Profitability of clusterbean through front line demonstrations
ABSTRACT
Eleven (11) Front Line Demonstrations (6 at Gwalior and 5 at Shivpuri district) on the farmers’ field were conducted on complete recommended package of practices in comparison with farmers’ practice during kharif 2015 on clusterbean crop in two districts of Gwalior and Shivpuri district of Madhya Pradesh. On the basis of two districts average results indicated that higher seed yield (1726 kg/ha) and net monetary return (71,001/-ha) of Guar was obtained under recommended package of practices, which was 41.04% higher seed yield as compared to farmer’s practices. Farmer’s practices obtained (1227 kg/ha) seed yield and net monetary return (51,177 /-ha) of Guar only.
REFERENCES
- Gurjar, P.K.S., Singh, Lal, Kanpure, R.N, Singh, Lakhan, Singh, Chandrabhan and Kumar, Amit (2015). Improvement in productivity of garlic (Allium sativum) through demonstration on farmer’s fields. Bhartiya Krishi Anusandha Patrika, 30 (1), 26-28
- Mida, L.K. and Khatri, R.S. (2012). Improvement of productivity through front line demonstrations in clusterbean at Hisar Centre , Annual Progress Report (2012-13), pp 295-296
- Rawat, G.S. (2014). Improvement of productivity of clusterbean through front line demonstration. Bhartiya Krishi Anusandha Patrika, 29 (3), 126 – 127
- Rawat, G.S., Rawat, Upama and Rajput, R.L. (2016). Improvement of productivity of clusterbean through front line demonstration. Bhartiya Krishi Anusandha Patrika, 31 (1), 35-36
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.