volume 39 issue 2 (july to december 2005) : 123 - 126

KINETICS OF ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE ISOLATED FROM RAT LIVER, KIDNEY AND CERTAIN BRAIN REGIONS

N
N.H. Mohan1
S
S.K. Maurya
A
A.K Gangwar
R
R.S. Srivastava2
1Department of Veterinary Physiology, College of Veterinary Science and A.H., NDUAT, Kumarganj, Faizabad (UP) - 224 229, India
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Mohan1 N.H., Maurya S.K., Gangwar A.K, Srivastava2 R.S. (2025). KINETICS OF ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE ISOLATED FROM RAT LIVER, KIDNEY AND CERTAIN BRAIN REGIONS. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 39(2): 123 - 126. doi: .
In the present study, the kinetics of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) isoforms partially purified
from rat liver, kidney, hypothalamus and cerebro-cortical region of brain is reported. The MichaelisMenten
constant (Km,micromoles) of the enzyme for the substrate p-nitrophenyl phosphate
were 2.67,2.50 2.85 and 3.33 for the enzymes-obtainecJ-from liver, kidney, hypothalamus and
cortical region respectively. The corresponding V..... values (nanomoles/milligram protein/minute)
were 1.03, 1.43, 1.33 and 2.22 respectively. The fraction of catalytic sites filled in the enzyme
by the substrate was also calculated. For any substrate concentration, the fraction of catalytic
sites filled was highest for renal ALP and lowest for cortical one. The variation in the properties
of these tissue specific or unspecific enzymes may be due to differential expression of ALP
genes or post-translational modifications. Since there was no significant difference between
these values it was concluded that the kinetics of ALP for p-nitrophenyl phosphate substrate
alone is not sufficient to distinguish these clinically important isoforms
    1. Berg. J.M. et al. (2002). Biochemistry. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York, 200-222.
    2. Goldstein, D.L. et al. (1980). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 77: 2857-2860.
    3. Hodson. AW. et al. (1963). Clin. Chern. Acta., 9: 255-261.
    4. Hoffman. W.E.et al. (1983). Enzymes, 30: 269-275.
    5. Lowry, O.H. et al. (1951). 1. Bioi. Chem., 193: 265-275.
    6. Noguchi. T. and Yamashita, Y. (1987). Biochem. Biophy. Res. Commn., 143: 15-20.
    7. Raphael, 5.5. (1976). Lynch's Medical Laboratory Technology. 3rd ed, W.B. Saunders, Philidelphia, 271-277.
    8. Saini. P.K a~d Saini, S.K. (1978a). Am. J. Vet. Res., 39: 1506-1509.
    9. Saini. P.K et al. (1978b). Am. J. Vet. Res., 39: 1514-1518.
    10. Stigbrand. T. et al. (1982). In: Isozymes:Current Topics in Biological and Medical Research. (Rallazzi, M.C. et al.. eds). 6: 93-117.
    11. Wellman. M.L. et al. (1982). Am. J. Vet. Res.. 43: 1204-1207.
    volume 39 issue 2 (july to december 2005) : 123 - 126

    KINETICS OF ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE ISOLATED FROM RAT LIVER, KIDNEY AND CERTAIN BRAIN REGIONS

    N
    N.H. Mohan1
    S
    S.K. Maurya
    A
    A.K Gangwar
    R
    R.S. Srivastava2
    1Department of Veterinary Physiology, College of Veterinary Science and A.H., NDUAT, Kumarganj, Faizabad (UP) - 224 229, India
    • Submitted|

    • First Online |

    • doi

    Cite article:- Mohan1 N.H., Maurya S.K., Gangwar A.K, Srivastava2 R.S. (2025). KINETICS OF ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE ISOLATED FROM RAT LIVER, KIDNEY AND CERTAIN BRAIN REGIONS. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 39(2): 123 - 126. doi: .
    In the present study, the kinetics of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) isoforms partially purified
    from rat liver, kidney, hypothalamus and cerebro-cortical region of brain is reported. The MichaelisMenten
    constant (Km,micromoles) of the enzyme for the substrate p-nitrophenyl phosphate
    were 2.67,2.50 2.85 and 3.33 for the enzymes-obtainecJ-from liver, kidney, hypothalamus and
    cortical region respectively. The corresponding V..... values (nanomoles/milligram protein/minute)
    were 1.03, 1.43, 1.33 and 2.22 respectively. The fraction of catalytic sites filled in the enzyme
    by the substrate was also calculated. For any substrate concentration, the fraction of catalytic
    sites filled was highest for renal ALP and lowest for cortical one. The variation in the properties
    of these tissue specific or unspecific enzymes may be due to differential expression of ALP
    genes or post-translational modifications. Since there was no significant difference between
    these values it was concluded that the kinetics of ALP for p-nitrophenyl phosphate substrate
    alone is not sufficient to distinguish these clinically important isoforms
      1. Berg. J.M. et al. (2002). Biochemistry. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York, 200-222.
      2. Goldstein, D.L. et al. (1980). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 77: 2857-2860.
      3. Hodson. AW. et al. (1963). Clin. Chern. Acta., 9: 255-261.
      4. Hoffman. W.E.et al. (1983). Enzymes, 30: 269-275.
      5. Lowry, O.H. et al. (1951). 1. Bioi. Chem., 193: 265-275.
      6. Noguchi. T. and Yamashita, Y. (1987). Biochem. Biophy. Res. Commn., 143: 15-20.
      7. Raphael, 5.5. (1976). Lynch's Medical Laboratory Technology. 3rd ed, W.B. Saunders, Philidelphia, 271-277.
      8. Saini. P.K a~d Saini, S.K. (1978a). Am. J. Vet. Res., 39: 1506-1509.
      9. Saini. P.K et al. (1978b). Am. J. Vet. Res., 39: 1514-1518.
      10. Stigbrand. T. et al. (1982). In: Isozymes:Current Topics in Biological and Medical Research. (Rallazzi, M.C. et al.. eds). 6: 93-117.
      11. Wellman. M.L. et al. (1982). Am. J. Vet. Res.. 43: 1204-1207.
      In this Article
      Published In
      Indian Journal of Animal Research

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)