Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 43 issue 3 (september 2009) : 178-182

EFFECT OF REPLACEMENT OF SOYBEAN MEAL WITH CANOLA AND MUSTARD MEAL ON CARCASS CHARACTERSTICS AND ECONOMICS OF BROILER PRODUCTION

A
Amit Sharma
J
Jatinder Singh
S
S.S. Nagra
1Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana- 141 004, India.

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Sharma Amit, Singh Jatinder, Nagra S.S. (2025). EFFECT OF REPLACEMENT OF SOYBEAN MEAL WITH CANOLA AND MUSTARD MEAL ON CARCASS CHARACTERSTICS AND ECONOMICS OF BROILER PRODUCTION. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 43(3): 178-182. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Six week feeding trial was conducted to study the carcass characteristics and economics of
production on replacement of soybean meal with different levels of canola or mustard meal. A
total of 196 day old commercial (Vencob) broiler chicks were subjected to 7 isocaloric and
isonitrogenous dietary treatments in which maize soybean based ration was used as a control
diet and in 6 test diets either canola or mustard meal replaced the soybean meal at 10, 15 and 20
% level on equal nitrogen basis. Results showed that neither canola nor mustard meal at any
level had significant effect on evisceration rate. In comparison to control, on per unit live weight
basis margin of receipt over feed cost was higher in canola and lower in mustard supplemented
groups. The margin of receipt was higher in all levels of canola meal compared to mustard meal.
It was concluded that for partial replacement of soybean meal the canola meal is more economical
and better alternate to mustard meal due to its lower glucosinolate and erucic acid content and
higher level of essential amino acids.

REFERENCES

  1. Bell, J. M. and Keith, M. O. (1991) Canadian J Anim Sci 71: 469-80.
  2. Carlson, C.W. et al. (1992) In: 53rd Minnesota Nutrition Conference, Bloomington, Minralsota USA, pp 293-302.
  3. Duncan D. B. (1995) Biometrics 11: 1-42.
  4. Elangovan, A.V. et al. (2001) Asian Aust J Anim Sci 14: 1304-07.
  5. Karunajeeva, H. et al. (1990) British Poult Sci 31: 545-55.
  6. Kocher, A. et al. (2001) Aust J Agri Res 52: 447-52.
  7. Nascimento et al. (1998) Revista-Brasileiva-de-Zootechia 27: 1168-76.
  8. Sarcicek, B. Z. et al. (2005) Asian-Aust J Anim Sci 98: 1457-63.
  9. Snedecor, G. W. and Cochran, W. G. (1980) Statistical Methods. 7th edn., Oxford and IBH Publishing Co., Calcutta
Published In
Indian Journal of Animal Research
Article Metrics
Metrics Icon
0
Views
0
Citations
Reviewed By
Share Article
Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    volume 43 issue 3 (september 2009) : 178-182

    EFFECT OF REPLACEMENT OF SOYBEAN MEAL WITH CANOLA AND MUSTARD MEAL ON CARCASS CHARACTERSTICS AND ECONOMICS OF BROILER PRODUCTION

    A
    Amit Sharma
    J
    Jatinder Singh
    S
    S.S. Nagra
    1Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana- 141 004, India.

    • Submitted|

    • First Online |

    • doi

    Cite article:- Sharma Amit, Singh Jatinder, Nagra S.S. (2025). EFFECT OF REPLACEMENT OF SOYBEAN MEAL WITH CANOLA AND MUSTARD MEAL ON CARCASS CHARACTERSTICS AND ECONOMICS OF BROILER PRODUCTION. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 43(3): 178-182. doi: .

    ABSTRACT

    Six week feeding trial was conducted to study the carcass characteristics and economics of
    production on replacement of soybean meal with different levels of canola or mustard meal. A
    total of 196 day old commercial (Vencob) broiler chicks were subjected to 7 isocaloric and
    isonitrogenous dietary treatments in which maize soybean based ration was used as a control
    diet and in 6 test diets either canola or mustard meal replaced the soybean meal at 10, 15 and 20
    % level on equal nitrogen basis. Results showed that neither canola nor mustard meal at any
    level had significant effect on evisceration rate. In comparison to control, on per unit live weight
    basis margin of receipt over feed cost was higher in canola and lower in mustard supplemented
    groups. The margin of receipt was higher in all levels of canola meal compared to mustard meal.
    It was concluded that for partial replacement of soybean meal the canola meal is more economical
    and better alternate to mustard meal due to its lower glucosinolate and erucic acid content and
    higher level of essential amino acids.

    REFERENCES

    1. Bell, J. M. and Keith, M. O. (1991) Canadian J Anim Sci 71: 469-80.
    2. Carlson, C.W. et al. (1992) In: 53rd Minnesota Nutrition Conference, Bloomington, Minralsota USA, pp 293-302.
    3. Duncan D. B. (1995) Biometrics 11: 1-42.
    4. Elangovan, A.V. et al. (2001) Asian Aust J Anim Sci 14: 1304-07.
    5. Karunajeeva, H. et al. (1990) British Poult Sci 31: 545-55.
    6. Kocher, A. et al. (2001) Aust J Agri Res 52: 447-52.
    7. Nascimento et al. (1998) Revista-Brasileiva-de-Zootechia 27: 1168-76.
    8. Sarcicek, B. Z. et al. (2005) Asian-Aust J Anim Sci 98: 1457-63.
    9. Snedecor, G. W. and Cochran, W. G. (1980) Statistical Methods. 7th edn., Oxford and IBH Publishing Co., Calcutta
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us
      Published In
      Indian Journal of Animal Research

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)