Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 43 issue 2 (june 2009) : 124-126

COMPARISON OF SEED GERMINATION TEST WITH URINE BARIUM CHLORIDE TEST AND MILK COPPER SULPHATE TEST FOR EFFICACY TO DETECT PREGNANCY IN COWS

S
S. 'J. Krishna Raol
T
T. Veena2
1Department of Veterinary Physiology, Veterinary College, KVAFSU, Bangalore - 560024, India.

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Raol Krishna 'J. S., Veena2 T. (2025). COMPARISON OF SEED GERMINATION TEST WITH URINE BARIUM CHLORIDE TEST AND MILK COPPER SULPHATE TEST FOR EFFICACY TO DETECT PREGNANCY IN COWS. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 43(2): 124-126. doi: .

ABSTRACT

The present study included per rectally confirmed pregnant (n=30) and non pregnant cows
(n=30), all milking, selected to conduct urine barium chloride test, milk copper sulphate test
and seed germination test for pregnancy. The data were assessed for significance using Cochran
Q test. The results indicated that the efficacies of true positive reaction for pregnancy and non
pregnancy status in cows were 100 per cent, each by seed germination test whereas 80 and 10
per cent respectively, by urine barium chloride test, and 90 and 13.33 per cent by milk copper
sulphate test.

REFERENCES

  1. Abilay, J.P. and Roussel, J.D. (1975). J. Dairy Sci., 58:134.
  2. Akhmadeev, A.N. and Vasilev, G.T. (1967). Veterinariya Moscow, 43:77-78.
  3. Avahikar, G.T. etaJ. (2002). In: 891' Session ofIndian Science Congress Association held from.Jd- 'J'hJanuary, 2002at Lucknow.
  4. EIpakov, K.A. and Cyganok, N.S. (1966). Anim. Breed. Abstr., 35:1319.
  5. Kavani, ES. etal. (1983). Indian J. Reprod,4:70-72.
  6. Maslov, N. and Smirnov, A. (1965). Mol. mjasn. Skotovod., 10:24-25.
  7. Snedecor, G.w. and Cochran, w.G. (1967). Statistical Methods, 6th ed.:oxford & ISH Pub. co, Culcuta. 126 INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL RESEARCH
  8. Stancev, S. and Angelov, K. (1966). Vet. Sbir., So!., 60:30-32.
  9. Temblador, AS.R and Acosta, B. H. (1971) In: XII InEm. Invest. Esc. Agric. Ganad. Inst. Techno/. Estud. Sup. Monterrey. 144.
  10. Temblador, AS.R. and Landa, N. (1971). In: XIIInfm. Invest. Esc. Agric. Ganad.Inst. Techno!. £stud. Sup. Monterrey. 145.
  11. Veena, T. and Narendranath, R (1993). Curro Sci., 65:989-990.
  12. Verma, RP. and Mishra, RR (1981). IndianJ. Dairy Sci., 23:133
  13. Vohra, S.C. and Kaikini, AS. (1992). Indian J. oE Reprod., 43:223.
  14. Wani. N. A et ai. (2003). Indian J. Dairy Sci., 56:1-8.
Published In
Indian Journal of Animal Research
Article Metrics
Metrics Icon
0
Views
0
Citations
Reviewed By
Share Article
Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    volume 43 issue 2 (june 2009) : 124-126

    COMPARISON OF SEED GERMINATION TEST WITH URINE BARIUM CHLORIDE TEST AND MILK COPPER SULPHATE TEST FOR EFFICACY TO DETECT PREGNANCY IN COWS

    S
    S. 'J. Krishna Raol
    T
    T. Veena2
    1Department of Veterinary Physiology, Veterinary College, KVAFSU, Bangalore - 560024, India.

    • Submitted|

    • First Online |

    • doi

    Cite article:- Raol Krishna 'J. S., Veena2 T. (2025). COMPARISON OF SEED GERMINATION TEST WITH URINE BARIUM CHLORIDE TEST AND MILK COPPER SULPHATE TEST FOR EFFICACY TO DETECT PREGNANCY IN COWS. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 43(2): 124-126. doi: .

    ABSTRACT

    The present study included per rectally confirmed pregnant (n=30) and non pregnant cows
    (n=30), all milking, selected to conduct urine barium chloride test, milk copper sulphate test
    and seed germination test for pregnancy. The data were assessed for significance using Cochran
    Q test. The results indicated that the efficacies of true positive reaction for pregnancy and non
    pregnancy status in cows were 100 per cent, each by seed germination test whereas 80 and 10
    per cent respectively, by urine barium chloride test, and 90 and 13.33 per cent by milk copper
    sulphate test.

    REFERENCES

    1. Abilay, J.P. and Roussel, J.D. (1975). J. Dairy Sci., 58:134.
    2. Akhmadeev, A.N. and Vasilev, G.T. (1967). Veterinariya Moscow, 43:77-78.
    3. Avahikar, G.T. etaJ. (2002). In: 891' Session ofIndian Science Congress Association held from.Jd- 'J'hJanuary, 2002at Lucknow.
    4. EIpakov, K.A. and Cyganok, N.S. (1966). Anim. Breed. Abstr., 35:1319.
    5. Kavani, ES. etal. (1983). Indian J. Reprod,4:70-72.
    6. Maslov, N. and Smirnov, A. (1965). Mol. mjasn. Skotovod., 10:24-25.
    7. Snedecor, G.w. and Cochran, w.G. (1967). Statistical Methods, 6th ed.:oxford & ISH Pub. co, Culcuta. 126 INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL RESEARCH
    8. Stancev, S. and Angelov, K. (1966). Vet. Sbir., So!., 60:30-32.
    9. Temblador, AS.R and Acosta, B. H. (1971) In: XII InEm. Invest. Esc. Agric. Ganad. Inst. Techno/. Estud. Sup. Monterrey. 144.
    10. Temblador, AS.R. and Landa, N. (1971). In: XIIInfm. Invest. Esc. Agric. Ganad.Inst. Techno!. £stud. Sup. Monterrey. 145.
    11. Veena, T. and Narendranath, R (1993). Curro Sci., 65:989-990.
    12. Verma, RP. and Mishra, RR (1981). IndianJ. Dairy Sci., 23:133
    13. Vohra, S.C. and Kaikini, AS. (1992). Indian J. oE Reprod., 43:223.
    14. Wani. N. A et ai. (2003). Indian J. Dairy Sci., 56:1-8.
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us
      Published In
      Indian Journal of Animal Research

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)