Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.5 (2023)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 57 issue 8 (august 2023) : 1079-1084

Antibacterial Potential of Fungal Endophytes Isolated from Carica papaya

M.S. Kushwaha1, Anju Nayak1,*, A.K. Rai1, S. Bordoloi1, V. Gupta1, J. Jogi1, P. Shakya1, K. Himani1, B. Gupta1
1Department of Veterinary Microbiology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Nanaji Deshmukh Veterinary Science University, Jabalpur-482 004, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Cite article:- Kushwaha M.S., Nayak Anju, Rai A.K., Bordoloi S., Gupta V., Jogi J., Shakya P., Himani K., Gupta B. (2023). Antibacterial Potential of Fungal Endophytes Isolated from Carica papaya . Indian Journal of Animal Research. 57(8): 1079-1084. doi: 10.18805/IJAR.B-4354.
Background: Drug resistant bacteria related health problems are major concern globally and search for newer and most effective antibacterial agents is the urgent need to combat with these challenges. The study was undertaken with the aim of isolating and identifying endophytic fungi associated with Carica papaya and assessing their potential as antibacterial agents.

Methods: Carica papaya plants were collected from different locations and endophytic fungi were isolated and characterized phenotypically and genotypically by microscopy, colonial characteristics and ITS gene sequencing, respectively. Antibacterial activity of endophyte was assessed against Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumonia, Salmonella Typhimurium, Bacillus cereus, Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes, using the agar plate diffusion assay method with Ciprofloxacin as a positive control.

Result: Thirty four (34) fungal endophytes of two genera Fusarium and Penicillium were recovered from 60 samples of Carica papaya and they showed the antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus. Thus, the endophytic fungi have the potential to be used as an antibacterial agent.
Drug resistant bacteria related health problems are major concern in the modern world and search for newer and most effective antibacterial agents are the urgent need tocombat with these challenges (Singh et al., 2017). There has been a tremendous increase in interestin screening endophytes for their antimicrobial activities.

Endophytes are the bacterial and fungal microorganisms that live inside the living plant tissues for at least part of their life without causing any apparent disease symptoms in the host (Christina et al., 2013). They are ubiquitous, colonize in all plants and recognized as one of the most chemically promoting groups of microorganisms in terms of diversity and pharmaceutical potential (Thaslimmunisha et al., 2016). The plantendophyte interaction is a mutual relationship (Ginting et al., 2013), with plants offering residence, nutrients and protection to the endophytes; whilst endophytes provide several benefits to improve growth and health of their plant hosts (Pereira et al., 2016, Morare et al., 2018). Metabolites produced by endophytes have shown various biological activities such as anti-microbial, anti-cancer, anti-oxidant and anti-diabetic (Nair and Padmavathy, 2014, Morare et al., 2018). Endophytic fungi are a good source of natural products that have been observed to kill a wide variety of harmful disease causing agents (Sandhu et al., 2014). Medicinal plants and their fungal endophytic communities produce similar pharmaceutical products (Prabukumar et al., 2015).

Papaya (Carica papaya) is a fruit crop widely grown in tropical and subtropical environments. Traditionally, the plant is used for the treatment of a wide range of ailments like wounds, ulcers, dyspepsia, diarrhea, bleeding, haemorrhoids, whooping cough, dysentery, skin diseases (Saeed et al., 2014, Krishnan et al., 2012). Lot of information on the nutritive importance and antimicrobial properties of papaya fruit are available. However, the endophytes associated with papaya plant are yet to be elucidated and functionally characterized. Papaya, a sugar crop, possessing many saccharides like glucose, fructose and sucrose, harbours numerous endophytes and and their study can provide  important clues about the characteristic medicinal features (Krishnan et al., 2012). Many of the recent researches are pointing towards identifying novel natural pharmaceutically active compounds from various plant sources. The fungal endophytes are also helpful in controlling antimicrobial resistance. Any breakthrough in this direction will be a significant achievement in fight against bacterial diseases of human and animals. To best of our knowledge very scanty database is available with respect to characterization of endophytic bacteria from papaya plants. Therefore, the present study was undertaken with the aim of isolating and identifying endophytic fungi associated with Carica papaya and assessing their potential as antibacterial agents.
The experiment was conducted in the year 2018-19 in the Department of Veterinary Microbiology, College of Veterinary Science and A.H., Nanaji Deshmukh Veterinary Science University, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India.
 
Ethical approval
 
The research work was conducted as approved by the College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, NDVSU, Jabalpur, India.
 
Collection of plant materials
 
A total of 60 samples consisting 20 samples each from leaves, roots and shoots tip of Carica papaya were collected from four different locations of Jabalpur (Table 1) and immediately transported to Laboratory of Department of Veterinary Microbiology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Jabalpur, India.

Table 1: Sample collection from Carica papaya plants.


 
Isolation and identification of endophytic fungi
 
The disinfection of roots, leaves and shoots tip of Carica papaya plants and isolation of endophytic fungi from the collected samples was done according to Mahajan et al., (2014) with some modifications. The isolated fungal endophytes were identified on the basis of morphological features like colony characteristics, growth of fungi, colour of colony (front and reverse) on SDA plates (Promputtha et al., 2005) and their microscopic appearance like shape of conidia. The microscopic identification of fungal endophytes was carried out by lactophenol cotton blue staining and visualization under high power lens using light microscope.
 
Molecular identification of endophytic fungi and phylogenetic analysis
 
Isolation of DNA was performed as per the protocol described by Gul et al., (2017). DNA was dissolved in nuclease free water and preserved in -20°C until further use. Molecular characterization of endophytic fungi was performed using universal primers (ITS1: 5'- TCCGTAGG TGAACCTGCGG -3' and ITS4: 5'- TCCTCCGCTTATTGAT ATGC -3') of internal transcribed spacer ribosomal DNA (ITS rDNA) sequences (Sushma et al., 2018). The PCR products were tested for amplification of gene by agarose gel electrophoresis using 1% agarose gel. The amplified DNA products from endophytic fungi was sent for sequencing at Triyat Genomics, Nagpur, India. Endophytic fungi were identified by comparing similarity between ITS rDNA sequences with sequences available in (NCBI) GenBank database using BLAST tool.
 
Antibacterial activity of endophytic fungi
 
The agar plate diffusion assay method as described by Nwakanma et al., (2016) The modified agar plug method described by Devaraju and Satish (2011) was used to evaluate screen the antibacterial activity of the fungal endophytes with some modifications against six bacteria viz. Escherichia coli (ATCC25922), Klebsiella pneumonia (ATCC700603), Salmonella Typhimurium (ATCC13311), Bacillus cereus (ATCC11778), Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC6538), Streptococcus pyogenes (ATCC12386). Briefly the Muller-Hinton agar (MHA) was inoculated with 100 μl of the bacterial suspension and spread uniformly. The mycelial discs (6 mm) of each endophytic fungal isolate (15 days old) grown on sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA) were obtained from actively growing margins using a sterile cork borer and placed on the surface of the MHA medium previously seeded with test organisms. The plates were sealed using para film and incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. The antibacterial activity was assessed by measuring the diameter of the zone of inhibition in millimeters and compared with ciprofloxacin as positive and distilled water as negative control.
 
Determination of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for endophytic fungi
 
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined using broth dilution method as per the guidelines of Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI, 2006). The fungal plates were incubated at 25-28°C for 42 hours and were visually observed for the presence or absence of turbidity. The minimum concentration of the compound showing no turbidity was recorded as MIC.
Fungi are among the most important groups of eukaryotic organisms they are well known for producing many novel metabolites which are directly used as drugs or function as lead structures for synthetic modifications. The advent of endophytes has shifted the focus of drug discovery from plants to microorganisms.
 
Isolation of fungal endophytes
 
In present study the disinfection of Carica papaya leaves, roots and shoot tipsurface was adequate as all control plates did not have any microbial growth. While, a total of 34 endophytic fungi were recovered from the Carica papaya leaves (Table 2), roots (Table 3) and shoot tips (Table 4). Isolates of one group of endophytic fungi had sickle shaped conidia and formed dark brown colored colony from front view and yellowish colour at reverse view of petridish. Isolates of second group formed filamentous velvety green colony from front view and white colour colony at reverse view of petridish and microscopically unbranching chain of round conidia were observed. Phenotypically first isolate was characterized as Fusarium species whereas second isolate was characterized as Penicillium species. Mahajan et al., (2014) conducted a study to isolate and characterize endophytes from plants on kings B media. During the study fungal species were isolated and characterized on the basis of various morphological and biochemical assays. The variation in morphological characteristics of fungi may be due to variation in host of endophytic fungi and the endophytic fungi which was isolated. Since the papaya plants used in this study appeared healthy and Fusarium spp and Penicillium spp are known to be pathogens, it appears that these fungal isolates are avirulent, hypovirulent, or virulent but in a latent phase, causing no harm to papaya plant. Sushma et al., (2018) screened four plants with medicinal properties Carica papaya, Phyllanthus amarus, Tinospora cordifolia and Azadiracta indica for the isolation of endophytic fungi. The leaves of these plants revealed two, four, six and three isolates of endophytic fungi belonging to the family Hypomycetes, Ascomycetes, Dothideomycetes, Coleomycetes, respectively. The roots, leaves and shoots tip of Carica papaya was chosen for isolation of fungal endophytes. However, only two fungal endophytes were isolated in this study, providing limited diversity of fungal endophytes as compared to other similar studies (Tenguria and Khan, 2015, Jariwala et al., 2018). This may be due to the temperature, rainfall and atmospheric humidity (Selvanathan et al., 2011), plant used, age, seasonal collection the isolation method (Jasim et al., 2014) media composition (Costa et al., 2002, Kumar et al., 2015) and culture conditions used (Kumar et al., 2015). Huang et al., (2007) indicated that isolation method whereby plant material is cut intosmall pieces and placed on growth medium yield highly numerous endophytes.

Table 2: Morphological characteristic of endophytic fungi isolated from leaves of Carica papaya in Sabouraud dextrose agar.



Table 3: Morphological characteristic of endophytic fungi isolated from roots of Carica papaya plant in Sabouraud dextrose agar.



Table 4: Morphological characteristic of endophytic fungi isolated from shoots tip Carica papaya in Sabouraud dextrose agar.


 
Molecular characterization and phylogenetic analysis
 
The amplified PCR products of the bacterial isolates were run on agarose gel electrophoresis. The amplified DNA fragments with 700bp were observed (Fig 1). Endophytic fungi were identified by comparing similarity between ITS gene sequences with sequences available In NCBI GenBank database using BLAST tool. Based on ITS sequence analysis 20 endophytic fungiisolates were classified as Fusariumspecies (Fig 2) and 14 isolates were classified as Penicillium species.

Fig 1: Agarose gel electrophoresis of ITS gene PCR product of endophytic fungi. Lad: 100 bp ladder, Lane 1: 700 bp PCR product.



Fig 2: Construction of phylogenetic tree of isolated endophytic fungi.


 
Antibacterial activity of endophytic fungi
 
Among 34 isolated endophytic fungi only 20 isolates belonged to Fusarium species showed antibacterial activity (Table 5). Isolates of endophytic fungi Fusarium species were effective against Staphylococcus aureus. None of the endophytic fungal isolates showed antibacterial activity against Escherichia coli, Streptococcus pyogenes, Salmonella Typhimurium and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Present study results were similar with the findings of Eze et al., (2019). They investigated the antibacterial activity of secondary metabolites of endophytic fungi isolated from leaves of Carica papaya. In the antimicrobial assay, the extracts PPL-LE2 displayed mild antibacterial activity against both Gram negative and Gram positive test bacteria. PPL-LAC extract showed mild activity only against Staphylococcus aureus. Likewise, Phongpaichit et al., (2006) screened the antimicrobial activity in endophytic fungi of five Garcinia plants. Isolates displayed antimicrobial activity against at least one pathogenic microorganism, such as Staphylococcus aureus, a clinical isolate of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcusaureus, Candida albicans and Cryptococcus neoformans. Similarly, Romasi et al., (2011) reported that the extracts of papaya leaves could inhibit the growth of pathogenic bacteria. Their findings strongly support that the endophyte from papaya can be rich source with antimicrobial properties.

Table 5: In vitro antibacterial activity of endophytic fungi isolated from Carica papaya plant.



In the present study Carica papaya plant fungal endophyte showed antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus suggests that metabolites of endophytic fungi might had diffused in the culture medium and suppressed the growth of pathogenic bacteria. The bioactive compound could easily move into the bacterial cell membrane via the general bacterial porins, which might be responsible for several metabolic functions of the cell or they may form various pores in the outer cell membrane of bacteria, thus resulting in the leakage of internal substances to the outside, causing cell lysis and death (Islam et al., 2018).

The endophytic fungi which showed antibacterial activity, their minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined. The antibacterial activity of endophytic fungi Fusariumspp.and Penicillium spp. was observed against Staphylococcusaureus and their minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ranged between 64 to 128 mg/ml (Table 6).

Table 6: Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of endophytic fungi against pathogenic bacteria.

In the present study, two endophytic fungi Fusarium spp and Penicillium spp were isolated from the leaves, roots and shoots tip of Carica papaya plant. Molecular characterization based on ITS1 and ITS4 gene sequence analysis, the endophytic fungus present was confirmed as Fusarium spp and Penicillium spp. Endophytic fungi Fusarium spp and Penicillium spp. possess the antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus. Thus, study suggests that endophytic fungi isolated from leaves, roots and shoots tip of Carica papaya have the potential to be used as antibacterial agents.

  1. CLSI, (2006). Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that Grow Aerobically. 7th Ed. Approved Standard, M7-A7.

  2. Costa, E., Teixido, N., Usall, J., Atares, E. and Vinas, I. (2002). The effect of nitrogen and carbon sources on growth of the biocontrol agent Pantoeaagglomerans strain CPA-2. Letters in Applied Microbiology. 35: 117-120. https://doi. org/10.1046/j.1472-765X.2002.01133.x.

  3. Christina, A., Christapher, V. and Bhore, S.J. (2013). Endophytic bacteria as a source of novel antibiotics: An overview. Pharmacognosy Reviews. 7(13): 2013. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-7847.112833.

  4. Devaraju, R. and Satish, S. (2011). Endophytic mycoflora of Mirabilis jalapa L. and studies on antimicrobial activity of its endophytic Fusarium sp. Asian Journal of Experimental Biological Sciences. 2(1): 75-79.

  5. Eze, P.M., Abonyi, D.O., Abba, C.C., Proksch, P., Okoye, F.B. and Esimone, C.O. (2019). Toxic, but beneficial compounds from endophytic fungi of Caricapapaya. The Euro Biotech Journal. 3(2): 105-111. https://doi.org/10.2478/ebtj-2019-0012.

  6. Ginting, R.C.B., Sukarno, N., Widyastuti, U., Darusman, L.K. and Kanaya, S. (2013). Diversity of endophytic fungi from red ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.) plant and their inhibitory effect to Fusariumoxysporum plant pathogenic fungi. HAYATI Journal of Biosciences. 20(3): 127-137. https://doi.org/10.4308/hjb.20.3.127.

  7. Gul, F., Hussain, A., Gul, J. and Hamayun, M. (2017). Genomic DNA extraction for molecular identification of endophytic fungi. An easy and efficient protocol. Bioscience Biotechnology Research Asia. 14(2): 667-671. http://dx.doi.org/10.13005/bbra/2492.

  8. Huang, W.Y., Cai, Y.Z., Xing, J., Corke, H. and Sun, M. (2007). A potential antioxidant resource: Endophytic fungi from medicinal plants. Economic Botany. 61(1): 2007.https://doi.org/10.1663/0013-0001(2007)61[14: APAREF]2.0.CO;2.

  9. Islam, M.N., Choi, J. and Baek, K. (2018). Antibacterial activityes of endophytic bacteria isolated from Taxusbrevifolia agent foodborne pathogenic bacteria. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease. 10(10): 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2017.2357.

  10. Jariwala, B. and Desai, B. (2018). Isolation and identification of endophytic fungi from various medicinal plants. BMR Microbiology. 4(1): 1-7.

  11. Jasim, B., Joseph, A.A., John, C.J., Mathew, J.and Radhakrishnan, E.K. (2014). Isolation and characterization of plant growth promoting endophytes bacteria from rhizome of Zingiber officinale. 3 Biotech. 4: 197-204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-013-0143-3.

  12. Krishnan, P., Bhat, R., Kush, A. and Ravikumar, P. (2012). Isolation and functional characterization of bacterial endophytes from Carica papaya fruits. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 113: 308-317.

  13. Kumar, S.N., Jacob, J., Reshma, U.R., Rajesh, R.O. and Kumar, B.S.D. (2015). Molecular characterization of forest soil based Paenibacillus elgii and optimazation of various culture conditions for its improved antimicrobial activity. Frontiers in Microbiology. 6: 1-11. 

  14. Mahajan, S., Bakshi, S., Bansal, D. and Bhasin, P. (2014). Isolation and characterization of endophytes. International Journal of Latest Scientific Research and Technology. 1: 29-33.

  15. Morare, R.F., Ubomba-Jaswa, E. and Serepa-Dlamini, M.H. (2018). Isolation and identification of bacterial endophytes from Crinum macowanii Baker. African Journal of Biotechnology. 17(33): 1040-1047. DOI: 10.5897/AJB2017.16350.

  16. Nair, D.N. and Padmavathy, S. (2014). Impact of endophytic microorganisms on plants, environment and humans. The Scientific World Journal. 113: 308-317.

  17. Nwakanma, C., Njoku, E.N. and Pharamat T. (2016). Antimicrobial activity of secondary metabolites of fungi isolated from leaves of Bush mango. Journal of Next Generation Sequencing and Applications. 3(135): DOI:10.4172/2469-9853.1000135.

  18. Pereira, S.I.A., Monteiro, C., Vega, A.L. and Castro, P.M.L. (2016). Endophytic culturable bacteria colonizing Lavandula dentate L. plants: Isolation, characterization and evaluation of their plant growth-promoting activities. Ecological Engineering. 87: 91-97. 

  19. Phongpaichit, S., Rungjindamai, N.,Rukachaisirikul, V. and Sakayaroj, J. (2006). Antimicrobial activity in cultures of endophytic fungi isolated from Garciniaspecies. FEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology. 48(3): 367-372. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-695X.2006.00155.x.

  20. Prabukumar, S., Rajkuberan, C., Ravindran, S. and Krishnan, S. (2015). Isolation and characterization of endophytic fungi from Crescentiacujetel and treir antibacterial antioxidant and anticancer properties. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 7(11): 316-321.

  21. Promputtha, I., Jeewon, R., Lumyong, S., McKenzie, E.H. and Hyde, K.D. (2005). Ribosomal DNA fingerprinting in the identification of non sporulatingendophytes from Magnolia liliifera (magnoliaceae). Fungal Diversity. 4: 167-186.

  22. Romasi, E.F., Karina, J. and Parshusip, A.J.N. (2011). Antibacterial activity of Papaya leaf against pathogenic bacteria. Makara Teknology. 15(2): 173-177.

  23. Saeed, F., Arshad, M.U., Pasha, I., Naz, R. Batool, R., Khan, A.A., Nasir, M.A. and Shafique, B. (2014). Nutritional and phyto-therapeutic potential of papaya (Carica papaya Linn.): An overview. International Journal of Food Properties. 7: 1637-1653.

  24. Sandhu, S.S., Kumar, S. and Aharwal, R.P. (2014). Isolation and identification of endophytic fungi from Ricinus communis linn and their antibacterial activity.International Journal of Research In Pharmacy and Chemistry. 4(3): 611-618.

  25. Selvanathan, S., Indrakumar, I.andJohnpaul M. (2011). Biodiversity of the endophytic fungi isolated from Calotropis gigantea (L.) R.BR. Recent Research in Science and Technology. 3(4): 94-100.

  26. Singh, A.K., Sharma, R.K., Sharma, V., Sharma, T. and Kumari, D. (2017) Isolation, morphological identification and In vitro antibacterial activity of endophytic bacteria isolated from Morusnigra (mulberry) leaves. Journal of Animal Research. 7(1): 155-164.

  27. Sushma, K.S., Jayashankar, M., Vinu, A.K. and Sayeed, M.A. (2018). Identification of fendophytic fungi from the medicinal plants of Biligi-rirangana hill, Karnataka. Journal of Applied and Natural Science. 10(4): 1156-1161.

  28. Tenguria, R.K. and Khan, N.F. (2015). Biodiversity of endophytic fungi in Withania somnifera leaves of panchmarhi biosphere reserve, Madhya Pradesh. Journal of Innovations in Pharmaceuticals and Biological Science. 2(2): 222-228.

  29. Thaslimmunisha, T., Bharathidasan, R. and Prince, L. (2016). Endophytic fungi mediated silver nanoparticles as effective of antibacterial agents. World Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 4(4): 76-82.

Editorial Board

View all (0)