Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 39 issue 2 (july to december 2005) : 127 - 130

STUDIES ON PREVALENCE, ETIOLOGY AND DIAGNOSIS OF SUBCLINICAL MASTITIS AMONG CROSSBRED COWS

N
N.A. Sudhan
R
R. Singh
M
M. Singh
J
J.S. Soodan
1Division of Veterinary Clinical Medicine and Jurisprudence, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences and A.H., SKU.A.S.T.. R.S. Pura. (J&K) -181 102. India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Sudhan N.A., Singh R., Singh M., Soodan J.S. (2025). STUDIES ON PREVALENCE, ETIOLOGY AND DIAGNOSIS OF SUBCLINICAL MASTITIS AMONG CROSSBRED COWS. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 39(2): 127 - 130. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Incidence of subclincial mastitis (SCM) among crossbred cattle from organized dairy farms
was studied. The quarter-wise and animal-wise incidence of SCM was 15.62 and 43.33 per
cent, respectively. Maximum number of animals (74.36 %) were having one quarter infection.
Right-hind quarters were having higher incidence (38.18%) compared with other quarters. The
incidence of SCM was lowest during first lactation which increased with subsequent lactations
and was highest in sixth and above lactations. Bacteriological isolations revealed that Staphylococcus aureus was the major pathogen (56.89%) followed by Micrococcus spp.(15.51 %) Bacillus spp. (12.06 %) , Staphylococcus epidermidis (8.62 %), Klebsiella spp (3.44 %), E. coli (1.72 %) and Corynebacterium spp. (1.72 %). Among the indirect tests, SLS was found to be highly (19.03 %) effective in detection of subclinical mastitis followed by WST, BTB Card test and CMT (15.90, 15.62 and 14.77 %, respectively). The percentage of agreement of CMT, SLS, BTB
Card test and WST with bacteriological examination were found to be 57.89, 62.07, 64.46 and
68.65 per cent, respectively.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Buragohain, J. and Dutta, G.N. (1991). Indian Vet. J., 66: 19-22.
    2. Chanda, A. et al. (1989). Indian Vet. J., 66: 277-282.
    3. Cruickshank, R. et aJ. (1982). Medical Microbiology. 12th ed. Vol. III.Churchill Livingstone, New York.
    4. Domi, Y. et a/. (1990). Veterinarski Glasnik., 44: 851-857.
    5. Dua, K. (2001). Indian Dairyman., 53: 41-48.
    6. Kalorey, DR et al. (1983). Indian J. Anim. Sci., 53: 916.
    7. Kumar, B. (1988). MV. Sc Thesis, Punjab Agric. University, Ludhiana (India).
    8. Pandit, A.v. and Mehta, M.L. (1969). Indian Vet. J., 40: 111-119.
    9. 130 INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL RESEARCH
    10. Randhawa, 5.5. et al. (1983). Indian J. Vet. Med., 3: 59,
    11. Saini. 5.5. et a/. (1994). Indian J. Dairy Sci., 47 :103-106.
    12. Schalm, OW. et a/. (1971). Bovine Mastitis. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, Pa. p. 94-124.
    13. Sharma, K.L. (1993). Buffaloes J., 9: 271-273.
    14. Sharma. V,K. and Rajani. H.B. (1969). Indian Vet. J., 46: 749.
    15. Singh, R. et a/. (2000). Indian J. Anim. Res., 34:120-123.
    16. Tuteja, F.C. et a/. (1993). Indian Vet. J., 70: 787-791.
    17. Verma. T.N. et a/. (1978). Indian J. Publ. Hlth .. 22: 249-253 (Vet. Bull.. 50: 3916).
    18. Wesen. D.P. et a/. (1968). J. Dairy Sci., 51: 679-684.
    Published In
    Indian Journal of Animal Research
    Article Metrics
    Metrics Icon
    0
    Views
    0
    Citations
    Reviewed By
    Share Article
    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      volume 39 issue 2 (july to december 2005) : 127 - 130

      STUDIES ON PREVALENCE, ETIOLOGY AND DIAGNOSIS OF SUBCLINICAL MASTITIS AMONG CROSSBRED COWS

      N
      N.A. Sudhan
      R
      R. Singh
      M
      M. Singh
      J
      J.S. Soodan
      1Division of Veterinary Clinical Medicine and Jurisprudence, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences and A.H., SKU.A.S.T.. R.S. Pura. (J&K) -181 102. India

      • Submitted|

      • First Online |

      • doi

      Cite article:- Sudhan N.A., Singh R., Singh M., Soodan J.S. (2025). STUDIES ON PREVALENCE, ETIOLOGY AND DIAGNOSIS OF SUBCLINICAL MASTITIS AMONG CROSSBRED COWS. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 39(2): 127 - 130. doi: .

      ABSTRACT

      Incidence of subclincial mastitis (SCM) among crossbred cattle from organized dairy farms
      was studied. The quarter-wise and animal-wise incidence of SCM was 15.62 and 43.33 per
      cent, respectively. Maximum number of animals (74.36 %) were having one quarter infection.
      Right-hind quarters were having higher incidence (38.18%) compared with other quarters. The
      incidence of SCM was lowest during first lactation which increased with subsequent lactations
      and was highest in sixth and above lactations. Bacteriological isolations revealed that Staphylococcus aureus was the major pathogen (56.89%) followed by Micrococcus spp.(15.51 %) Bacillus spp. (12.06 %) , Staphylococcus epidermidis (8.62 %), Klebsiella spp (3.44 %), E. coli (1.72 %) and Corynebacterium spp. (1.72 %). Among the indirect tests, SLS was found to be highly (19.03 %) effective in detection of subclinical mastitis followed by WST, BTB Card test and CMT (15.90, 15.62 and 14.77 %, respectively). The percentage of agreement of CMT, SLS, BTB
      Card test and WST with bacteriological examination were found to be 57.89, 62.07, 64.46 and
      68.65 per cent, respectively.

      KEYWORDS

        REFERENCES

        1. Buragohain, J. and Dutta, G.N. (1991). Indian Vet. J., 66: 19-22.
        2. Chanda, A. et al. (1989). Indian Vet. J., 66: 277-282.
        3. Cruickshank, R. et aJ. (1982). Medical Microbiology. 12th ed. Vol. III.Churchill Livingstone, New York.
        4. Domi, Y. et a/. (1990). Veterinarski Glasnik., 44: 851-857.
        5. Dua, K. (2001). Indian Dairyman., 53: 41-48.
        6. Kalorey, DR et al. (1983). Indian J. Anim. Sci., 53: 916.
        7. Kumar, B. (1988). MV. Sc Thesis, Punjab Agric. University, Ludhiana (India).
        8. Pandit, A.v. and Mehta, M.L. (1969). Indian Vet. J., 40: 111-119.
        9. 130 INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL RESEARCH
        10. Randhawa, 5.5. et al. (1983). Indian J. Vet. Med., 3: 59,
        11. Saini. 5.5. et a/. (1994). Indian J. Dairy Sci., 47 :103-106.
        12. Schalm, OW. et a/. (1971). Bovine Mastitis. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, Pa. p. 94-124.
        13. Sharma, K.L. (1993). Buffaloes J., 9: 271-273.
        14. Sharma. V,K. and Rajani. H.B. (1969). Indian Vet. J., 46: 749.
        15. Singh, R. et a/. (2000). Indian J. Anim. Res., 34:120-123.
        16. Tuteja, F.C. et a/. (1993). Indian Vet. J., 70: 787-791.
        17. Verma. T.N. et a/. (1978). Indian J. Publ. Hlth .. 22: 249-253 (Vet. Bull.. 50: 3916).
        18. Wesen. D.P. et a/. (1968). J. Dairy Sci., 51: 679-684.
        In this Article
          Contact us
          Follow us
          Published In
          Indian Journal of Animal Research

          Editorial Board

          View all (0)