Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 23 issue 1 (march 2002) : 46 - 52

NITROGEN NUTRITION OF PEACH - A REVIEW

D
Devi Singh
R
Rajbir Singh
1Department of Horticulture CCS HAU,College of Agriculture, Kaul- 136021, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Singh Devi, Singh Rajbir (2025). NITROGEN NUTRITION OF PEACH - A REVIEW. Agricultural Reviews. 23(1): 46 - 52. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Nitrogen is the most limiting element in peach production due to its bearing on previous year's growth. Nitrogen levels standardized under different agroclimatic conditions show variation from region to region and project variations in the nutrient status of the orchard soils. Besides growth and yield of quality fruits it is also involved in a number of physiological functions. In peach with various fertilizer trials 500 g N/tree is the best and most economical for improving the growth, yield and quality of fruits alongwith basal dose of 200g P2O5 and 480g K2O. Work done on peach reveals that a positive relationship exists between the rate of N fertilizer and leaf N, Fe, Mn, Zn and the negative relationship between N rate and leaf P, K and Ca

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Armstrong, WD.(1966). Proc. l'Jlh./nt. Hort. Congr. Md.,1.Abstr.27.
    2. Ballinger, WE.; Hunter, A.H.; Correll, EE. and Cummings, G,A,(1963). Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 83:248-258.
    3. Baroccio, A. and Manzo, P. (1966). ItaJ. Agric. 103:355-64. .
    4. ·".attilani, A. (1977). Acta. Hort. No.449:153-159.
    5. ~ter, P. (1970). Aust. J. Expt. Anim. Husb. 10:468473.
    6. Brown, L.C. and Proebsting, E.L.(1962). Calif. Agric.16:7.
    7. Bussi, C.; Huguet, J.G.and Defrance, H. (1991). J. Hort. Sci.,66(4):487-93.
    8. Bussi, C.; Huguet, J.G.; Besset, J. and Girand, T. (1994). European J. Agro., 3(3):243-248.
    9. Cahoon, G.A. (1971). Proc. 92'd AnnualMeeting Arkansas State Hort. Soc. FayetteviUe, USA(undated); 75-81.
    10. Cullinan, EP. and Batjer, L.P. (1943). Soil Sci. 55:49-60.
    11. Davidson, O.W and Blake, M.A. (1936). Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 34:247-8.
    12. Degtyar,J.A. and Krolik, M,A,(1972). Sadovrxktvo Vmogradarstive I Vinodelie MoldaviiNo.10, 11-13.
    13. Devi Singh (1992). Ph.D.Thesis, Dr. Y.S.Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni,Solan.
    14. Devi Singh and Chauhan, J.S. (1998). Haryana J. Hort. Sci. 27:92-97.
    15. Devi Singh; Chauhan, J.S. and Kaith, N.S. (1995). IndianJ. Agric. Sci.,65:33740.
    16. Devi Singh; Chauhan, J.S. and Kaith,'N.S. (1996). HaryanaJ. Hort. Sci. 25:95-10J,
    17. Devi Singh; Chauhan, J.S. and Kaith, N.S. (1997). HaryanaJ.Hort. Sci.-26:t83-187.
    18. Dotti, E (1942). Sta. Sperin. Ortofloutt. Milano, Nota l1'elim.
    19. .Dudzinski, F. (1985). Roozniki Akademii Rolniczej w Poznaniu, Ogrcxinictwa 156:75-87.
    20. El-&nna, G.J. et al (1981). Egyptian Hort. 8:65-76.
    21. Gammon, N.Jr. and Shoemaker, J.S. (1964). PrQc. Ra. Sta. Hort. Soc.,76:380-387.
    22. Green, EM. (1957). Colo. Exp. Sta. Pamphlet pp.3-a. .
    23. Hassan, A.N. (1990). Acta. Hort. No.274:187-194.
    24. Havelka, B. (1970). Acta. Universitatis Agriculturae Smo, A. 18:621-623.
    25. Hewetson, EN. (1955). Sci. For. Fmr., 3(2):7.
    26. Janie, V. (1979). Jugoslov. Vocarstvo, 13:3-14.
    27. Jia, H etaJ. (1999). J. Jap. Soc. Hort. Sci. 68:487-493.
    28. Judkins, WP. and Wander, J.P. (1950). Pl Physiol, 25:78-85.
    29. Kanwar, J.S.(1979). Ph.D. Thesis, Punjab A~rieultural University, Ludhiana.
    30. Kanwar, J.S. and Nijjar, G.S. (1983). Indian J. Hort., 40:48-54.
    31. Kenworthy, A.L. (1948). Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci., 51:209-215.
    32. 52 AGRICULTURAL REVIEWS
    33. Khan, M.S; Wazir, F.K. and Ayaz Muhammad (2000). SarhadJ. Agrle.16:25-28.
    34. Kwong, G.S. and Fisher, E.G. (1962). Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci., 81:1168-1171.
    35. Lanzelottl, J.J. (1986). BoIetin Tecnieo Estacion Experimental de Mercedes Buenos Aires 6(6): 12.
    36. Lanzelottl, J,J. (1987). Eoletin Tecnieo Estaeion Experimental de Mercedes, Buenos Aires 7(6):7.
    37. Leece, D.R. (1976). Aust. J. Exp. Agr. Anim. Husb., 16:775-779.
    38. Lenina, V. etal (1977). PomiculturaPitest., 5:263-275.
    39. Upman, J.G. and Blair, A.w. (1918). NJ. Agr. Exp. Sta. Ann. Rpt. BuD.,No.323:32-33.
    40. Uwerant, J. (1959). CR. Aead. Agr. Fr., 45:818-826.
    41. McMunn, R.L. (1933). Proc.Am. Soc. Hort. Sci., 30:187-191.
    42. Monastra, E etal (1975). QuaDtasPlantarum. 24:351-357.
    43. Mowry, J.B.·(1963). Am. FruitGr., 83:14,56-57.
    44. Nijjar, G.S. etal (1972). PAUJ. Res., 9:261-263.
    45. Nii, N.; Kato, M.; Hirano, Y. and Funagama, T. (1993). J. Jap. Soc. Hort. Sci., 62:547- 554.
    46. Nii, N.; Yamaguchi, K. and Nishimura, M. (1997). J. Jap. Soc. Hart. Sci., 66:505-511.
    47. Orphanos, P.I. (1974). Tech. PaperAgrie. Res./nst.,No.6 pp. 9.
    48. Overcash, J.P. etal (1960). Bull. Miss. Agrie. Exp. Sta., 596:23.
    49. Post, G.R. etal (1966). West. Fruit. Gr., 20(3):36-37.
    50. Radajewska, 8.(1987). Rocmiki Akademii Rolniczej w Poznaniu,Rozprawg Naukowe No.166: 94.
    51. Radajewska, R and Wozniak, W. (1990). Rocmiki Akademii Rolniezej w Poznaniu, Ognodnictwo, 217(18):65-77.
    52. Reeder, B.D. and Bown, H.H. (1978). J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci., 103:745-749.
    53. Ritter, C.M. (1956). Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci., 68:48-55.
    54. Ritter, C.M. (1961). NJ. St. Univ. pp. 32-42.
    55. Rogers, E. (1971). Tech. BuD. Colorado St. Univ. No.16:28.
    56. Sato, K. (1955). Bull Natl.lnst. Agrie. Sci. SeriesE (Hort),4:146:148.
    57. Schneider, GW. and McClung, A.C. (1957). Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci., 69:141-147.
    58. Schneider, GW. etal (1958). ProcAmer. Soc. Hort. Sci, 71:110-115.
    59. Scott, L.E. and Thompson, A.H. (1956). Md. Agr. Exp. Dept. Hort. Misc. Pub. No.260.
    60. Sharma, A.K. etal (1979). Punjab Hort. J. 19:49-5l.
    61. Sharma, M.R. (1976). Pl Sci. 8:82-83.
    62. Sharma, Y.P. (1987). Ph.D. Thesis, DrYS. Parmar Univ. Hort. & Forestry, Nauni, Solan.
    63. Sharma, Y.P. and Bhutani, V.P. (1989). Indian J. Agrie. Sci., 59(4):255-259.
    64. Sharma, M.R. and Singh, R. (1980). Indian J. Hort. 87:364-368.
    65. Sharma, M.R. and Singh, R. (1982). Punjab Hort. J.~ 22:93-98.
    66. Shear, G.M. and Horsfall, E (1948). Proc. Am. SocHort. Sci, 52:57-60.
    67. Soing, P; Lobit, P. and Ardoin, N. (1998). Infos (Paris) No.146:32-35.
    68. Stebbins, R.L. etal (1963). Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci., 82:114- 119.
    69. Stembridge, G.E. etal (1962). Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci., 81:153-16l.
    70. Stojkovska, A. etal (1972). Jugoslovenska Ulcar.stvo, 6(19/20):525-535.
    71. Tawfik, M. etal (1974). Agrie. Res. Rev. 52:15-23.
    72. Taylor, B.K. and Den Ende, V.V. (1970). Anim. Husb. 10:214-217.
    73. Tewari, J.C. etal (1992). Prog. Hort. 21(3-4):308-13
    74. Uchiyama, Y. (1973). J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 98:546"556.
    75. Vanderkles, L.J.J. (1949). Meded. Dir. Tuinb., 12:633-642.
    76. Walsh, C.S. etal (1989). J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 114(3):373-377.
    77. Weinberger, J.H. (1949). Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci 53:57-6l.
    78. Weinberger, J.H. and Cullinan, EP. (1936). Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci., 34:249-54.
    79. Yamdagni, R. and Jindal, P.C. (1979). Prog. Hort. 10(4):41-44.
    80. Ystaas, J. (1966). Forakn For.s. Landhr.,17:281-295.
    81. Zegbe Dominguez, J.A. (1995). Revista Atatecnia Mexicana. 18(2):91-106.
    82. Zegbe Dominguez, J.A. and Rumayor Rodriguez, A.F. (1996). /TEA ProdUCtion Vegetal. 92(3): 171-187.
    Published In
    Agricultural Reviews
    Article Metrics
    Metrics Icon
    0
    Views
    0
    Citations
    Reviewed By
    Share Article
    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      volume 23 issue 1 (march 2002) : 46 - 52

      NITROGEN NUTRITION OF PEACH - A REVIEW

      D
      Devi Singh
      R
      Rajbir Singh
      1Department of Horticulture CCS HAU,College of Agriculture, Kaul- 136021, India

      • Submitted|

      • First Online |

      • doi

      Cite article:- Singh Devi, Singh Rajbir (2025). NITROGEN NUTRITION OF PEACH - A REVIEW. Agricultural Reviews. 23(1): 46 - 52. doi: .

      ABSTRACT

      Nitrogen is the most limiting element in peach production due to its bearing on previous year's growth. Nitrogen levels standardized under different agroclimatic conditions show variation from region to region and project variations in the nutrient status of the orchard soils. Besides growth and yield of quality fruits it is also involved in a number of physiological functions. In peach with various fertilizer trials 500 g N/tree is the best and most economical for improving the growth, yield and quality of fruits alongwith basal dose of 200g P2O5 and 480g K2O. Work done on peach reveals that a positive relationship exists between the rate of N fertilizer and leaf N, Fe, Mn, Zn and the negative relationship between N rate and leaf P, K and Ca

      KEYWORDS

        REFERENCES

        1. Armstrong, WD.(1966). Proc. l'Jlh./nt. Hort. Congr. Md.,1.Abstr.27.
        2. Ballinger, WE.; Hunter, A.H.; Correll, EE. and Cummings, G,A,(1963). Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 83:248-258.
        3. Baroccio, A. and Manzo, P. (1966). ItaJ. Agric. 103:355-64. .
        4. ·".attilani, A. (1977). Acta. Hort. No.449:153-159.
        5. ~ter, P. (1970). Aust. J. Expt. Anim. Husb. 10:468473.
        6. Brown, L.C. and Proebsting, E.L.(1962). Calif. Agric.16:7.
        7. Bussi, C.; Huguet, J.G.and Defrance, H. (1991). J. Hort. Sci.,66(4):487-93.
        8. Bussi, C.; Huguet, J.G.; Besset, J. and Girand, T. (1994). European J. Agro., 3(3):243-248.
        9. Cahoon, G.A. (1971). Proc. 92'd AnnualMeeting Arkansas State Hort. Soc. FayetteviUe, USA(undated); 75-81.
        10. Cullinan, EP. and Batjer, L.P. (1943). Soil Sci. 55:49-60.
        11. Davidson, O.W and Blake, M.A. (1936). Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 34:247-8.
        12. Degtyar,J.A. and Krolik, M,A,(1972). Sadovrxktvo Vmogradarstive I Vinodelie MoldaviiNo.10, 11-13.
        13. Devi Singh (1992). Ph.D.Thesis, Dr. Y.S.Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni,Solan.
        14. Devi Singh and Chauhan, J.S. (1998). Haryana J. Hort. Sci. 27:92-97.
        15. Devi Singh; Chauhan, J.S. and Kaith, N.S. (1995). IndianJ. Agric. Sci.,65:33740.
        16. Devi Singh; Chauhan, J.S. and Kaith,'N.S. (1996). HaryanaJ. Hort. Sci. 25:95-10J,
        17. Devi Singh; Chauhan, J.S. and Kaith, N.S. (1997). HaryanaJ.Hort. Sci.-26:t83-187.
        18. Dotti, E (1942). Sta. Sperin. Ortofloutt. Milano, Nota l1'elim.
        19. .Dudzinski, F. (1985). Roozniki Akademii Rolniczej w Poznaniu, Ogrcxinictwa 156:75-87.
        20. El-&nna, G.J. et al (1981). Egyptian Hort. 8:65-76.
        21. Gammon, N.Jr. and Shoemaker, J.S. (1964). PrQc. Ra. Sta. Hort. Soc.,76:380-387.
        22. Green, EM. (1957). Colo. Exp. Sta. Pamphlet pp.3-a. .
        23. Hassan, A.N. (1990). Acta. Hort. No.274:187-194.
        24. Havelka, B. (1970). Acta. Universitatis Agriculturae Smo, A. 18:621-623.
        25. Hewetson, EN. (1955). Sci. For. Fmr., 3(2):7.
        26. Janie, V. (1979). Jugoslov. Vocarstvo, 13:3-14.
        27. Jia, H etaJ. (1999). J. Jap. Soc. Hort. Sci. 68:487-493.
        28. Judkins, WP. and Wander, J.P. (1950). Pl Physiol, 25:78-85.
        29. Kanwar, J.S.(1979). Ph.D. Thesis, Punjab A~rieultural University, Ludhiana.
        30. Kanwar, J.S. and Nijjar, G.S. (1983). Indian J. Hort., 40:48-54.
        31. Kenworthy, A.L. (1948). Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci., 51:209-215.
        32. 52 AGRICULTURAL REVIEWS
        33. Khan, M.S; Wazir, F.K. and Ayaz Muhammad (2000). SarhadJ. Agrle.16:25-28.
        34. Kwong, G.S. and Fisher, E.G. (1962). Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci., 81:1168-1171.
        35. Lanzelottl, J.J. (1986). BoIetin Tecnieo Estacion Experimental de Mercedes Buenos Aires 6(6): 12.
        36. Lanzelottl, J,J. (1987). Eoletin Tecnieo Estaeion Experimental de Mercedes, Buenos Aires 7(6):7.
        37. Leece, D.R. (1976). Aust. J. Exp. Agr. Anim. Husb., 16:775-779.
        38. Lenina, V. etal (1977). PomiculturaPitest., 5:263-275.
        39. Upman, J.G. and Blair, A.w. (1918). NJ. Agr. Exp. Sta. Ann. Rpt. BuD.,No.323:32-33.
        40. Uwerant, J. (1959). CR. Aead. Agr. Fr., 45:818-826.
        41. McMunn, R.L. (1933). Proc.Am. Soc. Hort. Sci., 30:187-191.
        42. Monastra, E etal (1975). QuaDtasPlantarum. 24:351-357.
        43. Mowry, J.B.·(1963). Am. FruitGr., 83:14,56-57.
        44. Nijjar, G.S. etal (1972). PAUJ. Res., 9:261-263.
        45. Nii, N.; Kato, M.; Hirano, Y. and Funagama, T. (1993). J. Jap. Soc. Hort. Sci., 62:547- 554.
        46. Nii, N.; Yamaguchi, K. and Nishimura, M. (1997). J. Jap. Soc. Hart. Sci., 66:505-511.
        47. Orphanos, P.I. (1974). Tech. PaperAgrie. Res./nst.,No.6 pp. 9.
        48. Overcash, J.P. etal (1960). Bull. Miss. Agrie. Exp. Sta., 596:23.
        49. Post, G.R. etal (1966). West. Fruit. Gr., 20(3):36-37.
        50. Radajewska, 8.(1987). Rocmiki Akademii Rolniczej w Poznaniu,Rozprawg Naukowe No.166: 94.
        51. Radajewska, R and Wozniak, W. (1990). Rocmiki Akademii Rolniezej w Poznaniu, Ognodnictwo, 217(18):65-77.
        52. Reeder, B.D. and Bown, H.H. (1978). J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci., 103:745-749.
        53. Ritter, C.M. (1956). Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci., 68:48-55.
        54. Ritter, C.M. (1961). NJ. St. Univ. pp. 32-42.
        55. Rogers, E. (1971). Tech. BuD. Colorado St. Univ. No.16:28.
        56. Sato, K. (1955). Bull Natl.lnst. Agrie. Sci. SeriesE (Hort),4:146:148.
        57. Schneider, GW. and McClung, A.C. (1957). Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci., 69:141-147.
        58. Schneider, GW. etal (1958). ProcAmer. Soc. Hort. Sci, 71:110-115.
        59. Scott, L.E. and Thompson, A.H. (1956). Md. Agr. Exp. Dept. Hort. Misc. Pub. No.260.
        60. Sharma, A.K. etal (1979). Punjab Hort. J. 19:49-5l.
        61. Sharma, M.R. (1976). Pl Sci. 8:82-83.
        62. Sharma, Y.P. (1987). Ph.D. Thesis, DrYS. Parmar Univ. Hort. & Forestry, Nauni, Solan.
        63. Sharma, Y.P. and Bhutani, V.P. (1989). Indian J. Agrie. Sci., 59(4):255-259.
        64. Sharma, M.R. and Singh, R. (1980). Indian J. Hort. 87:364-368.
        65. Sharma, M.R. and Singh, R. (1982). Punjab Hort. J.~ 22:93-98.
        66. Shear, G.M. and Horsfall, E (1948). Proc. Am. SocHort. Sci, 52:57-60.
        67. Soing, P; Lobit, P. and Ardoin, N. (1998). Infos (Paris) No.146:32-35.
        68. Stebbins, R.L. etal (1963). Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci., 82:114- 119.
        69. Stembridge, G.E. etal (1962). Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci., 81:153-16l.
        70. Stojkovska, A. etal (1972). Jugoslovenska Ulcar.stvo, 6(19/20):525-535.
        71. Tawfik, M. etal (1974). Agrie. Res. Rev. 52:15-23.
        72. Taylor, B.K. and Den Ende, V.V. (1970). Anim. Husb. 10:214-217.
        73. Tewari, J.C. etal (1992). Prog. Hort. 21(3-4):308-13
        74. Uchiyama, Y. (1973). J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 98:546"556.
        75. Vanderkles, L.J.J. (1949). Meded. Dir. Tuinb., 12:633-642.
        76. Walsh, C.S. etal (1989). J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 114(3):373-377.
        77. Weinberger, J.H. (1949). Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci 53:57-6l.
        78. Weinberger, J.H. and Cullinan, EP. (1936). Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci., 34:249-54.
        79. Yamdagni, R. and Jindal, P.C. (1979). Prog. Hort. 10(4):41-44.
        80. Ystaas, J. (1966). Forakn For.s. Landhr.,17:281-295.
        81. Zegbe Dominguez, J.A. (1995). Revista Atatecnia Mexicana. 18(2):91-106.
        82. Zegbe Dominguez, J.A. and Rumayor Rodriguez, A.F. (1996). /TEA ProdUCtion Vegetal. 92(3): 171-187.
        In this Article
          Contact us
          Follow us
          Published In
          Agricultural Reviews

          Editorial Board

          View all (0)