Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

Research Article

volume 53 issue 10 (october 2019) : 1269-1274,   Doi: 10.18805/ijar.B-3646

Comparative analysis of semen quality parameters and their relationship with fertility in different genetic groups of layer chicken

G
Gurjot Kaur Mavi
P
P.P. Dubey
R
Ranjna S. Cheema
S
S.K. Dash
B
B.K. Bansal
1<div style="text-align: justify;">Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana-141 004, Punjab, India.</div>
Cite article:- Mavi Kaur Gurjot, Dubey P.P., Cheema S. Ranjna, Dash S.K., Bansal B.K. (2018). Comparative analysis of semen quality parameters and their relationship with fertility in different genetic groups of layer chicken. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 53(10): 1269-1274. doi: 10.18805/ijar.B-3646.

ABSTRACT

The present study was conducted to characterize the semen quality parameters in roosters of three genetic groups viz. Rhode Island Red (RIR), Punjab Red and RIR X local cross. The roosters for each genetic group were also evaluated for fertility rate. There was no significant difference in color, pH and abnormalities among different genetic groups. RIR X local cross had significant higher (p<0.01) ejaculate volume (0.51±0.02 ml vs. 0.27±0.01 and 0.30±0.01ml), sperm concentration (2804.70±114.61 vs. 1826.10±77.66 and 2133.50±81.18X106 sperms/ml), sperm motility % (66.60±2.12 vs. 55.38±1.82 and 51.95±1.84), sperm viability % (72.43±2.06 vs. 64.67±1.88 and 51.25±1.89) and HOST % (64.59±2.61 vs. 58.55±1.17 and 47.09±2.11) than RIR and Punjab Red respectively.  Interestingly, RIR X local cross had significant lower (p<0.01) partially damaged sperm % (36.96±2.81 vs. 41.84±1.78 and 48.98±1.89) and fully damaged sperm % (14.15±3.39 vs. 26.27±1.93 and 31.25±2.46) than RIR and Punjab Red respectively indicating desirable performance. The fertility rate for RIR X local cross was also found to be higher than Punjab Red and RIR respectively. Sperm traits were significantly positively correlated among groups with high correlation between fertility rate and sperm traits. It can be concluded that the selection of roosters on the basis of sperm function tests for artificial insemination may improve fertility rate and thereby may reduce maintenance cost of large number of cocks.

REFERENCES

  1. Bah, G.S., Chaughari, S.U.R., Al-Amin, J.D. (2001). Semen characteristics of local breeder cocks in the Sahel region of Nigeria. Revue D’Elevage Et De Medecine Veterinaire Des Pays Tropicaux, 54:153-158.
  2. Das, S.K., Adhikary, G.N., Islam, M.N, Paul, B.K., and Das, G.G. (2004). Artificial insemination (AI) by raw semen: Its advantages and disadvantages in Deshi chicken (Gallus domesticus) International Journal of Poultry Science, 3:662–663.
  3. Denisa, V., FilipcikRadek, F., Ladislav, M. (2015). Assessment of Ejaculate Quality In Roosters of three Laying Lines. Mendel Net: 174-177.
  4. Galal. A.(2007). Predicting semen attributes of naked neck and normally feathered male chickens from live performance traits. International Journal of Poultry Science, 6:36-42. 
  5. Hrncar, C., Barborova, L., Bujko, J. (2013). The quality of ejaculate in cocks of Brown Leghorn, Oravka and Brahma breeds. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 46:66–69.
  6. Hu, J., Chen, J.L., Zhao, G.P., Zheng, M.Q., Liu, R.R., Liu, W.P., Zhao, L.H., Liu, G.F., Wang, Z.W. (2013). Estimation of the genetic parameters of semen quality in Beijing – You chickens. Poultry Science, 2606-2612.
  7. Jarinkovicova, L., Machal. L., Machal. J., Filipcik, R., Tumova, E., and Horsky, R. (2008). Relationship of ejaculate quality and selected biochemical parameters of blood in cockerels of three laying lines. ýCzech Journal of Animal Science, 8:370–376.
  8. Kabir, M., Oni, O.O, and Akpa, G.N. (2007). Osborne selection index and semen traits interrelationships in Rhode Island Red and White breeder roosters. International Journal of Poultry Science, 6:999-1002.
  9. Machal. L., and Krivanek, I. (2002) .Indicators of semen quality of rooster of three paternal layer lines and specific conductivity of the semen. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, 71:109–116.
  10. Machebe, N.S. and Ezekwe, A.G. (2005). Ejaculate characteristics of three genotypes of local cocks in the humid tropics. Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, 3:33-37.
  11. Malik, A., Haron, A.W., Yusoff, R., Nesa, M., Bukar, M., and Kasim, A. (2013). Evaluation of the ejaculate quality of the red jungle fowl, domestic chicken, and bantam chicken in Malaysia. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 37:564-568. 
  12. Mavi, G.K., Dubey, P.P., Cheema, R.S. (2017). Comparison of sperm attributes in two indigenous layer breeds and their relationship with fertility. Theriogenology Insight, 7:123-129.
  13. McDaniel, C.D., Parker, H.M., Yeatman, J.B., Schultz, C.D., Zumwalt, C.D. (1998). Selection of young broiler breeder roosters for the sperm motility index increases the percentage of fertilized eggs produced for weeks. Poultry Science, 77:124.
  14. McGary, S., Estevez, I., Bakst, M.R., Pollock, D.L. (2002). Phenotypic traits as reliable indicators of fertility in male broiler breeders. Poultry Science, 81:102–111.
  15. Moce, E., and Graham, J.K. (2008). In vitro evaluation of sperm quality. Animal Reproduction Science, 105:104–118.
  16. Mosenene, T.B.M. (2009). Characterisation and cryopreservation of semen of four South African chicken breeds. Master of Science in Agriculture Thesis. Bloemfontein, South Africa.
  17. Murugesan, S., Matam, N., Kulkarni, R., Bhattacharya, T.K., and Chatterjee, R.N. (2013). Semen quality in white leghorn chicken select for egg production traits. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 37:747-749.
  18. Peters, S.O., Shoyebo, O.D., Ilori, B.M., Ozoje, M.O., Ikeobi, C.O.N., Adebambo, O.A. (2008). Semen quality traits of seven strain of chickens raised in the humid tropics. Journal of Poultry Science, 7:949-953.
  19. Rakha, B.A., Ansari, M.S., Hussain, I., Malik, M.F., Akhtar, S., Blerbois, E.(2015). Semen characteristics of the Indian red jungle fowl (Gallus gallus murghi). European Journal of Wildlife Research, 61: 379.
  20. Shanmugam, M., Niranjan, M., Rakesh, K., Bhattacharya, T.K., Chatterjee, R.N. (2013). Semen quality in White Leghorn chicken selected for egg production traits. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 37:747–749
  21. Shanmugam, M., Rajkumar, A.U., Reddy, M.R., Rao, S.V.R. (2012). Effect of age on semen quality in naked neck and dwarf chicken under tropical climatic conditions. Animal Reproduction Science, 52:964-968.
  22. Tuncer, P.B., Kinet, H., Ozdogan, N. (2008). Evaluation of some spermatological characteristics in Gerze cocks. Ankara University Veterinary Veteriner Fakultesi Dergisi, 55:99-102. 
Published In
Indian Journal of Animal Research
Article Metrics
Metrics Icon
0
Views
0
Citations
Reviewed By
Share Article
Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Research Article

    volume 53 issue 10 (october 2019) : 1269-1274,   Doi: 10.18805/ijar.B-3646

    Comparative analysis of semen quality parameters and their relationship with fertility in different genetic groups of layer chicken

    G
    Gurjot Kaur Mavi
    P
    P.P. Dubey
    R
    Ranjna S. Cheema
    S
    S.K. Dash
    B
    B.K. Bansal
    1<div style="text-align: justify;">Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana-141 004, Punjab, India.</div>
    Cite article:- Mavi Kaur Gurjot, Dubey P.P., Cheema S. Ranjna, Dash S.K., Bansal B.K. (2018). Comparative analysis of semen quality parameters and their relationship with fertility in different genetic groups of layer chicken. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 53(10): 1269-1274. doi: 10.18805/ijar.B-3646.

    ABSTRACT

    The present study was conducted to characterize the semen quality parameters in roosters of three genetic groups viz. Rhode Island Red (RIR), Punjab Red and RIR X local cross. The roosters for each genetic group were also evaluated for fertility rate. There was no significant difference in color, pH and abnormalities among different genetic groups. RIR X local cross had significant higher (p<0.01) ejaculate volume (0.51±0.02 ml vs. 0.27±0.01 and 0.30±0.01ml), sperm concentration (2804.70±114.61 vs. 1826.10±77.66 and 2133.50±81.18X106 sperms/ml), sperm motility % (66.60±2.12 vs. 55.38±1.82 and 51.95±1.84), sperm viability % (72.43±2.06 vs. 64.67±1.88 and 51.25±1.89) and HOST % (64.59±2.61 vs. 58.55±1.17 and 47.09±2.11) than RIR and Punjab Red respectively.  Interestingly, RIR X local cross had significant lower (p<0.01) partially damaged sperm % (36.96±2.81 vs. 41.84±1.78 and 48.98±1.89) and fully damaged sperm % (14.15±3.39 vs. 26.27±1.93 and 31.25±2.46) than RIR and Punjab Red respectively indicating desirable performance. The fertility rate for RIR X local cross was also found to be higher than Punjab Red and RIR respectively. Sperm traits were significantly positively correlated among groups with high correlation between fertility rate and sperm traits. It can be concluded that the selection of roosters on the basis of sperm function tests for artificial insemination may improve fertility rate and thereby may reduce maintenance cost of large number of cocks.

    REFERENCES

    1. Bah, G.S., Chaughari, S.U.R., Al-Amin, J.D. (2001). Semen characteristics of local breeder cocks in the Sahel region of Nigeria. Revue D’Elevage Et De Medecine Veterinaire Des Pays Tropicaux, 54:153-158.
    2. Das, S.K., Adhikary, G.N., Islam, M.N, Paul, B.K., and Das, G.G. (2004). Artificial insemination (AI) by raw semen: Its advantages and disadvantages in Deshi chicken (Gallus domesticus) International Journal of Poultry Science, 3:662–663.
    3. Denisa, V., FilipcikRadek, F., Ladislav, M. (2015). Assessment of Ejaculate Quality In Roosters of three Laying Lines. Mendel Net: 174-177.
    4. Galal. A.(2007). Predicting semen attributes of naked neck and normally feathered male chickens from live performance traits. International Journal of Poultry Science, 6:36-42. 
    5. Hrncar, C., Barborova, L., Bujko, J. (2013). The quality of ejaculate in cocks of Brown Leghorn, Oravka and Brahma breeds. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 46:66–69.
    6. Hu, J., Chen, J.L., Zhao, G.P., Zheng, M.Q., Liu, R.R., Liu, W.P., Zhao, L.H., Liu, G.F., Wang, Z.W. (2013). Estimation of the genetic parameters of semen quality in Beijing – You chickens. Poultry Science, 2606-2612.
    7. Jarinkovicova, L., Machal. L., Machal. J., Filipcik, R., Tumova, E., and Horsky, R. (2008). Relationship of ejaculate quality and selected biochemical parameters of blood in cockerels of three laying lines. ýCzech Journal of Animal Science, 8:370–376.
    8. Kabir, M., Oni, O.O, and Akpa, G.N. (2007). Osborne selection index and semen traits interrelationships in Rhode Island Red and White breeder roosters. International Journal of Poultry Science, 6:999-1002.
    9. Machal. L., and Krivanek, I. (2002) .Indicators of semen quality of rooster of three paternal layer lines and specific conductivity of the semen. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, 71:109–116.
    10. Machebe, N.S. and Ezekwe, A.G. (2005). Ejaculate characteristics of three genotypes of local cocks in the humid tropics. Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, 3:33-37.
    11. Malik, A., Haron, A.W., Yusoff, R., Nesa, M., Bukar, M., and Kasim, A. (2013). Evaluation of the ejaculate quality of the red jungle fowl, domestic chicken, and bantam chicken in Malaysia. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 37:564-568. 
    12. Mavi, G.K., Dubey, P.P., Cheema, R.S. (2017). Comparison of sperm attributes in two indigenous layer breeds and their relationship with fertility. Theriogenology Insight, 7:123-129.
    13. McDaniel, C.D., Parker, H.M., Yeatman, J.B., Schultz, C.D., Zumwalt, C.D. (1998). Selection of young broiler breeder roosters for the sperm motility index increases the percentage of fertilized eggs produced for weeks. Poultry Science, 77:124.
    14. McGary, S., Estevez, I., Bakst, M.R., Pollock, D.L. (2002). Phenotypic traits as reliable indicators of fertility in male broiler breeders. Poultry Science, 81:102–111.
    15. Moce, E., and Graham, J.K. (2008). In vitro evaluation of sperm quality. Animal Reproduction Science, 105:104–118.
    16. Mosenene, T.B.M. (2009). Characterisation and cryopreservation of semen of four South African chicken breeds. Master of Science in Agriculture Thesis. Bloemfontein, South Africa.
    17. Murugesan, S., Matam, N., Kulkarni, R., Bhattacharya, T.K., and Chatterjee, R.N. (2013). Semen quality in white leghorn chicken select for egg production traits. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 37:747-749.
    18. Peters, S.O., Shoyebo, O.D., Ilori, B.M., Ozoje, M.O., Ikeobi, C.O.N., Adebambo, O.A. (2008). Semen quality traits of seven strain of chickens raised in the humid tropics. Journal of Poultry Science, 7:949-953.
    19. Rakha, B.A., Ansari, M.S., Hussain, I., Malik, M.F., Akhtar, S., Blerbois, E.(2015). Semen characteristics of the Indian red jungle fowl (Gallus gallus murghi). European Journal of Wildlife Research, 61: 379.
    20. Shanmugam, M., Niranjan, M., Rakesh, K., Bhattacharya, T.K., Chatterjee, R.N. (2013). Semen quality in White Leghorn chicken selected for egg production traits. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 37:747–749
    21. Shanmugam, M., Rajkumar, A.U., Reddy, M.R., Rao, S.V.R. (2012). Effect of age on semen quality in naked neck and dwarf chicken under tropical climatic conditions. Animal Reproduction Science, 52:964-968.
    22. Tuncer, P.B., Kinet, H., Ozdogan, N. (2008). Evaluation of some spermatological characteristics in Gerze cocks. Ankara University Veterinary Veteriner Fakultesi Dergisi, 55:99-102. 
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us
      Published In
      Indian Journal of Animal Research

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)