Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 55 issue 8 (august 2021) : 936-940

Clinico-Pathological and Hemato-Biochemical Assessment of Field Originated Chicken Anemia Virus in Experimentally Challenged Broiler Chicken

Syed Maaz Nadeem1,*, Muti ur Rehman Khan1, Asim Aslam1, Ali Ahmad Sheikh2, Arfan Ahmad2, Asma Abdul Latif3, Ahsan Anjum1
1Department of Pathology, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan.
2University Diagnostic Laboratory, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan.
3Department of Zoology, Lahore College for Women University, Lahore, Pakistan.
Cite article:- Nadeem Maaz Syed, Khan Rehman ur Muti, Aslam Asim, Sheikh Ahmad Ali, Ahmad Arfan, Latif Abdul Asma, Anjum Ahsan (2021). Clinico-Pathological and Hemato-Biochemical Assessment of Field Originated Chicken Anemia Virus in Experimentally Challenged Broiler Chicken . Indian Journal of Animal Research. 55(8): 936-940. doi: 10.18805/ijar.B-1229.
One hundred broiler chicks were divided into two groups A and B. The chicks in group A were control group and group B was challenged with field originated chicken infectious anemia virus (CIAV) at 7th day of age. The samples were collected on 7th, 14th, 21st, 28th and 35th day of post infection for hematological, biochemical, immunohistochemical and histopathological examination. The hematological analysis showed significantly (P<0.05) low level of hemoglobin, decreased packed cell volume, leukocytopenia and thrombocytopenia in infected group as compared to control group. In immunohistochemical assay, CIAV was detected in portal zone of liver, epicardium and myocardium, lymphoid follicles of bursa of Fabricius, thymic lobules and mainly white pulp of spleen. Histopathological changes were observed in both lymphoid and non-lymphoid organs. Concerning the serum biochemical profile, hypoproteinemia, hypoalbuminemia, increased concentration of liver enzymes, creatinine and urea were observed in infected birds. Our results showed that field originated stra in is pathogenic for broilers which induce significant changes in hematology, serum biochemical profile and histopathology of lymphoid and non-lymphoid organs.
Chicken infectious anemia (CIA) is an important devastating viral disease of commercial poultry industry caused by chicken infectious anemia virus (CIAV), which is placed in Circoviridae family and belongs to genus Gyrovirus. Since its first isolation in 1979 in Japan, this virus has been isolated in many countries (Oluwayelu, 2010). CIAV can be diagnosed by detecting virus antigens and specific antibodies. Although the chickens of all ages are prone to CIAV, young birds (10-14 days) are mostly infected. The infected birds showed poor feed conversion ratio, decreased hematocrit values, anemia, increased mortality rate and lymphoid atrophy with aplasia of bone marrow (Schat et al., 2011; Vaziry et al., 2011). Atrophied lymphoid organs particularly thymus may result in immunosuppression of chickens leading to high risk of diseases with reduced weight gain. With the passage of time, birds may develop resistance against the virus and become carrier and shed the virus throughout the life. Among the distinguished features of CIAV, the most prominent is its both horizontal and vertical transmission which is mostly observed in birds between 3 to 4 weeks of age (Li et al., 2017).
        
Previously, antibodies in serum samples of poultry flocks produced either by infection or vaccination were detected by virus neutralization tests and indirect immunofluorescent tests which have been outdated by ELISA. For diagnosing CIAV on commercial level, ELISA is being used by most diagnostic laboratories in unvaccinated flocks. Very less published data is available about CIAV infection and its effect on different organs and hematology from commercial chicken industry of Pakistan. This study was planned to evaluate the tissue tropism, histopathological changes and haemato-biochemical parameters in broilers experimentally infected with local field isolated CIAV.
Experimental scheme
 
One hundred (n=100) 1-day-old chicks were procured and kept under standard housing conditions in experimental shed of university of veterinary and animal sciences, Lahore, Pakistan.  The blood samples were collected to assess the status of anti-CIAV-antibodies through ELISA on 7th day of  age. After ensuring the seronegative status of birds, the birds were categorized into two groups (A and B), with 50 birds in each group. Group A served as negative control while birds of group B were exposed to CIAV (100 CID50) on 7th day of age through intramuscular route. The endpoint estimation for 100 CID50 was clinical signs and hemoglobin estimation. At 7th, 14th, 21st, 28th and 35th day post infection (dpi), 5 chicks from each group were slaughtered for collection of blood and tissues (heart, liver, spleen, thymus and bursa of Fabricius). Tissue samples were preserved in 10% neutral buffered formalin for histopathological (Karimi et al., 2010) and immunohistochemistry (Haridy et al., 2009) studies by commercially available IHC kit according to manufacturer instructions (HRP/DAB Detection IHC kit, Abcam, Japan). Scoring of pathological changes in dead birds were made according to criteria as described by Najm-ul-Islam et al. (2013). To validate the IHC results, tissue samples were tested for the presence of CIAV through PCR using primers targeting the specific regions overlapping VP1-VP2 and VP2-VP3, CAV-1 (5-CTAAGATCTGCAACTGCGGA-3) and CAV-2 (5-CCTTGGAAGCGGATAGTCAT-3) to amplify a 419 bp DNA fragment (Hermann et al., 2012) as shown in Fig 1.
 

Fig 1: Detection of CAV by polymerase chain reaction.


 
Haemato-biochemical profile
 
Blood samples were divided in EDTA and gel containing vacutainers for hematological and serum biochemistry analysis respectively. The vacutainers were centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for ten minutes to collect the serum, labeled properly and stored at -20°C for further processing. Hematology of the samples were performed as descried by Al-Hassani (2011). Liver function tests including alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), total bilirubin, albumin, total protein and renal function test including creatinine and urea level were measured according to protocol as described by Khanam et al. (2016).
 
Statistical analysis
 
Data were presented in mean ± standard deviation form and analyzed by applying t-test on statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS) version 23.0 software.
On day 7 PI, clinical signs developed in the infected birds were lethargic appearance, depressed, stunting growth, drooping of both wings and pale comb and wattle due to anemia. Only 06/50 birds (12.0%) were died throughout the whole time period of the study. On necropsy, hemorrhages on thigh and breast muscles, yellow fatty bone marrow, enlarged liver and atrophied lymphoid organs were observed. On 7th DPI, mild (+) subcutaneous and cutaneous hemorrhages were found in the pectoral and breast muscles, heart, liver and skin underlying feathers which become further worse on day 14th PI as moderate (++) to severe (+++) on day 28th PI (Table 1). However, the severity in cutaneous and subcutaneous hemorrhages got reduced by 35th DPI. The finding observed in this study are in concordance with the results reported earlier (Spackman et al., 2002; Najm-ul-Islam et al., 2013). Similar to those reported previously (Kuscu and Gürel, 2008), the histopathological changes in both lymphoid and non-lymphoid organs were observed on 7th DPI in experimental birds. Histopathological changes in non-lymphoid organs such as in liver were mild hepatic necrosis and vascular degenerations (Fig 2a). In case of heart, multifocal myocarditis and a few mononuclear cell infiltrates were seen (Fig 2b). Lymphocyte depletions were seen in lymphoid follicles in bursa of Fabricius (Fig 2c). Necrotic areas were seen in spleen with lymphopenia in white pulp (Fig 2d). Necrosis was observed in the thymus in the cortical and medullary regions along with lymphocytic depletion especially in cortico-medullary regions (Fig 2e). Although histopathological changes in non-lymphoid organs were mild by day 14th DPI, these changes were moderate in lymphoid organ. Karyomegaly in infected cells was obvious along with necrosis and lymphocytic depletions were mostly detectable in the white pulp area. On day 21 PI, histopathological changes both in lymphoid and non-lymphoid organ were similar to that of observed at day 14th PI. Few bloody spots were also apparent in some regions of thymic lobules. Some detectable inclusion bodies were present in spleen. On day 28 PI, microscopic changes were absent in non-lymphoid organs (liver, heart), while in lymphoid organs such as bursa, thymus, spleen, mild microscopic lesions were observed with mild necrosis with lymphocytes depletions. Karyomegaly and inclusion bodies in infected cells were obvious. At day 35th post-infection, microscopic changes were absent both in lymphoid organs and non-lymphoid organs. Our findings are supported by  similar studies by McNulty (1991) and Haridy et al., (2009). There were no microscopic lesions observed in organs tested in the non-infected birds.

Fig 2: Histopathological examination (H&E stain, 10X) of CIAV infected birds.


 

Table 1: Scoring of histopathological lesions.


        
At day 7th, 14th and 21st PI, CIA antigen was present mostly in portal zone of liver, while at 28th and 35th DPI, no evidence of CIA antigen either in hepatocytes or in sinusoids was seen. On day 7th, 14th and 21st post-infection, presence of CIA antigens was detectable by tan colored immune complex in the epicardium and myocardium of the heart. In bursa of Fabricius, CIA antigens were seen by day 7th, 14th, 21st and 28th post-infection. Chicken infectious anemia antigen was more obvious in the cortical region of lymphoid follicles as compared to medullary area. In spleen, at day 7th, 14th, 21st and 28th post-infection, CIA antigen was detectable in white pulp as compared to red pulp, while no CIA antigen was seen in any region of spleen at day 35 post-infection. In thymus, at day 7th, 14th, 21st and 28th post-infection, CIA antigens were prominently present in cortical regions of thymic lobules as compared to medullary areas. Similar immunohistochemical findings have been reported earlier (Haridy et al., 2009). It was further analyzed and confirmed that all IHC positive were found positive through PCR.
        
The significant hematologic changes (Table 2) observed were more prominent especially on day 7th to 21st PI in the experimental group. The PCV in the challenged group was found in the range from 20.86±2.39-27.33±0.84 indicating anemia in a pattern similar to reported previously by Goodwin et al., (1992a). The hemoglobin concentration showed  decreased pattern starting from 7th DPI (7.42±0.34) that continued until 14th DPI (7.06±0.59). However, it was interesting to note that increasing pattern in the concentration of Hb on 21st DPI although the concentration remained in the anemic range (7.18±0.96-.9.58±0.43) in the virus exposed group (7.42 to 9.58 g/dL). This might be due to development of immunity against the virus that could have decreased the virus load in infected group. All the data obtained from hematological findings showed that the pathological changes might be different, even between the birds infected with the same dose of CAV. Therefore, it is difficult to identify the bird having the subclinical form of the infection. Previous studies suggested that anemia and atrophy of lymphoid organs are not enough criteria to diagnose CIAV infections. Leukocytes (67.5%) and platelets percentage (74.3%) were found significantly (P< 0.05) lower than the control group (Goodwin et al., 1992b). The differences between the values of heterophils, lymphocytes, monocytes and eosinophils were statistically non-significant (P>0.05) throughout the study period.
 

Table 2: Serum biochemical values in CIAV infected and control groups.


 
The values of biochemical parameters have been given in Table 2. For ALT, there was non-significant difference (P>0.05) between the groups at day 7th, while at day 14th, 21st, 28th and 35th, the difference regarding the ALT values between the groups was found significant (P<0.05). In the challenged group significantly, elevated values of AST (P<0.05) were noted than control group on 07th, 14th, 28th and 35th DPI, however; on 21st DPI, no significant difference (P>0.05) was observed. A non-significant difference among the infected and control groups was observed on day 07, 14, 21, 28 and 35 PI with respect to alkaline phosphatase values. These findings agree to what has been reported previously by Krishan et al. (2015). For bilirubin, the difference between infected and control group was significant (P<0.05) at day 14th and 28th post-infection. Difference between infected and control group with respect to total protein was significant (P<0.05) at day 07th, 14th, 21st, 28th and 35th post-infection. No significant difference was observed at day 07th, 14th, 21st and 35th post-infection between the infected and control groups with respect to albumin level. However, difference between infected and control groups regarding albumin level was significant (P<0.05) at day 28th post-infection. No significant difference was observed between the infected and control groups with respect to creatinine level.
It can be concluded that field strain of CIAV can induce significant pathological lesions in lymphoid and non-lymphoid organs. Moreover, hematology, histopathology and serum biochemistry can be used as tool for presumptive diagnosis.
Authors would like to acknowledge all the laboratory staff that kindly contributed to this research.

  1. Al-Hassani A.S. (2011). Effect of dietary supplementation with different levels of arginine on some blood traits of laying hens. Intl. J. Poult. Sci. 10 (9): 705-709.

  2. Goodwin M.A., Davis J.F. and Brown J. (1992a). Packed cell volume reference intervals to aid in the diagnosis of anemia and polycythemia in young broiler chickens. Avian Dis. 36 (2): 440-443.

  3. Goodwin M., Brown J., Davis J., Girshick T., Miller S., Nordgren R. and Rodenberg J. (1992b). Comparisons of packed cell volumes (PCVs) from so-called chicken anemia agent (CAA; a virus)-free broilers to PCVs from CAA-free specific-pathogen-free leghorns. Avian Dis. 36 (4): 1063-1066.

  4. Haridy M., Goryo M., Sasaki J. and Okada K. (2009). Pathological and immunohistochemical study of chickens with co-infection of Marek’s disease virus and chicken anaemia virus. Avian Pathol. 38 (6): 469-483.

  5. Hermann J., Koski D., Taylor S. and Gatewood D. (2012). Evaluation of the analytical sensitivity of a polymerase chain reaction assay for the detection of chicken infectious anemia virus in avian vaccines. Biologicals. 40 (4): 266-269.

  6. Karimi I., Mahzounieh M., Bahadoran S. and Azad F. (2010). Chicken anemia virus infection in broiler chickens in Shahrekord, Iran: serological, hematological and histopathological findings. Comp. Clin. Path. 19 (1): 63-67.

  7. Khanam F., Iqbal M.N., Ashraf A., Alam S., Muhammad A., Xiao S., Toor S. and Mumtaz H. (2016). Evaluation of Changes in Liver Enzymes in Broiler Chicks (Gallous domesticus). PSM Vet. Res. 1 (1): 26-31.

  8. Krishan G., Shukla S.K., Bhatt P., Kumar R., Tiwari R., Malik Y.S. and Dhama K. (2015). Immunomodulatory and protective effects of a polyherbal formulation (immon) against infectious anemia virus infection in broiler. Int. J. Pharmacol. 11 (5): 470-476.

  9. Kuscu B. and Gürel A. (2008). Lesions in the thymus and bone marrow in chicks with experimentally induced chicken infectious anemia disease. J. Vet. Sci. 9 (1): 15-23.

  10. Li Y., Fang L., Cui S., Fu J., Li X., Zhang H., Cui Z., Chang S., Shi W. and Zhao P. (2017). Genomic Characterization of Recent Chicken Anemia Virus Isolates in China. Front. Microbiol. 8 401.

  11. McNulty M. (1991). Chicken anaemia agent: a review. Avian Pathol. 20(2): 187-203.

  12. Najm-ul-Islam M.K.S., Khan M.Z., Butt S.L., Khan A., Javed I. and ShahidRafique F.S.A.a. (2013). Molecular Diagnosis and Pathology of Chicken Infectious Anemia in Commercial White Leghorn Layer Flocks in Pakistan. Pak. Vet. J. 33 (3): 378-381.

  13. Oluwayelu D.O. (2010). Diagnosis and epidemiology of chicken infectious anemia in Africa. Afric. J. Biotec. 9 (14): 2043-2049.

  14. Schat K.A., da Silva Martins N.R., O’Connell P.H. and Piepenbrink M.S. (2011). Immune complex vaccines for chicken infectious anemia virus. Avian Dis. 55 (1): 90-96.

  15. Spackman E., Cloud S., Pope C. and Rosenberger J. (2002). Comparison of a putative second serotype of chicken infectious anemia virus with a prototypical isolate I. Pathogenesis. Avian Dis. 46 (4): 945-955.

  16. Vaziry A., Silim A., Bleau C., Frenette D. and Lamontagne L. (2011). Chicken infectious anaemia vaccinal strain persists in the spleen and thymus of young chicks and induces thymic lymphoid cell disorders. Avian Pathol. 40 (4): 377-385.

Editorial Board

View all (0)