Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.5 (2023)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 45 issue 4 (december 2011) : 300 - 304

EFFECT OF HATCHING EGG SIZE ON HATCHABILITY AND CHICK HATCH-WEIGHT OF INDIGENOUS VENDA CHICKENS

C.A. Mbajiorgu
1Department of Agriculture and Animal Health, University of South Africa, Private Bag X6, Florida 1710, Johannesburg, South Africa.
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Mbajiorgu C.A. (2024). EFFECT OF HATCHING EGG SIZE ON HATCHABILITY AND CHICK HATCH-WEIGHT OF INDIGENOUS VENDA CHICKENS. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 45(4): 300 - 304. doi: .
An experiment was conducted to determine the effect of hatching egg size on hatchability and hatch-weight of indigenous Venda chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus). Three different egg size groups classified into small: (hatchability and hatch-weight. Large-sized eggs had higher (P medium-sized eggs produced chicks with higher (Ps. Results from quadratic analysis indicated that egg weight of 67 g supported optimum hatchability while optimum-hatch weight was achieved with an egg weight of 60 g.  These values are higher than the average egg weight of 52.81 g recorded for the three different egg size groups used in the experiment. This may indicate that improvement in egg size would be needed in order to maximize the hatchability potentials and day-old chick weight in indigenous Venda chickens.
  1. Abiola, S.S. (1999). Effects of turning frequency of hen’s egg in electric table-type incubator on weight losses, hatchability and mortality. Nig. Agri. J. 30: 77-82.
  2. Abiola, S.S., Meshioye, O.O., Oyerinde, B.O and Bamgbose, M.A. (2008). Effect of egg size on hatchability of broiler chicks. Arc. de Zootecnia 57 (217): 83-86.
  3. Atteh, J .O .(1990). Rural poultry production in Western Middle belt of Nigeria. In: Sonaiya E B (Editor).Rural poultry in Africa. Proceedings of an International workshop held in Ile-Ife, Nigeria. Nov. 13-16, 1989. Thelia House, Ile-Ife.
  4. Brah, G. S. and Sandhu, J. S. (1989). Preincubation storage of guinea fowl eggs in cooling cabinet vs. room: Effect on hatchability components. Trop. Agri. (Trinidad and Tobago) 66:265-268.
  5. Bray, D.F. (1965). Embryonic weight as a selection criterion in alternation of growth curves of domestic birds. Data from the domestic turkey. Canadian. J. of Genetics and Physio. 7: 1-11.
  6. Buhr, R. J. (1995). Incubation relative humidity effects on allantoic fluid volume and hatchability. Poult. Sci, 74:874-884.
  7. Gebhardt-Henrich, S. G. and Mark, H. L. (1991). The effect of switching males among caged females on egg production and hatchability in Japanese quail. Poult. Sci, 70:1845-1847.
  8. Kalita, N., (1994). Effect of egg weight, storage period and position of egg on hatchability. Ind. J. poult. Sci. 29(3), 281-283.
  9. Kitalyi, A.J., (1998). Village Chicken Production Systems in rural Africa. FAO Animal Production and Health Series. No. 142. Rome.
  10. Moran, E.T. and Bilgili, S.F. (1990). Processing losses, carcass quality and meat yield of broiler chickens receiving diets marginally deficient to adequate in lysine prior to marketing. Poult. Sci. 69, 702-710.
  11. Narushin, U.G. and M.N. Romanov (2002): Egg physical characteristics and hatchability. World’s Poult. Sci. J., 58: 297-303.
  12. Permsak, S. (1996). Effect of water spraying and eggs turning angle to efficiency of duck hatchability. Proceedings of the 34th Kasetsart university annual conference, Bangkok (Thailand),,517: 22-26.
  13. Rogue, L. and Soares, M. C .(1994). Effect of egg shell quality and broiler breeding age on hatchability. Poult. Sci, 73:1838-1845.
  14. SAS, (2008). SAS User’s Guide Version 9.2, 2nd edition. SAS Institute, Inc. Raleigh, North Caroline, USA.
  15. Seker ., I kul, S. and Bayrakter, M. 2004. Effects of parental age and hatching egg weight of Japanese quails on hatchability and chick weight. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 3(4), 159-265.
  16. Shananwany, M.M. (1987). Hatching weight in relation to egg weight in domestic birds. Worlds Poult. Sci. J. 43: 107-115.
  17. Tarongoy, J jr,, Eduave, F., and Gemota, E. K. (1990). Age as a factor of hatchability. SWUCA- J. Agri. Res. (Philippines) 5:22-26.
  18. Uluocak, A.N., Okan, F., Efe, E and Nacar, H., 1995. Exterior and interior quality characteristics and their variation according to age in Japanese quail. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 19: 181-187
  19. Weis, J., (1991). Analysis of fertility, hatchability and egg quality indices in reproduction breeding of guinea fowls. Acta Zootechnica Uni. Agri. (CSFR). (1991). Number 47 pp 5-15.
  20. Wilson, H.R. (1991): Interrelationships of egg size, chick size, posthatching growth and hatchability. World’s Poult. Sci. J. 47: 5-20.
  21. WIlson, H.R. (1997): Effects of maternal nutrition on hatchability. Poult. Sci. 76:134-143.

Editorial Board

View all (0)