Agricultural Reviews

  • Chief EditorPradeep K. Sharma

  • Print ISSN 0253-1496

  • Online ISSN 0976-0741

  • NAAS Rating 4.84

Frequency :
Quarterly (March, June, September & December)
Indexing Services :
AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Agricultural Reviews, volume 42 issue 3 (september 2021) : 315-321

Sugarcane Wax - A Par Excellent by-Product of Sugar Industry - A Review

S. Mohan1,*, L. Chithra1, R. Nageswari1, V. Manimozhi Selvi1, M. Mathialagan1
1Sugarcane Research Station, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Sirugamani, Trichy-639 115, Tamil Nadu, India.
Cite article:- Mohan S., Chithra L., Nageswari R., Selvi Manimozhi V., Mathialagan M. (2021). Sugarcane Wax - A Par Excellent by-Product of Sugar Industry - A Review . Agricultural Reviews. 42(3): 315-321. doi: 10.18805/ag.R-2055.
Sugarcane is one of the major cash crops, used for the production of sugar and ethanol. Sugarcane processing, results in many by by-products like bagasse, molasses and press mud which have economic value. Also, the by-products serve to generate many value added products. Sugarcane wax is a value added product obtained by the processing of press mud. It has pharmaceutical, agricultural and industrial applications. n-Triacontanol, Policosanol, D-003 acids and waxes are some of the products derived from the sugarcane wax. This article attempt discusses the various methods of extraction of sugarcane wax, its constituents and its characteristics and applications of the products derived from the sugarcane wax.
Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) is a tall perennial true grass belonging to the genus Saccharum and tribe Andropogoneae. It originated in Southeast Asia and is now cultivated in tropical and subtropical countries throughout the world for sugar and by-products. The genus Saccharum contains five important species, viz., Saccharum officinarum, Saccharum sinense, Saccharum barberi, Saccharum robustum and Saccharum spontaneum. S. officinarum was originally grown in Southeast Asia and Western India. It’s cultivation in the Indian subcontinent dates back to ca. 327 B.C. It was introduced into Egypt at around 647 A.D. and about one century later, to Spain (755 A.D.) (Chinnadurai, 2017). Since then, cultivation of sugarcane has extended to nearly all tropical and subtropical regions around the world.
       
Sugarcane is a C4 crop with leaves in the form of spears, sprouting in stalks and abundant tillering in the initial phase of development (Santos et al., 2013). The plant has approximately 57% of water in its mass composition, the remainder being divided between straw, bagasse and sugar.
       
Worldwide, sugarcane inhabits 26.27 million ha area with a total production of 1907 million metric tons (FAO 2018). Sugarcane area and productivity differ widely from country to country. Brazil occupies the highest sugarcane-growing area (10.04 million ha) followed by India (4.73 million ha), China, Thailand, Pakistan and Mexico (Suganthi et al., 2019). Sugarcane is a versatile crop which a rich source of food (sucrose, jaggery and syrups), fiber (cellulose), fodder (green leaves and tops of cane plant), fuel and chemicals (bagasse, molasses and alcohol) and fertilizer (press mud and spent wash). The main by-products of the sugar industry which have economic value are bagasse, molasses and press mud.
       
In India, on an average, processing of 100 tons of sugarcane in a factory yields 10 tons of sugar, 30-34 tons of bagasse (of which 22-24 tons is used in processing and 8-10 tons is saved), 4-5 tons of molasses, 3 tons of filter mud (press mud), 120 tons of flue gases (at 180°C) and 1,500 kWh of surplus electricity (Solomon, 2011; Yadav and Solomon, 2006). The by-products of processing like bagasse, molasses, press-mud, etc., being rich in carbon compounds and minerals provide ample opportunity for production of valuable chemicals, waxes, new food/feed products and low calorie sweeteners, energy options (like cogeneration/fuel/bio-diesel, ethanol), medicines, pesticides, etc. The objective of this paper is to bring to light the holistic idea about the Sugarcane waxes being extracted from the press mud, components and its commercial applications.
 
Sugarcane press mud
 
In the manufacture of cane sugar (Fig 1), during clarification the precipitated impurities present in the cane juice after removal by filtration, in rotary vacuum filters or by batch type filter presses forms a cake. It is also known as milk mud or press mud or filter cake. It is produced at the rate of around 3% of weight of cane in sulphitation factories and 7% in carbonation factories. Press mud/Filter cake contains about 50-70 % moisture; 5-14% of crude wax and fat; 15-30% fiber, 5-15% sugar and 5-15% of crude protein, with appreciable amount Si, Ca, P2O5, MgO, Fe and Mn (Roufa et al., 2010).
 

Fig 1: Processing of sugarcane into sugar in sugar industry.


 
Sugarcane wax
 
In Sugarcane, waxes provide protection against water loss from the plant surface by evapotranspiration and against
pest attack. It acts as a thin layer of waxy material, forming the interface between plant and the atmosphere, controlling the volatile compounds that can attract insect pests and pollinators, preventing the development of diseases and promote drought resistance (Howe and Schaller, 2008). Sugarcane wax has been chemically defined as a complex and variable mixture of long chain alkenes, hydrocarbons, fatty acids, ketones, aldehydes, alcohols and esters and steroids such as β-sitosterol, stigmasterol, ketosteroids and hydroxy keto steroids (Bhosale et al., 2012). It appears as a whitish to dark yellowish powdery deposit on the surface of the stalks of the sugarcane. The principal product obtained from the filter cake is the sugarcane crude wax. Sugarcane wax is considered as a possible substitute for the expensive carnauba wax.
 
Extraction process
 
Conventionally, extractions use the relatively time- and solvent-consuming Soxhlet method. New extraction techniques, such as microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) supercritical fluid extraction (SFE), ultrasonic-assisted supercritical CO2 extraction (USC-CO2) and accelerated solvent extraction (ASE), have been developed to reduce the time and solvent consumption of conventional extraction methods. The different extraction processes that exist for isolation of sugarcane wax from press mud are:


       
Though extraction yield is rather high, the conventional Soxhlet method presents several drawbacks such as toxicity from organic solvent, high cost of operation, solvent recovery requirement, as well as being energy-intensive operation (Lucus et al., 2006). Consequently, there is a demand for new extraction techniques that is more environmental friendly. Modern methods as alternative to Soxhlet method offer rapid and environmental friendly wax extraction concomitant with higher yield.
 
Conventional extraction method
 
Sugarcane wax is extracted with different solvents such as Toluene, Hexane and Benzene under a reflux system for 4-6 hours at a stretch. The extract is filtered under mild vacuum and the solvent used is recovered by distillation. The resultant solid mass containing wax mixtures and resins is dissolved in hot isopropyl alcohol and filtered (Fig 2). The resin portion is separated and the total wax portion is obtained, which is yellow or light cream in colour.
 

Fig 2: Flow chart diagram for the improved process of isolation and recovery of microcrystalline wax from sugarcane press mud of the sugar industry.


 
Microwave assisted extraction (MAE)
 
MAE was first reported by Ganzeler et al., 1990. Two common types of microwave-assisted exaction configuration are a closed extraction under controlled pressure and temperature and an open extractor under atmospheric pressure condition and controlled temperature at solvent boiling point. MAE enhances extraction efficiency by inducing high thermal energy via electromagnetic radiation in the range of 300 MHz to 300 GHz for heating the sample (Veggie et al., 2012). Sugarcane wax components are extracted by exploiting their differences in solubility in different solvents and their mixtures. This is achieved by altering giving the solvent mixture ratio and controlling the temperature.
 
Ultrasonic–assisted extraction (UAE)
 
UAE is a good choice in comparison with the more traditional approaches due to its high efficiency, low energy requirements and low solvent consumption. This technique has been applied in the extraction of bioactive compounds from plants and other products (Samaram et al., 2015; Cardoso et al., 2013 and Ghitescu et al., 2015). The improvement in the extraction process on using ultrasound is attributed to the destruction of the cell walls, the reduction of the particle size and the enhancement of mass transfer through the cell wall due to the collapse of bubbles produced by cavitation (Paniwnyk et al., 2001). UAE uses ultrasonic energy above 20 kHz to produce cavitation bubbles; which in turn, collapse and generate higher shear resulting in complete extraction (Chemat et al., 2017). Moreover, UAE can be used as a pre-treatment technique for botanicals to enhance extraction performance. UAE is operated at lower extraction temperature and solvent volume yielding improvement in extraction and purity.
 
Supercritical fluid extraction (SFE)
 
In SFE, carbon dioxide is used as the solvent in the majority of cases. This is an advanced technology that has a low environmental impact due to low toxicity, low cost and eases of separation from extracts [Macías-Sánchez et al., 2008]. The use of CO2 gives an added advantage in terms of quality, as extracts do not suffer excessive heating, which may destroy thermally unstable compounds. CO2 has a very high selectivity and is a good solvent for low molecular weight and nonpolar products. In some cases, a small amount of co-solvent can be added to modify the polarity in an effort to increase the effectiveness of this solvent. The quality of the supercritical extract was found to considerably higher on using SFE due to the higher n-alcohol purity, 78.24% (w/w) compared to organic solvent extraction yield, 22.00% (w/w) (Lucas et al., 2007).
 
Accelerated solvent extraction (ASE)
 
Accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) or pressurized extraction (PLE) uses elevated solvent temperature and pressure in the extraction of sugarcane wax. This improves solvent solubility, diffusion rates for mass transfer into the solvent and lowers viscosity to increase solvent penetrability into the sample matrix. Extraction of sugarcane wax is done using 95% ethanol at two different temperatures (60°C and 100°C) and 2 levels of solvent flushing volume (50% and 100% volume of extraction cell). The volume of obtained extracts from filter cake is adjusted to two folds of extract volume with distilled water and kept in cold chamber (3-5°C) for 5-8 hours in order to solidify crude wax. Then the wax is separated from the extract by filtration as a white insoluble crystal due to its low solubility in ethanol at low temperature. Finally, crude wax is dried at 50°C overnight in the oven. The dried crude wax is stored at -20°C for further use. ASE is considered non-toxic, safe and low environmental impact. One study that dealt with sugarcane wax extraction using various techniques stated that ASE gave higher yield of extracted sugarcane wax than Soxhlet and SFE techniques (Chakhanbordee et al., 2016).
 
Sugarcane Wax constituents, characteristics and applications

n-Triacontanol
 
n-Triacontanol is a fatty alcohol of the molecular formula: C30H62O, also known as melissyl alcohol or myricyl alcohol. It is found in plant cuticle waxes and in beeswax. Triacontanol was first isolated in 1933 from alfalfa wax (Medicago sativa L.) (Chibnall et al.,1933). n-Triacontanol can also be extracted by supercritical carbon dioxide from sugarcane crude wax (de Lucas et al., 2007). Sugarcane wax contains 10–15 % n-triacontanol. After the wax has been extracted from press mud, it is esterified and the compound is further purified and fractionally crystallized using suitable solvent. CFTRI has developed a method to make pure n-triacontanol (Sontakke et al., 2018).
 
Applications
 
n-Triacontanol is a prominent plant growth promoter. It improves the growth by its effect on photosynthesis, plant metabolism (Naeem et al., 2012) and can upsurge the growth of roots, shoots and flower production (Perveen et al., 2014). It also has anti-inflammatory, anti-ulcer (Srivastava et al., 2009) and antitumor activity (Wang et al., 2015). It is found to reduce salt stress in cultivars of wheat, maize and coriander when used as foliar spray (Asadi and Batool 2017; Perveen et al., 2014 and 2017). Successful field trials have proved its efficacy for high yield in the case of a number of crops like barley, corn, paddy, maize, lettuce, cucumber, etc. Tea Research Institute, UPASI, Coimbatore has made successful field trials with n-Triacontanol on tea cultivation. Yield increase to the extent of 20 to 30% and a reduction in dormant shoots (banji) in tea plantation has been reported. One of the important factors of this compound is its effectiveness at low concentration i.e. 1 to 2 ppm. n-Triacontanol is used at the rate of 2.5 mg to 5 mg per hectare.
 
Policosanol
 
“Policosanol” is a term coined by researchers in Cuba to refer to an extract derived from sugar cane wax that was a mixture of long-chain alcohols.  The Policosanol (PCO) is a mixture of long-chain aliphatic primary alcohols isolated from sugarcane wax, whose main components include octacosanol (63%), triacontanol (13%) and hexacosanol (6%). It was first developed in 1991 and is presently used in more than 25 countries for cholesterol reduction, especially in Cuba and other parts of Latin America.


 
Applications
 
Policosanol (an octacosanol) has been isolated from sugarcane wax which has been found to lower the synthesis of cholesterol in the liver (which is related to the cardiac problems). This compound has been reported to increase physical stamina, repairs damaged nerve cells and even stimulates sex hormones. Policosanol has been reported to reduce platelet aggregation, endothelial damage, foam cell formation and lowering low-density lipoproteins (LDL) and increasing high- density lipoproteins (HDL) (Varady et al., 2003).
 
Sugarcane Wax Acids (SCWAs)
 
Sugarcane Wax Acids also known as D-003, is a mixture of high aliphatic primary acids (C24-C36) isolated and purified from sugar cane wax (Saccharum officinarum L.), that have antioxidant, cholesterol lowering and anti-platelet properties. Its main component is octacosanoic acid, followed by triacontanoic, dotriacontanoic and tetracontanoic acids. There are also some other acids (hexacosanoic, heptacosanoic, nonacosanoic, hentriacontanoic, tritriacontanoic, pentatriacontanoic and hexacotriacontanoic) as minor components of this mixture. Sugar cane wax acid (SCWA) or D-003 is purified after saponification of sugar cane wax post-extraction with n-hexane, ethanol and acetone.
 
Applications
 
D-003 has shown to exhibit cholesterol lowering effects in experimental and clinical studies. D-003 inhibits cholesterol synthesis prior to mevalonate formation by regulating HMGCoA reductase activity (Noa et al., 2004). D-003 also inhibits lipid peroxidation and protein oxidation, its antioxidant effects being superior as compared to those of policosanol (Castaño et al., 2003; Pérez et al., 2008). Also, D-003 has shown to posses bone protective effects in experimental and clinical studies. It has no toxicity over long term consumption.
 
Wax
 
Wax content in filter mud has attracted considerable interest over the years and being recovered for commercial use. It is used as a substitute for imported Carnauba wax. It is an excellent electric insulator. National Chemical Laboratory, Pune, has developed a method for preparing steroids and superior quality of wax from Filter Cake.
       
Carnauba wax, also called Brazil wax or palm wax, is obtained from the leaves of the carnauba palm (Copernicia prunifera). It is known as queen of waxes and in its pure state, it usually comes in the form of hard yellow-brown flakes. Because of its hypoallergenic and emollient properties as well as its shine, carnauba wax appears as an ingredient in many cosmetic formulas where it is used to thicken lipstick, eyeliner, mascara, eye shadow, foundation, deodorant, various skin care preparations, sun care preparations, etc.
 
Applications
 
As early as 1914 sugarcane wax was known to be useful as a partial substitute for beeswax in the stout, dark-colored candles of the Russian Orthodox churches. In 1918 Rindl referred to its use to a limited extent in the polish and electrical industries; for gramophone records; and as a replacement wax in general for carnauba, beeswax and montan (lignite wax extracted from brown coal) wax for edible coating applications. In its refined form it has a light yellowish colour. Due to the high melting point of 75 to 80°C sugarcane wax remains stable even on exposure to direct sunlight.
       
Oil from sugarcane wax is used for protection against corrosion and crude sugarcane wax is used directly for the manufacture of carbon paper. It is also used in improving the low melting/release properties of toners used in multicolour photographic copiers and printers. For this, in the core material 0.5 to 2 per cent of sugarcane wax (melting point: 60°C) is used. All the components of wax such as hard wax, oil and resin find their use as a plasticizer in tyre industry. Sugarcane refined wax is used as water proofing emulsion for particle board and textile treatment, hot melting glues, removers of a casting from fibreglass moulds and precision casting.
 
Food
 
Until the 1960s, sugar cane wax is added to the production of chewing gum as an edible wax. In this process the sugar cane wax acts as elastomer or as plasticizer and consistency regulator (Rindl, 1922). In 1943, J.W. Schlegel and L. Lang were granted a patent to flour donuts with sugar (Schlegal and Lang, 1943). The ground sugar was mixed with 0.4% of sugar cane wax. Thus, the donuts became puffy and water-repellent and kept their fresh appearance longer. Also, chocolates are thinly coated with sugarcane wax. The gloss durability improved, the melting reduced and the packing was relieved as well. In order to keep vegetables and fruits fresh or to make it look fresh emulsions from sugarcane wax mixed with other natural waxes is prepared. Vegetables or fruits are immersed in the emulsions or sprayed with wax emulsions (Warth, 1956).
The sugarcane wax and their derived products isolated from the press mud waste have a variety of applications. The potential areas of sugarcane wax include pharmaceutical preparations, agriculture use, confectionary items, processed food, industrial applications and in cosmetics industries. It is realized that there are more avenues to earn profits as there is good demand for these products in the country and also export opportunities are to be explored for fuller utilization of sugarcane crop.

  1. Asadi, E. and Batool, K. (2017). Foliar spray of triacontanol improves growth by alleviating oxidative damage in coriander under salinity. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology. 22(1): 120-124. http://doi.org/10.1007/s40502-017-0286-z

  2. Bhosale, P.R., Chonde Sonal, G. and Raut, P.D. (2012). Studies on extraction of sugarcane wax from press mud of sugar factories from Kolhapur district, Maharashtra. Journal of Environmental Research and Development. Vol. 6 (3A): 715-720.

  3. Björklund, E., Nilsson, T. and Bøwadt, S. (2000). Pressurised liquid extraction of persistent organic pollutants in environmental analysis. TrAC - Trends in Analytical Chemistry. 19(7): 434-445. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-9936(00)00002-9.

  4. Bowadt, S., Johansson, B. Wunderli, S. Zennegg, M. de Alencastro, L.F. and Grandjean, D. (1995). Independent Comparision of Soxhlet and Supercritical Fluid Extraction for the determination of PCBs in an Industrial Soil. Analytical Chemistry. 67: 2424-2430.

  5. Eskilsson, C.S. and Björklund, E. (2000). Analytical-scale microwave-assisted extraction. Journal of chromatography A. 902(1): 227-250.

  6. Cardoso, L.C., Serrano, C.M. Quintero, E.T. Lopez, C.P. ´Antezana, R.M. and de la Ossa, E.J.M. (2013). High pressure extraction of antioxidants from Solanum stenotomun peel. Molecules. 18(3): 3137–3151.

  7. Castaño, G., Menéndez, R. Mas, R. Ledón, N. Fernández, J.C. Pérez, J.L. González, R.M. and Lescay, M. (2003). Effects of D-003: A new hypocholesterolaemic and antiplatelet compound on lipid profile and lipid peroxidation in healthy volunteers. Clinical Drug Investigation. 23(3):193-203. DOI: 10.2165/00044011-200323030-00005.

  8. Chakhathanbordee, R., Khotavivattana, S. and Sriroth, K. (2016). Development of sugarcane wax extraction methods from sugarcane filter cake for value creation, VRU Research and Development Journal Science and Technology. 11(3): 95-106.

  9. Chemat, F., Rombaut, N. Sicaire, A.G. Meullemiestre, A. Fabiano- Tixier, A.S. and Abert-Vian, M. (2017). Ultrasound assisted extraction of food and natural products. Mechanisms, techniques, combinations, protocols and applications. A review. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry. 7(34):540-560. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.06.035.

  10. Chibnall, A.C., Williams, E.F. Latner, A.L. and Piper, S.H. (1933). The isolation of n-triacontanol from lucerne wax. Biochemical Journal. 27: 1885-1888.

  11. Chinnadurai, C. (2017). Potential Health Benefits of Sugarcane [In Ch. Mohan (ed.)] Sugarcane Biotechnology: Challenges and Prospects. Springer, Cham: 1-11.

  12. de Lucas, A., García, A. Alvarez, A. and Gracia, I. (2007). Supercritical extraction of long chain n-alcohols from sugar cane crude wax. The Journal of supercritical fluids. 41(2): 267-271.

  13. FAOSTAT. 2018. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Statistics. Rome, Italy. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC (Accessed on June, 2020).

  14. Ganzler, K., Salgó, A. and Valkó, K. (1986). Microwave extraction: A novel sample preparation method for chromatography. Journal of chromatography A. 371: 299-306.

  15. Ganzeler, K., Szinai, I. and Salga, A. (1990). Effective sample preparation method for extracting biologically active compounds from different matrices by a microwave technique. Journal of chromatography A. 520: 257-262.

  16. Ghitescu, R.E., Volf, I. Carausu, C. Bühlmann, A.M. Gilca, I.A. and Popa, V.I. (2015). Optimization of ultrasound-assisted extraction of polyphenols from spruce wood bark. Ultrasonics sonochemistry, 22:535-541.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2014.07.013.

  17. Howe, G.A., Schaller A. (2008). Direct defenses in plants and their induction by wounding and insect herbivores. In: Induced Plant Resistance to Herbivory, Schaller A. (Eds). Springer Science and Business Media, Germany. Pp 7-23.

  18. Lucas, S., Calvo, M.P. Garcia-Serna, J. Palencia, C. and Cocero, M.J. (2007). Two parameter model for mass transfer processes between solid matrixes and supercritical fluids: analytical solution. Journal of Supercritical Fluids. 41: 257-266.

  19. Lucus, D.A., A. Garcia, A. Alvarez and I. Gracia. (2006). Supercritical extraction of long chain n-alcohols from sugar cane crude wax. The Journal of Supercritical Fluids. 41: 267-271.

  20. Macías Sánchez, M.D., Mantell Serrano, C. Rodríguez Rodríguez, M. Martínez de la Ossa, E. Lubián, L.M. and Montero, O. (2008). Extraction of carotenoids and chlorophyll from microalgae with supercritical carbon dioxide and ethanol as cosolvent. Journal of Separation Science. 31(8): 1352-1362.

  21. Naeem, M., Khan, M.M.A. and Moinuddin. (2012). Triacontanol: a potent plant growth regulator in agriculture. Journal of Plant Interactions. 7(2): 129-142. http://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2011.619281.

  22. Noa, M., Mendoza, S. Más, R. Mendoza, N. and León, F. (2004). Effect of D-003, a mixture of very high molecular weight aliphatic acids, on prednisolone-induced osteoporosis in Sprague-Dawley rats. Drugs in R and D, 5(5): 281-290.

  23. Paniwnyk, L., Beaufoy, E.Lorimer, J.P. and Mason, T.J. (2001). The extraction of rutin from flower buds of Sophora japonica. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry. 8 (3): 299-301.

  24. Pérez, Y., Menéndez, R. Mas, R. González, R. Fernández, L. Fernández, J. Illnait, J. and Mendoza, S. (2008). Effects of D-003, a mixture of high molecular weight acids from sugarcane wax, on lipid peroxidation (LP) markers of older individuals. Current Therapeutic Research. 69(1): 36-48. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2008.01.001.

  25. Perveen, S., Shahbaz, M. and Ashraf, M. (2014). Triacontanol- induced changes in growth, yield, leaf water relations, oxidative defense system, minerals and some key osmoprotectants in Triticum aestivum under saline conditions. Turkish Journal of Botany. 38: 896–913. http://doi.org/10.3906 /bot-1401-19.

  26. Perveen, S., Iqbal, M. Parveen, A. and Sohail, M. (2017). Exogenous triacontanol-mediated increase in phenolics, proline, activity of nitrate reductase and shoot k+ confers salt tolerance in maize (Zea mays L.). Brazilian Journal of Botany. 40(1): 1-11. http://doi.org/10.1007/s40415-016-0310-y

  27. Rindl, M. (1922). South African Journal of Industry. 5: 513-518.

  28. Roufa, M.A., Bajpaib, P.K. and Jotshic. C.K. (2010). Optimization of Biogas Generation from Press Mud in Batch Reactor. Bangladesh Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research. 45(4): 371-376.

  29. Samaram, S., Mirhosseini, H. Tan, C.P. Ghazali, H.M. Bordbar, S. and Serjouie, A. (2015). Optimisation of ultrasound-assisted extraction of oil from papaya seed by response surface methodology: Oil recovery, radical scavenging antioxidant activity and oxidation stability. Food Chemistry. 172: 7-17.

  30. Santos, F., Colodette, J. and Queiroz, J.H. (2013). Bioenergry and Biorefinery-Sugarcane and Forestry Species (in Portuguese: Bioenergia e Biorrefinaria-Cana-de-Açúcar eEspécies Florestais) first ed. Meenas Publishing, Brazil. 

  31. Schlegel, John W. and Lang, L., (1943). The National Sugar Refining Company, N.J. Doughnut sugar. U. S. Patent 2, 320, 831.

  32. Solomon, S. (2011). Sugarcane By-Products Based Industries in India. Sugar Tech. 13(4): 408-416. DOI 10.1007/s12355-011-0114-0.

  33. Sontakke, S., Nagavekar, N. Dubey, K.K. and Singhal, R. (2018). Supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of triacontanol from green tea leaves and its evaluation as an unconventional plant growth regulator for spinach tissue culture. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology. 16: 476-482.

  34. Srivastava, N., Khatoon, S. Rawat, A.K.S. Rai, V. and Mehrotra, S. (2009). Chromatographic estimation of p-coumaric acid and triacontanol in an ayurvedic root drug patala (Stereo spermum suaveolens Roxb.). Journal of Chromatographic Science. 47. 936–939. http://doi.org/10.1093/chromsci/47.10.936.

  35. Suganthi, M., Muthukrishnan, P. and Chinnusamy, C. (2019). Crop Weed Competition in Sugarcane–A Review. Agricultural Reviews. 40(3): 239-242.

  36. Sune Sporring, A., Soren Bowadt, B, Bo Svensmark, B. and Erland Bjorklund, A, (2005). Comprehensive comparison of classic Soxhlet extraction with Soxtec extraction, ultrasonication extraction, supercritical fluid extraction, microwave assisted extraction and accelerated solvent extraction for the determination of polychlorinated biphenyls in soil. Journal of Chromatography A. 1090: 1-9.

  37. Varady, K.A., Wang, Y. and Jones. P.J.H. (2003). Role of policosanol in the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease. Nutrition Reviews. 61: 376-383.

  38. Veggi, P.C., Martinez, J. and Meireles, M.A.A. (2012). Fundamentals of microwave extraction. In. Microwave-assisted extraction for bioactive compounds. (Boston, MA : Springer US, 2012).

  39. Wang, C., Fan, A. Deng, S. Gao, W. Zhang, W. Yang, W. and Chen, X. (2015). Investigation on pharmacokinetics, tissue distribution and excretion of 1-triacontanol in rats by gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS). Xenobiotica, 45(1): 71-78.

  40. Warth, A.H. (1956). The Chemistry and Technology of Waxes. Reinhold Publishing Co., New York. Pp. 735 - 737.

  41. Yadav, R.L. and Solomon. S. (2006). Potential of developing sugarcane by products based industries in India. Sugar Tech. 8(2-3): 104-111.

Editorial Board

View all (0)