volume 42 issue 3 (september 2008) : 213-215

EFFICIENCY OF COMPUTERIZED RECORDING SYSTEM

C
C. Paul Princely Rajkumar
F
Francis Xavier
L
Leena Anil
1Department of Livestock Production Management, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Mannuthy, Trissur-680 651, India
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Rajkumar Princely Paul C., Xavier Francis, Anil Leena (2025). EFFICIENCY OF COMPUTERIZED RECORDING SYSTEM. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 42(3): 213-215. doi: .
A study was made to know the comparative efficiency of traditional manual record
management and computerized record management using indigenously developed software.
Computerized record management proved to be of better efficiency than the traditional
manual record management.
    1. Furman, J.W. and Hughes (1992). Vet. Med. 85: 920-940.
    2. Gaines, J.D. (1989). Vet. Med. 83: 532-543.
    3. Lissemore, K.D. et al. (1992). Can. Vet. J. 33: 114-119.
    4. Lucey, S. et al. (1983). Vet. Rec. 113: 294-298.
    5. Pepper, T.A. et al. (1977). Vet. Rec. 101: 177-180.
    6. Saha, S. and Kumar, S. (1999). Milcow, 21: 7-9.
    7. Sendecor, G.W. and Cocharn, W.G. (1994). Statistical Methods. 8th Edn.
    8. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, p.564.
    9. Williams, P.C.W. and Ward, W.R. (1989). Vet. Rec. 124: 265-268.
    volume 42 issue 3 (september 2008) : 213-215

    EFFICIENCY OF COMPUTERIZED RECORDING SYSTEM

    C
    C. Paul Princely Rajkumar
    F
    Francis Xavier
    L
    Leena Anil
    1Department of Livestock Production Management, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Mannuthy, Trissur-680 651, India
    • Submitted|

    • First Online |

    • doi

    Cite article:- Rajkumar Princely Paul C., Xavier Francis, Anil Leena (2025). EFFICIENCY OF COMPUTERIZED RECORDING SYSTEM. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 42(3): 213-215. doi: .
    A study was made to know the comparative efficiency of traditional manual record
    management and computerized record management using indigenously developed software.
    Computerized record management proved to be of better efficiency than the traditional
    manual record management.
      1. Furman, J.W. and Hughes (1992). Vet. Med. 85: 920-940.
      2. Gaines, J.D. (1989). Vet. Med. 83: 532-543.
      3. Lissemore, K.D. et al. (1992). Can. Vet. J. 33: 114-119.
      4. Lucey, S. et al. (1983). Vet. Rec. 113: 294-298.
      5. Pepper, T.A. et al. (1977). Vet. Rec. 101: 177-180.
      6. Saha, S. and Kumar, S. (1999). Milcow, 21: 7-9.
      7. Sendecor, G.W. and Cocharn, W.G. (1994). Statistical Methods. 8th Edn.
      8. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, p.564.
      9. Williams, P.C.W. and Ward, W.R. (1989). Vet. Rec. 124: 265-268.
      In this Article
      Published In
      Indian Journal of Animal Research

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)