EVALUATION OF ANTIDIABETIC EFFICACY OF COCCINIA INDICA IN RATS

Article Id: ARCC1234 | Page : 168 - 172
Citation :- EVALUATION OF ANTIDIABETIC EFFICACY OF COCCINIA INDICA IN RATS.Indian Journal Of Animal Research.2010.(44):168 - 172
Eliza Jose and P.T.A Usha,*
Address : College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Mannuthy-680 651, India

Abstract

The present study was aimed to assess the hypoglycaemic, hypolipidemic and antioxidant
activities of a common herb, Coccinia indica. The study was conducted in Sprague-Dawley
strain of albino rats and the chemical, alloxan was used for the experimental induction of diabetes.
Thirty two adult albino rats were divided into four groups of eight each. Group I served as
normal control and group II was made as diabetic control. Group III and IV were made diabetic
and administered orally with 200 mg/kg of ethanolic extract of C. indica leaves and 0.25 mg/kg
of glibenclamide, respectively, for 45 days. There was a significant (p<0.05) reduction in blood
glucose, serum cholesterol, triglyceride and lipid peroxides levels and elevation of reduced
glutathione and liver glycogen in C. indica treated group when compared with the diabetic
control. The results showed that the ethanolic extract of C. indica leaves possessed significant
hypoglycaemic, hypolipidemic and antioxidant effects. The ethanolic extract of C. indica leaves
was screened for the active ingredients and also for acute oral toxicity and sub acute toxicity.
No toxic effects were revealed from the toxicity studies. The results indicate the safety and
efficacy of indica in diabetes mellitus.

Keywords

Coccinia indica Alloxan Antidiabetic Antioxidant Toxicity Rats

References

  1. Alagesaboopathi (2009). Afr. J. Trad. CAM 6(3): 222-227.
  2. Carroll, N.V. et al. (1956). J. Bio. Chem. 220:583-593.
  3. Chaturvedi, P. and Segale, M. (2007). Scientific Res. and Assay. 2:384-389.
  4. Geetha, T. et al. (1998). Pharmacological Res. 37:191-195.
  5. Harbone, J. B. (1991). Phytochemical Methods- Techniques of Plant Analysis. 2nd Ed. Chapman and Hall, India,
  6. 653p.
  7. Hyvarien, A and Nikila, E.A. (1962). Clin. Chem. Acta 7:140
  8. Lu, H. et al. (2009). J. Ethnopharmacol. 122:486-491.
  9. Moron, M.S. et al. (1979) . Biochem. Biophys. Acta. 582:67-78.
  10. 172 INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL RESEARCH
  11. OECD (2001). Test Guideline 423. OECD Guideline for Testing Acute Oral Toxicity of Chemicals. Available at http://
  12. iccvam.niehs.nih.gov/SuppDocs/FedDocs/OECD/OECD_GL423.pdf
  13. Ogbonnia, et al. (2008). African J. Biotech. 7: 2998-3003.
  14. Ohkawa, H. et al. (1979). Anal Biochem. 95: 351-358.
  15. Pari, L. and Venkateswaran, S. (2003) Pharmazie. 58(6): 409-412
  16. Ravi, K. et al. (2004). Life Sci. 75:2717-2731.
  17. Sakurai, T. et al. (2002). Med. Chem. Lett. 12:807-810.
  18. Shaheen et al. (2009) Afr. J. Biotechnol. 8(24): 7073-7076.
  19. Snedecor, G.W. and Cochran, W.G. (1994). Statistical Methods. 8th Ed.: Iowa University Press, Ames, Iowa. 584p.
  20. Turner, R.A. (1965). Screening Methods in Pharmacology. Academic Press, London. 61p.
  21. Veerapan, A. et al. (2007). Phytomedicine. 14:209-215.

Global Footprints