Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First Articles
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First Articles
Indian Journal of
Animal Research
Print ISSN: 0367-6722
Online ISSN: 0976-0555
NASS Rating
6.40
SJR
0.233
CiteScore
0.606

Chief Editor:
M. R. Saseendranath
Kerala Veterinary and Animal Science University, Mannuthy, Thrissur, INDIA
Frequency:Monthly
Indexing:
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, ...

Research Article

Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 52 issue 3 (march 2018) : 444-448

Productive performance, body condition score and carcass characteristics of Deccani lambs reared under different farming systems

S.A. Kochewad, T. Raghunandan, K. Sarjan Rao, K. Kondal Reddy, N. Nalini Kumari, D.B.V. Ramana, D. Anil Kumar, Yogeshwar Kankarne, Sanjeev Kumar, L.R. Meena, Magan Singh
1College of Veterinary Science Rajendranagar, Hyderabad-500 030, Telangana, India.
Cite article:- Kochewad S.A., Raghunandan T., Rao Sarjan K., Reddy Kondal K., Kumari Nalini N., Ramana D.B.V., Kumar Anil D., Kankarne Yogeshwar, Kumar Sanjeev, Meena L.R., Singh Magan (2018). Productive performance, body condition score and carcass characteristics of Deccani lambs reared under different farming systems. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 52(3): 444-448. doi: 10.18805/ijar.B-3478.

ABSTRACT

The present study was carried out to assess the effect of different farming systems on productive performance, body condition score and carcass characteristics of Deccani lambs. Thirty-six weaned lambs having 3 months of age were divided into three groups with twelve lambs in each group in under intensive (T1), semi-intensive (T2) and extensive (T3) farming systems. The comparative mean dry matter intake (kg/day) and (kg/100kg BW) was significantly (p<0.05) higher in T1 group when compared to other groups. T2 group had significantly (p<0.05) higher DM intake (kg/day) than T3 group. The mean values of Average daily gains in Deccani lambs were significantly (p<0.05) higher in T1 group compared to T2 and T3 groups. The feed efficiency was significantly (p < 0.05) higher in T1 compared to T2, T3 groups. Statistically significant difference was found in BCS at six months of age (p<0.05) between T1 and T3 groups. BCS at 9, 12 months and overall BCS, there was a significant (p<0.05) difference between T1 and T3 groups. T1 group had higher pre-slaughter weight, hot carcass weight, meat %, fat% and meat: bone ratio thanT2 and T3. The dressing yields were comparable. The weights of other offals (heart, kidney, spleen, testicles, blood, head and lung and trachea) were comparable. The findings of this study indicated that the intensive and semi-intensive system of rearing could be useful for mutton production. In extensive system, which is predominant in India should change its facet by enriching the grazing land resources as well by the supplementation of required plane of nutrition during growth and special life stages viz., gestation, puberty, post lambing and finisher stages for achieving optimum productivity.

REFERENCES

  1. Bharambe, V.Y. and Burte, R. (2012). Comparative growth performance of deccani lambs under various rearing systems in agro-    ecological conditions of Konkan. Indian Journal of Hill Farming, 25:44-47. 
  2. Carvalho, S., Brochier, M.A., Pivato, J., Vergueiro, A., Teixeira, R.C. and Kieling, R. (2007). Performance and economic evaluation of the feeding of feedlot lambs with diets with different roughage: concentrate ratios. Ciencia Rural, 37: 1411-1417.
  3. Garcia, Iraides Ferreira Furusho, Costa, Tharcilla Isabella Rodrigues, Almeida, Amélia Katiane de, Pereira, et al. (2010). Performance and carcass characteristics of Santa Inêspure lambs and crosses with Dorper Texel at different management systems. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 39:1313-1321.
  4. Karabacak, A., Aytekin, I and Boztepe, S. (2015). Fattening performance and carcass characteristics of Akkaraman lambs in different housing systems. Indian J. Anim. Res., 49: 515-522
  5. Karaca, S., Yilmaz., Kor, A., Bingöl, M. and Keskin, S. (2016). Effect of different feeding systems on the fattening performance, slaughter-carcass characteristics and meat quality in lambs. Indian J. Anim. Res., 50: 595-600.
  6. Kramer,C..Y (1957). Extension of multiple range tests to group correlated adjusted means. Biometrics 1: 13-18.
  7. Molina, A., Gallego, L and Sotillo, J.L. (1991). Annual growth in BW and BCS in Manchega ewes at different stages of production.Archivos de Zootecnia, 40: 237-249.
  8. Ozder, M., Yurtman, I.Y. and Koycu, E. (1995). Condition score and use of sheep breeding. Journal AnimalProduction, 36: 1-10. 
  9. Porwal K., Karim, S.A., Agarwal, A., Singh, V.K. (2005). Blood biochemical profile of lambs maintained under different system of feeding management. Indian Journal of Small Ruminants,11: 166-171.
  10. Ramana Reddy, Y., Krishna, N., Raghava Rao, E., Janardhana Reddy, T. (2003). Influence of dietary protected lipids on intake and digestibility of straw based diets in Deccani sheep. Animal Feed Science Technology,106: 29–38.
  11. Ripoll, G., Alvarez-Rodriguez, J., Sanz, A., and Joy, M. (2014). The capability of alfalfa grazing- and concentrate-based feeding systems to produce homogeneous carcass quality in light lambs over time. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 12:167-    179. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2014121-4830
  12. Russel, A.J.F., Doney,J.M. and Gunn,R.G. (1969). Subjective assessment of body fat in live sheep. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 72: 451-454. 
  13. Santra, A. and Karim, S. A. (2009). Effect of dietary roughage and concentrate ratio on nutrient utilization and performance of ruminant animals. Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology,9: 113"135.
  14. Sari, M., ÖNK, K., Aydin, E., Tilki, M., and Tufan, T. (2014). Effects of different fattening systems on fattening performance and body measurements of Hemsin Male lambs. Kafkas Universitesi Veteriner FakultesiDergisi, 20:209-215.
  15. Sawal, R.K., Sharma, K.C., Narula, H.K., Ayub, M. (2011). Nutrient availability for small ruminants in community pasture of hot arid zone. Indian Journal of Small Ruminants, 17: 235- 236.
  16. Snedecor, G.W. and Cochran, W.G. (1989). Statistical Methods 6th Edition Oxford Publishing Company, Calcutta India.
  17. Thakur, A., Malik, D. S., Kaswan, S and Saini,A.L .(2017). Effect of different floor space allowances on the performance and behavior of Beetal kids under stall-fed conditions. Indian Journal of Animal Research, 51:776-780.
  18. Turner, R. L. (2004). Livestock production and rural poor in Andhra Pradesh and Orissa States, India. Pro-poor Livestock Policy Initiative Working Paper No. 9. FAO, Rome. http://www.fao.org/ag/againfo/projects/en/pplpi/docarc/wp9.pdf
  19. Venkaeswarlu,B. (2005). Completion Report: Production System Research 1999-2004. Rainfed Agro-Ecosystem, National agricultural Technology Project. Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, pp 202.
  20. Venkataaju, N, Pankaj P.K., Ramana D.B.V., Rita Rani, Nikhila. M and Sudheer D. (2015). Physiological responses to Intensification in Deccani Sheep. International Journal of Plant, Animal and Environmental Sciences,5:50-55.
  21. Yadav, D.K., Jain, A., Kulkarni, V.S., Govindaiah, M.G., Aswathnarayan, T. and Sadana, D.K. (2013). Classification of four ovine breeds of southern peninsular zone of India, morphometric study using classical discriminate function analysis. Springer Plus, 2: 29.
  22. Zervas, G., Hadjigeorgiou, I., Zabeli, G., Koutsotolis, K. and Tziala. C. (1999).Comparison of a grazing- with an indoor-system of lamb fattening in Greece. Livestock Production Science,61:245–251 
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)