Agricultural Reviews

  • Chief EditorPradeep K. Sharma

  • Print ISSN 0253-1496

  • Online ISSN 0976-0741

  • NAAS Rating 4.84

Frequency :
Quarterly (March, June, September & December)
Indexing Services :
AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Agricultural Reviews, volume 21 issue 4 (december 2000) : 255-260

SOME BIOTIC AND ABIOTIC FACTORS AFFECTING CHLOROPLAST STRUCTURE AND CHLOROPHYLL CONTENT IN BEAN (PHASEOLUS VULGARIS L) - A REVIEW

R.K. Maiti, Pedro Wesche-Ebeling, Adriana Nunez-Gonzale:l" S.L. Moreno-Limon·, J.L. Hernandez-Pinero·, Maria Luisa Cadenas-Avila·
1Universidad de las Americas, Depto. Quimica y Biologia, AP. 78, Santa Catarina Martir, C.P. 72820, Puebla, Mexico.
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Maiti R.K., Wesche-Ebeling Pedro, Moreno-Limon· S.L. Nunez-Gonzale:l" Adriana, Hernandez-Pinero· J.L., Cadenas-Avila· Luisa Maria (2024). SOME BIOTIC AND ABIOTIC FACTORS AFFECTING CHLOROPLAST STRUCTURE AND CHLOROPHYLL CONTENT IN BEAN (PHASEOLUS VULGARIS L) - A REVIEW. Agricultural Reviews. 21(4): 255-260. doi: .
This paper briefly discusses the ontogeny and ultrastructure of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) chloroplasts and the effects of some biotic and abiotic stress factors on chloroplast ultrastructure. It is assessed that all stress factors cause chloroplast structure modifications such as dilation of the whole chloroplast, separation of grana, and the accumulation of starch granules. All these anomalies have a direct impact on the photosynthetic capacity of chloroplast.
    1. Appiano, A. ancfRerlolfi, P. (1993). ProtopJasma 174:116-117.
    2. Darweesh, M.M. (1992). BuD. Fac. Agric., Univ. Cairo43:797-815.
    3. ElSaht, H.M. (2000) Acta Biologica Hungarica51:83-90.
    4. Fofana B. et aI., (1999). TheoriticlJi andApplied Genetics 98: 202-212.
    5. Gaspar, J.D. and Costa, A.S. (1993). Fitopatologia Brasi/eria 18: 534-540.
    6. GOEldwin, P.H. and Sopher, C.R. (1994). J. Phytopathol. 140:219-226.
    7. Hao-SiCheng etal., (1996). Acta Agri. Borealj-Sinica 1:14-18.
    8. Keeler S.J. et aI., (2000). P. Physiol. 1231121-1132.
    9. Khandakar, K. and Bradbeer, J.W. (1989). Cytologia 54:409-417.
    10. Kutik. J. (1989). Photosynthetica 23: 678-681.
    11. Kutik, J. et aI., (1988). f!hotosynthef,ica 22: 511-515.
    12. Kutfk,J. etal., (1998). Photosynthetica 35: 361-367.
    13. Maiti, RK (1997). Phaseolusspp. Bean Science. Oxford lBH Book Pubhshmg Co. Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi, India,
    14. 534 pp.
    15. McEwen, B. et aI.:(1994). 'PhvsioJogia PlantaTtlm 90:396407.
    16. McEwen-B. et al., (1996) Phys/Vlogia P1antaTtlm 96: 51·58.
    17. Sanchez, I. etal., (1999). Euphytica 106 (1): 15-26.
    18. Smith, M.Q. etal., (2000). Plant Physiol. 124(1): 211:221.
    19. Stefani, E. etal,(l993). J. Phytopath. 137: 195-206.
    20. Stoyanova, D. and Velikova, V. (1988).. Biologia Plantarum: 589-595.
    21. Takacs, E. etaJ., (1987). Botanikai KozJemenyek74-75:331-351.
    22. Wilhelmova, N. (1994). Photosynthetica 30: 415-424.
    23. Zielinska, t. et aI., (1995). Materialy Sesjiln.-etytutu Ochrony Roslin 35:231-234.

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)