Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 25 issue 3 (september 2004) : 173 - 188

ZINC NUTRITION AND CITRUS DECLINE - A REVIEW

A
A.K. Srivastava
S
Shyam Singh
1National Research Centre for Citrus, Nagpur - 440010, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Srivastava A.K., Singh Shyam (2025). ZINC NUTRITION AND CITRUS DECLINE - A REVIEW. Agricultural Reviews. 25(3): 173 - 188. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Sub-optimum nutrition of zinc is one of the prime concerns of citrus nutrition. Worldwide occurrence of Zn deficiency known by various names like, rosette, little leaf, frenching, mottle leaf etc. is basically characterized by interveinal chlorosis mayor may not be coupled with rosetting of leaves. Metabolically, zinc deficiency induces many morphological, cytological as well as anatomical changes. With the available information, etiology of Zn deficiency can now be precisely established with further support of leaf/soil analysis data. Zinc deficiency is also suggested to appear due to competition from P, Fe, Mn, Ca and upto some extent K besides soil properties on the Zn availability. Though, citrus decline is considered to be a syndrome of many contributory factors. But, a number of hypotheses have been postulated to establish the role of zinc nutrition is citrus decline carried out from time to time over the last 70 years. These include: dysfunction of water translocation, increased resistance to water transport in the xylem, altered disturbance and redistribution of Zn especially in bark suggesting horizontal movement of Zn instead of vertical movement, outer wood next to cambium with distinct seasonal cycles. However, the evidences of late suggested that citrus decline effect on abnormal zinc metabolism developed prior to the dysfunction of water translocation.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Ahmed. N. and Jackson. P. (1965): Soil Sci., ioo: 428-432.
    2. Aiyappa. KM. eta/. (1968). IndianJ. Hort., 25: 112-115.
    3. A1brigo. L.G. and Young, RH. (1980). Hort. Science, 16: 158-160.
    4. Alva,AK (1993). Bull. Environmental Contamin¢ion and Toxicology. 51: 857-864.
    5. Anderson, C.A. and Calvert, DV (1970). Proc. Fla. State Hart. Soc., 83: 41-45.
    6. Araya. R et a/. (1994). Agronomia Costaqicense, 18: 21-27.
    7. Asher, c.J. and Loneragan. J.E (1976). Soil Sci., 103: 225-233
    8. Aso. P.J. and Dantur. N.C. (1970). Rev. Indust Agric. Tueuman. 47: 10-61.
    9. Awasthi, RP. et al. (1984). Punjab Hart. J:, 24:27-36.
    10. Bamdad, D. et al. (1977).lranian J. Pl. Pathol., 13: &5. 9-12.
    11. Bandale, J.R. et al. (1951). Poona Agric. ColI. Mag., 43:3-10. . .
    12. Barleson, c.A. etal. (1961). Soi/Sel. Soc. Am. Proc., 25 :365-368.
    13. Bausher. M.G. (1982). Hart. Science. 17: 497.
    14. Cakmak, J. et al. (1995). J. Pl. Physiol., 146: 355-360.
    15. Calavan. E.C. etal. (1951). Calif. Citrog., 37: 46-47. 63-64, 66.
    16. Calavan, E.C. and Sufficool, J.R (1952) ..Calif Citrog., 38: 2-3. 14"17.
    17. Chandler, WH. et al. (1932). Proc. Am. Soc. Hart Sci.. 28: 556-560.
    18. Chandler. WH. et al. (1933a). Proc. Am. Soc. Hart. Sci., 30: 70-86
    19. Chandler, WH. et al. (1933b). Proc. Am. Soc. Hart Sci.,. 29: 255-263.
    20. Chapman, H.D. (1966). In: Zinc USA Diagnostic Criteria for Plants and Soils. (Chapman. H. D. ed.), Div. Agr. Sci.
    21. Univ. California, USA. pp. 484-499.
    22. Chapman. HD. (1968). In: The Citrus Industry, (Reuther,W et al., eds.). Vol. n, Univ. Calif. Berkeley, USA. pp. 127-289.
    23. Chapman, H.D. et al. (1940). Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc., 4: 196·200.
    24. Chapman, H.D. et al. (1945). Citrus Leaves, 25: 17-28
    25. Chapman, H.D. (1949). Calif. Citrog., 34: 518.
    26. Chapman, H.D. (1960). CeM Citrog., 45: 230-233.
    27. Childs, J.F.L. (1953). Proe: Fla. State Hart. Soc., 66: 33-37.
    28. Childs, J.F.L. and Carlysle, T.C..(1975). Citrus Indus., 56: 7. 9.10.11.13.14.
    29. Childs, J.F.L. (1980). Proc. Fla. State Hart. Soc., 94: 25-28.
    30. Choudhary, S. (1954). Bull. PI. Prot. FAD, 2: 151-53.
    31. Gphen, M. (1974). Pf. Dis. Rptr, 58: 801-805.
    32. Cohen. M. (1979). Proc. Fla. StateHart. Soc., 92: 68-70.
    33. Qeshmukh, P.P. et al. (1988). In: Two Decades of Research on Fruits in Vidarbha (1969-1987). Directorate of
    34. Research. Punjabrao Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola, Maharashtra. p. 2.
    35. Dettori. A. et al. (1996). Proc. Int. Soc. Citrieulture, Vol 2, pp. 1288-1289
    36. Dhillon, WS. and Dhatt, A.S. (1988). Punjab Hart. J., 28: 7-13.
    37. Dhingra, D.R. and Kanwar, J.S. (1963). Punjab Hart. J.. 3: 55-59.
    38. Dikshit, N.N. and Bojapa, KM. (1959). Sci. Cult., 24: 91-4.
    39. Dutt, S. and Bhambota, J.R. (1967). Indian J. Hort.. 24: 50-59.
    40. El·Fouly, M.M. etal. (1984). Commun. Soil Sci. PI. Anal., 15: 1175-1189.
    41. Ellis. R. Jr. et al. (1964). Soil Sci. Am. Proe., 28: 83-86.
    42. Elsokkary. L H. (1976). Hort. Abst.. 46: 339.
    43. Embleton, TW. et al. (1973). In: The Citrus Industry. Volume III. (Reuther, Wed.), Univ. California, Berkeley. USA.
    44. pp. 183-210.
    45. Embleton. T.W et al. (1988). In: Proc. Sixth IntI. Citrus Congo Tel Aviv, Israel. 5-11 Mar., 1988. Vol 2, pp 681-688.
    46. Ercivan. S.L. (1974). J. Turkish Phytopathol.. 3: 51-56.
    47. Fedorenko, LV. (1962). Soils and Fertilizers, 27: 1666,1964.
    48. Fischer, H.U. et al. (1983). In: Proc. I}h Conf. !nt.Organ. Citrus Virel., (S.M. Garnsey. L.w. Timmer, and J.A. Dods,
    49. ed.) IOCV Riverside, USA. pp. 279-286.
    50. Fisichella, G. et al. (1994). Agroehimica, 38(4): 254-267.
    51. Floyd, B.F. (1917). Bull. 137, Fla. Agri. Expt. Sta.. Florida, USA. pp. 161-179.
    52. Gallasch, P.T. and Pfeiler, G.R. (1988). In: Proc. Sixth Int. Citrus Congr. (Goren, R and Mendel. K. ed.), Balaban
    53. Publi. Rehouot, Israel.
    54. Garnsey. S.M. and Young, RH. (1975). Proc.Fla. State Hort. Soc., 88: 79-84.
    55. Graca, JV da and Vuuren van, S.P. (1979). PI. Dis. Rptr., 63: 901·903.
    56. 186 AGRICULTURAL REVIEWS
    57. Halse, N.J. (1963). J. Agric. Western Australia, 4: 241-244.
    58. Haque, A and Godfrey, SA (1976). Commun. Soil Sci. PI. Anal., 7: 843-860.
    59. Huang, J.S and Tao, O.v. (1987). J. Nanjing Forestry Univ., 4: 109-112.
    60. Jawanda, J.S. (1966). Punjab Hart. J., 6: 88-103
    61. Johnston, J.e. (1933). Calif. Citrog., 18: 107, 116-118.
    62. Jones, WW and Calavan, E.e. (1951), Preliminary work. Unpublished.
    63. Jones, WW and Smith, P.F. (1964), In: Hunger Signs in Crops. (Sprague. Howard B. ed.l. David McKay Co.,
    64. New York, USA
    65. Jones, WW and Smith, P.F. (1984). In: Hunger Signs in Crops (Sprague, Howard B, ed,), David McKay Co.,
    66. New York, USA pp. 359-414.
    67. Jorgensen, K.R. and Price, G.H. (1978). Proc. Int. Soc. Citriculture. Vol. 1, pp. 297-299.
    68. Kanwar. H.S. and Dhingra, D.R (1962). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 32: 309-314.
    69. Kanwar. J.S. and Dhingra, DR (1961). Punjab Hart. J., 1: 92-95.
    70. Kanwar, J.S. and Randhawa, N.S. (1960). Hart. Adv., 4: 61-67.
    71. Kelley, WP. and Cummins, AB. (1920). J. Agric. Res., 20: 161-191.
    72. Koo, RC.J. (1984). BuIl. 604. Agri. Expt. Sta., Inst. Food Agri. Sci., Univ. Florida, USA
    73. Koo, R.C.J. (1988). Proc. Soil Crop Sci. Soc. Fla., 47: 9-12.
    74. Koo, RC.J. and Young, T.W (1970). Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc., 82: 274-278.
    75. Koo, Re.J. et a/. (1984) Fla. Agric. Expt. Stn. BuIl., 536D
    76. Kotur, S.C. (1982). Curro Res., 12: 126-27.
    77. Kovanci, I. etaI. (1978). PI. Soil, 50: 193-205.
    78. Kovanci, I. et aI. (1985). Doga Bilim Dergisi, Dz (rarim ve Ormancilik) 9: 304-311.
    79. Labanauskas, CK et aI. (1959). Calif Agric., 13: 13.
    80. Lee, C.W eta/. (1996). J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci., 127: 77-82.
    81. Llorente, S. et aI. (1973). Congresco. Mundias de Citriculture (1974), pp. 33-37.
    82. Loneragan, J.F. et aI. (1979). Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 43: 966-972.
    83. Loneragan, J.F. etaI. (1982). Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 46: 345-352.
    84. Malewar, G.U.and Randhawa, N.S. (1977). Marathwada Agric. Univ. Res. Bull. 1, pp. 158-159.
    85. Malewar, G.U. and Randhawa, N.S. (1978). J. Maharashtra Agric. Univ., 3: 157-59.
    86. Malewar, G.U. et aI. (1978). J. Maharashtra Agric. Univ., 3: 95-99.
    87. Mann, M.S. et a/. (1979). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 49: 120-125.
    88. Mann, M.S. and Sidhu, B.S. (1983). Punjab Hort. J., 23: 17-20.
    89. Mariakulandai, A and Dorairaj, D.J. (1958). Ibid., 6: 23-31.
    90. Marschner, H. (1986). In: Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. Academic Press. London., UK
    91. Marudarajan, D. (1949). Madras Agric. J., 34: 488-493.
    92. Mazza, S.M. et aI. (1997). Horticultura Argentina, 16: 83-86.
    93. McCall. WW (1965). KaestsartJ., 5: 1-9.
    94. Mendes, O. (1972). Agronomia Mocambicana, 6: 83-99.
    95. Misra, S.G. and Tiwari, R.e. (1966). Soil Sci., 101: 465-471.
    96. Morgan, PW eta/. (1966). PI. PhysioI., 41: 718-724.
    97. Mumford, E.E. et a/. (1962). PI. PhysioI., 37: Supplement XN (Abstr. 693).
    98. Naidu Venkata, e. and Rao, OV (1958). Andhra Agric. J., 5: 54-60.
    99. Nair, GGK and Mehta, B.V. (1959). J. Agric. Sci., 52: 396-401.
    100. Nair, PC.S. et aI. (1968). Indian J. Hart., 38: 184-94,
    101. Neilsen. D. et aI. (1986). Can. J. Soil Sci., 66: 445454.
    102. Neilsen, D. eta/. (1987). Commun. Soil. Sci. PI, Anal., 18: 161-186.
    103. Neilsen. GH. and Neilsen, D. (1994). In: Tree Fruit Nutrition. (peterson, AB. and Stevens, R. G. eds.), Good Fruit
    104. Grower. Yakima, WA pp. 85-93.
    105. Nemec, S. (1975), Can. J. Bot., 53: 102-108.
    106. Nemec, S. and Kopp, D. (1974). Proc. Fla. State Hart. Soc" 87: 107-111.
    107. Nemec, S. et aI. (1975). Proc. Fla. State Hart. Soc., 88: 70-75,
    108. Nemec, S. et aI, (1984) Proc. Int. Soc, Citric4Iture, Vo1.2, pp, 398-401.
    109. Nijjar, G.S. and Singh, R. (1971). Punjab Hart. J., 32: 39.
    110. Nilangekar, R.G. and Pati!, v.K. (1982). J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 30: 213-215.
    111. Ozbek. N. (1969). [n Proc. 1st Int. Citrus Symp. Vol. 3, pp. 1513-1514.
    112. Parker, E.B. (1934a). Calif. Citrog., 19: 204
    113. Vol. 25, No.3, 2004 187
    114. Parker, E.R. (1934b). Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci., 31: 98-107.
    115. Parker, E.R. (1936). Proc. Am. Soc. Hart. Sci., 34: 213-215..
    116. Parker, E.R. (1937). Hilgardia, 11: 35-53.
    117. Parker, E.R. (1935). Proc. Am. Soc. Hart. Sci., 33: 82-86.
    118. Pavan, MA and Wutscher, HK (1993). Commun. Soil Sci. Pl. Anal., 24: 979-987.
    119. Perez, G.C. (1996). Proc. Int. Soc. Citri. Vol. 2, pp. 1279.
    120. Pinto, M.R. and Leal, P.F. (1974). Revista de la facultad de Agronomia, Venezuela, 8: 71-80.
    121. Plessis, S.F. Du.and Prando, H. (1975). Information BuJI. No. 33, pp. 12-14, Citrus and Subtrop. Fruit Res. Inst.,
    122. Nelspruit, South Africa.
    123. Qin, X.N. et aI. (1993). J. Southwest Agric. Univ., 15: 86-90.
    124. Quaggio, JA and Canteralla Mattos, Jr. D. (1996). Proc. Int. Soc. CUri. Vol. 2, pp. 1271-1273.
    125. Quyang, T. (1993). Pedosphere, 3: 341-347.
    126. Raheja, P.C. (1966). In: Soil Productivity and Plant Growth, Asia Publishing House, New Delhi, India
    127. Raina, J.N. (1988). Punjab Hart. J., 28: 1-6.
    128. Randhawa, G.S. and Srivastava, K.c. (1986). In: Citriculture in India. Hindustan PubUshing House, New Delhi, India.
    129. pp. 128-187..
    130. Randhawa, N.S. et al. (1966). Punjab Hart. J., 34-35.
    131. Rao, A.C.S. (1993). Agrochimica, 37: 41-54.
    132. Rao, Narasinga U. (1948). Madras Agric. J., 35: 41-43.
    133. Reuther, W. and Crawford, C.L. (1946). Soil Sci., 62: 477-491.
    134. Rodney, D.R. et aI. (1956). J. Am. Soc. Hart. Sci., 68: 234-244.
    135. Rodriguez, O. et al. (1977). Proc. Int. Soc. Citriculture, Vol, 1, pp. 9-12.
    136. Rosell, R.A and Ulrich, A (1964). Soil Sci., 97: 152-67.
    137. Rossetti, V. et a/. (1980). In: Proc. Can£. Int. Org. Citrus Virol. Australia, 1978. (Calavan, E. C. et al., ed.l, Riverside,
    138. ·Univ. Calif. 1980.8, pp. 251-259.
    139. Safaya, N.M. etal. (1975). Ferti/. News., 20: 31-35.
    140. Salami, U.A. and Kenefick D.G. (1970). Crop. Sci., 10: 291-294.
    141. Schneider, Henry (1948). Phytopathol., 38: 918.
    142. Schneider, Henry (1950). Phytopathol., 40: 24.
    143. Schneider, Henry (1952). Cali£. Citrog., 37: 208-212.
    144. Seau, L.F. (1960). Trans. 'J'h Int. Congr. Soil Sci. Vol. 2, pp. 271 -280.
    145. Sekhon, G.S. et aI. (1985). In: SoU Testing Plant Analysis and Fertilizer Evaluation for Potassium. Potash Research
    146. Institute of India, Gurgaon, Haryana.
    147. Sharma, VK and Mahajan, KK (1990).lndian J.Hort., 47: 180-185.
    148. Shear, C.B. and Faust, M.(1980). Hort. Rev., 2: 142-163.
    149. Singh, Vinay and Tripathi, B.R. (1983). J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 31: 310-12.
    150. Singh, Vinay and Tripathi, B.R. (1985). J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 33: 333-38.
    151. Singh, M. and Sekhon, G.S. (1991). J.lndian Soc. SoIl5cJ., 39: 129-133:
    152. Smith, P.F. (1974a). Citrus Indus., 55(9): 13,14,16,18,19d1O) : 9,10,13,14; (11): 12,13.
    153. Smith, P.F. (1974b). Proc. Fla. State Hart. Soc., 87: 91-95.
    154. Smith, P.F. and Rasmussen, GK (1959). Proc. Fla. State Hart. Soc., 72: 87-92.
    155. Smith, P.F. (196(;). In: Temperate to Tropical Fruit Nutrition (Childers, N.F. ed.), Rutgers University, New Jersey. pp.
    156. 208-228.
    157. Spurling, M.B. (1969). In: Proc: 1" Int. Citrus Symp. Voll, pp. 93-101.
    158. Srivastava, AK and Singh, Shyam (2001a). J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 49: 226-229.
    159. Srivastava, AK and Singh, Shyam (1998). In: Fertilizer Use Efficiency in Citrus, National Research Centre for Citrus,
    160. Nagpur, pp. 1-66.
    161. Srivastava, AKet al. (2001). Agric. Rev. 21: 1-15
    162. Srivastava, A.K and Singh, Shyam (2001b). Trap. Agri. (Trinidad), 78: 1-8
    163. Srivastava, AK and Singh, Shyam (2001c). J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 49: 226-229
    164. Srivastava, AK arxI Singh, Shyam (2oo1d). Ann. Rep. National Research Centre for Citrus, Nagpur, India pp. 112-114.
    165. Srivastava, AK and Singh, Shyam (2002). Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 33: 1689-1706.
    166. Stewart, I. et a/. (1968). Proc. Fla. State Hart. Soc., 81: 15-18.
    167. Swietllk, D. (1989). J. Rio Grande Valley Hart. Soc., 42: 87 -95.
    168. Swletlik, D. (1996b). Proc. Int. Soc. Citriculture. Vol. 2, pp. 1265-1268
    169. Swietlik, D. and laDuke, J. (1991). J. PI. Nutri., 14: 129-142.
    170. w·
    171. 188 AGRICULTURAL REVIEWS
    172. Syvertsen, J.P. et a1. (1980). Hart. Science, 105: 431-434.
    173. Thorne, D.W. (1957). Adv. Agron., 9: 31-65.
    174. Timmer, L.w. eta1. (1986). Phytophtho1., 76: 707-71l.
    175. Tripathi. B.P. and Harding, A.H. (2001). J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 49: 503-506.
    176. Tsui, C. (1948). Am. J. Bot., 35: 172-179.
    177. VanderMolen, G.E. (1978). PI. Physio1. Patho1., 13: 271-274.
    178. VanderMolen, G.E. et al. (1975). Proc. Fla. State Hart Soc., 88: 76-79.
    179. Veregara, I. et a1. (1993). Hart. Science, 8: 325-326.
    180. Viets, FG. Jr. (1966). In: Zinc Metabolism (Prasad, A. ed.), Charles C. Thomas Pub!., Springfield, IL. pp. 90-127.
    181. Wallace, A. et a1. ,(1975). Egyptian J. Hart., 2: 233-241.
    182. Wallace, and Hewitt, E.J. (1946). J. Hart. Sci., 22: 152-161.
    183. Weir, c.e. (1965a). Exp. Agric., 1: 179-184.
    184. Weir, c.c. (1965b). J. Agric. Sci. Trin Tab., 65:471-478.
    185. West. E.S. (1938). J. Council Sci. and Indus. Res. Australia, 11: 182-184
    186. Wheaton, T.A. (1985). Citrus Indus., 66: 25-32.
    187. Williams, G.M. and Albrigo, L.G. (1984). J. Am. Soc. Hart. Sci., 109: 437-440.
    188. Wutscher, H.K. (1979). Citrus and Veg. Mag., 43: 14,49-52.
    189. Wutscher, H.K. (1981). Hart. Science, 16: 157-158.
    190. Wutscher, H.K. and Hardesty, C. (1979). J. Am. Soc. Hart. Sci., 104:9-11.
    191. Wutscher. H.K. et al. (1982). Hart. Science, 17: 676-677.
    192. Wutscher. H.K. (1980). Revista Ind.Agricola de Tucuman, 57: 81-89.
    193. Wutscher. H.K. et al. (1977). Proc. Fla. State Hart. Soc., 90: 81-84.
    194. Xie, Z.N. et al. (1993). China Citrus, 22(3): 69-75.
    195. Yamdagni. R et al. (1983). Punjab Hart. J., 23: 149-52.
    196. Young, RH. (1979). Proc. Fla. State Hart. Soc., 92: 64-67.
    197. Young. RH. and Garnsey S.M. (1977). J. Am. Soc. Hart. Sci., 102: 751-756,
    198. Young, RH. et a1. (1978). Proc. Fla. State Hart. Soc., 91: 56-59.
    199. Young, R.H. et aI. (1980a). Proc. Fla. State Hart. Sdc., 93: 14-17.
    200. Young, RH. et a1. (1980b). J. Am. Soc. Hart. Sci. 105: 444-447.
    201. Zekri, M. (1995). Citrus Industry, 10: 16-17.
    202. Zou, N. et a1. (1990). Proc. Int. Citrus Symp. (Huang Bangyan and Yang Qian, ed.) pp. 454-546.
    Published In
    Agricultural Reviews
    Article Metrics
    Metrics Icon
    0
    Views
    0
    Citations
    Reviewed By
    Share Article
    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      volume 25 issue 3 (september 2004) : 173 - 188

      ZINC NUTRITION AND CITRUS DECLINE - A REVIEW

      A
      A.K. Srivastava
      S
      Shyam Singh
      1National Research Centre for Citrus, Nagpur - 440010, India

      • Submitted|

      • First Online |

      • doi

      Cite article:- Srivastava A.K., Singh Shyam (2025). ZINC NUTRITION AND CITRUS DECLINE - A REVIEW. Agricultural Reviews. 25(3): 173 - 188. doi: .

      ABSTRACT

      Sub-optimum nutrition of zinc is one of the prime concerns of citrus nutrition. Worldwide occurrence of Zn deficiency known by various names like, rosette, little leaf, frenching, mottle leaf etc. is basically characterized by interveinal chlorosis mayor may not be coupled with rosetting of leaves. Metabolically, zinc deficiency induces many morphological, cytological as well as anatomical changes. With the available information, etiology of Zn deficiency can now be precisely established with further support of leaf/soil analysis data. Zinc deficiency is also suggested to appear due to competition from P, Fe, Mn, Ca and upto some extent K besides soil properties on the Zn availability. Though, citrus decline is considered to be a syndrome of many contributory factors. But, a number of hypotheses have been postulated to establish the role of zinc nutrition is citrus decline carried out from time to time over the last 70 years. These include: dysfunction of water translocation, increased resistance to water transport in the xylem, altered disturbance and redistribution of Zn especially in bark suggesting horizontal movement of Zn instead of vertical movement, outer wood next to cambium with distinct seasonal cycles. However, the evidences of late suggested that citrus decline effect on abnormal zinc metabolism developed prior to the dysfunction of water translocation.

      KEYWORDS

        REFERENCES

        1. Ahmed. N. and Jackson. P. (1965): Soil Sci., ioo: 428-432.
        2. Aiyappa. KM. eta/. (1968). IndianJ. Hort., 25: 112-115.
        3. A1brigo. L.G. and Young, RH. (1980). Hort. Science, 16: 158-160.
        4. Alva,AK (1993). Bull. Environmental Contamin¢ion and Toxicology. 51: 857-864.
        5. Anderson, C.A. and Calvert, DV (1970). Proc. Fla. State Hart. Soc., 83: 41-45.
        6. Araya. R et a/. (1994). Agronomia Costaqicense, 18: 21-27.
        7. Asher, c.J. and Loneragan. J.E (1976). Soil Sci., 103: 225-233
        8. Aso. P.J. and Dantur. N.C. (1970). Rev. Indust Agric. Tueuman. 47: 10-61.
        9. Awasthi, RP. et al. (1984). Punjab Hart. J:, 24:27-36.
        10. Bamdad, D. et al. (1977).lranian J. Pl. Pathol., 13: &5. 9-12.
        11. Bandale, J.R. et al. (1951). Poona Agric. ColI. Mag., 43:3-10. . .
        12. Barleson, c.A. etal. (1961). Soi/Sel. Soc. Am. Proc., 25 :365-368.
        13. Bausher. M.G. (1982). Hart. Science. 17: 497.
        14. Cakmak, J. et al. (1995). J. Pl. Physiol., 146: 355-360.
        15. Calavan. E.C. etal. (1951). Calif. Citrog., 37: 46-47. 63-64, 66.
        16. Calavan, E.C. and Sufficool, J.R (1952) ..Calif Citrog., 38: 2-3. 14"17.
        17. Chandler, WH. et al. (1932). Proc. Am. Soc. Hart Sci.. 28: 556-560.
        18. Chandler. WH. et al. (1933a). Proc. Am. Soc. Hart. Sci., 30: 70-86
        19. Chandler, WH. et al. (1933b). Proc. Am. Soc. Hart Sci.,. 29: 255-263.
        20. Chapman, H.D. (1966). In: Zinc USA Diagnostic Criteria for Plants and Soils. (Chapman. H. D. ed.), Div. Agr. Sci.
        21. Univ. California, USA. pp. 484-499.
        22. Chapman. HD. (1968). In: The Citrus Industry, (Reuther,W et al., eds.). Vol. n, Univ. Calif. Berkeley, USA. pp. 127-289.
        23. Chapman, H.D. et al. (1940). Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc., 4: 196·200.
        24. Chapman, H.D. et al. (1945). Citrus Leaves, 25: 17-28
        25. Chapman, H.D. (1949). Calif. Citrog., 34: 518.
        26. Chapman, H.D. (1960). CeM Citrog., 45: 230-233.
        27. Childs, J.F.L. (1953). Proe: Fla. State Hart. Soc., 66: 33-37.
        28. Childs, J.F.L. and Carlysle, T.C..(1975). Citrus Indus., 56: 7. 9.10.11.13.14.
        29. Childs, J.F.L. (1980). Proc. Fla. State Hart. Soc., 94: 25-28.
        30. Choudhary, S. (1954). Bull. PI. Prot. FAD, 2: 151-53.
        31. Gphen, M. (1974). Pf. Dis. Rptr, 58: 801-805.
        32. Cohen. M. (1979). Proc. Fla. StateHart. Soc., 92: 68-70.
        33. Qeshmukh, P.P. et al. (1988). In: Two Decades of Research on Fruits in Vidarbha (1969-1987). Directorate of
        34. Research. Punjabrao Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola, Maharashtra. p. 2.
        35. Dettori. A. et al. (1996). Proc. Int. Soc. Citrieulture, Vol 2, pp. 1288-1289
        36. Dhillon, WS. and Dhatt, A.S. (1988). Punjab Hart. J., 28: 7-13.
        37. Dhingra, D.R. and Kanwar, J.S. (1963). Punjab Hart. J.. 3: 55-59.
        38. Dikshit, N.N. and Bojapa, KM. (1959). Sci. Cult., 24: 91-4.
        39. Dutt, S. and Bhambota, J.R. (1967). Indian J. Hort.. 24: 50-59.
        40. El·Fouly, M.M. etal. (1984). Commun. Soil Sci. PI. Anal., 15: 1175-1189.
        41. Ellis. R. Jr. et al. (1964). Soil Sci. Am. Proe., 28: 83-86.
        42. Elsokkary. L H. (1976). Hort. Abst.. 46: 339.
        43. Embleton, TW. et al. (1973). In: The Citrus Industry. Volume III. (Reuther, Wed.), Univ. California, Berkeley. USA.
        44. pp. 183-210.
        45. Embleton. T.W et al. (1988). In: Proc. Sixth IntI. Citrus Congo Tel Aviv, Israel. 5-11 Mar., 1988. Vol 2, pp 681-688.
        46. Ercivan. S.L. (1974). J. Turkish Phytopathol.. 3: 51-56.
        47. Fedorenko, LV. (1962). Soils and Fertilizers, 27: 1666,1964.
        48. Fischer, H.U. et al. (1983). In: Proc. I}h Conf. !nt.Organ. Citrus Virel., (S.M. Garnsey. L.w. Timmer, and J.A. Dods,
        49. ed.) IOCV Riverside, USA. pp. 279-286.
        50. Fisichella, G. et al. (1994). Agroehimica, 38(4): 254-267.
        51. Floyd, B.F. (1917). Bull. 137, Fla. Agri. Expt. Sta.. Florida, USA. pp. 161-179.
        52. Gallasch, P.T. and Pfeiler, G.R. (1988). In: Proc. Sixth Int. Citrus Congr. (Goren, R and Mendel. K. ed.), Balaban
        53. Publi. Rehouot, Israel.
        54. Garnsey. S.M. and Young, RH. (1975). Proc.Fla. State Hort. Soc., 88: 79-84.
        55. Graca, JV da and Vuuren van, S.P. (1979). PI. Dis. Rptr., 63: 901·903.
        56. 186 AGRICULTURAL REVIEWS
        57. Halse, N.J. (1963). J. Agric. Western Australia, 4: 241-244.
        58. Haque, A and Godfrey, SA (1976). Commun. Soil Sci. PI. Anal., 7: 843-860.
        59. Huang, J.S and Tao, O.v. (1987). J. Nanjing Forestry Univ., 4: 109-112.
        60. Jawanda, J.S. (1966). Punjab Hart. J., 6: 88-103
        61. Johnston, J.e. (1933). Calif. Citrog., 18: 107, 116-118.
        62. Jones, WW and Calavan, E.e. (1951), Preliminary work. Unpublished.
        63. Jones, WW and Smith, P.F. (1964), In: Hunger Signs in Crops. (Sprague. Howard B. ed.l. David McKay Co.,
        64. New York, USA
        65. Jones, WW and Smith, P.F. (1984). In: Hunger Signs in Crops (Sprague, Howard B, ed,), David McKay Co.,
        66. New York, USA pp. 359-414.
        67. Jorgensen, K.R. and Price, G.H. (1978). Proc. Int. Soc. Citriculture. Vol. 1, pp. 297-299.
        68. Kanwar. H.S. and Dhingra, D.R (1962). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 32: 309-314.
        69. Kanwar. J.S. and Dhingra, DR (1961). Punjab Hart. J., 1: 92-95.
        70. Kanwar, J.S. and Randhawa, N.S. (1960). Hart. Adv., 4: 61-67.
        71. Kelley, WP. and Cummins, AB. (1920). J. Agric. Res., 20: 161-191.
        72. Koo, RC.J. (1984). BuIl. 604. Agri. Expt. Sta., Inst. Food Agri. Sci., Univ. Florida, USA
        73. Koo, R.C.J. (1988). Proc. Soil Crop Sci. Soc. Fla., 47: 9-12.
        74. Koo, RC.J. and Young, T.W (1970). Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc., 82: 274-278.
        75. Koo, Re.J. et a/. (1984) Fla. Agric. Expt. Stn. BuIl., 536D
        76. Kotur, S.C. (1982). Curro Res., 12: 126-27.
        77. Kovanci, I. etaI. (1978). PI. Soil, 50: 193-205.
        78. Kovanci, I. et aI. (1985). Doga Bilim Dergisi, Dz (rarim ve Ormancilik) 9: 304-311.
        79. Labanauskas, CK et aI. (1959). Calif Agric., 13: 13.
        80. Lee, C.W eta/. (1996). J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci., 127: 77-82.
        81. Llorente, S. et aI. (1973). Congresco. Mundias de Citriculture (1974), pp. 33-37.
        82. Loneragan, J.F. et aI. (1979). Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 43: 966-972.
        83. Loneragan, J.F. etaI. (1982). Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 46: 345-352.
        84. Malewar, G.U.and Randhawa, N.S. (1977). Marathwada Agric. Univ. Res. Bull. 1, pp. 158-159.
        85. Malewar, G.U. and Randhawa, N.S. (1978). J. Maharashtra Agric. Univ., 3: 157-59.
        86. Malewar, G.U. et aI. (1978). J. Maharashtra Agric. Univ., 3: 95-99.
        87. Mann, M.S. et a/. (1979). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 49: 120-125.
        88. Mann, M.S. and Sidhu, B.S. (1983). Punjab Hort. J., 23: 17-20.
        89. Mariakulandai, A and Dorairaj, D.J. (1958). Ibid., 6: 23-31.
        90. Marschner, H. (1986). In: Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. Academic Press. London., UK
        91. Marudarajan, D. (1949). Madras Agric. J., 34: 488-493.
        92. Mazza, S.M. et aI. (1997). Horticultura Argentina, 16: 83-86.
        93. McCall. WW (1965). KaestsartJ., 5: 1-9.
        94. Mendes, O. (1972). Agronomia Mocambicana, 6: 83-99.
        95. Misra, S.G. and Tiwari, R.e. (1966). Soil Sci., 101: 465-471.
        96. Morgan, PW eta/. (1966). PI. PhysioI., 41: 718-724.
        97. Mumford, E.E. et a/. (1962). PI. PhysioI., 37: Supplement XN (Abstr. 693).
        98. Naidu Venkata, e. and Rao, OV (1958). Andhra Agric. J., 5: 54-60.
        99. Nair, GGK and Mehta, B.V. (1959). J. Agric. Sci., 52: 396-401.
        100. Nair, PC.S. et aI. (1968). Indian J. Hart., 38: 184-94,
        101. Neilsen. D. et aI. (1986). Can. J. Soil Sci., 66: 445454.
        102. Neilsen, D. eta/. (1987). Commun. Soil. Sci. PI, Anal., 18: 161-186.
        103. Neilsen. GH. and Neilsen, D. (1994). In: Tree Fruit Nutrition. (peterson, AB. and Stevens, R. G. eds.), Good Fruit
        104. Grower. Yakima, WA pp. 85-93.
        105. Nemec, S. (1975), Can. J. Bot., 53: 102-108.
        106. Nemec, S. and Kopp, D. (1974). Proc. Fla. State Hart. Soc" 87: 107-111.
        107. Nemec, S. et aI. (1975). Proc. Fla. State Hart. Soc., 88: 70-75,
        108. Nemec, S. et aI, (1984) Proc. Int. Soc, Citric4Iture, Vo1.2, pp, 398-401.
        109. Nijjar, G.S. and Singh, R. (1971). Punjab Hart. J., 32: 39.
        110. Nilangekar, R.G. and Pati!, v.K. (1982). J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 30: 213-215.
        111. Ozbek. N. (1969). [n Proc. 1st Int. Citrus Symp. Vol. 3, pp. 1513-1514.
        112. Parker, E.B. (1934a). Calif. Citrog., 19: 204
        113. Vol. 25, No.3, 2004 187
        114. Parker, E.R. (1934b). Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci., 31: 98-107.
        115. Parker, E.R. (1936). Proc. Am. Soc. Hart. Sci., 34: 213-215..
        116. Parker, E.R. (1937). Hilgardia, 11: 35-53.
        117. Parker, E.R. (1935). Proc. Am. Soc. Hart. Sci., 33: 82-86.
        118. Pavan, MA and Wutscher, HK (1993). Commun. Soil Sci. Pl. Anal., 24: 979-987.
        119. Perez, G.C. (1996). Proc. Int. Soc. Citri. Vol. 2, pp. 1279.
        120. Pinto, M.R. and Leal, P.F. (1974). Revista de la facultad de Agronomia, Venezuela, 8: 71-80.
        121. Plessis, S.F. Du.and Prando, H. (1975). Information BuJI. No. 33, pp. 12-14, Citrus and Subtrop. Fruit Res. Inst.,
        122. Nelspruit, South Africa.
        123. Qin, X.N. et aI. (1993). J. Southwest Agric. Univ., 15: 86-90.
        124. Quaggio, JA and Canteralla Mattos, Jr. D. (1996). Proc. Int. Soc. CUri. Vol. 2, pp. 1271-1273.
        125. Quyang, T. (1993). Pedosphere, 3: 341-347.
        126. Raheja, P.C. (1966). In: Soil Productivity and Plant Growth, Asia Publishing House, New Delhi, India
        127. Raina, J.N. (1988). Punjab Hart. J., 28: 1-6.
        128. Randhawa, G.S. and Srivastava, K.c. (1986). In: Citriculture in India. Hindustan PubUshing House, New Delhi, India.
        129. pp. 128-187..
        130. Randhawa, N.S. et al. (1966). Punjab Hart. J., 34-35.
        131. Rao, A.C.S. (1993). Agrochimica, 37: 41-54.
        132. Rao, Narasinga U. (1948). Madras Agric. J., 35: 41-43.
        133. Reuther, W. and Crawford, C.L. (1946). Soil Sci., 62: 477-491.
        134. Rodney, D.R. et aI. (1956). J. Am. Soc. Hart. Sci., 68: 234-244.
        135. Rodriguez, O. et al. (1977). Proc. Int. Soc. Citriculture, Vol, 1, pp. 9-12.
        136. Rosell, R.A and Ulrich, A (1964). Soil Sci., 97: 152-67.
        137. Rossetti, V. et a/. (1980). In: Proc. Can£. Int. Org. Citrus Virol. Australia, 1978. (Calavan, E. C. et al., ed.l, Riverside,
        138. ·Univ. Calif. 1980.8, pp. 251-259.
        139. Safaya, N.M. etal. (1975). Ferti/. News., 20: 31-35.
        140. Salami, U.A. and Kenefick D.G. (1970). Crop. Sci., 10: 291-294.
        141. Schneider, Henry (1948). Phytopathol., 38: 918.
        142. Schneider, Henry (1950). Phytopathol., 40: 24.
        143. Schneider, Henry (1952). Cali£. Citrog., 37: 208-212.
        144. Seau, L.F. (1960). Trans. 'J'h Int. Congr. Soil Sci. Vol. 2, pp. 271 -280.
        145. Sekhon, G.S. et aI. (1985). In: SoU Testing Plant Analysis and Fertilizer Evaluation for Potassium. Potash Research
        146. Institute of India, Gurgaon, Haryana.
        147. Sharma, VK and Mahajan, KK (1990).lndian J.Hort., 47: 180-185.
        148. Shear, C.B. and Faust, M.(1980). Hort. Rev., 2: 142-163.
        149. Singh, Vinay and Tripathi, B.R. (1983). J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 31: 310-12.
        150. Singh, Vinay and Tripathi, B.R. (1985). J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 33: 333-38.
        151. Singh, M. and Sekhon, G.S. (1991). J.lndian Soc. SoIl5cJ., 39: 129-133:
        152. Smith, P.F. (1974a). Citrus Indus., 55(9): 13,14,16,18,19d1O) : 9,10,13,14; (11): 12,13.
        153. Smith, P.F. (1974b). Proc. Fla. State Hart. Soc., 87: 91-95.
        154. Smith, P.F. and Rasmussen, GK (1959). Proc. Fla. State Hart. Soc., 72: 87-92.
        155. Smith, P.F. (196(;). In: Temperate to Tropical Fruit Nutrition (Childers, N.F. ed.), Rutgers University, New Jersey. pp.
        156. 208-228.
        157. Spurling, M.B. (1969). In: Proc: 1" Int. Citrus Symp. Voll, pp. 93-101.
        158. Srivastava, AK and Singh, Shyam (2001a). J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 49: 226-229.
        159. Srivastava, AK and Singh, Shyam (1998). In: Fertilizer Use Efficiency in Citrus, National Research Centre for Citrus,
        160. Nagpur, pp. 1-66.
        161. Srivastava, AKet al. (2001). Agric. Rev. 21: 1-15
        162. Srivastava, A.K and Singh, Shyam (2001b). Trap. Agri. (Trinidad), 78: 1-8
        163. Srivastava, AK and Singh, Shyam (2001c). J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 49: 226-229
        164. Srivastava, AK arxI Singh, Shyam (2oo1d). Ann. Rep. National Research Centre for Citrus, Nagpur, India pp. 112-114.
        165. Srivastava, AK and Singh, Shyam (2002). Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 33: 1689-1706.
        166. Stewart, I. et a/. (1968). Proc. Fla. State Hart. Soc., 81: 15-18.
        167. Swietllk, D. (1989). J. Rio Grande Valley Hart. Soc., 42: 87 -95.
        168. Swletlik, D. (1996b). Proc. Int. Soc. Citriculture. Vol. 2, pp. 1265-1268
        169. Swietlik, D. and laDuke, J. (1991). J. PI. Nutri., 14: 129-142.
        170. w·
        171. 188 AGRICULTURAL REVIEWS
        172. Syvertsen, J.P. et a1. (1980). Hart. Science, 105: 431-434.
        173. Thorne, D.W. (1957). Adv. Agron., 9: 31-65.
        174. Timmer, L.w. eta1. (1986). Phytophtho1., 76: 707-71l.
        175. Tripathi. B.P. and Harding, A.H. (2001). J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 49: 503-506.
        176. Tsui, C. (1948). Am. J. Bot., 35: 172-179.
        177. VanderMolen, G.E. (1978). PI. Physio1. Patho1., 13: 271-274.
        178. VanderMolen, G.E. et al. (1975). Proc. Fla. State Hart Soc., 88: 76-79.
        179. Veregara, I. et a1. (1993). Hart. Science, 8: 325-326.
        180. Viets, FG. Jr. (1966). In: Zinc Metabolism (Prasad, A. ed.), Charles C. Thomas Pub!., Springfield, IL. pp. 90-127.
        181. Wallace, A. et a1. ,(1975). Egyptian J. Hart., 2: 233-241.
        182. Wallace, and Hewitt, E.J. (1946). J. Hart. Sci., 22: 152-161.
        183. Weir, c.e. (1965a). Exp. Agric., 1: 179-184.
        184. Weir, c.c. (1965b). J. Agric. Sci. Trin Tab., 65:471-478.
        185. West. E.S. (1938). J. Council Sci. and Indus. Res. Australia, 11: 182-184
        186. Wheaton, T.A. (1985). Citrus Indus., 66: 25-32.
        187. Williams, G.M. and Albrigo, L.G. (1984). J. Am. Soc. Hart. Sci., 109: 437-440.
        188. Wutscher, H.K. (1979). Citrus and Veg. Mag., 43: 14,49-52.
        189. Wutscher, H.K. (1981). Hart. Science, 16: 157-158.
        190. Wutscher, H.K. and Hardesty, C. (1979). J. Am. Soc. Hart. Sci., 104:9-11.
        191. Wutscher. H.K. et al. (1982). Hart. Science, 17: 676-677.
        192. Wutscher. H.K. (1980). Revista Ind.Agricola de Tucuman, 57: 81-89.
        193. Wutscher. H.K. et al. (1977). Proc. Fla. State Hart. Soc., 90: 81-84.
        194. Xie, Z.N. et al. (1993). China Citrus, 22(3): 69-75.
        195. Yamdagni. R et al. (1983). Punjab Hart. J., 23: 149-52.
        196. Young, RH. (1979). Proc. Fla. State Hart. Soc., 92: 64-67.
        197. Young. RH. and Garnsey S.M. (1977). J. Am. Soc. Hart. Sci., 102: 751-756,
        198. Young, RH. et a1. (1978). Proc. Fla. State Hart. Soc., 91: 56-59.
        199. Young, R.H. et aI. (1980a). Proc. Fla. State Hart. Sdc., 93: 14-17.
        200. Young, RH. et a1. (1980b). J. Am. Soc. Hart. Sci. 105: 444-447.
        201. Zekri, M. (1995). Citrus Industry, 10: 16-17.
        202. Zou, N. et a1. (1990). Proc. Int. Citrus Symp. (Huang Bangyan and Yang Qian, ed.) pp. 454-546.
        In this Article
          Contact us
          Follow us
          Published In
          Agricultural Reviews

          Editorial Board

          View all (0)