Published In
Agricultural Reviews
Article Metrics

0
Views
0
Citations
Reviewed By
In this Article
APC
APC cover the cost of turning a manuscript into a published manuscript through peer-review process, editorial work as well as the cost of hosting, distributing, indexing and promoting the manuscript.
Publish With US
Submit your manuscript through user friendly platform and acquire the maximum impact for your research by publishing with ARCC Journals.
Become a Reviewer/Member
Join our esteemed reviewers panel and become an editorial board member with international experts in the domain of numerous specializations.
Open Access
Filling the gap between research and communication ARCC provide Open Access of all journals which empower research community in all the ways which is accessible to all.
Products and Services
We provide prime quality of services to assist you select right product of your requirement.
Support and Policies
Finest policies are designed to ensure world class support to our authors, members and readers. Our efficient team provides best possible support for you.
Follow us
volume 22 issue 2 (june 2001) : 71-78
WEED MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR corrON - A REVIEW
1Department of Agronomy
Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore-641 003, India
ABSTRACT
Cotton crop is slow in its initial growth and grown with wide spacing is subjected to severe weed competition during early stage that results in low yield. A wide spectrum of weeds with wider adaptability to extremities of climatic, edaphic and biotic stresses are infesting the cotton fields. High persistence nature of weeds is attributed to their ability of high seed production and seed viabilily. Hand weeding/Hoeing twice is the most commonly adopted method of weed control in cotton. However, complete weed control cannot be achieved by using any single method alone. Herbicidal weed control is a competitive and promising way to control weeds at initial stages of crop growth. Fluchloralin 1.0 kg ha−1 (PPI), Pendimethalin 1.5 kg ha−1 (PRE), Diuron (PRE - 1.125 kg ha−1 and PO-0.75 kg ha−1) were some of the effective herbicides in cotton. Effective weed control and highest seed cotton yield is obtained when herbicides were combined with hand weeding/hoeing than either practice was used alone. Integration of weed management practices not only boost the productivity but also help in the sustainability. Maintaining weed free period upto 60 days after sowing (DAS) is more remunerative and essential to obtain higher yield in cotton.
KEYWORDS
REFERENCES
- AICkPWe.(1987). Final Technical Report. Coimbatore Centre p.117
- AICHPWe. (1997). Status Report on Weed Research, Coimbdtore Centre p.37.
- Bak~r. M. and Terry. S. (1991). Tropical Grassy Weeds. CAb International. pp. 73 - 811.
- Balasubrarnanian, N. (1975) M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Tamil Nadu Agril. Univ., Coimbatore
- BalasubraJl1anian, N. (1985). Ph.D. Thesis. Tamil Nadu Agric. Univ.. Coimbatore.
- Balasllbramanian, N. and Sankaran. S. (1976). Madras Agric. J. 63: 449 - 453.
- Balasubramanian, N. and Sankaran. S. (1978). Cotton Dev. 13: 9 - 10.
- Balyan, R.S., eta/. (1983). Trap. Pest Managernent29: 56 - 59.
- Bardhan, S. (1998). Pesticides World45 :34-38.
- Bassett. D.M., et al. (1970). Agron. J. 62: 299 - 303.
- Bir. S.S. and Sindhu. H. (1984). Weed Austr. 34: 156.
- Blaeo, H.G. and De. A. Oliveria. (1976). Weed Abstr. 27: 153.
- Brar. A.S., et a/. (1995). Indian J. Weed Sci. 27: 138 - 143.
- BlIchanai1, G.A. and Burns. E.R. (1970). WaedSci.18: 149-154.
- Bliendid, J.P.C. et al. (1976). Weed Abs/r. 28: 1932.
- Byrd,J.D. Jr. and Coble. H.D. (1991). Weed Tech. 5: 263 - 269.
- Carson, AG. (1975). Cotton and Trop. Fibre Abs/r. 5: 175.
- Chander, S.5. et al. (1994). Haryana J. Agron. 10: 237 - 239.
- Chandrasekharan, B. (1989). Indian J. Agron. 34(2):26'l-265.
- Choudhary, AH. (1981). Weed Asb/r. 30: 350.
- Dadari, SA et al. (1994). Indian J. Agron. 39: 4 - 8.
- Dason, AA et al. (1975). Madras Agric. J. 62: 508 - 512.
- Detroja, K.S. eta/. (1992). IndianJ. Agron. 37: 376 - 379.
- Donald,C.M. (1963). Adv. Agron. 15: 1-118.
- Douli, P.Y. (1998). Weeds Abs/r. 49: 194.
- Drennen, D.S.H. and Jennings. E.A. (1977). Weed Res. 17: 3-9
- EI-Naggar, H.M.M. et al. (1996). Field crop Abstr. 50: 794 (5866).
- Giri, AN. and Bhosle, R.H. (1997). IndianJ. Agron. 42: 705 - 708.
- Giri, A.N. et al. (1998). Indian J. Agron. 43: 264 - 268.
- Gupta, O.P. (1998). Modern Weed Management. Agro Botanica. Publishers Bikaner. India.pp. 1-1J88.
- Gururnoorthy, T.R. (1998). Kurukshetra 46: 14-16.
- Halevy, J. (1976). Agron. J. 68: 701 - 705.
- ,Jacobson, B.D. et al. (1994). Weed Tech. 8: 190 - 198.
- ,Jadhav, J.K. et a/. (1995). Haryana J. Agron. 11: 62 - 65.
- ,Jain, H.e. a/ al. (1985). Indian J. Weed .Sci. 17 1 - 8.
- Jain, S.e. eta/. (1981). Proc. 8/hAsian -Pacific Weed Sci. Soc. 131-135.
- 78 AGRICULTURAL REVIEWS
- Jody. E. Morett and William. B. Mcclosky. (1998). We.m'Sci. 46: 231 - 237.
- Kairon M.S. ilnd Venugopalan, M.v. (2000). FertJ1. News 45: 51-56.
- I\.crkhovan. C.J.(1964). Emp. Cotton Grow. Rev. 41: 2 - 12.
- I\.linHl11an, c.c. (1973). Weed Control as a Science. Pub!. John Wiley and Sons,Inc., New York.
- M,mi, VS. (1975). Fertiliser News 20 : 21 - 27.
- Milrlincz, c.l. and Nieto. J. (1968). Proc. Weed Science Society of America Abstr. p. 151.
- MohLllllmed Ali. A. and 13hanumurthy. VB. (1985). Trap. Pest Management 31: 232 -234.
- Monlani, MK and Bachan. P.L (19r6). Indian J. Agron. 11: 372 377.
- Nehra, D.S. et al. (198.'\) Cotton dev. 17; 32 - 35.
- Nobrega. LBDA. et al. (1997). Weeds Abstr. 47: 294.
- Pagar, Pc. et al. (1995). J. SOils Crops 5 160 - 162.
- PaliWal', RS. and Malik. RK (1992). H A U J. Res. 22: 99 - 100.
- Panwar. RS.-et al. (1988). Indian J. Agron. 33: 205 - 207.
- PanWijr, R.S et al. (1997). Haryana J. Agron. 13: 78 - 80.
- P'lIlwar, RS. etal. (1994). HA UJ. Res. 24: 65-67.
- P,J[lwar. RS. et al. (1995). Indian J. Agron 40: 153 - 155.
- POllnusmllY. K. dnd Kandasamy, 0.5. (1996). Weed Abstr. 45: 48
- F'rcntice. AN. (1971). Cotton with Special Reference to Africa. Tropical Agricultural series, Longman Group Ltd
- pp. 1-282.
- H"JC'"wdri, V 1\ and Charyulu. N.R (1996). Ann. Agric. Res. 17 438 - 440.
- 1{,lIlqiah, PK et al. (1976). Madras agrio J 63: 501 - 504.
- Hi"'. VS (1983). Principles of Weed SCIence. Oxford and IBH Publication Company. New Delhi. pp. 17 - 18
- HOSler, NK eta/. (1976). Weed Sci. 24: 410-413.
- RouL D. and Satapathy, M.R (1998). Indian J. Agron.,43: 348 - 350.
- Rushing. DW eta/. (1984). Weed Abstr. 35: 179.
- Salome, AS. (1984). Weed Abstr. 33: 104.
- SI,karan, S. (1977). Indian Farming. 26: 36 - 37.
- Sankaran. S. and Rathinam. P. (1974). Cotton Dev. 3: 25 - 29.
- Sa~lecl, SA et al. (1979). Pakistan cattails 23: 245-248.
- Schwerzel, r. ,J. and Thomas, PEL (1971). PANS. 18 : 30 - 34.
- Shelke, OK and Bhosle, RH. (1990). J. Maharastra Agric. Univ., 15 : 265 - 266.
- Singh, C. and Katti, C.v. (1972). Indian J. Agric. Sci. 42: 840 - 844.
- Singh, C. et al. (1971). Indian J. Agron. 16: 137 - 138.
- Singh, J.N. (1983). "Indian J. Weed Sci. 15:69-71.
- Singh, RV. and Arya, M.P.S. (1994). Indian J. Weed Sci. 26: 45 - 51.
- .~im.h, S. and Malik, RK. (1993), HAUJ. Res. 23: 215 - 219.
- Singh, T. et af. (1992). Indian J. Agron. 37: 874·876.
- Singh, Vend Nagwekar, S.N.(19891. J. Indian Soc. Cotton Improv. 14: 60 - 64.
- Singh. V and Verma, 5.S. (1988). J. Indian Soc. Cotton Improv. 13: 28 - 32.
- Snipes C. E. et a/ (1982). Weed Sci. 30 553-556.
- SOldidppan. V (1992). Indian J. Agron. 37:,878 - 880. '
- SlIbram,miilll. P. (1976). M.Sc. (Ag.) TheSIS. Tamil Nadu Agril. Univ., COimbatore.
- Thind. RJ.S. et al. (1995). Indian J. Weed Sci. 27: 71 - 74.
- Tliomas. P.E.L. and Schwerzel, P.J.A. (1968). British Weed Control ConI. 1968. pp. 737 - 743.
- Tiwalla,V.S and Brar, L.S. (1990). Indian J. Weed Sci. 22 : 6 - 10,
- Tripathi, H.P. and Singh, D. (1978). Pesticides 12: 11 - 13.
- Virl. J et ill. (1982). Pesticides 16: 21 - 25.
- Wagh, V.v. etal. (1992).. PKV. Res. J. 16: 197 - 199.
- Zeman, E. (1985). Cotton and Trop. Fibre Abstr. 10: 740.
Disclaimer :
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Copyright :
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
In this Article
APC
APC cover the cost of turning a manuscript into a published manuscript through peer-review process, editorial work as well as the cost of hosting, distributing, indexing and promoting the manuscript.
Publish With US
Submit your manuscript through user friendly platform and acquire the maximum impact for your research by publishing with ARCC Journals.
Become a Reviewer/Member
Join our esteemed reviewers panel and become an editorial board member with international experts in the domain of numerous specializations.
Open Access
Filling the gap between research and communication ARCC provide Open Access of all journals which empower research community in all the ways which is accessible to all.
Products and Services
We provide prime quality of services to assist you select right product of your requirement.
Support and Policies
Finest policies are designed to ensure world class support to our authors, members and readers. Our efficient team provides best possible support for you.
Follow us
Published In
Agricultural Reviews