Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

Research Article

volume 53 issue 12 (december 2019) : 1694-1697,   Doi: 10.18805/ijar.B-3705

Histomorphological and scanning electron microscopic studies on tongue of Emu (Dromaius Novaehollandiae)

V
Varinder Uppal
N
Neelam Bansal
A
Anuradha Gupta
D
Devendra Pathak
1Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana-141 004, Punjab, India.
Cite article:- Uppal Varinder, Bansal Neelam, Gupta Anuradha, Pathak Devendra (2019). Histomorphological and scanning electron microscopic studies on tongue of Emu (Dromaius Novaehollandiae). Indian Journal of Animal Research. 53(12): 1694-1697. doi: 10.18805/ijar.B-3705.

ABSTRACT

The present research was conducted on the tongue of eight dead emu birds (both male and female) collected from poultry farm of GADVASU, Ludhiana to investigate its histological and scanning electron microscopic details. The tissue pieces of tongue were processed for light and scanning electron microscopic studies. The lingual surfaces were lined by stratified squamous non keratinized epithelium. Tongue consisted of connective tissue, mucus glands, blood vessels, Herbst corpuscles, lingual skeleton and striated muscles. SEM indicated desquamating and non-desquamating epithelial cells along with microplicae were observed. Microvilli were very few. The area of papillae was devoid of any glandular openings. 

REFERENCES

  1. Berkhoudt, H. (1985). Structure and function of avian taste buds in form and function in birds. Volume 3 [edited by A. S. Kang and J. McLelland]. Acedemic Press, London, 463-91.
  2. Crole, M. R. and Soley, J. T. (2009). Morphology of the tongue of the emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae). II Histological feartures. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research,76: 347-61.
  3. Crole, M. R. and Soley, J. T. (2010). Surface morphology ofthe emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae) tongue. Anatomia Histologia Embryologia,39(4):355-65.
  4. Crole, M. R. and Soley, J. T. (2014). Comparative distribution and arrangement of Herbst corpuscles in the oropharynx of the ostrich (Struthio camelus) and emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae). Anatomical Record,297: 1338-48.
  5. Dehkordi,R.A. F., Parchami, A. and Bahadoran, S. (2010). Light and scanning electronmicroscopic study of the tongue in the zebra finch Carduelis carduelis (Aves:Passeriformes: Fringillidae). Slovenian Veterinary Research,47: 139–44.
  6. Emura, S., Okumura, T. and Chen, H.(2009). Scanning electron microscopic study of thetongue in the Japanese pygmy woodpecker (Dendrocopos kizuki). Okajimas Folia Anatomia Japnese,86: 31–35.
  7. Erdogan, S., Sagsöz, H. and Akbalýk, M. E.(2012). Anatomical and histological structureof the tongue and histochemical characteristics of the lingual salivary glands in the Chukar partridge. British Poultry Science,53 (3):307–15.
  8. Iwasaki, S.(1992). Fine structure of the dorsal lingual epithelium of the little tern,Sterna albifrons Pallas (Aves, Lari). Journal of Morphology,212: 13–26.
  9. Iwasaki,S.(2002). Evolution of the structure and function of the vertebrate tongue. Journal of Anatomy,201: 1–13.
  10. Jackowiak, H. and Godynicki, S.(2005). Light and scanning electron microscopic study of the tongue in the white-tailed eagle (Haliaeetus albicilla, Accipitridae, Aves).Annals of Anatomy,187: 251–59.
  11. Jackowiak, H. and Ludwig, M. (2008). Light and scanning electron microscopic study of the structure of the ostrich (Strutio camelus) tongue. Zoological Science,25: 188–94.
  12. Kobayashi, K., Kumakura, M., Yoshimura, K., Inatomi M. and Asami T.(1998). Fine struc-ture of the tongue and lingual papillae of the penguin. Archieve of Histology and Cytology,61:37–46.
  13. Liman N, Bayram G and Koc A M.(2001). Histological and histochemical studies on the lingual, preglottal and laryngeal salivary glands of the Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) at the post hatching period. Anatomia Histologia Embryologia,30: 367–73.
  14. Luna, L. G. (1968). Manual of histologic staining: Methods of Armed forces Institute of Pathology. 3rd edn. McGraw Hill Book Co, New York, USA. pp 38-196.
  15. Nicke,lR.., Schummer, A. and Seiferle, E. (1977). Anatomy of the Domestic Birds. Verlag Paul Parey, Berlin, Hamburg, pp. 44–46.
  16. Parchami, A. and Fatahian, D.R.A. (2013). Light and electron microscopic study of the tongue in the white eared bulbul (Pycnonotus leucotis).Iranian Journal of Veterinary Research,14:9-14.
  17. Parchami, A., Fatahian,D.R.A. and Bahadoran, S.(2010). Fine structure of the dorsal lingual epithelium of the common quail (Coturnix coturnix). World Applied Science Journal,10: 1185–89.
  18. Pasand, A. P., Tadjalli, M. and Mansouri, H. (2010). Microscopic study on the tongue of male ostrich. European Journal of Biological Science,2: 24–31.
  19. Sagsöz, H., Erdogan, S. and Akbalik, M.E.(2013). Histomorphological structure of thepalate and histochemical profiles of the salivary palatine glands in the Chukarpartridge (Alectoris chukar, Gray 1830). Acta Zoologica,94 (4): 382–391.
  20. Santos, T. C., Fukuda, K. Y., Guimarães, J. P., Oliveira, M.F., Miglino, M. A. and Watanabe, L.S.(2011). Light and scanning electron microscopy study of the tongue in Rheaamericana. Zoological Science,28: 41–46.
  21. Tivane, C. (2008). A morphological study of the oropharynx and oesophagus of the ostrich (Strutio camelus). M Sc dissertation, University of Pretoria, South Africa.
  22. Uppal, V., Bansal, N., Anuradha, Pathak, D. and Singh, A.(2014). Light and electron microscopic study on tongue of quail. Avian Biology Research,7(3): 167-171 
Published In
Indian Journal of Animal Research
Article Metrics
Metrics Icon
0
Views
0
Citations
Reviewed By
Share Article
Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Research Article

    volume 53 issue 12 (december 2019) : 1694-1697,   Doi: 10.18805/ijar.B-3705

    Histomorphological and scanning electron microscopic studies on tongue of Emu (Dromaius Novaehollandiae)

    V
    Varinder Uppal
    N
    Neelam Bansal
    A
    Anuradha Gupta
    D
    Devendra Pathak
    1Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana-141 004, Punjab, India.
    Cite article:- Uppal Varinder, Bansal Neelam, Gupta Anuradha, Pathak Devendra (2019). Histomorphological and scanning electron microscopic studies on tongue of Emu (Dromaius Novaehollandiae). Indian Journal of Animal Research. 53(12): 1694-1697. doi: 10.18805/ijar.B-3705.

    ABSTRACT

    The present research was conducted on the tongue of eight dead emu birds (both male and female) collected from poultry farm of GADVASU, Ludhiana to investigate its histological and scanning electron microscopic details. The tissue pieces of tongue were processed for light and scanning electron microscopic studies. The lingual surfaces were lined by stratified squamous non keratinized epithelium. Tongue consisted of connective tissue, mucus glands, blood vessels, Herbst corpuscles, lingual skeleton and striated muscles. SEM indicated desquamating and non-desquamating epithelial cells along with microplicae were observed. Microvilli were very few. The area of papillae was devoid of any glandular openings. 

    REFERENCES

    1. Berkhoudt, H. (1985). Structure and function of avian taste buds in form and function in birds. Volume 3 [edited by A. S. Kang and J. McLelland]. Acedemic Press, London, 463-91.
    2. Crole, M. R. and Soley, J. T. (2009). Morphology of the tongue of the emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae). II Histological feartures. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research,76: 347-61.
    3. Crole, M. R. and Soley, J. T. (2010). Surface morphology ofthe emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae) tongue. Anatomia Histologia Embryologia,39(4):355-65.
    4. Crole, M. R. and Soley, J. T. (2014). Comparative distribution and arrangement of Herbst corpuscles in the oropharynx of the ostrich (Struthio camelus) and emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae). Anatomical Record,297: 1338-48.
    5. Dehkordi,R.A. F., Parchami, A. and Bahadoran, S. (2010). Light and scanning electronmicroscopic study of the tongue in the zebra finch Carduelis carduelis (Aves:Passeriformes: Fringillidae). Slovenian Veterinary Research,47: 139–44.
    6. Emura, S., Okumura, T. and Chen, H.(2009). Scanning electron microscopic study of thetongue in the Japanese pygmy woodpecker (Dendrocopos kizuki). Okajimas Folia Anatomia Japnese,86: 31–35.
    7. Erdogan, S., Sagsöz, H. and Akbalýk, M. E.(2012). Anatomical and histological structureof the tongue and histochemical characteristics of the lingual salivary glands in the Chukar partridge. British Poultry Science,53 (3):307–15.
    8. Iwasaki, S.(1992). Fine structure of the dorsal lingual epithelium of the little tern,Sterna albifrons Pallas (Aves, Lari). Journal of Morphology,212: 13–26.
    9. Iwasaki,S.(2002). Evolution of the structure and function of the vertebrate tongue. Journal of Anatomy,201: 1–13.
    10. Jackowiak, H. and Godynicki, S.(2005). Light and scanning electron microscopic study of the tongue in the white-tailed eagle (Haliaeetus albicilla, Accipitridae, Aves).Annals of Anatomy,187: 251–59.
    11. Jackowiak, H. and Ludwig, M. (2008). Light and scanning electron microscopic study of the structure of the ostrich (Strutio camelus) tongue. Zoological Science,25: 188–94.
    12. Kobayashi, K., Kumakura, M., Yoshimura, K., Inatomi M. and Asami T.(1998). Fine struc-ture of the tongue and lingual papillae of the penguin. Archieve of Histology and Cytology,61:37–46.
    13. Liman N, Bayram G and Koc A M.(2001). Histological and histochemical studies on the lingual, preglottal and laryngeal salivary glands of the Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) at the post hatching period. Anatomia Histologia Embryologia,30: 367–73.
    14. Luna, L. G. (1968). Manual of histologic staining: Methods of Armed forces Institute of Pathology. 3rd edn. McGraw Hill Book Co, New York, USA. pp 38-196.
    15. Nicke,lR.., Schummer, A. and Seiferle, E. (1977). Anatomy of the Domestic Birds. Verlag Paul Parey, Berlin, Hamburg, pp. 44–46.
    16. Parchami, A. and Fatahian, D.R.A. (2013). Light and electron microscopic study of the tongue in the white eared bulbul (Pycnonotus leucotis).Iranian Journal of Veterinary Research,14:9-14.
    17. Parchami, A., Fatahian,D.R.A. and Bahadoran, S.(2010). Fine structure of the dorsal lingual epithelium of the common quail (Coturnix coturnix). World Applied Science Journal,10: 1185–89.
    18. Pasand, A. P., Tadjalli, M. and Mansouri, H. (2010). Microscopic study on the tongue of male ostrich. European Journal of Biological Science,2: 24–31.
    19. Sagsöz, H., Erdogan, S. and Akbalik, M.E.(2013). Histomorphological structure of thepalate and histochemical profiles of the salivary palatine glands in the Chukarpartridge (Alectoris chukar, Gray 1830). Acta Zoologica,94 (4): 382–391.
    20. Santos, T. C., Fukuda, K. Y., Guimarães, J. P., Oliveira, M.F., Miglino, M. A. and Watanabe, L.S.(2011). Light and scanning electron microscopy study of the tongue in Rheaamericana. Zoological Science,28: 41–46.
    21. Tivane, C. (2008). A morphological study of the oropharynx and oesophagus of the ostrich (Strutio camelus). M Sc dissertation, University of Pretoria, South Africa.
    22. Uppal, V., Bansal, N., Anuradha, Pathak, D. and Singh, A.(2014). Light and electron microscopic study on tongue of quail. Avian Biology Research,7(3): 167-171 
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us
      Published In
      Indian Journal of Animal Research

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)