Agricultural Reviews

  • Chief EditorPradeep K. Sharma

  • Print ISSN 0253-1496

  • Online ISSN 0976-0741

  • NAAS Rating 4.84

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October & December)
Indexing Services :
AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Eco-friendly Biodegradable Packaging in the Food Sector: A Brief Overview

Neha Bajal1, Kanika Pawar2,*, Ranjan Kaushik2
  • https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1979-6753
1I.C. College of Community Science, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar-125 004, Haryana, India.
2Centre of Food Science and Technology, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar-125 004, Haryana, India.

The abstract provides an overview of environmentally friendly biodegradable packaging in the food industry. The summary explores key aspects such as the types of biodegradable materials utilized, their production processes and their pivotal role in addressing environmental concerns. By examining the food industry’s reaction to biodegradable packaging, the abstract highlights the potential for mitigating ecological harm and fostering a more sustainable future.

In contemporary existence, polymers have become indispensable in daily activities owing to their numerous favourable characteristics and production convenience. Global plastic (thermoplastics, thermosets, elastomers, coatings and sealants and PP fibers) production reached approximately 400.3 million metric tons in 2022, reflecting a 1.6 percent increase from the year before. Asia is the world’s leading region for plastic production, with China alone contributing 32 per cent of the global output in 2022. In recent years, China’s monthly plastic production has ranged between six and 12 million metric tons. North America follows as the second-largest producer, accounting for 17 per cent of global plastic production in 2022 (Statista, 2024a). If plastic production continues to grow at an annual rate of 4%, emissions from plastics will triple to 6.78 gigatonnes by 2050 (Jones, 2024). Since its beginnings in 1957 with the production of polystyrene, India’s plastics industry has expanded significantly, establishing itself as a major player in global production. With over 20,000 processing units, it contributes billions to India’s economy and provides jobs for around four million people. India is also a key exporter, with polymer exports reaching approximately 1.5 million metric tons in 2021 (Statista, 2024b).

The petrochemical industry, excluding fertilizers, produces 63 per cent of all plastics, with more than a third of this output dedicated to packaging. Under a business-as-usual scenario, demand for oil in the plastics and petrochemical sectors is expected to double by 2050, resulting in emissions that would exceed the targets needed to keep global warming within 1.5oC. This growth is projected across all regions, with the highest increase in demand anticipated in China and developing Asian countries through 2050 (Zero Carbon Analytics, 2024). The top three sectors for plastics production are packaging, which accounts for 30-36%, followed by construction at 16% and textiles at 16-17% (Zero Carbon Analytics, 2024; Emami et al., 2024). In 2020, plastic waste totalled approximately 460±22 kilotonnes, with around half of that waste originating from packaging (Emami et al., 2024).

Only 13% of plastic waste is recycled, while 46% is mismanaged, with the remainder either incinerated or discarded in landfills or the environment (Emami et al., 2024). Nevertheless, synthetic plastics were incapable of undergoing physical, chemical and biological degradation, ultimately contributing to a rise in waste accumulation (Vert et al., 2002).  The accumulation of waste posed numerous significant environmental and health related challenges, manifesting in the obstruction of streets and roads, leading to the blockage of drains and subsequent overflow (Foolmaun and Ramjeeawon, 2012). A substantial volume of plastic waste is disposed of in oceans and rivers, causing harm to aquatic life. The incineration of plastic causes harmful petrol emissions to occur, including carbon dioxide, furans, chlorine, 1,3-butadiene, furans, carbon monoxide, amines and dioxin, etc., which degrade the excellence of air, heighten the global warming risk and poses numerous health concerns (Smith, 2005). The escalating challenges associated with waste disposal and the adverse effects on public health and the environment, stemming from an ability of many synthetic polymers to degrade, prompted global apprehensions, leading to intensified efforts worldwide to explore alternative materials with environmentally friendly attributes (Luckachan and Pillai, 2011). Biodegradable polymers have surfaced as a viable alternative strategy for several industrial applications aimed at mitigating the risks connected with non-biodegradable plastics. In accordance with the definition provided by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), A plastic is that which undergoes degradation due to the activity of naturally occurring microorganisms, including bacteria, fungi and algae (ASTM, 2004). Biodegradable polymers, which come from renewable resources, have water vapour transmission rates and oxygen transmission rates comparable to those of traditional plastics as PET (polyethylene terephthalate), PP (polypropylene), PE (polyethylene) and others, elongation at break and tensile strength (Kirwan and Strawbridge, 2003). The primary by-products of the breakdown of biodegradable polymers are carbon dioxide, water, inorganic chemicals, or biomass. This process is advantageous for the environment as it precludes the accumulation of waste. The primary utilization of biodegradable plastics was observed in the realms of packaging of food and agricultural sector. In food sector, packaging serves various functions (Song et al., 2009).
 
Adoption of biodegradable materials
 
From 2012 to 2017, the use of biodegradable materials increased at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) in the markets of North America, Europe and Asia which was between 15 and 20% (Chbib et at., 2019). However, comprehensive Africa’s market data remains inadequately constituted (Atarés and Chiralt, 2016). The utilisation of crucial oils in the Spanish producers of biodegradable food packaging sheets aims to provide bio-based packaging with possible health benefits, such as antibacterial and antioxidant qualities. The packaging films’ mechanical, optical and structural characteristics were improved by the lipidic makeup of essential oils, which also reduced the water vapour permeability in hydrophilic materials. Subsequently, biodegradable packaging films, developed and evaluated in Finland for preservation purposes, demonstrated an extension in the tomato fruit’s shelf life (Kantola and Helen, 2007). A study conducted in Malaysia demonstrated gum arabic used as an edible covering film to improve the postharvest quality and extend the shelf life of tomatoes. Furthermore, starch-based edible coatings were applied, derived from native potatoes in Colombia to wild South American blueberries, or Andean blueberries, which led to a significant 27% decrease in respiration rate. However, previous research indicated that further study should focus on improving biodegradable films’ physical strength to a degree equivalent to that of petroleum-based polyfilms (Ali et al., 2010).
 
Biodegradable and biopolymer substances
 
Cotton fibres in South Africa, Washingtonian filifera in Algeria, Luffa Cylindrica in Nigeria, Napier grass in Botswana and Hibiscus sabdariffa in Kenya, Ethiopia and Uganda are among the countries that produce vegetable cellulose extracts are examples of biomass materials suitable for the production of both biodegradable and biopolymeric substances in Africa. Biopolymers like chitosan, cellulose and pectin have attracted a lot of interest from the scientific community as well as the food packaging production industry (Sanaa and Medimagh, 2019). Additionally, in Ethiopia, the pectin and chitosan extract-based film that was tested on tomatoes showed a 15 to 17 days shelf life, which was longer than the control group’s shelf life of ten days. Furthermore, there are published findings from Nigeria that show a significant amount of biodegradable plastic film is produced there by combining biodegradable polymer ingredients with cassava starch. According to reports, the fresh tomato postharvest losses on the market the eastern part of sub-Saharan Africa, Central and Southern African countries were 9.50%, 9.80% and 10.04%, respectively. Notably, postharvest losses were documented in Kenya, South Africa and Nigeria at 10.10%, 10.20% and 13.40%, respectively (Sibomana, 2016). However, when recyclable cardboard boxes of various sizes, bulk bins, plastic crates and wooden crates were utilised for packing and shipping across the South African supply chain, postharvest losses among commercial or emerging tomato producers were decreased (Cherono and Workneh, 2018).

Food packaging films can be made from raw plastic polymers, biopolymers and biodegradable materials by techniques like lamination, casting, coextrusion or coating (Mathlouthi, 2013). Several foods packaging film were made of biopolymers, such as gelatin, starch, cellulose and bio-derived monomers like polylactic acid. Furthermore, substances produced by bacteria, include cellulose, xanthan, curlan and pullulan were utilized in the film production process. Chitosan, a natural polymer obtained through the chitin, the second most prevalent biopolymer in nature after cellulose, undergoes deacetylation, was also employed. Chitosan is characterized by being natural, non-toxic, edible and biodegradable. It is advised that various additives be added to the biodegradable film in order to improve its quality (Abdul Khalil et al., 2018). Proteins and polysaccharides, two material components having hydrophilic properties, were added to stabilise edible biodegradable films. Drying was the next step in the film-forming aqueous dispersions casting process, also known as the coating process. During the dispersion process, essential oils were added to the film as additives and the mixture was homogenised or emulsified. As a result, the dried polymer, which included lipid droplets, formed the film’s structural matrix (Atares and Chiralt, 2016).

The manufacture of biodegradable food packaging materials involves three generational stages of biodegradable polymers. The initial generation comprises 5 to 15% starch filters and autoxidative additives are included in low-density polyethylene (LDPE) film. Low-density polyethylene (LDPE), hydrophilic copolymer additives and 40 to 70% pregelatinized starch make up second-generation films. Third-generation materials are manufactured from biomaterials and can be divided into three categories: (a) biomonomers and polymers made from natural or genetically modified organisms; (b) polymers synthesised from bio-derived monomers, such as polylactate; and (c) polymers extracted from biomass, such as starch, chitin, chitosan, plant proteins and soybeans. Nanocomposite materials have been recognised for their exceptional qualities, including their high performance, lightweight nature and environmental friendliness, were recognized as surpassing plastic food packaging materials (Youssef and El-Sayed, 2018). The cost-effectiveness, renewable nature and widespread availability of biopolymers represent key favourable considerations for thermoplastic starch-based materials utilized in food packaging (Khan et al., 2017; Mayuri et al., 2023).
 
Mechanisms involved in the preservation of savoury coatings
 
Fruit Deterioration in quality is closely associated with biochemical processes occurring within the cell structure, including changes in the composition of the intracellular components and the cell wall. Two significant cell wall hydrolase enzymes are cellulase and polygalacturonase, were found to be important contributors to have relationships with the softening and ripening phenomena in fruit (Lombardelli et al., 2020). Fruits covered with edible coverings have the capacity to impede ripening by reducing the permeability of oxygen, leading to an elevation in intracellular carbon dioxide levels. Elevated carbon dioxide concentrations can inhibit the activities of cell wall hydrolase enzymes, thereby preserving fruit firmness throughout storage. This influence of a low oxygen environment has been effectively utilized to optimize storage conditions, transportation and extend the duration of the shelf life of various fruit commodities. Lower respiration rates in tomatoes with coatings may be a factor in the delayed ripening process, which would lead to fewer changes in physiological parameters as colour, titratable acidity, weight loss and firmness retention (Cukrov, 2018). The antimicrobial characteristics of edible coatings serve as a protective barrier for fruits, safeguarding them against agents that contribute to firmness degradation, such as insects and mites. Ripe tomato fruits might become softer and spoiled due to the fungal and bacterial spores carried by these vectors. Moreover, the use of biodegradable packing materials guarantees decomposability of fruits, such as tomatoes, facilitating soil microbial decomposition (Gharezi et al., 2012).
 
Process by which biodegradable films degrade
 
Microorganisms found in soil can break down biodegradable materials into elemental molecules like carbon dioxide, water and methane. They can also produce monomers like alcohol, carboxylate acid and amine. The biodegradability of these materials is contingent upon factors such as chemical composition, bonding nature and water availability. The presence of specific peaks in the infrared spectra, particularly those associated with carbonyl signals, serves as an indication of the starch is broken down by enzymes into the disaccharide maltose and the monosaccharide glucose (Tai et al., 2019). The primary mechanism of microbial activity is enzymatic. The microorganisms develop saprophytically, using plant metabolites as their substrates. Within this process, microorganisms secrete a variety of enzymes, including amylases and cellulases, which play key roles in the enzymatic hydrolysis and oxidative cleavage of glycosidic bonds present in starch and cellulose. Furthermore, labile aliphatic ester connections in plasticizing films are hydrolysed by extracellular enzymes such lipase, cutinase and esterase. These enzymatic activities result in the production of metabolites that microorganisms absorb to meet their energy requirements. The influence of these processes is demonstrated by the carbonyl signals in the IR spectra gradually decreasing and then disappearing over time (Bhatnagar et al., 2018). The slow decrease in metabolites indicates that the saprophytic phase is progressing. UV radiation at wavelengths less than 350 nm has the ability to stimulate enzyme activity and cause chain scission in polymer molecules. Over the course of seven weeks, the simultaneous application of the cellulase enzyme and UV radiation led to the breakdown of 60% of cellulose acetate, surpassing the 23% degradation obtained with UV therapy alone. Thermal gravimetric Three-stage degradation profiles are produced by the biodegradation process, which is extensively characterised by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The loss of water and volatiles is the first stage; the synthesis of lower molecular weight starch subunits is the second; and the breakdown of the starch’s constituent parts is the third (Tampau et al., 2020). Biodegradable film degradation is dependent on a number of elements, such as temperature, sample surface area, crystallinity, molecular weight and microbial activity in water and soil (Table 1). Plasticizers that are hydrophilic also play a role. Plasticizers increase the amount of polar groups in the water, which accelerates their contact with it and their permeability to water in the samples. Biosurfactant plasticizers are highly active at the surface and interface, biocompatible and promote the biodegradation of soil hydrocarbons by lowering the interfacial tension between soil and water. A regulated fermentation technique that produced ideal pH conditions of 10 showed higher outputs of metabolites, including volatile fatty acids. Higher pH values might prevent acidophilic bacteria, which would limit the formation of metabolites. After being exposed to pulsed electric fields, films composed of zein, chitosan and poly (vinyl alcohol) exhibited enhanced durability against enzyme and electrolyte degradation (Giteru et al., 2020).

Table 1: Application of diverse biodegradable films used in food sector.



Characteristics of biodegradable films
 
a) Characteristics of structure
 
The analysis of the chemical content and architectures of Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and atomic force microscopy (AFM) were used in the packaging materials research. (Hu et al., 2018). The starch’s crystalline and amorphous structures were assessed and quantified using the X-ray diffraction technique. The amylopectin molecule and crystallinity are intimately associated; amylose is primarily found in the amorphous lamellae of the starch granule, whereas amylopectin makes up the crystalline lamellae (Chisenga et al., 2019). Dispersion properties, like how starch swells when plasticizers are present, are influenced by the degree of crystallinity. The common characteristic of the infrared (IR) spectrum is the way in which IR radiation and chemical bonds interact. The broad band observed in the infrared spectra of starch films was explained as the result of hydroxyl (-OH) groups’ intra- and inter-chain vibrational stretching. Meanwhile, narrow bands were associated with the stretching of C-H bonds and peaks were linked to carbonyl (C=O) groups that were attached to the glucose ring. (Brandelero et al., 2011).

Utilising scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM), the researchers looked inside the surface microstructural of the film formations. PVA and starch films both showed smooth, homogeneous surfaces. The films’ cross-section showed erratic, heterogeneous formations that looked like bubbles, with variations based on the crystallinity level. PVA and starch film mixes in particular showed signs of microstructure phase separation, which were explained by differences in the extrusion process, uneven crystallinity and inadequate miscibility. To mitigate phase separation in blended films, compatibilizer compounds like formaldehyde and poly (ethylene glycol) were introduced into the film blends (Vaezi et al., 2019). The amount of phosphate and starch groups in the amylopectin chain is one of the elements influencing phase separation. Because the potato starch film has a higher phosphate group concentration than other native starches, it is noteworthy that it did not exhibit phase separation. The determination of film thickness using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) revealed that film blends exhibited greater thickness compared to pure starch films. These variations in thickness were explained by variations in molecular weight, where thicker molecules have a larger molecular weight. It is recommended for biodegradable edible packaging materials, whether coatings or films, to have a thickness below 254 μm (Liu et al., 2020).
 
b) Characteristics of permeability
 
The researchers used transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to examine, the polymer matrix must efficiently allow gases to move through. Water transfer between food and the environment has a significant impact on the shelf life and freshness of fruits and vegetables, including tomatoes. As a result, packaging’s main purpose is to reduce water transmission. The hydrophilic nature of polysaccharides is the reason for the edible films’ poor moisture resistance. Hydrophobic lipids improve the water vapour barrier qualities of films made of polysaccharides and chitosan. The entanglement of hydrogen bonding between the NH2 group of chitosan and the OH group of plasticizers (e.g., CAP and PVA) resulted in increased hydrophobicity of blended films (CAP/chitosan and PVA/chitosan), which led to a considerable sixfold reduction in the water transfer rate. The moisture permeability of biodegradable films was reduced upon the addition of silica nanoparticles. PVC, chitosan and silica can all be used to alter the oxygen permeability properties; this will rely on the product’s respiratory requirements as well as the polarity of the components used in the packaging. The addition of silica to PVA/chitosan biodegradable films resulted in a significant decrease in oxygen permeability values of about 26% (Yu et al., 2018).
 
c) Characteristics of mechanical performance
 
To package cherry tomatoes, biodegradable polylactic films composed of polylactic acid and pea starch were created. However, compared to their petroleum-derived equivalents, these biodegradable polylactic films were shown to have worse mechanical qualities. Brittle films have been related to biopolymers such as starch. Hydrophilic plasticizers, such polyols (glycerol, sorbitol and polyethylene glycol), were added to the film-forming dispersions to reduce intermolecular pressures, which improved the polymers’ extensibility and flexibility (Zhou et al., 2019). The mechanical properties, such as strain, tensile strength and compression test and film-forming ability, are related to the amylose content and polymer crystallinity. These qualities are also influenced by the distribution of molecular weights and the concentration of additives. Because they create both intra- and intermolecular hydrogen bonds, plasticizing agents such as cellulose acetate phthalate (CAP) and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) can change the mechanical behaviour of a material. PVA and starch combined to create a biodegradable film with improved mechanical properties. In comparison to pure chitosan film, a greater tensile strength was reported in the film blend consisting of chitosan CAP and nano ZnO. Increased interaction between the film’s constituent parts is indicated by the higher tensile strength in film blends. Furthermore, as the concentration of the diblock copolymer increased, the films’ tensile strengths showed an increase (Gomez-Aldapa et al., 2020).
 
Varieties of biodegradable packaging
 
Films
 
Films represent a prevalent form of bio packaging across diverse sectors. Initially conceived as a substitute for PE film, biodegradable films were engineered with superior properties compared to non-degradable plastics (Balaji et al., 2022). Essential attributes of a high-quality packaging film encompass:
•  Facilitating regulated respiration.
•  Possessing effective barrier properties.
•  Sustaining structural integrity.
•  Preventing or mitigating microbial spoilage.

A study was carried out to analyse the permeability of carbon dioxide and oxygen of the biodegradable film that is used to package tomatoes. The outcomes demonstrated that the fruit was able to breathe in the proper manner thanks to films with the best permeability, which kept microbes out and the fruit’s quality intact (Muratore et al., 2005). Applications for blown films include the manufacture of bags and different types of packaging. The base material for blown film production was polylactic acid (PLA), which showed exceptional mechanical and transparent qualities. A change in these films’ degree of crystallinity influences their sealability property. For the creation of blown films, one biodegradable polymer is insufficient because of its low melting strength and delayed crystallisation. The polyesters are laminated using the co-extrusion technique. For instance, polymers like PHA and PHB are coated on thermoplastic starch (TPS) and blown into film during the coextrusion process. Avebe created ParagonTM, which is used in cheese packaging (Van Tuil et al., 2000; Weber et al., 2002; Ojha et al., 2015).
 
Containers
 
Fruits, salads and vegetables can all be packaged in thermoformed trays or containers because these foods require a regulated environment to maintain their quality. The process involves the melt extrusion’s polymer to create sheetsand subsequently, sheets are heated above the glass transition temperature point (Tg) and melting point (Tm) to assume a particular form (Pawar and Purwar, 2013). Most trays made of biodegradable polymers are moisture and brittleness resistant. When the tray freezes, its structural characteristics don’t alter. Tropical fruits including mangoes and melons were kept fresh using oriented polylactic acid (PLA) trays. Fruits packed in these trays had a shelf life that was comparable to fruits that are arranged in PET trays (Chonhenchob et al., 2007).
 
Foamed product
 
Starch-based foams are employed for loose-fill applications. A number of methods are used to produce foamed items, including expandable bead moulding, foam extrusion, loose-fill moulding and extrusion transfer moulding (Van Tuil et al., 2000). Various foam-filled goods, such as trays and clamshells, derived from starch, find application in food packaging. However, coatings suitable for direct food contact are essential. Preferably, coatings made from Paraffin and other polymers are preferred over PLA and starch. An important factor is the adherence between the coating and the foamed product. The American-developed foam Novamontis a substance made of starch that finds use in a variety of packaging applications (Crow, 2020). The Landaal Packaging system invented Green Cell foam TM, a sustainable alternative to PP foams. Within four weeks, it completely degraded in a humid soil environment (Ibrahim et al., 2022).
 
Biodegradation
 
Biodegradation is characterized as the transformation of microorganisms that help break down polymers into carbon dioxide, water, methane and biomass. The process by which polymeric materials biodegrades encompasses various stages, including.
 
Biodeterioration
 
The fragmentation of the biodegradable substance happens as a consequence of the coordinated action of several abiotic stimuli and soil microbes.
 
Depolymerisation
 
Enzymes are the main catalytic agents released by microorganisms. These agents cleave molecules to produce dimers, monomers and oligomers.
 
Recognition
 
Certain broken-up dimers, monomers and oligomers can cross the microbial cell’s plasma membrane thanks to the recognition of microbial receptors. Unidentified pieces persist within the surroundings outside of cells.
 
Assimilation
 
Once inside molecules combine with metabolism in the cytoplasm to produce a range of primary and secondary metabolites, biomass and energy.
 
Mineralization
 
Aldehydes and organic acids are two examples of metabolites that are secreted into the extracellular space by microbial cells. CO2, CH4, H2O and other salts are released into the environment during this process (Lucas et al., 2008).
In conclusion, the examination of environmentally friendly biodegradable packaging in the food sector underscores the significance of sustainable practices in addressing packaging challenges. The overview has illuminated the various aspects of biodegradable materials, their production and their crucial role in mitigating environmental impact. As the food industry continues to embrace eco-friendly alternatives, the implementation of biodegradable packaging emerges as a promising solution to reduce ecological harm and foster a more sustainable future.
Not Applicable.

Disclaimers
 
The views and conclusions expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of their affiliated institutions. The authors are responsible for the accuracy and completeness of the information provided, but do not accept any liability for any direct or indirect losses resulting from the use of this content. 
 
Informed consent
 
Not Applicable.
 
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article. No funding or sponsorship influenced the design of the study, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

  1. Abdul Khalil, H.P.S., Banerjee, A. and Saurabh, C.K. (2018). Biodegra- dable films for fruits and vegetables packaging application: Preparation and properties. Food Engineering Reviews. 10(3): 139-153.

  2. Ali, A., Maqbool, M., Ramachandran, S. and Alderson, P.G. (2010). Gum arabic as a novel edible coating for enhancing shelflife and improving postharvest quality of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) fruit. Postharvest Biology and Technology.  58(1): 42-47.

  3. Aryan Y., Yadav P. and Samadder S.R. (2019). Life cycle assessment of the existing and proposed plastic waste management options in India: A case study. Journal of Cleaner Production. 211: 1268-1283.

  4. ASTM, D. (2004). Standard Specification for Compostable Plastics. West Conshohocken, PA, Standard Number D6400.

  5. Atares, L. and Chiralt, A. (2016). Essential oils as additives in biodegradable films and coatings for active food packaging. Trends in Food Science and Technology. 48: 51-62.

  6. Balaji J., Immanuel G. and Mayuri T. (2022). Mechanical and functional properties of biodegradable films compounding from low-density poly ethylene (LDPE), modified corn starch (MCS). Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research. 41(4): 462-467. doi: 10.18805/ajdfr.DR-1861.

  7. Bhatnagar, J.M., Sabat, G. and Cullen, D. (2018). The foliar endophyte Phialocephalascopiformis DAOMC 229536 secretes enzymes supporting growth on wood as sole carbon source Bio R xiv. 4(10-25): 354365. 

  8. Brandelero, R.P.H., Grossmann, M.V.E.  and Yamashita, F. (2011). Effect of the method of production of the blends on mechanical and structural properties of biodegradable starch films produced by blown extrusion. Carbohydrate Polymers. 86(3): 1344-1350.

  9. Chbib, H., Faisal, M., Husseiny, A. El, I. Fa and ME, N. (2019). The future of biodegradable plastics from an environmental and business perspective. Modern Approaches on Material Science. 2(1): 1-16.

  10. Cherono, K. and Workneh, T. (2018). A review of the role of transportation on the quality changes of fresh tomatoes and their manage- ment in South Africa and other emerging markets. International Food Research Journal. 25(6): 2211-2228.

  11. Chisenga, S.M., Workneh, T.S., Bultosa, G. and Alimi, B.A. (2019). Progress in research and applications of cassava flour and starch: A review. Journal of Food Science and Technology. 56(6): 2799-2813.

  12. Chonhenchob, V., Chantarasomboon, Y. and Singh, S.P. (2007). Quality changes of treated fresh-cut tropical fruits in rigid modified atmosphere packaging containers. Packaging Technology and Science-International Journal. 20(1): 27-37.

  13. Crow, P. (2020). Novamont Buys Eastman’s ‘Eastar Bio’ Technology | ICIS. ICIS Explore. http://www.icis.com/resources/ news/2004/09/08/611549/novamont-buyseastman-s- eastar biotechnology. (Accessed on 21th November, 2020).

  14. Cukrov, D. (2018). Progress toward understanding the molecular basis of fruit response to hypoxia. Plants. 7(4): 78.

  15. De Queiroz Antonino R.S.C.M., Lia Fook B.R.P., De Oliveira Lima V.A., De Farias Rached R.I., Lima E.P.N., Da Silva Lima R.J., Peniche Covas C.A. and Lia Fook M.V.  (2017). Preparation and characterization of chitosan obtained from shells of shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei Boone). Marine Drugs. 15(5): 141. 

  16. Emami, N., Baynes, T.M., Kaushik, T., Singh, M., Bhattacharjya, S., Locock, K. and Schandl, H. (2024). Plastics in the Indian economy: A comprehensive material flow analysis. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management. 1-12.

  17. Europe P. and EPRO (2019). Plastics-the facts 2019. https://www. plasticseurope.org/en/resources/market-data. (Accessed  on 21st, September, 2024).

  18. FICCI (2014). Potential of plastics industry in northern India with special focus on plastic culture and food processing. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 135: 111048.

  19. Foolmaun, R.K. and Ramjeeawon, T. (2012). Disposal of post- consumer polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles: Comparison of five disposal alternatives in the small island state of Mauritius using a life cycle assessment tool.  Environ. Technol. 33(5): 563-572.

  20. Gharezi, M., Joshi, N. and Sadeghian, E. (2012). Effect of postharvest treatment on stored cherry tomatoes. Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences. 2(8): 1-10.

  21. Giteru, S.G., Cridge, B., Oey, I., Ali, A. and Altermann, E. (2020). In-vitro degradation and toxicological assessment of pulsed electric fields crosslinked zein-chitosan-poly (vinyl alcohol) biopolymeric films. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 135: 111048.

  22. Gomez-Aldapa, C.A., Velazquez, G., Gutierrez, M.C., Rangel-Vargas, E., Castro-rosas, J. and Aguirre-Loredo, R.Y. 2020. Effect of polyvinyl alcohol on the physicochemical properties of biodegradable starch films. Materials Chemistry and Physics. 239.

  23. Hu, H., Zhang, R., Wang, J., Ying, W.B. and Zhu J. (2018). Fully bio-based poly (propylene succinate-co-propylene furandicarboxylate) copolyesters with proper mechanical,  degradation and barrier properties for green packaging applications. European Polymer Journal. 102(1): 101-110.

  24. Ibrahim, I.D., Hamam, Y., Sadiku, E.R., Ndambuki, J.M. (2022). Need for sustainable Packaging: An overview. Polymers (Basel). 14(20): 4430.

  25. Jones, N. (2024). Plastic pollution: Three numbers that support a crackdown. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586- 024-01117-1. (Accessed on 28th October, 2024).

  26. Kantola, M. and Helen, H. (2007). Quality changes in organic tomatoes packaged in biodegradable plastic films. Journal of Food Quality. 24(2): 167-176.

  27. Khan, B., Niazi, M.B.K., Samin, G. and Jahan. Z. (2017). Thermoplastic starch: A possible biodegradable food packaging material- a review. Journal of Food Process Engineering. 40(3): e12447.

  28. Kirwan, M.J. and Strawbridge, J.M. (2003). Plastics in food packaging. In: Coles, R., Macdowell, D., Kirwan, M.J. (Eds.), Food Packaging Technology. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford. 174-240.

  29. Koc, B., Akyuz, L. and Cakmak, Y.S. (2020). Production and characteri- zation of chitosan-fungal extract films. Food Bioscience. 35(7): 100545.

  30. La Fuente, C.I.A., Castanha, N., Maniglia, B.C., Tadini, C.C. and Augusto, P.E.D. (2020). Biodegradable films produced from ozone- modified potato starch. Journal of Packaging Technology and Research. 4(1): 3-11.

  31. Lei, L., Zhi, H., Xiujin, Z., Takasuke, I. and Zaigui, L. (2007). Effects of different heating methods on the production of protein- lipid film. Journal of Food Engineering. 82(3): 292-297.

  32. Liu, X., Xu, Y. and Zhan, X. (2020). Development and properties of new kojic acid and chitosan composite biodegradable films for active packaging materials. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 144(8): 483-490.

  33. Lombardelli, C., Liburdi, K., Benucci, I. and Esti, M. (2020). Tailored and synergistic enzyme-assisted extraction of carotenoid containing chromoplasts from tomatoes. Food and Bioproducts Processing. 121: 43-53.

  34. Lucas, N., Bienaime, C., Belloy, C., Queneudec, M., Silvestre, F. and Nava-Saucedo, J.E. (2008). Polymer biodegradation: Mechanisms and estimation techniques-A review. Chemosphere. 73(4): 429-442. 

  35. Luckachan, G.E. and Pillai, C.K.S. (2011). Biodegradable polymers- a review on recent trends and emerging perspectives. Journal of Polymers and the Environment. 19(3): 637-676.

  36. Mangaraj, S., Yadav, A., Bal, L.M., Dash, S.K. and Mahanti, N.K., (2019). Application of biodegradable polymers in food packaging industry: A comprehensive review. Journal of Packaging Technology and Research. 3(1):77-96.

  37. Mania, S., Cieœlik, M. and Konzorski, M. (2020). The synergistic microbiological effects of industrial produced packaging polyethylene films incorporated with zinc nanoparticles. Polymers. 12(5): 1198.

  38. Mantovan, J., Bersaneti, G.T., Faria-Tischer, P.C.S., Celligoi, M.A. P.C. and Mali, S. (2018). Use of microbial levan in edible films based on cassava starch. Food Packaging and Shelf Life. 18(5): 31-36.

  39. Mathlouthi, M. (2013). Food Packaging and Preservation, Springer Science and Business Media.

  40. Mayuri T., Shukla R.N., Balaji J. (2023). Biobased food packaging materials: Sustainable alternative to conventional petroc- hemical packaging paterials: A review. Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research. 42(2): 137-143. doi: 10.18805/ ajdfr.DR-1841.

  41. Muratore, G., Nobile, D.M.A., Buonocore, G.G., Lanza, C.M. and Asmundo, N.C. (2005). The influence of using biodegradable packaging films on the quality decay kinetic of plum tomato (Pomodorino Datterino). Journal of Food Engineering. 67(4): 393-399.

  42. Muthuraj, R., Misra, M. and Mohanty, A.K. (2018). Biodegradable compatibilized polymer blends for packaging applications: A literature review. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 135(24): 45726.

  43. Nilsuwan, K., Guerrero, P., De la Caba, K., Benjakul, S. and Prodpran, T. (2020). Properties and application of bilayer films based on poly (lactic acid) and fish gelatin containing epigallo- catechin gallate fabricated by thermo-compression molding.  Food Hydrocolloids. 105(8): 105792.

  44. Ojha, A., Sharma, A., Sihag, M. and Ojha, S. (2015). Food packaging - materials and sustainability-A review. Agricultural Reviews. 36(3): 241-245. doi: 10.5958/0976-0741.2015.00028.8.

  45. Pawar, P.A. and Purwar, A.H. (2013). Biodegradable polymers in food packaging. American Journal of Engineering Research. 2(5):151-164.

  46. Sanaa, R. and Medimagh, R. (2019). Applications of modified biomonomers and biomaterials: A prospective from Africa. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry. 18: 124-132.

  47. Sibomana, M.S., Workneh, T.S. and Audain, K. (2016). A review of postharvest handling and losses in the fresh tomato supply chain: A focus on sub-Saharan Africa. Food Security. 8(2): 389-404.

  48. Smith, R. (2005). Biodegradable Polymers for Industrial Applications. CRC Press.

  49. Song, J.H., Murphy, R.J., Narayan, R. and Davies, G.B.H. (2009). Biodegradable and compostable alternatives to conventional plastics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological Sciences. 364 (1526): 2127-2139.

  50. Statista (a) (2024). Annual production of plastics worldwide from 1950 to 2022. https://www.statista.com/statistics/ 282732/global-production-of-plastics-since-1950/. (Accessed on 28th October, 2024). 

  51. Statista (b) (2024). Plastic industry in India-statistics and facts. https://www.statista.com/topics/6902/plastic-industry- in-india/#topicOverview. (Accessed on 28th October, 2024).

  52. Tai, N., Adhikari, R., Shanks, R. and Adhikari, B. (2019). Aerobic biodegradation of starch-polyurethane flexible films under soil burial condition: Changes in physical structure and chemical composition. International Biodeterioration and Biode- gradation. 145(11): 104793.

  53. Tampau, A., González-Martínez, C. and Chiralt, A. (2020). Biodegrad- ability and disintegration of multilayer starch films with electrospun PCL fibres encapsulating carvacrol. Polymer Degradation and Stability. 173: 109100.

  54. Tinoco, A., Rodrigues, R.M., Machado, R., Pereira, R.N., Cavaco-Paulo, A. and Ribeiro, A. (2020). Ohmic heating as an innovative approach for the production of Keratin films. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules.150(3): 671-680.

  55. Van Tuil, R., Schennink, G.G.J., Beukelaer, H. De, Heemst, J. Van and Jaeger, R. (2000). Converting biobased polymers into food packagings. The Food Biopack Conference. Copenhagen. Proceedings. 28-30.

  56. Vaezi, K., Asadpour, G. and Sharifi, H. (2019). Effect of ZnO nano- particles on the mechanical, barrier and optical properties of thermoplastic cationic starch/montmorillonite biode- gradable films. International Journal of Biological Macro- molecules. 124(9): 519-529.

  57. Vert, M., Santos, I.D., Ponsart, S., Alauzet, N., Morgat, J.L., Coudane, J. and Garreau, H. (2002). Degradable polymers in a living environment: Where do you end up? Polymer International. 51(10): 840-844.

  58. Weber C., Haugaard V., Festersen R. and Bertelsen G. (2002). Production and applications of biobased packaging materials for the food industry. Food Additives and Contaminantes. 19: 172-177.

  59. Yar, M., Gigliobianco, G. and Shahzadi L. (2015). Production of chitosan PVA PCL hydrogels to bind heparin and induce angiogenesis. International Journal of Polymeric Materials and Polymeric Biomaterials. 65(9): 466-476.

  60. Youssef, A.M. and El-Sayed, S.M. (2018). Bionanocomposites materials for food packaging applications: Concepts and future outlook. Carbohydrate Polymers. 193: 19-27.

  61. Yu, Z., Li, B., Chu, J. and Zhang, P. (2018). Silica in situ enhanced PVA/chitosan biodegradable films for food packages. Carbohydrate Polymers. 184: 214-220.

  62. Zero carbon analytics (2024). Overview of the global petrochemical industry. Energy and Transport. 1-7. https://zerocarbon- analytics.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Copy-of- Petchem-Explainer-ZCA.pdf. (Accessed on 28th October, 2024).

  63. Zhou, X., Yang, R., Wang, B. and Chen, K. (2019). Development and characterization of bilayer films based on pea starch/ polylactic acid and use in the cherry tomatoes packaging. Carbohydrate Polymers. 222: 114912.

Editorial Board

View all (0)