Agricultural Reviews

  • Chief EditorPradeep K. Sharma

  • Print ISSN 0253-1496

  • Online ISSN 0976-0741

  • NAAS Rating 4.84

Frequency :
Quarterly (March, June, September & December)
Indexing Services :
AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Agricultural Reviews, volume 36 issue 2 (june 2015) : 153-158

Telemedicine: A new rise of hope to animal health care sector-A Review

Sarita Devi*, R.D. Singh, R.S. Ghasura, M.K. Sharma, M.C. Sharma
1College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, S.D.A.U., Sardarkrushinagar-385 506, India.
Cite article:- Devi* Sarita, Singh R.D., Ghasura R.S., Sharma M.K., Sharma M.C. (2024). Telemedicine: A new rise of hope to animal health care sector-A Review. Agricultural Reviews. 36(2): 153-158. doi: 10.5958/0976-0741.2015.00018.5.

ABSTRACT

Telemedicine in recent years has become a dominant issue in the health care community due to the advances in technology that can provide patients with faster, cheaper and easier health care services. Telemedicine is not one specific technology but a means for providing health services at a distance using information and communications technology, medical and computer science. Telemedicine hinges on transfer of text, reports, voice, images and videos between geographically separated locations. Success relates to the efficiency and effectiveness of the transfer of required information. Evidence of technology is advancing in all aspects of our life and veterinary science is no different. Veterinary telemedicine era has also come and delegation of key skills to an emerging and evolving veterinary profession appears essential to the objectives of veterinary telemedicine.

REFERENCES

  1. Meher, S.K., Rath, B.K. and Kailash, S. (2008). Telemedicine: AIIMS Experience, Ukraine J. of Telemed., 6: 387-404.
  2. Strehle, E.M. and Shabde, N. (2006). One hundred years of telemedicine: does this new technology have a place in paediatrics? Ar. dis. in childhood, 91:956-959.
  3. Sharma, L.K. and Rajput, M. (2009). Telemedicine: socio-ethical considerations in the Indian milieu. Medico Legal J., 77(2):61-5.
  4. Bashshur, R. and Lovett, J. (1977). Assessment of telemedicine: Results of the initial experience. Aviation Space Environ. Med., 48:65–70.
  5. Mort, M., May, C.R. and Williams, T. (2003). Remote doctors and absent patients: Acting at a distance in telemedicine? Sci. Tech. and Human Values, 28(2):274-295.
  6. Doolittle, G.C., Whitten, P., McCartney, M., Cook, D. and Nazir, N. (2005). An empirical chart analysis of the suitability of telemedicine for hospice visits. Telemed. J. eHealth, 11:90-97.
  7. Robertson, T.A. (1999). Telemedicine – creating the virtual veterinary hospital. Comp. on Continuing Edu. for the Pract. Veterinarian, 21:128–133.
  8. Leung, D. (1999). Apropos telemedicine. Canad. Vet. Journal, 40:318–320.
  9. Mars, M. and Auer, R.E.J. (2006). Telemedicine in veterinary practice. J. S. Af. Vet. Association, 77(2):75-78.
  10. Anonymous (2014). Planning commission working body report. Govt. of India. Available online at: http:// planningcommission.gov.in. Last accessed 02/02/2014.
  11. Breen, G.M. and Matusitz, J. (2007). An interpersonal examination of telemedicine: Applying relevant communication theories. eHealth Int. J., 3(1):18-23.
  12. Wootton, R. (2001). Telemedicine and developing countries-successful implementation will require a shared approach. J of Telemed. and Telecare, 7:1–6.
  13. Bedi, B. S. (2003). Telemedicine in India: Initiatives and Perspective, eHealth: Addressing the Digital Divide. Available online at: http://www.telemedindia.org. Last accessed 02/04/2009.
  14. Dasgupta, A. and Deb, S. (2008). Telemedicine: A New Horizon in Public Health in India. I. J. Com. Med., 33:3-8.
  15. Maiolino, P., Restucci, B., Papparella, S. and De Vico, G. (2006). Evaluation of static tele pathology in veterinary diagnostic cytology. Vet. Cli. Pathology, 35:303-6.
  16. Drummond, M. and Sculpher, M. (2005). Common methodological flaws in economic evaluations. Med. Care, 43:5-14.
  17. Sculpher, M.J. and Price, M. (2003). Measuring costs and consequences in economic evaluation in asthma. Respir. Med., 97:508-520.
  18. Sassi, F., McKee, M. and Roberts, J.A. (1997). Economic evaluation of diagnostic technology. Methodological challenges and viable solutions. Int. J. Technol. Assess Health Care, 13:613-630.
  19. Drummond, M.F., Sculpher, M.J., Torrancem, G.W., O’Brien, B.J. and Stoddart, G.L. (2005). Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. 3rd edition. Oxford University Press.
  20. Gold, M.R., Siegel, J.E., Russell, L.B. and Weinstein, M.C. (1996). Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. New York: Oxford University Press.
  21. Bashshur, R., Shannon, G. and Sapci, H. (2005). Telemedicine evaluation. Telemed. J. E. Health, 11:296–316.
  22. Whitten, P.S., Mair, F.S., Haycox, A., May, C.R., Williams, T.L. and Hellmich, S. (2002). Systematic review of cost effectiveness studies of telemedicine interventions. B. Med. J., 324:1434–1437.
  23. Reardon, T. (2005). Research findings and strategies for assessing telemedicine costs. Telemed. J. E. Health, 2005; 11:348–369.
  24. Jennett, P.A., Hall, L.A., Hailey, D., Ohinmaa, A., Anderson, C., Thomas, R., Young, B., Lorenzetti, D.and Scott, R.E. (2003). The socio-economic impact of telehealth: A systematic review. J. Telemed. Telecare, 9: 311–320.
  25. Ruckdaschel, S., Reiher, M., Rohrbacher, R. and Nagel, E. (2006). The role of health economics in telemedicine. Dis. Manage. Health Outcomes, 14: 3–7.
  26. Whitten, P.S., Mair, F.S., Haycox, A., May, C.R., Williams, T.L. and Hellmich, S. (2002). Systematic review of cost effectiveness studies of telemedicine interventions. B. M. J., 324:1434-1437.
  27. Hailey, D., Roine, R. and Ohinmaa, A. (2002). Systematic review of evidence for the benefits of telemedicine. J. Telemed. Telecare., 8:1-30.
  28. Rojas, S.V. and Gagnon, M.P. (2008). A systematic review of the key indicators for assessing telehomecare cost-effectiveness. Telemed. J. E Health, 14(9):896–904.
  29. Gaikwad, R. and Warren, J. (2009).The role of home-based information and communications technology interventions in chronic disease management: a systematic literature review. Health Informatics J., 15(2):122–146.
  30. Seto, E. (2008). Cost comparison between telemonitoring and usual care of heart failure: a systematic review. Telemed. J. E Health, 14(7):679–686.
  31. Tran, K., Polisena, J. and Coyle, D. (2008). Home Telehealth for Chronic Disease Management, Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health.
  32. Barlow, J., Singh, D., Bayer, S. and Curry, R. (2007). A systematic review of the benefits of home telecare for frail elderly people and those with long-term conditions, J. Telemed. Telecare, 13:172–179.
  33. Deshpande, A., Khoja, S., McKibbon, A. and Jadad, A.R. (2008). Real-Time (synchrounous) Telehealth in Primary Care: Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews.
  34. Jaana, M., Pare, G. and Sicotte, C. (2009). Home telemonitoring for respiratory conditions: a systematic review. Am. J. Manag. Care, 15(5):313–320.
  35. Jackson, C.L., Bolen, S., Brancati, F.L., Batts-Turner, M.L. and Gary, T.L. (2006). A systematic review of interactive computer assisted technology in diabetes care. Interactive information technology in diabetes care. J. Gen. Intern. Med., 21(2):105–110.
  36. Papageorges, M. and Hebert, P. (2001). Other telemedicine applications. Clinical Tech. in S. An. Prac., 16:125-126.
  37. Papageorges, M. and Tilley, L. (2001). Why telemedicine? Clinical Tech. in S. An. Prac., 16:90–94.
  38. Papageorges, M., Hanson, J., Girard, E. and Leveille, R. (2001). Teleradiology. Clinical Tech. in S. An. Prac., 16:115–116.
  39. Hebert, P., Latouche, J.S., Menard, M. and Papageorges, M. (2001). Telecytology. Clinical Tech. in S. An. Prac., 16:122–124.
  40. Poteet, B.A. (2008). Veterinary teleradiology. Vet. Rad. Ultrasound, 49:S33-6.
  41. Gater, L. (2008). Telemedicine provides more options for veterinary care. Available online at: http//:www. Onlyforpetlovers.com. Last accessed on 02/04/2009.
  42. Cottam, N., Dodman, N.H., Moon-Fanelli, A A. and Patronek, G. J. (2008). Comparison of remote versus in-person behavioral consultation for treatment of canine separation anxiety. J. App. A. Welf. Sci., 11:28-41.
  43. Smith, K., Martinez, A., Craddolph, R., Erickson, H., Andresen, D. and Warren, S. (2006). An integrated cattle health monitoring system. Conference Proceedings - IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 1:4659-4662.
  44. Patil, V.M. (2009). Telemedicine in veterinary practice. In: Information technology in veterinary science. 1st edition. New India Publishing Agency, New Delhi. 83-87.
  45. Warren, S, Martinez, A, Sobering, T. and Andresen, D. (2008). Electrocardiographic Pill for Cattle Heart Rate Determination, in 30th Annual International IEEE EMBS Conference Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 20-08-2008.
  46. Matusitz, J. and Breen, G. M. (2007). Ehealth: A new kind of telemedicine. Social Work in Public Health, 23(1):95-113.
  47. Matusitz, J. and Breen, G. M. (2007). Telemedicine: Its effects on health communication. Health Comm., 21(1):73-83.
  48. Cermack, M. (2006). Monitoring and telemedicine support in remote environments and in human space flight. B. J. Anaesthesia, 97(1):107-114.
  49. Pazmino, D., Filippone, M., Mundra, P. and Iyengar, S. (2004). Pervasive Telemedicine System. Proceedings of Student/ Faculty Research Day, CSIS, Pace University.
  50. Robinson, S. S., Seale, D.E. and Tiernan, K.M. (2003). Use of telemedicine to follow special needs children. Telemed. J. Electronic Health, 9:57–61
  51. Leape, L.L. and Berwick, D.M. ( 2005). “Five Years After To Err Is Human: What Have We Learned?” J. Am. Med. Asso., 293:2384-2390.
  52. Boydell, P. (2000). Telemedicine – a vision of the future. In Practice, 22:409-413.
  53. Sarhan, F. (2009). “Telemedicine in healthcare. 2: The legal and ethical aspects of using new technology,” Nursing Times, 105(43):18-20.
  54. Anonymous (2003). Report of the Technical Working Group on Telemedicine Standardization. Ministry of Communication and Information Technology (MCIT), “Recommended Guidelines & Standards for Practice of Telemedicine in India”. Available online at: http://telemed.esanjeevani.in/Telemedicine/Report. Last accessed 04/04/2009.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)