Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorM. R. Saseendranath

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.40

  • SJR 0.233, CiteScore: 0.606

  • Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Research Article

Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 51 issue 5 (october 2017) : 948-951

Assessment of pre and post-incubation parameters in Uttara breeder hens

M.K. Singh, Shive Kumar, R. K. Sharma, S. K. Singh, Brijesh Singh, D. V. Singh
1<p>Department of Livestock Production Management,&nbsp;G.B.P.U.A &amp; T, Pantnagar-263 145, Uttarakhand, India.</p>
Cite article:- Singh M.K., Kumar Shive, Sharma K. R., Singh K. S., Singh Brijesh, Singh V. D. (2016). Assessment of pre and post-incubation parameters in Uttara breeder hens . Indian Journal of Animal Research. 51(5): 948-951. doi: 10.18805/ijar.v0iOF.6827.

ABSTRACT

A study was conducted to determine the effects of pre-incubation egg parameters on post-incubation parameters in Uttara breeder hens. A total of 2,890 hatching eggs were   classified according to three egg weight groups viz. small (44-52 g); medium (53-57 g) and large (58-68 g). Results indicated that large-sized eggs produced chicks with higher hatch-weight than medium and small-sized eggs. However, no differences were observed for fertility and hatchability rates but significant differences were found for chick quality and chick weight. It was therefore concluded from the results of the present study that sorting of eggs by weight prior to incubation might be advantageous in producing uniform size hatchlings to meet specific market demands with focus on breeding for obtaining maximum number of saleable chicks. 

REFERENCES


  1. Alabi, O.J.; Ng’ambi, J.W. and Norris, D. (2012). Effect of egg weight on physical egg parameters and hatchability of indigenous Venda chickens. Asian J. Anim. Vety. Adv. 7: 166-172.

  2. Asu Squo, B.; and B. Okon (1993). Effect of age in lay and egg size on fertility and hatchability of chick eggs. Nig. J. Anim. Prod. 20: 122-124.

  3. Bhardwaj, R.K., Kumar, S., Pant, D., Kumar, A. and Sharma, R.K. (2006). Study of growth, reproductive and carcass traits in purebred and crossbred chicken. Indian J. Poult. Sci. 41: 301-303.

  4. Borzemska, W.A., Malec, H., Niedzioalka, J., Lix, M. and Pijarska, I. (1998). Evaluation of hen hatch in incubators with different synchronization of incubation time. Rocz. Nauk. Zoot. T. 25: 223 - 229.

  5. Decuypere, E. and Michels, H. (1992). Incubation temperature as a management tool: a review. World’s Poultry Sci. J. 48: 28 - 38.

  6. Faruque, S.; Siddiquee, N.U.; Afroz, M.A. and Islam, M.S. (2010). Phenotypic characterization of Native Chicken reared under intensive management system. J. Bangladesh Agri. Univ. 8: 79-82.

  7. Iqbal, S.; Pampori, Z.A. and Hasin, (2009). Carcass and egg characteristics of indigenous chicken of Kashmir (Kashmir favorella). Indian J. Anim. Res. 43:194.

  8. Kamanli, S.; I., Durmus and S., Demir (2010). Hatching characteristics of abnormal eggs. Asian J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 5:271-    274. 

  9. Kramer, C. Y. (1957). Extension of multiple range tests to group correlated adjusted means. Biometrics. 13: 13-17.

  10. Kumar, S.; Kumar, A.; Singh, B.; Sharma, R.K.; Singh, D.V. and Singh, S.K. 2014. Study on blood biochemical parameters and carcass traits in Uttara fowl. Indian Vet. J., 91: 107-108.

  11. Lemlem A and Tesfay Y. (2010). Performance of exotic and indigenous poultry breeds managed by smallholder farmers in northern Ethiopia. Livest. Res. Rural Dev. 2:Article 133 (http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd22/7/leml22133.htm)

  12. Magnesha, M. (2012). Indigenous chicken production and the innate characteristics. Asian J. Poul. Sci. 6: 56-64.

  13. Mbajiorgu.(2011). Effect of egg weight on hatchability and chick hatch weight of indigenous Venda chickens. Indian Journal of Animal Research 45: 300- 304.

  14. Mohammed, M.D.; Abdalsalam, Y.B.; Kheir, A.R.M.; Jin-yu, W. and Hussein, M.H. (2012). Comparision of the egg characteristics of different Sudanese indigenous chicken types. In: Third RUFORUM Biennial Meeting 24-28 September 2012, Entebbe, Uganda.pp.595-599.

  15. Mohan, J; Sastry, K.V.H.; Moudgal R.P. and Tyagi, J.S. (2008). Production and other characteristics of Aseel peela desi hens under normal rearing system. Indian J. Poult. Sci. 43: 217-219.

  16. Olwande, P.O.; W.O., Ogara, S.O., Okoth, M.O., Odindo and R.F. Adhiambo (2010). Assessing the productivity of indigenous chickens in an extensive system in southern Nyanza, Kenya. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 42:283-288. 

  17. Padhi, M.K.; Rai, R.B.; Sehani, S. and Saha, S.K. (1998). Assessement of egg quality in different breeds of chicken. Indian J. Poult. Sci. 33: 113-115.

  18. Padhi, M.K.; Senani, S.; Ahlawat, S.P.S.; Saha, S.K.; Kundu, A. and Chatterjee, R.N. (2000). Fertility and hatchability performance of different breeds of chicken and crossbreds in hot and humid climate of A & N islands. In: XX Annual conference and symposium of Indian Poultry Science Association, October, 12-14. 

  19. Petek, M.; H. Baspinar, M., Ogan and F., Balci (2005). Effects of egg weight and length of storage period on hatchability and subsequent egg production traits of quail. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci., 29: 537-542. 

  20. Reijrink, I.A.M., Meijerhof, R., Kemp, B., Graat, E.A.M and van den Brand, H. (2009). Influence of pre-storage incubation on embryonic development, hatchability, and chick quality. Poultry Science 88: 2649–2660.

  21. Sahin, E.H.; Sengor, E.; Yardimci, M.; Centigul, I.S. (2009). Relationship between pre-incubation egg parameters from old breeder hens, egg hatchability and chick weight. J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 8: 115-119.

  22. Singh, G.; Singh, S.K.; Kumar, B. and Kumar, H. (2009). Genetic study of egg and hatch weight in different genetic groups of chicken. Indian J. Anim. Res. 43: 200-202.

  23. Singh, M.; Singh, U. and Gurung, B.S. (2000). Evaluation of egg weight and its various measurements to attributes in indigenous Aseel breed of chicken. Indian J. Poult. Sci. 35: 312-314.

  24. Smith, T.W. (2000). Hatching quality chicks. Publication 1182, Mississippi State University, Cooperating with U. S., http:/    /www.msstate.edu/dept/poultry/exthatch.htm.

  25. Thakur, M.S., Parmar, S.N.S. and Pillai, P.V.A. (2006). Studies on growth performance in Kadaknath breed of poultry. Livest. Res. Rural. Dev. 18: Article 18. (http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd18/12/cont1808.htm)

  26. Tona, K., Onagbesan, O., De Ketelaere, B., Decuypere, E. and Bruggeman, V. (2004). Effects of Age of Broiler Breeders and Egg Storage on Egg Quality, Hatchability, Chick Quality, Chick Weight and Chick Post-Hatch Growth to 42 Days. J. Appl. Poultry Res. 13: 10 - 18.

  27. Tona, K.F. Bamelis, B.D., Ketelaere, V. Bruggeman, V.M.B. Moraes, J. Buyse, O. Onagbesan and E. Decuypere, (2003). Effects of egg storage time on spread of hatch, chick quality, chick juvenile growth. Poul. Sci. 82: 736 - 741. PMID: 12762394.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)