Isolation and Identification of E. coli
The emergence of multidrug resistant bacteria is a global health concern. ESBL are rapidly spreading worldwide and are frequently isolated from animals and humans Enterobacteriaceae isolates. In the present study 52 rectal swabs of healthy as well as diarrheic cattle calves in and around Jabalpur were collected for characterization of ESBL producing
Escherichia coli. A total 51 (98.07%) samples yielded
E.
coli which include 27(100%) from non diarrheic cattle and 24 (96%) from diarrheic cattle calves (Table 2). In this study, singlex PCR was performed for targeting the highly conserved gene 16S rRNA for confirmation and rapid diagnosis of
E.
coli. Total 39 (76.47%) isolates produced 1476 bp of amplicon and were confirmed as
E.
coli (Fig 3a).
The present study shows much higher isolation rate than
Masud et al., (2012) (30.71%) and
Gebregiorgis and Tessema (2016) (36.8%). The reason why the result of the current study varies from the other reports might be due to variations in farm management conditions. The present study findings corroborate with the result of
Pereira et al., (2014); Awosile et al., (2018) and
Putra et al., (2020), they isolated and identified
E.
coli from calf and confirmed
E.
coli in 96%, 88.1% and 100%, respectively.
E.
coli are the normal commensal bacteria of intestine so they were present in all the non diarrheic calves as stated by
Saidani et al., (2017). Prevalence of
E.
coli was lower in diarrheic calves (88.46%) compared to other studies. The differences in the prevalence rates of
E.
coli among diarrheic calves may be attributed to the geographical locations of the farm, management practice and hygienic measures (
El-Seedy et al., 2016).
ESBL production
Out of 51
E.
coli isolates, 07 (13.72%)
E.
coli isolates showed reduced susceptibility to one or more antimicrobials of initial screening (Fig 1). Total 05 (9.8%) isolates were phenotypically confirmed as ESBL producing
E.
coli by using ESBL identification kit and double disc diffusion test (Table 3, Fig 2). Out of the 05 phenotypically positive isolates screened for the presence of
bla genes by PCR, 01 (20%) isolate was found to be positive for
bla CTX-M gene (Fig 3b), 04 (80%) isolate was found to be positive for
blaTEM gene (Fig 3c) and 03 (60%) isolates were positive for
bla AmpC gene (Fig 3d). Coexpression of
bla TEM and
bla AmpC was recorded in 03 (60%) isolates (Table 4).
Findings of present study are supported by observations of
Liu et al., (2018) from China using double disc diffusion test reported 9.60%
E.
coli isolates from pigs as ESBL producer. In France,
Haennia et al., (2014) reported prevalence of ESBL
E.
coli to be 29.40% in calves fecal flora.
Hiroi et al., (2011) screened 16
E.
coli isolates, out of which two isolates (12.50%) were phenotypically confirmed as ESBL producers. Similar findings of lower prevalence of ESBL producer
E.
coli were observed in the present study it might be due to differences in the detection methods. As documented in the
Schmid et al., (2013) using enrichment and selective media (MacConkey agar containing cefotaxime) for isolation of ESBL producing
E.
coli.
Olowe et al., (2015) performed PCR in
E.
coli isolates obtained from animal fecal samples in Nigeria and detected
blaTEM and
bla CTX gene in 48 (42.10%) and 51 (44.70%) isolates, respectively.
Liu et al., (2018) from China reported 9.60%
E.
coli isolates from pigs as ESBL producer harbored at least one type of beta lactamase, with
bla CTX-M,
bla TEM, being detected in 90.90% and 68.18%, respectively. The present study revealed
bla TEM shows higher prevalence which is similar to the finding of
Montso et al., (2019) from South Africa screened 53.1%
E.
coli isolates as ESBL producers. The
bla TEM and
bla CTX-M genes were detected in 85.5% and 58.00%, respectively.
Dewangan et al., (2017) from Chhattisgarh detected 39.4% isolates were found to harbour the
blaTEM gene on their plasmid DNA indicating the presence of multidrug resistant ESBL producing
E.
coli in foods of animal origin and human samples.
Tekiner and Ozpýnar (2016) from Turkey detected
blaTEM and
blaCTX-M 96.40% and 53.70%, respectively in foods of animal origin.
Plasmid profiling
The plasmid profile of 05, ESBL producing
E.
coli isolates from healthy and diarrheic cattle calves are presented in Table 5. Plasmid profiling of ESBL producing
E.
coli isolates from healthy and diarrheic cattle calves were observed by agarose gel electrophoresis which showed plasmid bands in different combinations (Fig 4). The average plasmid number among the isolates was 2.4 and ranging from 0-4 plasmids per isolate. Three isolates (60%) were harboring 04 plasmids which were highest number of plasmid and no plasmid was observed in two isolates (40%). The plasmid size was observed in different combinations which ranged from 900 bp to>10 k bp in all isolates. pQE-30 Xa vector was used as positive control in our study.
In
E.
coli, the antimicrobial resistance genes reside in plasmids which are responsible for resistance to numerous antimicrobial agents. We recorded smaller plasmids of <20 kb in size. Existence of common plasmid among the isolates implies the spread of resistant plasmid in the community.
Gupta et al., (2014) reported smaller size plasmid ranging from 3 kbp to 8 kbp and their number also varied from one to four. Whereas
Gohar et al., (2015) reported plasmid size from 100 bp to 12 kbp. Furthermore, the similarity in plasmids among different isolates suggested plasmid movement between bacteria. From ESBL resistant isolates, 40% of the isolates we couldn’t recover plasmid although the concentration of plasmid was visible in spectrophotometer but on electrophoresis, we were not able to amplifying it. It may be due to low copy number or loss of plasmid during curing in laboratory procedure.