Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 22 issue 1 (march 2001) : 57 - 60,

AI I EI OPATHICEFFECfS OF SUNA..OWER (HEUANTHUS SPp, "-A REVIEW

V
V. Maruthi·and N. Sankaran
1Central Research Institote for DryIand Agriculture Hyclerabad,500030, India.

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Sankaran N. Maruthi·and V. (2025). AI I EI OPATHICEFFECfS OF SUNA..OWER (HEUANTHUS SPp, "-A REVIEW. Agricultural Reviews. 22(1): 57 - 60,. doi: .

ABSTRACT

The self defense mechanism by which a plant safequards itself from the other plants in the struggle for survival led to allelopathy. This character is of utmost importance to the farm managers as well as for researchers to work in a cropping system. In view of the sunflower gaining importance in a cropping system, the work on allelopathic effects of sunflower has been reviewed in this paper. The stem parts of sunflower have more allelopathic potential followed by leaf and root. Among the factors affecting the allelochemicais production, water stress and temperature play an important role. Also, the review confirms the autotoxic effect of sunflower.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Amblka, S.R. and Suma, 5. (1999). AJleJopathyJ. 6: 49-56;
    2. Cooper, W.5. and Stoesz, A.D. (1931). BuD Torrey. &t. Qub. 58: 67-72.
    3. Curtis, J.T., and Cottam, G. (1950). BuD. Torrey. Bot. Qub. 77: 187-191.
    4. Del Moral, R. (1972). Oec%gia. 9: 289-300.
    5. Einhellig, F.A.etal. (1970). BuD. Torrey&t. Dub, 97: 22-23. .
    6. E1nhelllg, FA (1985). AUelopathy: Organisms, Processes and Applications. American Chemical Society, pp.
    7. 96-116. .
    8. GIU, ·D.S. and 5andhu, KS. (1993). IrrJian J. £Col. 20: 169-172.
    9. Goel, U. et aL (1989). J. Chern. £Col. 15: 591-600.
    10. Koeppe, D.E. etaJ. (1970). Phytochemistry. 9: 297"301.
    11. Koeppe, D.E. etaJ. (1976). Can. J. &t. 54: 593-599.
    12. Leather, G.R. (1983). WeedSci. 31: 37-42.
    13. Lehman, R.H. and Rice, E.L. (1)72). Am. Midi. nat. 87: 71-8.
    14. Molisch, H. (1997). "Der E1nfbiss einer PfIanze. auf die andere-Allelopathie."'Ftscher, .lena.
    15. Muller, C,H: (1969). \kgetatio 18: 348-357.
    16. Narwal, 5.S. et al. (1999). ABe/opathy J. 6: 20
    Published In
    Agricultural Reviews
    Article Metrics
    Metrics Icon
    0
    Views
    0
    Citations
    Reviewed By
    Share Article
    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      volume 22 issue 1 (march 2001) : 57 - 60,

      AI I EI OPATHICEFFECfS OF SUNA..OWER (HEUANTHUS SPp, "-A REVIEW

      V
      V. Maruthi·and N. Sankaran
      1Central Research Institote for DryIand Agriculture Hyclerabad,500030, India.

      • Submitted|

      • First Online |

      • doi

      Cite article:- Sankaran N. Maruthi·and V. (2025). AI I EI OPATHICEFFECfS OF SUNA..OWER (HEUANTHUS SPp, "-A REVIEW. Agricultural Reviews. 22(1): 57 - 60,. doi: .

      ABSTRACT

      The self defense mechanism by which a plant safequards itself from the other plants in the struggle for survival led to allelopathy. This character is of utmost importance to the farm managers as well as for researchers to work in a cropping system. In view of the sunflower gaining importance in a cropping system, the work on allelopathic effects of sunflower has been reviewed in this paper. The stem parts of sunflower have more allelopathic potential followed by leaf and root. Among the factors affecting the allelochemicais production, water stress and temperature play an important role. Also, the review confirms the autotoxic effect of sunflower.

      KEYWORDS

        REFERENCES

        1. Amblka, S.R. and Suma, 5. (1999). AJleJopathyJ. 6: 49-56;
        2. Cooper, W.5. and Stoesz, A.D. (1931). BuD Torrey. &t. Qub. 58: 67-72.
        3. Curtis, J.T., and Cottam, G. (1950). BuD. Torrey. Bot. Qub. 77: 187-191.
        4. Del Moral, R. (1972). Oec%gia. 9: 289-300.
        5. Einhellig, F.A.etal. (1970). BuD. Torrey&t. Dub, 97: 22-23. .
        6. E1nhelllg, FA (1985). AUelopathy: Organisms, Processes and Applications. American Chemical Society, pp.
        7. 96-116. .
        8. GIU, ·D.S. and 5andhu, KS. (1993). IrrJian J. £Col. 20: 169-172.
        9. Goel, U. et aL (1989). J. Chern. £Col. 15: 591-600.
        10. Koeppe, D.E. etaJ. (1970). Phytochemistry. 9: 297"301.
        11. Koeppe, D.E. etaJ. (1976). Can. J. &t. 54: 593-599.
        12. Leather, G.R. (1983). WeedSci. 31: 37-42.
        13. Lehman, R.H. and Rice, E.L. (1)72). Am. Midi. nat. 87: 71-8.
        14. Molisch, H. (1997). "Der E1nfbiss einer PfIanze. auf die andere-Allelopathie."'Ftscher, .lena.
        15. Muller, C,H: (1969). \kgetatio 18: 348-357.
        16. Narwal, 5.S. et al. (1999). ABe/opathy J. 6: 20
        In this Article
          Contact us
          Follow us
          Published In
          Agricultural Reviews

          Editorial Board

          View all (0)