Agricultural Reviews

  • Chief EditorPradeep K. Sharma

  • Print ISSN 0253-1496

  • Online ISSN 0976-0741

  • NAAS Rating 4.84

Frequency :
Quarterly (March, June, September & December)
Indexing Services :
AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Organic Fertilizer: A Key Component of Organic Agriculture-A Review

Mahima Begum1,*, Gayatri G. Kandali2, Dimpi Dutta 1, Charmon Keri Bey1
1Department of Agronomy, Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat-785 013, Assam, India.
2Department of Soil Science, Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat-785 013, Assam, India.
Gradually the area under organic farming is increasing and farmers are more attracted to organic farming due to various negative impacts associated with chemical fertilizers on soil as well as human health. But, while promoting the area under organic farming the main constraints that the farmers use-to face is lack of proper source, availability of adequate quantity of organic fertilizers for better crop production. For ages, although FYM and compost is the predominant source of organic agriculture, but the bulk requirement of the same discourages the farmers many a times. Now lot of organic fertilizers including liquid organic fertilizers is in use which is very cost effective and easy to apply. Therefore, an attempt has been made to review the different organic source, their nutrient content and their effect of different crops as well as on soil health. 
Globally, organic agriculture has been adopted by around 2.4 million farmers in area of 50.9 Mha which shares only 1.1% of total agricultural land (Willer and Lernoud, 2017). Moreover, with the crop intensification the nutrient demand could not be fulfilled by inorganic fertilizers alone, so 25-30 per cent of Indian agriculture’s nutrient requirement must be meeting by different organic nutrient sources (Lalrintluangi et al., 2020). By considering the negative impact of chemical fertilizers on soil health, scientists are trying to curtail the use of chemical fertilizers by partly replacing them with bio-organic sources. Organic fertilizers also improved the quality of certain crops, for e.g. increased the dry matter content in potato (Haase et al., 2007), pungency in chilli (Maheswari et al., 2004) and improved the milling quality of rice grain and cooking quality (Yadav and Lourduraj, 2006).
Organic fertilizer
Organic fertilizers are mainly derived from animal or plant material which can change soil properties due to the abundance of organic matter, presence of both micro and macro nutrients.
Different Organic Sources
Animal manure
The faeces, urine and animal bedding of animal manure turned up to finely decomposed end product. It acts as manure as they are rich source of many essential plants nutrients (Table1). Generally, the excreta of most of animals such as cattle, pig, sheep etc is used as manure, but out of these, cow dung is an excellent source of nitrogen and phosphorus (Goss et al., 2013).

Table 1: Nutrient content of differentanimal manure.

Since long back it was well documented that cattle manure either in solid or liquid form upon application improved the soil properties (Eghball, 2002) and eventually increase the crop yield (Butler and Muir, 2006). But because of presence of more quantity of immediately available N in liquid fertilizers it can work better than solid form. Cattle urine contains almost 95% water, 2.5% urea and others minerlas, hormones and enzymes that makes it suitable for applying as bio fertilizer (Khanal et al., 2011).Several researchers reported about the beneficial effect of cattle manure on crop as well as soil properties (Eghball, 2002; Butler and Muir, 2006). While applying dairy cattle manure at a rate equivalent to the RDF greatly increased the cob of maize (Anastasios et al., 2007). The effect of cattle manure is more or less equivalent to inorganic fertilizers, although  availability of N to crop through cattle manure is lower than inorganic fertilizers due to slow-release pattern from organically bound N (Griffin et al., 2002; Matsi et al., 2003).
Cow based liquid organic manure
Now a days instead of sole application of cow urine or cow dung some cow based organic nutrient formulations such as panchagavya, sanjibani, kunapajala, amrit pani,  Beejamruth, Jeevamruth, Amritmitti and Amritjal etc. are used in Agriculture (Gore and Shreenivasa, 2011). These liquid manures are nutritionally superior to cow dung/cow urine and rich in all essential macro and micro nutrient, plant growth hormone and vitamins etc. (Table 2). These liquid formulations are known for increasing crop yield, quality as well as enriching the soil fertility (Sornalatha and Esakkiammal, 2018). These organic nutrient formulations along with chemical fertilizers showed synergetic effect on crop growth and development (Patil and Udmale, 2016). The organic foliar spray ensures the adequate nutrients supply because of more persistence of organic droplets on leaf surface and better nutrient uptake (Mangle, 2002). The spraying of bio formulation like panchagavya, beejamrut, jivamrut increased the yield of soybean (Shwetha, 2008), black gram (Kumar and Singh, 2011) and many other crops. In addition to that, these liquid formulations helped in 25% reduction of pest problem in sweet corn particularly at tasseling and cob formation stages (Devakumar et al., 2008).

Table 2: Properties of different liquid organic nutrient sources.

Panchagavya is broadly applied as organic product plays a significant part in organic Agriculture.  “Panchgavya “is a sanskrit word which means blending of five products obtained from cow namely dung, urine, milk, curd and ghee (Patel et al., 2018). Besides having nutrients as well as plant growth hormone like IAA and GA essential for plant growth and development (Selvaraj et al., 2007), it is also rich in beneficial microbes such as bacteria, yeast, actinomycetes, photosynthetic bacteria, Acetobacter, Azospirillum, phosphobacteria and Lactobacillus (Selvaraj, 2003). Thus, spraying of these organic formulations helps in increasing the soil beneficial microbe’s i.e Rhizobium, Azospirillum and Azotobacteretc. (Tharmaraj et al., 2011; Kumar and Singaram, 2011). Moreover, it also acted as a  growth promoter (75%) and immunity booster (25%) in increasing crop yield (Vedivel, 2007).
 It can be applied both in soil as well as crop foliage. Seed or seedlings are also treated with panchagavya for better germination. Although 3% concentration is mostly followed by organic growers (Somasundaram et al., 2003) but it varies depending on crop (Natarajan, 2002). Spraying of panchagavya 3% at 10 days interval in addition to recommended dose of fertilizers also increased the green forage as well as dry matter yield as compared to control (Thirumeninathan et al., 2017). In most experiments, 3% foliar spray of panchagavya enhanced the growth and yield of many crops like rice (Ramanathan, 2006), fodder (Kumaravelu and Kadamban, 2009), black gram (Swaminathan et al., 2007), foxtail millet (Atish et al., 2020). However, in few crops like groundnut foliar spray of 4% panchagavya along with soil application of jeevamrutha @500 L ha-1 performed better than recommended dose of fertilizer (Patel et al., 2018). Similarly in black gram foliar spray of 4% panchagavya at branching and flowering stage recorded higher yield than the control (Choudhury et al., 2017). Panchagavya also showed synergistic effect on crop growth and development when it was applied with other manures like poultry manure (Lourduraj et al., 2005).
Besides foliar spray, soaking of seeds with 3% panchagavya followed by spraying of same concentration at tillering and jointing stage integrated with recommended dose of fertilizers significantly helped in boosting crop growth and yield of wheat (Pagar et al., 2016). Apart from field crops, panchagavya performed well in increasing crop yield and quality of many horticultural crops like ladies finger (Suchitra et al., 2017) and capsicum (Boraiah et al., 2017).
It is also prepared from cow urine, cow dung, cow milk, lime and water mainly used as seed treatment for better germination, crop establishment, for more crop growth and yield.Because of presence of abundant beneficial microorganisms, it saved the crop from other soil and seed borne pathogens (Sreenivasa et al., 2009). It also showed harmonizing effect to tomato growth and yield when applied with other liquid formulations such as panchagavya and jeevamruth (Gore and Sreenivasa, 2011). It performed better panchagavya in terms of seed germination and seedling vigour index (Shakuntala et al., 2012). It also helped in increasing the root length, epicotyl and hypocotyl length, crop growth and yield of many agricultural crops.
It is a mixture of cow dung, urine, Jaggery, flour, active soil and water and considered as an organic solution rich in beneficial microorganisms for crop growth and development. 
These organic nutrient formulations are synergistic in effect and showed positive response in terms of boosting crop production. Patel et al., (2018) stated that spraying of both panchgavya and jivamrut at branching and flowering stages performed better than the single application either at branching or flowering stage. Moreover, the application of both panchgavya @ 2% + jivamrut @ 500 l/ha produced equivalent pod yield (1563 kg/ha) with 100% RDN through FYM which was at par with foliar spray of panchgavya @ 4% along with soil application of jeevamrutha@ 500 lit./ha.Besides beneficial microbes, the presence of other growth hormone like IAA, GA, cytokinin, kinetin and essential plant nutrients are responsible for enhancing growth of crop (Ramesh et al., 2015). It is also reported that 5% foliar spray of jeevamrutha performed better in terms of crop growth and yield. Jeevamrutha can also be applied with irrigation water; the application of jeevamrutha @ 600 l ha-1 three times through irrigation water greatly enhanced the growth and yield of sweet corn (Safiullah et al., 2018).
Sanjibani is organic nutrient formulation prepared mainly from cow dung and cow urine. Apart from improving soil quality and crop productivity it is also having pest repellence properties (Swaminathan et al., 2007). Sanjeevani is prepared by mixing 1:1:10 proportions of cow dung: cow urine: water with handful of garden soil and 50 g of jaggery, In most of the experiment, 5% Sanjeevani performed better than its lower as well as higher dose.
Fish based formulation
The fish wastes like head, gut, fins, bones, scales etc. are rich in many essential nutrients. These waste materials could be converted to resource by simple fermentation process by using some carbohydrate source such as jaggery or molasses (Thendral et al., 2014). Besides this, trash fish is another material that has the potentiality to promote plant growth. Trash fish means the discarded fish which are not consumed by human being because of various reasons like poor quality, very small size etc (Immaculate et al., 2013). In this context, Ramalingam et al., (2014) reported 50, 45 and 66% higher shoot length in Lycopersicon esculentum, Hibiscus esculentus and Solanum melongena, respectivelydue to application of trash fish manure as compared to control. Thendral et al., (2014) also reported the spraying of liquid fermented fish waste helped in increasing plant growth and development because of increasing the thickness of the plant conducting systems. Table 3 presented the nutritional quality of fish manure (Ramalingam et al., 2014).

Table 3: Concentration of minerals and metals in trash fish manure.

Compost is prepared from any biodegradable waste materials like straws, crop stubbles, crop residues, weeds, waste fodder, waste vegetables and other organic material such as rice straw, wood, saw dust, sugarcane trash and corn cobs etc. These organic materials are rich in organic carbon and the addition of these organic materials improves the soil physicochemical characteristics. As shown in Table 4 some common weed species having high nutrient content and can be used as a substrate for compost (Bordoloi et al., 2015).

Table 4: Nutrient content of some common weed species.

To enrich the compost sometimes rock phosphate, Azotobocter, Acetobacter, PSB is also added. The N, P, K content of general compost was found to be enhanced by 2.76, 3.70 and 2.20 fold higher after incubation with microbes like AulosiraAzosprillum and Azotobacter for 6 weeks (Jacob et al., 2017).Thus, enrichment of compost with beneficial organisms like plant growth-promoting microorganisms further helps in increasing benefits of compost towards both agriculture as well as environment (Sousa et al., 2018).
Considering the importance of beneficial microbes, efficient microorganism (EM) compost is prepared by mixing the EM consortium like Candida tropicalis, Phanerochaete chrysosporium, Streptomyces globisporous, Lactobacillus sp. and photosynthetic bacteria etc. with the other compost material like paddy straw (Sharma et al., 2014). Apart from increasing the crop yield, the addition of EM compost also increased the microbial biomass C of soil (Sharma et al., 2017). When rock phosphate is added with compost materials like animal faeces, plant residues and microbes, it increased the P solubility from rock phosphate because of release of more soluble P due to the action of organic acids produced by the microbes (Puente et al., 2004). Apart from increasing the yield of wheat crop, the addition of rock phosphate enriched compost (rock phosphate + poultry litter + Pseudomonas sp.) enhanced soil chemical and biological properties as compared to control (Billah et al., 2020).
It is product of quick semi-aerobic process where organic residues are converted into fine organic material by some specific earthworms. It contains higher level of nitrogen (1.6%), phosphorus (0.7%) and potassium (0.8%), calcium (0.5%) and magnesium (0.2%) (Buchanan et al., 1988) as well as presence of some hormones, enzymes and humic acids (Khan, 2018). Now a days for nutrient enrichment of vermicompost, azolla and cattle dung is also used as a substrate of earthworm in addition to rice straw (Arora and Kaur, 2019). Since the nutrient content of azolla is comparatively more than rice straw, (5.3% N, 8.3% K) (Sreenivasa, 2012), thus nutrient content of vermicompost prepared through rice straw blended with azolla is also higher. Because of the robust metabolic system of earthworm, it has the potentiality to valorize and detoxify heavy metals in industrial by-products. Thus,vermicompost prepared from Municipal solid wastes (MSW) can also be effectively applied for crop growth and development (Banashree et al., 2020).
Vermicompost greatly enhances the root formation, elongation of stem and biomass production in many crops.  It also enhances the soil physical properties like porosity, aeration, bulk density, drainage, water-holding capacity as well as other microbial activity of soil (Lim et al., 2014).
Vermiwash is a collection of excretory products and mucus secretion of earthworms along with micronutrients from the soil organic molecules. It contains enzyme, vitamins, micro and macro nutrients as well as other plant growth promoting hormones like cytokinins, gibberlines (Tripathi and Bhardwaj, 2004) due to which it is considered as very good plant tonic. It plays a vital role in plant growth and development by accelerating the process of root initiation, root growth, plant development. Foliar spray of vermiwash promotes the physiological processes that ultimately helps in obtaining more crop growth (Gamaley et al., 2006). Actually it acts as natural growth promoter for many plantation as well as horticultural crops (Weersinghe et al., 2006). Because of presence of higher quantity of Na, vermiwash it increased the disease resistance capacity of the crop (Yadav et al., 2005).  It also hastens the flowering, increase the longevity of inflorescence, photosynthesis and soil microbial population etc. When seed treatment was done with vermiwash, it increased the germination rate and seedling vigor index of mung (Chattopadhyay, 2015), cowpea and paddy crops (Prabhu, 2006). Moreover, vermiwash showed significant yield improvement of many crops like paddy (Oryza sativa), maize (Zea mays), millet (Penisetumtyphoides), radish and many other crops.
Plant based organic manure/botanicals
These includes neem leaf extracts, wood ash extract.
Neem products
The neem products are well known for its insecticidal, antifeedant, hormonal, antifungal, antiviral and nematicidal properties. Because of numerous properties connected with neem based products, it has been used in various agricultural uses such as seed treatment, manurial application for increasing nutrient efficiency etc (Subbalakshmi et al., 2012). Almost every parts of this crop are utilized in Aagriculture starting from leaves, twigs, seeds, bark and root. For preparing the neem extract, 10 kg of fresh neem leaves were taken and chopped into pieces using a sharp knife then immersed them in a plastic container having 50 liters of water and kept in shade. The solution was stirred in every 3 days to allow proper leaching of the nutrients in the leaves into the water up to 14 days. Thereafter, the leaves were carefully re-moved using sieve of 2 mm to obtain clean neem leaf extract and diluted with water (1:1) (Emmanuel, 2012). After extraction of oil from seed the left-over material is known as seed cake that acts a source of nutrients to crop (Subbalakshmi et al., 2012).
Wood ash extract
Wood ash extract is prepared by weighing 10 kg of sieved wood ash into 50 litres of water in a plastic, thoroughly stirred with paddle every 3 days to enhance pro- per leaching of nutrients upto 14 days. Thereafter, suspension are properly sieved to obtain clear suspension of the wood ash extracts (Emmanuel, 2012).
Oil cakes
Oil cake solid residue obtained after extraction of oil from seeds can utilized as good organic fertilizers. For example, mustard, soybean, castor, Cotton seed oil cake etc. These oil cakes are rich N which helps in plant growth and development. Yasmin et al., (2021) found that effect of castor oil cake is better than mustard oil in terms of enhancing the yield of rice (Table 5).

Table 5: Nutrient content of some oil cakes.

Impact of organic fertilizers on soil properties
The status of soil micro-flora largely depends on soil type, soil temperature, availability of soil moisture and nutrients, pH etc. (OECD, 2007). The moderation in soil organic carbon (OC), nutrient availability, water holding capacity (WHC) due to application of organic inputs like farm yard manure, Beejamruth and Jeevamruth enhance mycoflora colony forming unit (CFU) and more species diversity (Gachande and Shaikh, 2017). Presence of cow dung in these liquid organic formulation acts as a medium for the growth of beneficial microbes resulted in more microbial population (De Britto and Girija, 2006).
The application of organic inputs like Glomus fasciculatum, Trichoderma harzianum, Panchagavya, Amrit pani, Agnihotra ash also improved the soil biological properties (Sushma et al., 2012). Similarly, a remarkable increase in microbial population such as bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes was also observed due to integrated supply of jeevamrutha @ 1000 L ha-1 and panchagavya at 7.5% in field bean (Devakumar et al., 2018).
The inclusion of organic matter in soil enhances the activity of heterotrophic bacteria and fungi and consequently the soil enzyme activity which leads to more nutrient availability due to conversion of organic to inorganic form. Other remarkable benefits are decrease of harmful pathogen and soil bulk density, increase in organic carbon and CEC etc (Bulluck et al., 2002).
Organic farming has been globally accepted as the modern farming practices mainly to cope up with the soil and environmental degradation and also for sustenance of natural resources for present and future needs.Organic fertilizer sources such as animal manure, panchagavya, beejamruth, sanjibani, fish based formulation, plant-based formulations etc. being the prime source of nutrients in organic farming has gained the potentiality in the worldwide market platforms. Therefore, there is the need for detailed study as well as research in order to find out the effect of different organic nutrient sources on growth and development of different crops as well as on soil health.

  1. Ali, M.N., Ghatak, S., Ragul, T. (2011). Biochemical analysis of Panchagavya and Sanjibani and their effect in crop yield and soil health. Journal of Crop and Weed. 7(2): 84-86. 

  2. Anastasios, S., Lithourgidis, T.M., Nikolaos, B. and Christos, A.D. (2007). Effect of liquid cattle manure on corn yield, composition and soil properties, Published in Agron. J. 99: 1041-1047. Waste Management. doi:10.2134/agronj 2006.0332.

  3. Ansari, A.A and Kumar, S (2010). Effect of vermiwash and vermicompost on soil parameters and productivity of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) in Guyana. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 5(14): 1794-1798

  4. Arora, M and Kaur, A. (2019). Scanning electron microscopy for analysing maturity of compost/vermicompost from crop residue spiked with cattle dung, Azolla pinnata and Aspergillus terreus. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 26(2): 1761-1769. DOI 10.1007/s11356-018-3673-8.

  5. Atish, B.B., Shivmurty, D., Hunje, R. (2020).  Effect of foliar organic nutrients and time of application on seed yield and yield attributes of foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.). Int. J Chem Stud. 8(1): 1718-1721.

  6. Banashree, S., Subhasish, D., Linee, G., Sarmistha P., Pradip, B. and Satya, S.B. (2020). An avenue for replacement of chemical fertilization under rice-rice cropping pattern: Sustaining soil health and organic C pool via MSW-based vermicomposts: Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science.  66(10): 1449-1465. DOI: 10.1080/03650340.2019.1 679782.

  7. Billah ,M.,  Khan, M.,  Bano, A., Nisa , S.,  Hussain, A., Muhammad, K., Munir, A and Khan, N. (2020). Rock phosphate- enriched compost in combination with rhizobacteria; A cost-effective source for better soil health and wheat (Triticum aestivum) productivity, Agronomy. 10(1390): 1- 21. doi:10.3390/agronomy10091390.

  8. Boraiah, B., Devakumar, N., Shubha, S. and Palanna, K.B. (2017). Effect of panchagavya, jeevamrutha and cow urine on beneficial microorganisms and yield of capsicum [Capsicum annuum (L.) var. grossum]. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 6(9): 3226-3234. 

  9. Bordoloi, L.J., Hazarika, S., Deka, B.C., Kumar, M., Verma, B.C. and Chatterjee, D. (2015). Nutrient enriched compost. ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Nagaland Centre, Jharnapani (Nagaland). pp34.

  10. Buchanan, M.A., Russelli, E., Block, S.D. (1988). Chemical Characterization and Nitrogen Mineralization Potentials of: Earthworms in Environmental and Waste Management, [Edwards, C.A. and Neuhauser, E.F. (eds)], SPB Acad, Publ., The Netherlands, 231-9

  11. Bulluck, L.R., Brosius, M., Evanylo, G.K., Ristaino, J.B. (2002). Organic and synthetic fertility amendments influence soil  microbial, physical and chemical properties on organic and conventional farms. Appl Soil Ecol. 19(2):147-160.

  12. Butler, T.J. and J.P. Muir. (2006). Dairy manure compost improves soil and increases tall wheat grass yield. Agron. J. 98: 1090-1096.

  13. Chattopadhyay, A. (2015). Effect of vermiwash of Eisenia foetida produced by different methods on seed germination of green mung, Vigna radiate Amita Chattopadhyay. Int. J. Recycl. Org. Waste Agricult. 4: 233-237 DOI 10.1007/s40 093-015-0103-5.

  14. Choudhury, G.L., Sharma, S.K., Choudhary, S., Singh, K.P., Kaushik, M.K., Bazaya, B.R. (2017). Effect of panchagavya on growth and yield of organic blackgram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper, Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 6(10): 1627-1632.

  15. De Britto, J.A. and Girija, S.L. (2006). Investigation on the effect of organic and inorganic farming methods on blackgram and greengram. Indian J. Agric. Res. 40(3): 204-207.

  16. Devakumar, N., Lavanya, G., Rao, G.E. (2018). Influence of jeevamrutha and panchagavya on beneficial soil microbial population and yield of organic fieldbean (Dolichos lablab L.). Mysore J Agric. Sci. 52(4): 790-795.

  17. Devakumar, N., Rao, G.G.E., Nagaraj, S., Shubha, S., Khan, I and Gouder S.B. (2008). Organic Farming and activities of Organic Farming Research Centre, A Bulletin by University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore. Pp: 18-27.

  18. Eghball, B. (2002). Soil properties as influenced by phosphorus- and nitrogen-based manure and compost applications. Agron. J. 94: 128-135.

  19. Emmanuel, I.M. (2012). Comparative evaluation of modified neem leaf, neem leaf and woodash extracts on soil fertility improvement, growth and yields of maize (Zea mays L.) and watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) (sole and intercrop), Agricultural Sciences. 3(1): 90-97doi:10.4236/as.2012. 31012.

  20. FAI (2012). Biofertilizer statistics. The Fertilizer Association of India. New Delhi.

  21. Gachande, B.D., Shaikh, N.F. (2017): Effect of organic and inorganic agricultural inputs on soil nutrient and mycoflora of cotton field, Intern J. of Botany Studies. 2(6): 78-83

  22. Gore, N., Shreenivasa, M.N. (2011).  Influence of liquid organic manures on growth, nutrient content and yield of tomato. Karanataka Journal. Agric. Sci. 24(2): 153-157

  23. Goss, M.J., Tubeileh, A. and Goorahoo, D. (2013). A review of the use of organic amendments and the risk to human health.  Adv Agron. 120: 275-379.

  24. Gamaley, A.V., Nadporozhskaya, M.A., Popov, A.I., Chertov, O.G., Kovsh, N.V. and Gramova, (2006). Non-root nutritional with vermicompost extract as the way of ecologicaloptimization, Plant Nutrition food Security and Susceptibility of Agro-Ecosystem.  pp: 862-863.

  25. Griffin, T., Giberson, E. and Wiedenhoeft, M. (2002). Yield responses of long-term mixed grassland swards and nutrient cycling under different nutrient sources and management regimes.  Grass Forage Sci. 57: 268-278.

  26. Haase, T., Schuler, C., Haase, N.U., Heb, J. (2007). Suitability of organic potatoes for industrial processing: Effect of agronomical measures on selected quality parameters at harvest and after storage. Potato Res. 50(2): 115-141.

  27. Immaculate, K.J., Velammal, A. and Jamila, P. (2013): Utilization of trash fishes as edible fish powder and its quality characteristics and consumer acceptance. World. J. Dairy and Food Sci. 8(1): 01-10.

  28. Jacob, S., Banerjee, R. (2017). Nutrient enrichment of organic manure through biotechnological means. Waste Biomass Valor. 8: 645-657.

  29. Khanal, A., Shakya, S.M, Shah, S.C. and Sharma M.D. (2011). Utilization of urine waste to produce quality cauliflower. The J. Agric. Environ. 12: 84-90.

  30. Kumar, V.K and Singaram, P. (2011). Impact of organic manure and organic spray on soil microbial population and enzyme activity in green chillies. Journal of Eco-Agriculture. 6(1): 10-12. 

  31. Kumar, R.S., Ganesh, P.K., Saranraj P. (2011). Growth and development of blackgram (Vigna mungo) under foliar application of Panchagavya as organic source of nutrient. Current Botany.  2(3): 9-11. 

  32. Khan, H.I. (2018). Appraisal of biofertilizers in rice: to supplement inorganic chemical fertilizer. Rice Science. 25(6): 357- 362 DOI 10.1016/j.rsci.2018.10.006.

  33. Kumaravelu, G. and Kadamban, D. (2009):  Panchagavya and its effect on the growth of the green gram cultivar K-851. International Journal of Plant Science. 4(2): 409-14.

  34. Lalrintluangi, I.F., Bisarya, D., Kumar, V and. Singh, A.K (2020). Organic Sources of Plant Nutrition For Sustainable Crop Production In India, European Journal of Molecular and Clinical Medicine. ISSN 2515-8260. 07(07): 2754-2764.

  35. Lim, S.L., Wu, T.Y., Lim, P.N., Shak, K.P.Y. (2014). The use of vermicompost in organic farming: Overview, effects on soil and economics. J. Sci. Food Agric. 95: 1143-1156

  36. Lourduraj, Christopher, A., Boomi, Raj, K. and Paneer Selvam, S. (2005). Yield attributes and yield of Okra as influenced by organic manures. Proc. Sem. Org. Agric. Peninsular India, OASIS, Coimbatore. pp: 187-188.

  37. Maheswari, T.U., Haripriya, K., Poonkodi, P., Kannan, S.K. (2004). Effect of foliar application of organic nutrients on some quality indices and economics of chilli (Capsicum annum L.). Adv Plant Sci. 17(1): 259-262.

  38. Mangle, K., (2002). Alternative or complementary role of foliar supply in mineral nutrition. Liebig University Giessen, Institute of Plant Nutrition.

  39. Matsi, T., Lithourgidis, A.S. and Gagianas, A.A. (2003). Effects of injected liquid cattle manure on growth and yield of winter wheat and soil characteristics. Agron. J. 95: 592-596. Natarajan, K. (2002). Panchagavya - A manual. Other India Press, Mapusa, Goa, India, pp: 33.

  40. OECD (2007). Consensus Document on Safety Information on Transgenic Plants Expressing Bacillus thuringiensis- Derived Insect Control Protein. ENV/JM/MONO. 14. Pagar, R.D., Jangilwad, B.D., Chaudhary, K.M. (2016). Effect of panchagavya on growth and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Adv. Life Sci. 5(3): 756-760.

  41. Patel, D.M., Patel, I.M., Patel, B.T., Singh, N.K and Patel, C.K (2018). Effect of Panchgavya and jivamrut on yield, chemical and biological properties of soil and nutrients uptake by kharif groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). International Journal of Chemical Studies 6(3): 804-809.

  42. Patil, H.M and Udmale, K.B. (2016). Response of different organic inputs on growth and yield of soyabean on inceptisol. Journal of Agriculture Science. 6(5):139-144.

  43. Prabhu, M.J. (2006). Coconut Leaf Vermiwash Stimulates Crop Yield. The Hindu Newspaper, 28th December, In: Science and Technology Section.

  44. Puente, M.E., Bashan, Y., Li, C.Y., Lebsky, V.K. (2004). Microbial populations and activities in the rhizoplane of rock-weathering desert plants. I. Root colonization and weathering of igneous rocks. Plant Biol. 6: 629-642.

  45. Ramalingam, V., Thirunavukkarasu, N., Chandy, N. and Rajaram, R. (2014). Proximate composition of trash fishes and their utilization as organic amendment for plant growth, J. Mar. Biol. Ass. 56(2): 1-5.

  46. Ramesh, S., Sudhakar, P. and Elankavi, S. (2015).  Effect of liquid organic supplements on growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L.). Int. J Curr. Res. 07(11): 23119-23122.

  47. Ramanathan, K.M. (2006). Organic farming for sustainability. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 54(4): 418-425.

  48. Safiullah, K., Durani, A., Durrani, H., Akbar, M. (2018). Effect of solid and liquid organic manures on growth, yield and economics of sweet corn [Zea mays (L.) Var.] Saccharata Sturt under South Gujarat Condition, Int. J Pure App. Biosci. 6(2): 567-574.

  49. Shakuntala, N.M., Vasudevan, S.N., Patil, S.B., Doddagoudar, R., Mathad, C., Macha, I. and Vijaykumar, A.G. (2012). Organic biopriming on seed vigour inducing enzyme in paddy- An alternative to inorganics. Ecoscan. 1: 251-257.

  50. Selvaraj, N. (2003).  Report on the Work Done on Organic Farming at Horticulture Research Station. Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Ooty, Indian. 2-5.

  51. Selvaraj, J., Ramaraj, B., Devarajan, K., Seenivasan, N., Senthilkumar, S., Sakthi, E. (2007). Effect of organic farming on growth and yield of thyme. In: Articles and Abstracts of Nation. Sem. Prod. Utiliz. Med. Pl. 13-14, March, 2003 held at Annamalaie Uni. Tamil Nadu, 63. 

  52. Sharma, A., Saha, N.T., Arora, A., Shah, R., and Nain, L. (2017). Efficient microorganism compost benefits plant growth and improves soil health in calendula and marigold. Horticultural Plant Journal. 3(2): 67-72

  53. Sharma, A., Sharma, R., Arora, A., Shah, R., Singh, A., Pranaw, K., Nain, L., (2014). Insights into rapid composting of paddy straw augmented with efficient microorganism consortium. Int J. Recycling Org Waste Agric. 3: 54.

  54. Shwetha, B.N. (2008).  Effect of nutrient management through the organics in soybean-wheat cropping system. M.Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad (India).

  55. Somasundaram, E., Sankaran, N., Meena, S., Thiyagarajan, T.M., Chandaragi, K.K., Panneerselvam, S. (2003).  Response of green gram to varied concentrations of panchagavya (organic nutrition) foliar application. Madras Agricultural Journal. 90(13): 169-172.

  56. Sornalatha, S. and Esakkiammal, B. (2018). Influence of cow products as a fertilizer on the fruits of ridge gourd and bottle gourd in nutrient analysis. European Journal of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 5(3): 897-900 

  57. Sousa, L.B., de Stamford, N.P., Oliveira, W. da, S., Silva, E.V.N. da, Martins, M., dos S., Santos, C.E., de, R.S. (2018). Evolution of nutrient availability in maturation phase of composting using proportions of different residues inoculated with Beijerinckia indica. Acta Scientiarum Agronomy. p: 1(7): 40.

  58. Sreenivasa, M.N., Naik. N and Bhat S.N. (2009). Beejamrutha: A source for beneficial bacteria. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 22: 1038-1040.

  59. Sreenivasa, M.N. (2012). Organic farming: For sustainable production and environmental protection. Microorganisms in Sustainable Agriculture and Biotechnology. 23(1): 55-76.

  60. Suchitra, R., Poonguzhali, S., Saranya, B., Suguna. S. and Jothibasu, K. (2017). Effect of panchagavya on growth and yield of Abelmoschus esculentus cv. Arka Anamika. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 6(9): 3090-3097

  61. Subbalakshmi, L., Muthukrishnan, P. and Jeyaraman, S. (2012). Neem products and their agricultural applications. J. Biopest. 5(Supplementary): 72-76 

  62. Sushma, H.E., Reddy, B.S, Patil, C.P., Kulkarni, B.S. (2012). Effect of organic and inorganic nutrients on sprouting, growth, flowering and nutrient status in Heliconia (Heliconia sp.) cv. Golden Torch. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci. 25(3): 370-372. 

  63. Swaminathan, C., Swaminathan, V. and Vijayalakshmi, K. (2007). Panchagavya Boon to Organic Farming, First edition, International Book Distributors Lucknow. pp. 20-63.

  64. Thamaraj, K., Ganesh, P., Kolanjinathan, K., Kumar, S.R., Ananad, A. (2011). Influence of vermicompost and vermiwash on physico-chemical properties of rice cultivated soil. Current Botany Journal. 2(3):18-21. 

  65. Thendral,  H.B., Sudhalakshmi, P. and Geetha, A. (2014). Influence of Gunapaselam, a liquid fermented fish waste on the growth characteristics of Solanum melongena. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research. 6(12): 58-66.

  66. Tripathi, G. and Bharadwaj, P. (2004). Comparative studies on biomass production, life cycles and composting effiency of Eisenia foetida (Savigny) and Lampito mauritii (Kingberg. Biores, Technol. 92: 275-278.

  67. Thirumeninathan, S., Tamilnayagan, T., Rajeshkumar, A. and Ramadass,  S. (2017). Response of panchagavya foliar spray on growth, yield and economics of Fodder cowpea (Vigna nguiculata L.). International Journal of Chemical Studies. 5(5): 1604-1606.

  68. Vedivel, E. (2007). The theory and practical of panchagavya Directorate of Extension Education. Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore. 9-14.

  69. Yadav, B.K and Lourdraj, C.A. (2006). Effect of organic manures and panchagavya spray on yield attributes and economics of rice (Oryza sativa). Crop Research. 31: 1-5.

  70. Yadav, A.K., Kumar, K., Singh, S., Sharma, M., (2005). VermiwashA liquid biofertilizer. Uttar Pradesh. J of Zoology. 25(1): 97-99.

  71. Yasmin, S., Hashem, M.A., Hoque. (2021). Influence of integrated use of cotton seed Oilcake and mustard oilcake with chemical fertilizers on growth, yield and nutritional quality of rice, progressive Agriculture. 31(3): 144-153.

  72. Weersinghe, K.L.K., Mohotti, K.M., Herath, C.N., Sanarajeewa, A., Liyangunawardena, V. and Hitinayake, H.M.G.S.B. (2006). Biological and chemical properties of “Vermiwash” Anatural plant growth supliment for tea, coconut and horticulture crops 12 September Forestry and Environment Symposium, University of Jayewardenepura, Sri Lanka.

  73. Willer, H and Lernoud, J. (2017). (Eds.) The World of Organic Agriculture: Statistics and Emerging Trends Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FIBL); Frick; IFOAM- Organic International: Bonn, Germany.

Editorial Board

View all (0)