Compound annual growth rates of area, production and productivity of rice
Table 1 illustrate the CAGR for the area, production and productivity of autumn, winter and summer rice in the BTAD across three study periods. During Period I, autumn rice experienced notable growth, with production and productivity increasing by 3.69 per cent and 22.22 per cent, respectively. This improvement was largely driven by a 3.9 per cent expansion in cultivated area, which contributed to the overall rise in output and yield. In Period II, despite a -10.22 per cent decline in the area under autumn rice cultivation, both production and productivity continued to grow, registering 1.18 per cent and 12.7 per cent increases, respectively suggesting enhanced efficiency in rice farming practices. Over the entire study period, the CAGR for area and production of autumn rice declined by -4.54 per cent and -0.26 per cent, while productivity improved by 4.48 per cent. Production decreased because of declined in area under autumn rice cultivation. The contraction in cultivation area is attributed by the factors such as land-use changes and shifting preferences toward alternative crops. These findings are corroborated by the study, including
Answari and Answari (2023). Winter rice is the most important rice crop in the BTAD, making a vital contribution to regional food security. Over the study periods, the area, production and productivity of winter rice showed consistent growth, with the exception of Period II, where the cultivated area declined marginally by -0.06 per cent. In Period I, the area under cultivation increased by 2.94 per cent, while production and productivity rose by 7.17 per cent and 26.76 per cent, respectively, reflecting favorable growing conditions and improved management. Although in Period II, there was reduction in area, production and productivity continued to grow by 10.25 per cent and 10.32 per cent driven by advancements in agricultural techniques. Sary
et al. (2024) found from their study that use of ferlitiser has significant impact on the output of wet season paddy. As per Statistical Handbook of BTC, fertilizer has also increased. In Annual Period, all three indicators area, production and productivity again recorded positive growth, underscoring ongoing improvements in farming practices, technology adoption and resource efficiency in the region.
The cultivation of winter rice in Assam is often affected by floods during the monsoon season. As a result, summer rice has become an important crop in the BTAD, particularly in flood-prone areas, as it is relatively less susceptible to flood damage. As per District irrigation plan, 2016-20, summer rice cultivation have received more attention to avoid flood and other natural calamities to make the study region self-sufficient in rice production. Despite a negative growth rate of the area under summer rice cultivation by -0.05 per cent during Period I, - 6.21 per cent during Period II and -5.12 per cent in Annual period, but the production and productivity have increased in two study periods. Production has increased by 1.79 per cent during Period I and Annual Period by 1.96 per cent. And productivity has increased from 7.22 per cent in Period I, 5.99 per cent in Period II and 7.47 per cent in Annual period. But in Period II, productivity has increased to 5.99 per cent even than there has been negative growth rate of area and production of summer rice. As per Statistical Handbook of BTC, there has been increased in irrigated area and consumption of fertilizer also support in the cultivation of summer rice.
In The use of fertilizers, vermin compost, foliar sprays and appropriate crop management practices during the cultivation, panicle initiation and flowering stages all of which contribute to higher yields may be responsible for the improvement in productivity in the case of autumn rice, even though both area and production have decreased.
Udhaya et al. (2024) support the findings of this study. Similarly, for winter rice, both production and productivity have increased due to an expansion in the area under cultivation, which is consistent with the findings of
Saikia and Hazarika (2025). Although the area under summer rice cultivation has decreased, production and productivity have increased due to the adoption of improved rice varieties, the use of fertilizers and effective plant protection measures, as noted by
Shankar et al. (2025).
Instability in area, production and productivity of rice of BTAD
CDVI has been used to analysis the instability in area, production and productivity of three types of rice and result was presented in Table 2. The results indicate notable fluctuations in the cultivated area, production and productivity of autumn rice across different sub-periods. During Period I, the area under cultivation grew at a rate of 1.48 per cent, which declined to 1.3 per cent in Period II and further to 0.93 per cent over the overall annual period. Production exhibited an initial increase from 4 per cent in Period I to 5 per cent in Period II, followed by a decline to 2.4 per cent in the annual period. In contrast, productivity consistently declined from 8.1 per cent in Period I to 3.8 per cent in Period II and 3 per cent in the annual period. Overall, the growth trends in area, production and productivity of autumn rice reflect low instability, as all values fall within the 0 to 15 per cent range.
In case of winter rice, the area under cultivation declined from 0.93 per cent in Period I to 0.3 per cent in Period II. Growth instability during the annual period remained low, with values falling within the 0-15 per cent range. A consistent decline was observed in production, decreasing from 4 per cent in Period I to 2 per cent in Period II and further to 1.28 per cent annually. A similar trend was noted in productivity, which fell from 7.3 per cent in Period I to 2.2 per cent in Period II, although a slight increase to 2.6 per cent was recorded during the annual period. Overall, the growth trends in area, production and productivity of winter rice exhibited low levels of instability throughout the study period because the value lies on 0-15 per cent.
The area under summer rice cultivation increased sharply from 1.6 per cent in Period I to 4 per cent in Period II, with low growth instability at 1.4 per cent during the annual period. Production declined from 3 per cent to 2.8 per cent, with an annual growth rate of 1.65 per cent. Similarly, productivity dropped from 3 per cent to 0.8 per cent, with an annual growth of 0.79 per cent. Overall, the values for area, production and productivity remained within the 0–15 per cent range, indicating low growth instability throughout the study period.
The implication of the current study
The study highlights important policy implications for enhancing rice production in the region. A positive growth trend in the area, production and productivity of winter rice suggests its continued importance. While only productivity has improved for autumn rice, summer rice has demonstrated increased production and productivity despite a decline in cultivated area. These trends underscore the potential of autumn and summer rice cultivation to offset losses from flood-affected winter rice. Given rice’s role as the staple food in the study area, the findings call for strategic investment in irrigation infrastructure. Expanding and improving irrigation facilities would allow for the productive use of currently fallow lands, which remain uncultivated due to insufficient rainfall during the Zaid and Rabi seasons. This, in turn, would enhance cropping intensity, reduce seasonal vulnerability and contribute to greater food security and rural income stability.