Agricultural Reviews

  • Chief EditorPradeep K. Sharma

  • Print ISSN 0253-1496

  • Online ISSN 0976-0741

  • NAAS Rating 4.84

Frequency :
Quarterly (March, June, September & December)
Indexing Services :
AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Agricultural Reviews, volume 21 issue 4 (december 2000) : 278-280

RESPONSES OF. COTTON TO ZINC- A REVIEW

K.Ramesh, B.Chandrasekharan
1Department Of Agronomy, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University,Coimbatore -641003,India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- K.Ramesh, B.Chandrasekharan (2024). RESPONSES OF. COTTON TO ZINC- A REVIEW. Agricultural Reviews. 21(4): 278-280. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Modern fertilizer technology and the, increasing frequency with which micronutrients are involved in fertility problems emphasizes the need for an appraisal of these nutrients in relation to cotton production. Among the micronutrients, zinc has assumed greater significance due to the wide occurrence of its deficiency. There are many reports indicating the favourable response of cotton to micronutrients. Application of zinc sulphate to zinc deficient soil improved fertilizer use efficiency and resulted in higher seed cotton yield. However, the work done on micronutrients in cotton was abysmally low and therefore, elaborate experimentation are yet to be made so as to prescribe site specific recommendations.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Anonymous,(1992).MicronutrientNews 6: 2- 3.
    2. Gupta, V,K and Vyas, KK (1994). Legume Res., 17: 5 -7.
    3. Jai Kashyap eta/.,( 1989).Cotton Develop., 19 :23 - 24.
    4. Kanwar, J.S. and Randhawa, N.5. (1974). Micronutrient Research ir) Soils and Plants in India, ICAR Report, New Delhi, India.
    5. Khampharia, R.S., et a/., (1984). J.lndian Soc. Soil Sci., 32:312 - 313.
    6. Khampharia,N,K ,(1996). Crop Res., 12 :278- 283.
    7. lfuurana, M.P.S .et ai., (1996). J.lndian Soc. Soil Sci., 44: 174-176.
    8. Mangala Prasad and Prasad, Rajendra (1994). Indian J. Agron. , 39: 707 -708.
    9. Nageswararao.(1976).CottonDeve1op.,69,: 11-12.
    10. - NamdeoKN.etai.,(1992). Crop Res., 5:451455.'
    11. Ohki, K(1976,a). Physio/. Plant.38: 300-304.
    12. Ohki, K(1976 b). Georgia Agric.&s.,18: 13-16.
    13. Prasad, M. and Prasad, R. (1996). Indian J. PI. Physiol., 1: 286 - 287.
    14. Randhawa, N.S.(1988). The Hindu Survey of Indian Agriculture. p. 157.
    15. Sakal, R. eta/., (1985). JJndian Soc: Soil Sci., 33:672.
    16. Sharma, C.P., et al.,(1981).J.Pl. Nutrn.,3:337 - 344.
    17. Sharma, S.c. and Gupta. V.K. (1990). Cotton and Tropical Fibres.
    18. Sharma, J.C etai., (1987). J.Cotton Res. al]ci Develop., 1:199-204.
    19. Singh, S.P. and Nayyar. V.K (1997). J.lndian Soc. Soil Sci., 45 :201 - 202
    20. Takkar, P.N. et al.,(1989). Report of the Twenty Years Coordinated Research Project on Micronutrients in India. Indian Society of Soil Science Report, Indian Society of Soil Science, Bhopil1, Madya Pradesh, India.
    21. Tandon, H.L.S. (1993). Fertiliser management in commercial crops. Fertiliser Development Corporation (FDCO) New Delhi. . .
    22. Thiagarajan, N.M. (1980). Abstract cif Seminar on Cotton. Agricultural College and Research Institute, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India p.l02.
    23. Venkatakrishllan, A.S. (1994). IndianJ. Agron.39: 504- 505.
    24. Vin, c.L. (1986). J.China Cotton. 5: 34-36
    25. Wankhade S.T., et a/., (1994). PKVRes. J., 18: 127 - 128.
    26. Zeng quing fang (1997). Field Crop Abstr., 50:918.
    Reviewed By

    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)