Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 47 issue 2 (april 2013) : 152-155

POPULATION INDICES AND HABITAT ASSOCIATION OF INDIAN PEAFOWL (PAVO CRISTATUS) IN HARYANA USING LINE TRANSECT AND CALL COUNT METHOD

D
Divya Jain*
S
Sarita Rana
1Dept. of Botany and Zoology, S.D. College, Ambala Cantt- 133 043, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Jain* Divya, Rana Sarita (2025). POPULATION INDICES AND HABITAT ASSOCIATION OF INDIAN PEAFOWL (PAVO CRISTATUS) IN HARYANA USING LINE TRANSECT AND CALL COUNT METHOD. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 47(2): 152-155. doi: .

ABSTRACT

The Indian Peafowl is becoming locally extinct from several parts of its former range due to habitat conversion, changing cropping pattern, poaching and pesticide use. Due to limited detailed study on population indices of Indian Peafowl, there is no exact estimate of population density of surviving population of Indian Peafowl in the country. The aim of the present study was to know the population indices of Indian Peafowl in Ambala, Kurukshetra and Yamuna Nagar districts of Haryana using call count and line transect method. The survey was also conducted to know the various habitat variables which influence the density index of Indian Peafowl. The findings are expected to provide baseline information for developing and adopting management as well as conservation strategies for Indian Peafowl in Haryana state.

REFERENCES

  1. REFERENCES
  2. Brickle, Nick W. (2002). Habitat use, predicted distribution and conservation of green peafowl (Pavo muticus) in Dak Lak Province, Vietnam. Biological Conservation 105 : 189–197.
  3. Buckland, S.T.;Anderson,D.R.;Burnham,K.P.;Laake,J.L.;Borchers,D.L.and Thomas, L.(2001). Introduction to Distance Sampling: Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  4. Budgey, H.V. (1994). Parental strategies of Indian Peafowl. Thesis submitted to Dept. of Biology, Open University, California (Unpublished).
  5. Choudhury, B. and S. Sathyakumar (2007). An assessment of the current status of Indian Peafowl (Pavo cristatus) in India based on questionnaire survey.In Galliformes of India, ENVIS Bulletin, Wildlife and Protected Areas, 10. pp 53-60.
  6. Dakin, Roslyn and Montgomerie, Robert (2011). Peahens prefer peacocks displaying more eyespots, but rarely. Animal Behaviour 82 : 21-28.
  7. Dodia,P.P.( 2011).Roost tree selection by the common Indian Peafowl at Bhavnagar. Life Sciences Leaflets. 11:346- 354.
  8. Gaston, A. J. (1980). Census techniques of Himalayan pheasants including notes on individual species. J. of World Pheasant Associ. 5: 40-53.
  9. Ghose,D.; Kaul, R. and Saha, G.K. (2003). Survey of the Blyth’s tragopan in Blue Mountain National Park, Mizoram, India, using call count technique. Current Sci. 84 :95-97.
  10. Harihar,A. and Fernandes, M (2010). Estimating the seasonal densities of Indian peafowl (Pavo cristatus) and red jungle fowl (Gallus gallus) in the northern Indian deciduous forests of Chilla Range, Rajaji National Park. Intern. J. Galliformes Conserv. 2:31-35.
  11. Harikrishnan ,S.;Vasudevan, Karthikeyan and Sivakumar, K. (2010). Behavior of Indian Peafowl Pavo cristatus Linn. 1758 During the Mating Period in a Natural Population. The Open Ornithology J., 3: 13-19.
  12. Imam, E. (2005). Population status and conservation of Indian Peafowl Pavo cristatus in Aligarh, northern India. In: Fuller, R.A. & S.J. Browne (eds). Galliformes 2004. Proceedings of the 3rd International Galliformes Symposium. World Pheasant Association, Fordingbridge, United Kingdom. 191-193.
  13. IUCNRedList: BirdLife International http://www.iucnredlist.org/apps/redlist/details/100600285/0.Accessed on:4.05.2011.
  14. Johnsingh,AJT and Murli,S.(1980). The Ecology and Behaviour of Indian Peafowl (Pavo cristatus) of Injar. J.Bombay Nat.Hist.Soc.; 75:1069-79.
  15. McGowan, P. J. K. and Garson, P.J. (1995). Status survey and conservation action plan 1995-99.Pheasants. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
  16. Ramesh,K. and McGowan,P. (2009). On the current status of Indian Peafowl (Pavo cristatus) (Aves: Galliformes: Phasianidae): Keeping the common species common. J. of Threatened Taxa 1 (2):106-108.
  17. Sathyanarayana, M.C.(2004). Bird pest management with special reference to Indian peafowl Pavo cristatus in Tamilnadu, India. (In): Fuller, R.A. and Browne, S.J. (eds). Galliformes 2004. Proceedings of the 3rd international Galliformes Symposium. World Pheasant Association, Fordingbridge, UK.
  18. Shahabuddin,G. and Kumar,R (2007). Effects of extractive disturbance on bird assemblages, vegetation structure and floristics in tropical scrub forest, Sariska Tiger Reserve, India. Forest Ecology and Management 246:175–185. Available online at www.sciencedirect.com.
  19. Subramanian,K.S. and John,Matthew C. (2001).Roosting and nesting habits of free ranging Indian Peafowl (Pavo cistatus) in Southern Tamil Nadu. Zoos Print J. 16 (7) :537-538.
  20. Takahashi, Mariko and Hasegawa, Toshikazu (2008) Seasonal and diurnal use of eight different call types by Indian peafowl ( Pavo cristatus ) . J. Ethology V. 26:(3): 375-381.
  21. Yasmin, S. (2011).Ecology and Biology of the Indian Peafowl, Pavo cristatus A field study in the Aligarh region. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.pp 68.
  22. Yasmin, S. and Yahya, H.S.A. (1996). Correlates of mating success in Indian Peafowl. The Auk 113(2): 490-492.
Published In
Indian Journal of Animal Research
Article Metrics
Metrics Icon
0
Views
0
Citations
Reviewed By
Share Article
Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    volume 47 issue 2 (april 2013) : 152-155

    POPULATION INDICES AND HABITAT ASSOCIATION OF INDIAN PEAFOWL (PAVO CRISTATUS) IN HARYANA USING LINE TRANSECT AND CALL COUNT METHOD

    D
    Divya Jain*
    S
    Sarita Rana
    1Dept. of Botany and Zoology, S.D. College, Ambala Cantt- 133 043, India

    • Submitted|

    • First Online |

    • doi

    Cite article:- Jain* Divya, Rana Sarita (2025). POPULATION INDICES AND HABITAT ASSOCIATION OF INDIAN PEAFOWL (PAVO CRISTATUS) IN HARYANA USING LINE TRANSECT AND CALL COUNT METHOD. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 47(2): 152-155. doi: .

    ABSTRACT

    The Indian Peafowl is becoming locally extinct from several parts of its former range due to habitat conversion, changing cropping pattern, poaching and pesticide use. Due to limited detailed study on population indices of Indian Peafowl, there is no exact estimate of population density of surviving population of Indian Peafowl in the country. The aim of the present study was to know the population indices of Indian Peafowl in Ambala, Kurukshetra and Yamuna Nagar districts of Haryana using call count and line transect method. The survey was also conducted to know the various habitat variables which influence the density index of Indian Peafowl. The findings are expected to provide baseline information for developing and adopting management as well as conservation strategies for Indian Peafowl in Haryana state.

    REFERENCES

    1. REFERENCES
    2. Brickle, Nick W. (2002). Habitat use, predicted distribution and conservation of green peafowl (Pavo muticus) in Dak Lak Province, Vietnam. Biological Conservation 105 : 189–197.
    3. Buckland, S.T.;Anderson,D.R.;Burnham,K.P.;Laake,J.L.;Borchers,D.L.and Thomas, L.(2001). Introduction to Distance Sampling: Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
    4. Budgey, H.V. (1994). Parental strategies of Indian Peafowl. Thesis submitted to Dept. of Biology, Open University, California (Unpublished).
    5. Choudhury, B. and S. Sathyakumar (2007). An assessment of the current status of Indian Peafowl (Pavo cristatus) in India based on questionnaire survey.In Galliformes of India, ENVIS Bulletin, Wildlife and Protected Areas, 10. pp 53-60.
    6. Dakin, Roslyn and Montgomerie, Robert (2011). Peahens prefer peacocks displaying more eyespots, but rarely. Animal Behaviour 82 : 21-28.
    7. Dodia,P.P.( 2011).Roost tree selection by the common Indian Peafowl at Bhavnagar. Life Sciences Leaflets. 11:346- 354.
    8. Gaston, A. J. (1980). Census techniques of Himalayan pheasants including notes on individual species. J. of World Pheasant Associ. 5: 40-53.
    9. Ghose,D.; Kaul, R. and Saha, G.K. (2003). Survey of the Blyth’s tragopan in Blue Mountain National Park, Mizoram, India, using call count technique. Current Sci. 84 :95-97.
    10. Harihar,A. and Fernandes, M (2010). Estimating the seasonal densities of Indian peafowl (Pavo cristatus) and red jungle fowl (Gallus gallus) in the northern Indian deciduous forests of Chilla Range, Rajaji National Park. Intern. J. Galliformes Conserv. 2:31-35.
    11. Harikrishnan ,S.;Vasudevan, Karthikeyan and Sivakumar, K. (2010). Behavior of Indian Peafowl Pavo cristatus Linn. 1758 During the Mating Period in a Natural Population. The Open Ornithology J., 3: 13-19.
    12. Imam, E. (2005). Population status and conservation of Indian Peafowl Pavo cristatus in Aligarh, northern India. In: Fuller, R.A. & S.J. Browne (eds). Galliformes 2004. Proceedings of the 3rd International Galliformes Symposium. World Pheasant Association, Fordingbridge, United Kingdom. 191-193.
    13. IUCNRedList: BirdLife International http://www.iucnredlist.org/apps/redlist/details/100600285/0.Accessed on:4.05.2011.
    14. Johnsingh,AJT and Murli,S.(1980). The Ecology and Behaviour of Indian Peafowl (Pavo cristatus) of Injar. J.Bombay Nat.Hist.Soc.; 75:1069-79.
    15. McGowan, P. J. K. and Garson, P.J. (1995). Status survey and conservation action plan 1995-99.Pheasants. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
    16. Ramesh,K. and McGowan,P. (2009). On the current status of Indian Peafowl (Pavo cristatus) (Aves: Galliformes: Phasianidae): Keeping the common species common. J. of Threatened Taxa 1 (2):106-108.
    17. Sathyanarayana, M.C.(2004). Bird pest management with special reference to Indian peafowl Pavo cristatus in Tamilnadu, India. (In): Fuller, R.A. and Browne, S.J. (eds). Galliformes 2004. Proceedings of the 3rd international Galliformes Symposium. World Pheasant Association, Fordingbridge, UK.
    18. Shahabuddin,G. and Kumar,R (2007). Effects of extractive disturbance on bird assemblages, vegetation structure and floristics in tropical scrub forest, Sariska Tiger Reserve, India. Forest Ecology and Management 246:175–185. Available online at www.sciencedirect.com.
    19. Subramanian,K.S. and John,Matthew C. (2001).Roosting and nesting habits of free ranging Indian Peafowl (Pavo cistatus) in Southern Tamil Nadu. Zoos Print J. 16 (7) :537-538.
    20. Takahashi, Mariko and Hasegawa, Toshikazu (2008) Seasonal and diurnal use of eight different call types by Indian peafowl ( Pavo cristatus ) . J. Ethology V. 26:(3): 375-381.
    21. Yasmin, S. (2011).Ecology and Biology of the Indian Peafowl, Pavo cristatus A field study in the Aligarh region. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.pp 68.
    22. Yasmin, S. and Yahya, H.S.A. (1996). Correlates of mating success in Indian Peafowl. The Auk 113(2): 490-492.
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us
      Published In
      Indian Journal of Animal Research

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)