Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 24 issue 3 (september 2003) : 211.- 216

FEW IMPORTANT SOIL MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES FOR SUSTAINABLE CROP PRODUCTION - A REVIEW

A
A.L.Yadav
B
B. Goswami
P
P. Aggarwal
M
M. Arya
1Division of Agricultural Physics. IARI, New Delhi - 110012, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- A.L.Yadav, Goswami B., Aggarwal P., Arya M. (2025). FEW IMPORTANT SOIL MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES FOR SUSTAINABLE CROP PRODUCTION - A REVIEW. Agricultural Reviews. 24(3): 211.- 216. doi: .

ABSTRACT

In irrigated farming, although intensive agriculture has brought sustainable enhancement in production of food grains but it has threatened the environment safety and promoted the degradation and inefficient use of basic resources such as land, water and fertiliter. Ridge furrow and bed-furrow systems have emerged as few of the most promising sustainable crop management technologies which increased input use efficiency and crop production without environmental degradation. Ridge-furrow system was found suitable for enhancing the production of crops sensitive to water logging, for improving the productivity of poorly drained vertisoils, for checking the runoff and soil loss in erodible lands (1–3%) and for increasing the soil depth of shallow Alfisols. Besides, use of ridge-furrow system resulted in reduced water and chemical use. However, under ridge-furrow system mechanical sowing of closely spaced crops like wheat, gram and soybean and weed removal at advance stage were big problems. Hence Broad bed and furrow system (BBF) was developed for deep black cotton soils in medium rainfall regions where mechanical sowing by seed drill could be done. In medium to high rainfall regions of Vertisols, 6–15 m wide and 30 cm high beds alternating with 6 m wide sunken beds (Raised bed-Sunken bed system-RBSB) were found most appropriate for raising both upland and low land crops. Whereas in low rainfall regions of Vertisols, 1–2 m wide raised beds were recommended for improving the crop production. Both BBF and RBSB technologies worked well in Vertisols only, where lateral movement of water was appreciable. However, they were found unsuitable for medium and coarse textured solis of indogangetic plains where vertical movement predominate over horizontal movement. Research trial on use of bed planting system (also known as furrow irrigated reduced tillage bed planting-FIRBS) for growing soybean, wheat, maize and cotton in Yaqui valley of central Mexico and Indo-Gangetic plains of south Asia showed promising results in terms of increased input use efficiency and crop productivity.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. AggalWal, P. et al (1998). National Seminar on 'Development in Soil Science'-1998: 27.
    2. AggalWal, P. et a/. (1998). In : Proc. National Sem. Water Management for Sustainable Agriculture - Problems and
    3. Prospects for 21- century' held at WTC.JARI. New Delhi in April :252.
    4. AggalWal. P. et al (2000). In: Extended Summary of International Conference on Managing Natural Resources for
    5. Sustainable Agricultural Production in 21- Century. 3: 1175-1176.
    6. Allen, R.R. and Musick. JT. (i994). App Eng. inAgri.. 10: 687-692.
    7. Allen. R.R. and Musick. J.T. (1994). App. Eng. in Agri.• 10(5): 687-692.
    8. Aujla. M.S. etal (1992). lndianJ. Agril Engg.• 2: 54-56.
    9. Bantllan. M.C.S. and Joshi .. PK (1998). Proc. Int. Workshop on Joint Impact Assessment of NARS/ICRISAT
    10. Technologies for the Semi-arid tropics, 2-4 Dec. 1996, ICRISAT. Patancheru, India.
    11. Bargar, B. etal (1999). Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.. 63: 1290-1299.
    12. Benjamin, J.G. et al (1997). Agro. J.. 89: 609-612.
    13. Bharmabe, P.R. (1999). J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci.. 47: 396·400
    14. . Bhoi. P.G. etal (1994). J. MaharastraAgric. Univ.. 9:466-467.
    15. Chauhan. D.S. etal (1998). Proc. Int. Conf. 'Research Needs Beyond 2000AD' DWR, Kamal, India, 263-273.
    16. Clark, L.E. (1983). Response of Cotton to Cultural Practices. Texas Agric. Exp. Stn. Progress Report: 4175.
    17. Clay, D.E. eta/. (1994). J. Environ.Qua/., 23: 9-13.
    18. Das. DK et al. (1997). Research highlights (1982-1996) of ICAR-AICRP on Tillage Requirement of Major Indian
    19. soils for different cropping systems; Division of Agricultural Physics, JARI. ·New Delhi.
    20. Fisher, A. etal (1995). In 'Soil Management in Sustainable Agriculture'. Proc. Third Int. Conf. Sustainable Agriculture.
    21. Wye college, University of London, UK, 31 Aug.-4 Sept.. 1993: 561-568.
    22. Gerard. C.J. et al (1983). Texas Agric. Exp. Stn. Progress Report. 4174.
    23. Gerard, C.J. et al (1984). Agron. J., 76: 945-950.
    24. Graterole, V.E. et al (1993). Agric. Water Mgmt.. 24: 133-145.
    25. Gupta, R.P. et a/. (1984). Soil Management to Increase Crop Production, ICAR. New Deihl.
    26. Gupta. R.P. and Abrol. J.P. (1993). Soil Tillage Res.. 27: 253-272.
    27. Gupta, R.P. eta!. (1995). Highlights of Research (1989- 91) of ICAR-AICRP on Soil Physical Conditions to Increase
    28. Agricultural Production of Problematic Areas. JARI. New Delhi. SPC Bulletin no. 8. 17-21.
    29. Hamlett, J.M. eta/. (1990). Trans. ASAE.. 33: 1859-1866.
    30. 216 AGRICULTURAL REVIEWS
    31. Hobbs, P.R. (2001). J Crop Prod., 4: 1-23.
    32. ICRISAT (1975-1984). Annual Reports, 1975-1984. ICRISAT. Hyderabad. India.
    33. ICRISAT (1989). ICRISAT Research Highlights, Patancheru. A.P
    34. Ingole, B.M. etal. (1998). J Soils Crops., 8(1): 64-66.
    35. Jones, O.R. and Stewart, B.A. (1990). Soil Tillage Res., 18: 249-265.
    36. Karle, B.G. et al. (1997). Status Report (1982-96) for All India Coordinated Project on 'Tillage Requirement of Major
    37. Indian Soils for Different Cropping Systems.
    38. Kranty, BA (1981). In: Advances in Food Producing Systems for Arid and Semiarid Lands. Part A, Univ. of California:
    39. 339-378.
    40. Pathak, P. et al. (1985). In : Soil Erosion and Conservation. (E1-Swalfy and Moldenhauer. L.O. eds). Soil Cons. Soc.
    41. Am.. 338-354.
    42. Patra, AK (1996). J Oilseeds Res.. 13(1): 26-31.
    43. Sayre, K.D. (1999). Proc of the Tenth Regional Workshop for Eastern. Central and Southern Africa, University of
    44. Stellenbosch, South Africa, 14-18 September, 1998: 119-141.
    45. Singh, G. etal. (1993). Soil Tillage Res.. 27: 273 -282.
    46. Tejwani, K.G. (1981). A Quarter Century of Soil and Water Conservation Research in India. Central Soil and Water Conservation Reseach andTraining Center, Dehradun, India.
    47. Tomar. S. eta/. (1995). In: Agricultural Physicsmonograph no. 2 on 'Management of Stress Environment for Sustainable Crop Production'. Proc. of NatiOnal C.C.S. Haryana Agriculture University, Hisar. Haryana, Dec. 1992: 38-43.
    48. Tsegaye, (1993). SoilSci. Soc. Am. J, 57: 240-245.
    Published In
    Agricultural Reviews
    Article Metrics
    Metrics Icon
    0
    Views
    0
    Citations
    Reviewed By
    Share Article
    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      volume 24 issue 3 (september 2003) : 211.- 216

      FEW IMPORTANT SOIL MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES FOR SUSTAINABLE CROP PRODUCTION - A REVIEW

      A
      A.L.Yadav
      B
      B. Goswami
      P
      P. Aggarwal
      M
      M. Arya
      1Division of Agricultural Physics. IARI, New Delhi - 110012, India

      • Submitted|

      • First Online |

      • doi

      Cite article:- A.L.Yadav, Goswami B., Aggarwal P., Arya M. (2025). FEW IMPORTANT SOIL MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES FOR SUSTAINABLE CROP PRODUCTION - A REVIEW. Agricultural Reviews. 24(3): 211.- 216. doi: .

      ABSTRACT

      In irrigated farming, although intensive agriculture has brought sustainable enhancement in production of food grains but it has threatened the environment safety and promoted the degradation and inefficient use of basic resources such as land, water and fertiliter. Ridge furrow and bed-furrow systems have emerged as few of the most promising sustainable crop management technologies which increased input use efficiency and crop production without environmental degradation. Ridge-furrow system was found suitable for enhancing the production of crops sensitive to water logging, for improving the productivity of poorly drained vertisoils, for checking the runoff and soil loss in erodible lands (1–3%) and for increasing the soil depth of shallow Alfisols. Besides, use of ridge-furrow system resulted in reduced water and chemical use. However, under ridge-furrow system mechanical sowing of closely spaced crops like wheat, gram and soybean and weed removal at advance stage were big problems. Hence Broad bed and furrow system (BBF) was developed for deep black cotton soils in medium rainfall regions where mechanical sowing by seed drill could be done. In medium to high rainfall regions of Vertisols, 6–15 m wide and 30 cm high beds alternating with 6 m wide sunken beds (Raised bed-Sunken bed system-RBSB) were found most appropriate for raising both upland and low land crops. Whereas in low rainfall regions of Vertisols, 1–2 m wide raised beds were recommended for improving the crop production. Both BBF and RBSB technologies worked well in Vertisols only, where lateral movement of water was appreciable. However, they were found unsuitable for medium and coarse textured solis of indogangetic plains where vertical movement predominate over horizontal movement. Research trial on use of bed planting system (also known as furrow irrigated reduced tillage bed planting-FIRBS) for growing soybean, wheat, maize and cotton in Yaqui valley of central Mexico and Indo-Gangetic plains of south Asia showed promising results in terms of increased input use efficiency and crop productivity.

      KEYWORDS

        REFERENCES

        1. AggalWal, P. et al (1998). National Seminar on 'Development in Soil Science'-1998: 27.
        2. AggalWal, P. et a/. (1998). In : Proc. National Sem. Water Management for Sustainable Agriculture - Problems and
        3. Prospects for 21- century' held at WTC.JARI. New Delhi in April :252.
        4. AggalWal. P. et al (2000). In: Extended Summary of International Conference on Managing Natural Resources for
        5. Sustainable Agricultural Production in 21- Century. 3: 1175-1176.
        6. Allen, R.R. and Musick. JT. (i994). App Eng. inAgri.. 10: 687-692.
        7. Allen. R.R. and Musick. J.T. (1994). App. Eng. in Agri.• 10(5): 687-692.
        8. Aujla. M.S. etal (1992). lndianJ. Agril Engg.• 2: 54-56.
        9. Bantllan. M.C.S. and Joshi .. PK (1998). Proc. Int. Workshop on Joint Impact Assessment of NARS/ICRISAT
        10. Technologies for the Semi-arid tropics, 2-4 Dec. 1996, ICRISAT. Patancheru, India.
        11. Bargar, B. etal (1999). Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.. 63: 1290-1299.
        12. Benjamin, J.G. et al (1997). Agro. J.. 89: 609-612.
        13. Bharmabe, P.R. (1999). J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci.. 47: 396·400
        14. . Bhoi. P.G. etal (1994). J. MaharastraAgric. Univ.. 9:466-467.
        15. Chauhan. D.S. etal (1998). Proc. Int. Conf. 'Research Needs Beyond 2000AD' DWR, Kamal, India, 263-273.
        16. Clark, L.E. (1983). Response of Cotton to Cultural Practices. Texas Agric. Exp. Stn. Progress Report: 4175.
        17. Clay, D.E. eta/. (1994). J. Environ.Qua/., 23: 9-13.
        18. Das. DK et al. (1997). Research highlights (1982-1996) of ICAR-AICRP on Tillage Requirement of Major Indian
        19. soils for different cropping systems; Division of Agricultural Physics, JARI. ·New Delhi.
        20. Fisher, A. etal (1995). In 'Soil Management in Sustainable Agriculture'. Proc. Third Int. Conf. Sustainable Agriculture.
        21. Wye college, University of London, UK, 31 Aug.-4 Sept.. 1993: 561-568.
        22. Gerard. C.J. et al (1983). Texas Agric. Exp. Stn. Progress Report. 4174.
        23. Gerard, C.J. et al (1984). Agron. J., 76: 945-950.
        24. Graterole, V.E. et al (1993). Agric. Water Mgmt.. 24: 133-145.
        25. Gupta, R.P. et a/. (1984). Soil Management to Increase Crop Production, ICAR. New Deihl.
        26. Gupta. R.P. and Abrol. J.P. (1993). Soil Tillage Res.. 27: 253-272.
        27. Gupta, R.P. eta!. (1995). Highlights of Research (1989- 91) of ICAR-AICRP on Soil Physical Conditions to Increase
        28. Agricultural Production of Problematic Areas. JARI. New Delhi. SPC Bulletin no. 8. 17-21.
        29. Hamlett, J.M. eta/. (1990). Trans. ASAE.. 33: 1859-1866.
        30. 216 AGRICULTURAL REVIEWS
        31. Hobbs, P.R. (2001). J Crop Prod., 4: 1-23.
        32. ICRISAT (1975-1984). Annual Reports, 1975-1984. ICRISAT. Hyderabad. India.
        33. ICRISAT (1989). ICRISAT Research Highlights, Patancheru. A.P
        34. Ingole, B.M. etal. (1998). J Soils Crops., 8(1): 64-66.
        35. Jones, O.R. and Stewart, B.A. (1990). Soil Tillage Res., 18: 249-265.
        36. Karle, B.G. et al. (1997). Status Report (1982-96) for All India Coordinated Project on 'Tillage Requirement of Major
        37. Indian Soils for Different Cropping Systems.
        38. Kranty, BA (1981). In: Advances in Food Producing Systems for Arid and Semiarid Lands. Part A, Univ. of California:
        39. 339-378.
        40. Pathak, P. et al. (1985). In : Soil Erosion and Conservation. (E1-Swalfy and Moldenhauer. L.O. eds). Soil Cons. Soc.
        41. Am.. 338-354.
        42. Patra, AK (1996). J Oilseeds Res.. 13(1): 26-31.
        43. Sayre, K.D. (1999). Proc of the Tenth Regional Workshop for Eastern. Central and Southern Africa, University of
        44. Stellenbosch, South Africa, 14-18 September, 1998: 119-141.
        45. Singh, G. etal. (1993). Soil Tillage Res.. 27: 273 -282.
        46. Tejwani, K.G. (1981). A Quarter Century of Soil and Water Conservation Research in India. Central Soil and Water Conservation Reseach andTraining Center, Dehradun, India.
        47. Tomar. S. eta/. (1995). In: Agricultural Physicsmonograph no. 2 on 'Management of Stress Environment for Sustainable Crop Production'. Proc. of NatiOnal C.C.S. Haryana Agriculture University, Hisar. Haryana, Dec. 1992: 38-43.
        48. Tsegaye, (1993). SoilSci. Soc. Am. J, 57: 240-245.
        In this Article
          Contact us
          Follow us
          Published In
          Agricultural Reviews

          Editorial Board

          View all (0)