan et al., (2013) investigated gene polymorphism studies of
DGAT1 gene in 118 Chinese buffaloes and observed seven polymorphic positions at 7299T>C, 7313C>T, 7474G>A, 10839T>C, 11192G>A, 11573G>A and 11785C>T and observed amino acid substitution (valine to alanine) at position 484 from SNP found at 11785C>T. However, no association studies were conducted to analyse the effect of genotypes on the performance traits.
Ozdil and Ilhan (2012) conducted similar studies to detect gene polymorphism in exon 8 region of Anatolian buffaloes and found three SNPs at 43T>C, 154G>A and 373G>C positions. Several studies have also been performed in cattle such as
Couto et al., (2022) studied genetic polymorphism for
DGAT1, CAPN-9, CAPN-14 and Leptin gene in 95 Nellore cattle which revealed four nucleotide variations at 11730A>T, 11809G>C, 11858A>G, 11927G>A that altered the amino acids too and influenced the meat tenderness quality of beef cattle.
Meng et al., (2013) conducted similar studies in Dehong buffaloes to detect polymorphism in exon 17 region of
DGAT1 gene and detected SNP at 1350C>G in exon 17 however it was not significantly affecting milk constituents.
Li et al., (2018) performed genetic association studies in coding region of
DGAT1 gene in 971 buffaloes which revealed a non-synonymous mutation (SNP 9046T>C) from arginine to histidine in exon17 region. The reported SNP significantly affected the milk fat% and TT genotype had maximum fat% (8·26±0·04%) and CC genotype had minimum fat% (8·13±0·04%). There was also significant effect by SNP 8330T>C on peak milk yield, milk yield and milk protein% in which highest milk yield was obtained by CT genotype (2869·39±40·67 Kg) whereas lowest yield by TT genotype (2413·33±86·90 Kg).
Gothwal et al (2023) conducted genetic association of
DGAT1 gene mutations in indigenous cattle with their production and reproduction traits and revealed significant association of K232A located at exon 8 with milk production traits like total milk yield,300 days milk yield.
Mishra et al. (2007) conducted a comparative study of
DGAT1 gene polymorphism in Chinese buffaloes and Indian buffaloes and reported 19 novel SNPs among Indian buffaloes and also concluded that genetic sequences of
DGAT1 gene of Indian buffaloes were closely linked with Chinese buffaloes.
Pareek et al., (2005) also found similar observations in Polish black and white cattle in which significant effect of
DGAT1 (K232A) on milk fat and milk protein were detected.
In the present investigation,
ESR1 was found to be monomorphic in the studied population. In line with our results,
Fouda et al., (2021) conducted study on 243 Egyptian water buffaloes targeting the promoter region of
ESR1 gene and observed monomorphic pattern in the studied population.
Kathiravan et al., (2017) also revealed similar monomorphic results in a study on 204 Murrah buffaloes for detection of SNPs in
ESR1 gene in exon 13 region.
Sarla et al. (2015) investigated genetic variation in the
ESR1 gene in buffaloes with the help of PCR-RFLP technique and found 870bp
ESR1 gene had monomorphic pattern in the studied population. Contrary to our results, polymorphism had been observed in various studies such as
Moravcíkova et al. (2015) performed a study on 100 Holstein cattle and found two SNPs at 5’ non-coding region.
Mohamadnejad et al., (2015) performed a study to detect genetic polymorphism at 5’ flanking region of
ESR1 gene in Iranian cattle and found SNP at 1213G>A position with gene frequencies ranging from 0.55 to 0.96 (A allele) and 0.04 to 0.20 (G allele). Also,
Szreder et al., (2007) conducted similar studies in Black and White Polish cattle and found transition at 1213A>G at 5’ non-coding region of
ESR1 gene. Similarly,
Othman and Abdel-samad (2013) detected gene polymorphism
ESR1 genes in 100 Egyptian buffaloes and they found three SNPs in
ESR1 gene as 89G>A, 200A>G and 201A>G. Also,
Zahmatkesh et al., (2011) conducted a study in 200 Holstein Friesian cattle to detect genetic association of
ESR1 gene with its performance traits and found that SNP 1213G>A possessed significant effect on average milk fat % at 5% level of significance whereas non-significant effect on milk yield, milk protein and SNF.