Agricultural Reviews

  • Chief EditorPradeep K. Sharma

  • Print ISSN 0253-1496

  • Online ISSN 0976-0741

  • NAAS Rating 4.84

Frequency :
Quarterly (March, June, September & December)
Indexing Services :
AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Reviewer Article

Agricultural Reviews, volume 38 issue 1 (march 2017) : 72-75

Solar Radiationutilization efficiency in cereal-legume intercropping systems: A review 

Umesh, M.R., 1*, Chittapur, B.M.1
1<p>Department of Agronomy,&nbsp;University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur-584 104, Karnataka, India.</p>
Cite article:- Umesh, M.R., 1*, Chittapur, B.M.1 (2017). Solar Radiationutilization efficiency in cereal-legumeintercropping systems: A review . Agricultural Reviews. 38(1): 72-75. doi: 10.18805/ag.v0iOF.7310.

ABSTRACT

Growing two or more crops together with close proximity has the challenge of utilizing the available resources. Crop yields need to be increased by improving the use efficiency of resources such as water, nutrients and solar energy. Intercropping is often a means to better use of land and other resources. Success of cereal-legume intercropping will depend on extent of harnessing solar radiation by the canopy profile. Several field experiments conducted in southern Great Plains have indicated radiation use efficiency has a means to evaluate efficiency.  In this paper, the growth and utilization of annual legumes as intercrops is reviewed with particular reference to resource use and their feasible with cereals. 

REFERENCES


  1. Allen G. R., Pereira, L.S., Raes, D., Smith M., 2000. FAO irrigation and drainage paper 56. pp: 41-56. 

  2. Anil, L., Park, J., Phipps, R.H. and Miller, F.A. (1998). Temperate intercropping of cereals for forage: A review of the potential for growth and utilization with particular reference to the UK. Grass Forage Sci., 53: 301-317.

  3. Buxton, D.R. and Fales, S.L. (1993).Plant environment and quality. In: Forage quality, evaluation and utilization [(Ed.): G.C. Fahey, Jr. et al]. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI. USA

  4. Colombo, B., Bouniols, A., Delpech, C. (1995). Effect of various phosphorus availabilities on radiation-use efficiency in sunflower biomass until anthesis. J. Plant Nutr.18:1649–1658.

  5. Crews, T.E. and Peoples, M.B. (2004). Legume versus fertilizer sources of nitrogen: Ecological tradeoffs and human needs. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 102: 279-297.

  6. Eskandari, H., Ghanbari, B., Galavi, M. and Salari, M. (2009). HH Forage quality of Cow Pea (Vigna sinensis) Intercropped with Corn (Zea mays) as Affected by Nutrient Uptake and Light Interception. Not. Bot. Hort. Agrobot. Cluj, 37: 171-174

  7. Evans, S.R. and Pooter, H. (2001). Photosynthetic acclimation of plants to growth irradiance: the relative importance of specific leaf area and nitrogen partitioning in maximizing the carbon gain. Plant Cell Environ., 24: 755-767.

  8. Fletcher, A.L., Derrick J. Moot, Peter J. Stone. (2008). Radiation use efficiency and leaf photosynthesis of sweet corn in response to phosphorus in a cool temperate environment. Europ. J. Agron., 28:88-93.

  9. Jacob, J. and Lawlor, D.W. (1991). Stomatal and mesophyll limitations of photosynthesis in phosphate deficient sunflower, maize and wheat plants. J. Exp. Bot. 42: 1003–1011.

  10. Kiniry, J.R. Tischler, C.R. and Van Esbroeck, G.A. (1999). Radiation use efficiency and leaf CO2 exchange for diverse C4 grasses. Biomass and Bioenergy, 7:95-112. 

  11. Kler, D.S., 1988. Better use of solar energy for improving crop yield through bidirectional sowing. Indian Rev. Life Sci., 8: 121-146.

  12. Lindquist, J.L., Arkebauer, T.J., Walters, D.T., Cassman, K.G. and Achim Dobermann (2005).Maize Radiation Use Efficiency under Optimal Growth Conditions. Agron. J., 97:72–78.

  13. Lithourgidis, A.S., Vasilakoglou, I.B., Dhima, K.V., Dordas, C.A. and Yiakoulaki, M.D. (2011). Forage yield and quality of common vetch mixtures with oat and triticale in two seeding ratio. Field Crop Res., 99: 106-113.

  14. Lizaso, J.I., Batchelor, W.D., Westgate, M.F. and Echarte, L. (2003). Enhancing the ability of CERES-Maize to compute light capture. Agric. Syst. 76: 293–311.

  15. Manderscheid, R., Burkart, S., Bramm, A., Weigel, H.J. (2003). Effect of CO2 enrichment on growth and daily radiation use efficiency of wheat in relation to temperature and growth stage. Europ. J. Agron., 19: 411–425.

  16. Mishra S. and Kler D.S. (2000). Solar radiation and its use efficiency in maize (Zea mays L.) canopy: A review. Environment and Ecology.18: 597- 615.

  17. Mollier, A., Pellerin, S. (1999). Maize root system growth and development as influenced by phosphorus deficiency. J. Exp. Bot.,50: 487–497.

  18. Mulholland, B.J., Craigon, J., Black, C.R., Colls, J.J., Atherton, J. and Landon, G. (1998). Growth, light interception and yield responses of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grown under elevated CO2 and O3 in open-top chambers. Global Change Biol.4: 121–130.

  19. Plenet, D., Mollier, A. and Pellerin, S. (2000). Growth analysis of maize field crops under phosphorus deficiency. II. Radiation use efficiency, biomass accumulation and yield components. Plant Soil, 224: 259–272.

  20. Rodriguez, D., Andrade, F.H. and Goudriaan, J. (2000). Does assimilate supply limit leaf expansion in wheat grown in the field under low phosphorus availability? Field Crops Res.67: 227–238. 

  21. Sinclair, T.R. and Muchow, R.C. (1999). Radiation use efficiency. Adv. Agron.,65: 215–265.

  22. Singer, J.W., Sauer, T.J., Blaser, B.C. and Meek, D.W. (2007). Radiation Use Efficiency in Dual Winter Cereal–Forage Production Systems. Agron. J.,99: 1175–1179. 

  23. Stirling, C.M., Williams, J.H., Black, C.R. and Ong, C.K. (1990). The effect of timing of shade on development. Dry matter production and light use efficiency in groundnut (Arachishypogaea L) under field conditions. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 41: 633-644.

  24. Tesfaye, K., Walker, S. and Tsubo, M. (2006). Radiation interception and radiation use efficiency of three grain legumes under water deficit conditions in a semi-arid environment. Eur. J. Agron. 25: 60–70.

  25. Tiedong Liu, Fengbin Song, Shengqun Liu and Xiancan Zhu, 2012, Light interception and radiation use efficiency response to narrow-wide row planting patterns in maize. Australian J. Crop Sci., 506-513. 

  26. Tsubo, M., and Walker, S. (2002). A model of radiation interception and use by a maize–bean intercrop canopy. Agric. For. Meteorol. 110: 203–205.

  27. Tsubo, M., S. Walker, and E. Mukhala. (2001). Comparisons of radiation use efficiency of mono-/inter-cropping systems with different row orientations. Field Crops Res. 71:17–29.

  28. Watiki, J.G., Vessey, J.K., Stobbe, E.H. and Soper, R.H. (1993a). Yield and symbiotic nitrogen-fixation in a pea-mustard intercrop as influenced by N fertilizer addition.Soil. Biol. Biochem.,26: 447-453.

  29. Watiki, J.M., Fukai, S., Banda, J.A. and Keating B.A. (1993b). Radiation interception and growth of maize/cowpea intercrop as affected by maize plant density and cowpea cultivar. Field Crops Res., 35: 123-133. 

  30. Whitmore, A.P. and Schroder, J.J. (2007). Intercropping reduces nitrate leaching from under field crops without loss of yield: A modeling study. Europ. J. Agron., 27: 81–88.

  31. Weigand, C.L., Richardson, A.J., Escobar, D.E. and Gerbermann, A.H. (1991). Vegetation indices in crop assessments. Remote sens. Environ., 35: 105-119. 

     
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)