REPRODUCTION AND PRODUCTION PERFORMANCE OF THREE-BREEDS CROSSES IN CATTLE*

Article Id: ARCC1556 | Page : 32-36
Citation :- REPRODUCTION AND PRODUCTION PERFORMANCE OF THREE-BREEDS CROSSES IN CATTLE*.Indian Journal Of Animal Research.2009.(43):32-36
S. Bindu Madhuri, C.L. Suman1 and H.S. Pandey
Address : Livestock Production Management Section, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar-243122 (India)

Abstract

The reproduction and production performance of three-breeds crosses of Holstein Friesian (F),
Jersey (J) and Hariana (H) breeds of cattle (½F ¼J ¼H) maintained during 1976 to 1996 at Indian
Veterinary Research Institute Izatnagar was studied. The mean age at first fertile service (AFFS) and
age at first calving (AFC) were 772.07±25.12 and 1053.59±24.86 days respectively and both these
traits showed significant (P 0.01) effect of periods of tudy. The first service period (FSP) averaged
to 166.61±11.11 days and showed significant effect of seasons and periods. The first lactation length
(FLL) averaged to 317.72±6.87 days and showed significant (P < 0.01) effect of periods. The first
dry period (FDP) averaged to 127.98±12.70 days did not show any effect of generations, seasons
and periods of study. The first lactation milk yield (FLMY) and first standard lactation milk yield
(FSLMY) averaged to 1851.69±114.70 and 1741.78±96.13 kg respectively. The present investigations
revealed that parent crosses of Holstein Friesian, Jersey and Hariana breeds had significantly higher
first standard lactation milk yield than inter-se crosses of cattle. The cold environment of
winter season had significant effect in improving first service period of crossbred cows in
three-breeds crosses.

Keywords

Crosses in cattle Three-breeds crosses Reproduction Production.

References

  1. Anil Kumar, B. et al. (1997). Indian J. Anim. Prod. Mgmt., 13(2):104-108.
  2. Basu, S.B. and Ghai, A.S. (1980). Indian J. Anim. Sci., 50(2):119-122.
  3. Bhattacharya, R. et al. (1993). Indian Vet. J., 70:1177-1178.
  4. Bhoite, O.V. and Kale, K.M. (1996). Indian Vet. J., 73:473-74.
  5. Chopra, S.C. (1990). Indian J. Anim. Sci., 60(1):93-96.
  6. Harvey, W.R. (1966). Least Squares Analysis of Data with Unequal Sub-Class Number. United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Washington, DC.
  7. Kaushik, S.N. et al. (1979). Indian J. Dairy Sci., 32(3):321-323.
  8. Malik, Z.S. and Dhaka, S.S. (1995). J. Dairing Food and Home Sci., 14(3):117-120.
  9. Mishra, R.K. et al. (1979). Indian J. Dairy Sci., 32(1):102-105.
  10. Nagare, N.K. and Patel, A.M. (1997). Indian J. Anim. Prod. Mgmt., 13(2):87-92.
  11. Nautiyal, L.P. (1983). Ph.D. Thesis, Rohilkhand University, Bareilly, India.
  12. Nayak, S.K. and Raheja, K.L. (1996). Indian J. Anim. Sci., 66(2):154-158.
  13. Nivsarkar, A.E. et al. (1988). Indian J. Anim. Prod. Mgmt., 4(1):40-45.
  14. Nguyen, V.N. and Taneja, V.K. (1984). Indian J. Anim. Sci., 54(11):1023-1028.
  15. Panda, P.B. and Sandhu, D.P. (1983). Indian J. Dairy Sci., 36(4):272-274.
  16. Significance P0.01 P0.01 0.01 P0.05 NS P.01 P<0.1
  17. NS indicated nonsignificant, P0.05 indicated significant at5 percent, P
  18. The figures in parenthesis indicated the number of observations. Means superscripted with different letters differ
  19. significantly from each other.
  20. 36 INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL RESEARCH
  21. Parmesh, N. Huballi (1998). M. V. Sc. Thesis, Deem University, IVRI, Izatnagar, India.
  22. Rajan, M.R. et al. (1981). Indian J. Anim. Sci., 51(2):1124-1127.
  23. Surya Prasad, et al. (1991). Indian J. Anim. Sci., 44:2-5.
  24. Thalkari, B.T. et al. (1995). Indian J. Dairy Sci., 48:4-7.

Global Footprints