Agricultural Reviews

  • Chief EditorPradeep K. Sharma

  • Print ISSN 0253-1496

  • Online ISSN 0976-0741

  • NAAS Rating 4.84

Frequency :
Quarterly (March, June, September & December)
Indexing Services :
AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Agricultural Reviews, volume 36 issue 2 (june 2015) : 164-167

Integrated nutrient management practices for enhancing growth and yield of pigeonpea: A Review

Fakeerappa Arabhanvi*, Amit, M. Pujar
1Department of Agronomy, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad-580 005, India.
Cite article:- Arabhanvi* Fakeerappa, Amit, Pujar M. (2024). Integrated nutrient management practices for enhancing growth and yield of pigeonpea: A Review. Agricultural Reviews. 36(2): 164-167. doi: 10.5958/0976-0741.2015.00020.3.

ABSTRACT

Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] is an important pulse crop grown for its dhal, fuel, and fodder belonging to the family fabaceae. It is an important crop amongst pulses and ranked second after chickpea in India interms of area and production. It provides protein rich food, firewood and income for resource poor small farmers. It is a protein rich legume grown throughout the tropical and subtropical regions of the world between 30° N and 35° S latitudes. However, in India major area under pigeonpea is lying between 14° and 28° N latitudes, which occupies an area of about 3.81 m ha with a production of 3.02 mt and average productivity of 806 kg ha-1. Integrated nutrient management practices are essential in realizing the higher productivity of pigeonpea and reducing cost of production on sustainable basis.

REFERENCES

  1. Anonymous. (2008). Annual report of AICRP on pigeonpea, Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur.
  2. Anonymous. (2010). Annual report of AICRP on Pigeonpea, Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur.
  3. Anonymous. (2012). Status of pigeonpea research in Karnataka, published by Principal Scientist AICRP on Pigeonpea UAS, GKVK, Bangalore.
  4. Babalad, H. B. (2000). Integrated nutrient management for sustainable production in soybean cropping system. Ph.D thesis UAS, Dharwad. Pp-140.
  5. Dubey, S. and Yyas, M. D. (2010) Integrated nutrient management in pigeonpea + soybean intercropping system under rainfed conditions. Mysore J. Agric. Sci., 44 (4): 781-785.
  6. Dudhat, M. S., Mathukia, . K. and Khampara, V. B. (1997). Effect of nutrient management through organic and inorganic source on growth, yield, quality and nutrient uptake by wheat (Triticum aestivum). Indian J. Agron., 42 (3): 455-458.
  7. Gholve, S. G., Shinde, S. G. and Gaikwad, C. B. (2005). Efficacy of integrated nutrient management for pigeonpea pearl- millet intercropping system under dryland conditions. J. Maharashtra. Agric. Univ., 30 (1): 41-43.
  8. Goud, V. V., Konde, H. B. and Mothod, P. V. (2012). Optimization of agronomic requirement for medium duration pigeonpea hybrid under rainfed condition in vertisol. Legume Res., 35 (3): 264-267.
  9. Kumawat, N., Singh, R. P., Kumar, R. and Hari, O. (2013). Effect of integrated nutrient management on the performance of sole and intercropped pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) under rainfed conditions. Indian J. Agron., 58 (3): 309-315.
  10. Meena, M. C., Dwivedi, B. S., Singh, D., Sharma, B. M., Kumar, K. and Rana, D. S. (2012). Effect of integrated nutrient management on productivity and soil health in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajana)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system. Indian J. Agron. 57 (4): 333-337.
  11. Nagaraju, A. P and Mohankumar, H. K. (2009). Response of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) to activated rock phosphate. Mysore J. Agric. Sci., 43 (1): 11-17.
  12. Pandey, I. B., Singh, S. K. and Tiwari, S. (2013). Integrated nutrient management for sustaining the productivity of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajana) based intercropping systems under rainfed condition. Indian J. Agron., 58(2): 192-197.
  13. Pandey, R. and Kushwaha, H. S. (2009). Productivity and profitability of pigeonpea under different sources of nutrients in rain fed condition of central Indian. J. Food Legume., 22 (4): 304-305.
  14. Patil, H. M. and Shete, B. T. (2008). Integrated nutrient management in pigeonpea-pearl millet intercropping system under dryland conditions. J. Maharashtra Agric. Univ. 33 (1): 119-120.
  15. Reddy, A. S. R., Babu, R., Reddy, M. C. S., Khan, M. M. and Rao, M. M. (2011). Integrated nutrient management in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajana). Int. J. Applied Bio. Pharm. Tech. 2 (2): 476-470.
  16. Roddannavar, S. S. (2008). Integrated nutrient management in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajana millsp.) based intercropping system. Department of agronomy, Univ. Agril Sci, GKVK. Bangalore.
  17. Sharma, A., Kumar, A and Potdar, M. P. (2009). Response of pigeonpea to conjunctive use of organic and inorganic source of fertilizers under rainfed conditions. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci. 22 (1): 8-10.
  18. Sharma, A., Pandit, S.R. and Mohan, C. (2010). Integrated nutrient management in pigeonpea Cajanus cajana) based intercropping system under rain fed conditions. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci. 23 (4): 584-589.
  19. Sharma, A., Pandit, S. R., Dharmaraj, P. S. and Mohan, C. (2012) Response of pigeonpea to biofertilizers in pigeonpea based intercropping systems under rainfed conditions. Karnataka. J. Agric. Sci. 25 (3): 322-325.
  20. Sharma, R., Rathod, P. and Basavaraj, K., (2010a). Agronomic management of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajana) based intercropping systems for improving productivity under rainfed conditions. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 23 (4): 570-574.
  21. Sharma, D. P., Sharma, T. R., Agarwal R. B. and Rawat, A., 2003, Differential response of turmeric to organic and inorganic fertilizers. JNKVV Res. J. 37 (2): 17-19.
  22. Singh, A. K. and Singh, R. S. (2012). Effect of phosphorus and bio inoculants on yield, nutrient uptake and economics of long duration pigeonpea (Cajanus cajana). Indian J. Agron. 57 (3): 265-269.
  23. Tiwari, D., Sharma, B. B. and Singh, V. K., (2011). Effect of integrated nutrient management in pigeonpea based intercropping system. J. Food. Legume. 24 (4): 304-305.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)